A Beamdump Facility at Jefferson Lab

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09652
• Title: A Beamdump Facility at Jefferson Lab
• Authors: Patrick Achenbach, Andrei Afanasev, Pawel Ambrozewicz and scientists from 34 institutions worldwide
• Classification: physics.acc-ph (Accelerator Physics), hep-ex (High Energy Physics Experiment), nucl-ex (Nuclear Physics Experiment)
• Publication Date: October 6, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09652

Abstract

This white paper explores the potential of intense secondary muon, neutrino, and (hypothetical) light dark matter beams produced through interactions of high-intensity electron beams with beam dumps. The approved Beam Dump eXperiment (BDX) for light dark matter searches is driving the construction of a new underground laboratory at Jefferson Lab, which can be extended into a beamdump facility through minimal additional installations. This paper summarizes contributions and discussions from the Jefferson Lab Secondary Beam International Workshop (BDX & Beyond), highlighting several possible muon physics applications at Jefferson Lab and neutrino detector technologies.

Research Background and Motivation

Scientific Background

1. Diverse Scientific Needs: Jefferson Lab is renowned for its comprehensive hadron physics science program using the 12 GeV electron beam from CEBAF, primarily involving fixed-target experiments. The interaction of high-intensity electron beams with dumps produces intense secondary beams of muons, neutrinos, neutrons, and hypothetical dark matter particles.
2. Dark Matter Search Drivers: Astrophysical observations suggest the possible existence of a new form of matter that does not directly interact with light: dark matter. Traditional searches have focused on the WIMP paradigm but have not yet produced conclusive evidence, prompting growing interest in exploring light dark matter (LDM) in the MeV-GeV mass range.
3. Technological Development Opportunities: Medium-energy, high-intensity particle beams provided by existing accelerator technology are well-suited for LDM discovery, particularly as electron beam dump experiments have proven to have high sensitivity to LDM.

Research Motivation

1. Facility Synergies: The underground laboratory required for the BDX experiment can also accommodate additional instruments for opportunistic secondary beam experiments, thereby extending to a beamdump facility with minimal additional installations.
2. International Competitiveness: Positioning Jefferson Lab alongside major laboratories such as CERN, PSI, J-PARC, TRIUMF, and Fermilab that provide muon beam lines enhances its scientific competitiveness.
3. Interdisciplinary Applications: Secondary beams can be utilized for research in multiple fields including fundamental science, high energy physics, applied physics, and condensed matter physics.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a comprehensive design scheme for the Jefferson Lab beamdump facility, including detailed engineering planning and infrastructure requirements for the underground laboratory
2. Systematically analyzed the characteristics and application potential of secondary muon beams, including energy spectra, spatial distribution, intensity comparisons, and focusing system design
3. Assessed the physics application prospects of neutrino beams, particularly coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS) and neutrino detection technologies
4. Established detailed comparative analysis with world's major muon facilities, demonstrating Jefferson Lab's competitive advantages in the secondary beam domain
5. Provided feasibility studies of multiple detector technologies, including liquid argon detectors and opaque liquid scintillator techniques

Methodology Details

Facility Design Architecture

Baseline Design

The main features of the beamdump facility include an underground laboratory divided into two regions:

• Upstream Section: Serves as shielding, without ceiling
• Downstream Section: Houses the BDX detector, covered by surface structures

Engineering Specifications

• Internal Dimensions: 34 feet 4 inches long, 10 feet wide
• Depth: Approximately 28 feet
• Load Capacity: Must support 524,000 pounds (262 tons) of shielding steel, requiring 2,550 lb/ft² bearing capacity
• Waterproofing System: Includes waterproofing and sump pump systems to handle groundwater

Muon Beam System

Beam Characteristics

Under 11 GeV electron beam irradiation, the muon beam exhibits the following characteristics:

• Energy Range: 100 MeV to several GeV
• Intensity: Approximately 9×10⁷ μ/s at the beamdump facility entrance
• Beam Size: 1-σ width of 35 cm
• Unique Features: Contains both positive and negative charge states, exhibits bremsstrahlung-like energy spectrum, and shows high polarization at high energies

Focusing System Design

Superconducting Solenoid Focusing:

• Design utilizing three 3T solenoids
• Magnetic field length 150 cm, cryostat length 200 cm
• Aperture approximately 90 cm

Quadrupole Focusing:

• Quadrupole design with inner diameter 416 mm, length 2000 mm
• Current density 275 A/cm², surface magnetic field approaching 2.5 T
• Each quadrupole requires 500 kW power supply and 14 l/s cooling water flow

Neutrino Beam System

Beam Production Mechanism

Primarily produced through decay-at-rest (DAR) of pions and kaons:

• π-DAR: Produces monochromatic 29.8 MeV νμ and νe and ν̄μ up to 50 MeV
• K-DAR: Produces monochromatic 236 MeV νμ

Detection Technologies

Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber:

• Applicable for CEvNS detection with energy threshold approximately 10 keV
• Expected to record thousands of CEvNS events annually
• Can provide θW extraction with approximately 10% precision

Opaque Liquid Scintillator:

• Readout via optical fibers with millimeter-level spatial resolution
• Suitable for low-energy-threshold dark matter searches
• Can form complementary approach with BDX project

Experimental Setup

BDX Detector Configuration

• Electromagnetic Calorimeter: Approximately one cubic meter of BGO and PbWO₄ crystals
• Shielding System: Plastic scintillator and lead layers as active and passive veto systems
• Energy Threshold: Approximately 100 MeV, optimized for electron recoil searches

Skipper-CCD Integration

• Low-Threshold Detection: 2×14 array of Skipper-CCDs can detect millicharged particles with mass below 1.5 GeV
• Sensitivity: Exceeds sensitivity of all existing millicharged particle searches
• Technology Verification: SENSEI collaboration has verified this technology downstream of Fermilab's NuMI beam

Infrastructure Requirements

• Power System: 480V three-phase electrical service, including transformers and grounding systems
• Cooling System: Upper structure temperature controlled at 75°F
• Network Connectivity: 24-core fiber optic link connecting to counting room
• Safety Systems: Including fire protection and lightning protection systems

Experimental Results

Muon Beam Performance Comparison

Based on comparative analysis with world's major facilities:

Expected Neutrino Beam Performance

• Off-Axis Configuration: Total neutrino flux approximately 6.6×10⁻⁵ ν/EOT (0-100 MeV)
• On-Axis Configuration: Total flux approximately 2.9×10⁻⁵ ν/EOT (0-500 MeV)
• CEvNS Event Rate: 1-ton liquid argon detector can record thousands of events annually

Physics Sensitivity Assessment

• Light Dark Matter Search: BDX sensitivity exceeds existing experiments by up to two orders of magnitude
• Millicharged Particles: World-leading sensitivity for particles with mass below 1.5 GeV
• Weinberg Angle Measurement: CEvNS measurement can provide sin²θW extraction with approximately 10% precision

Related Work

International Muon Facility Comparison

• CERN: North Area M2 beam line provides tunable muons at 50-220 GeV/c with maximum intensity 5×10⁷ μ/s
• Fermilab: Uses "magic momentum" 3.1 GeV/c for muon g-2 experiment
• PSI: Seven secondary beam lines, πE5 can provide intensity up to 5×10⁸ μ/s
• J-PARC: Four muon beam lines (D, U, S, H lines) with intensity up to 10⁸ μ/s

Neutrino Physics Frontier

• DUNE and Hyper-K: Next-generation long-baseline neutrino experiments require precise knowledge of neutrino-nucleus interactions
• COHERENT Experiment: First observation of CEvNS, but with limited statistics
• e4ν Project: Jefferson Lab benchmarks neutrino event generators using 1-6 GeV electron scattering data

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Technical Feasibility: The Jefferson Lab beamdump facility is technically fully feasible, expected to be realized by 2026-27
2. Scientific Competitiveness: Secondary muon beam intensity is comparable to world-leading facilities with unique high-energy polarization characteristics
3. Multidisciplinary Value: The facility will provide a world-class research platform for fundamental physics, applied physics, and materials science

Limitations

1. Space Constraints: The narrow design of the underground laboratory may limit installation of certain large-scale detectors
2. Energy Range: While muon energy is high, the range is relatively limited and may not be suitable for all experimental types
3. Background Noise: Detailed evaluation is needed for beam-related background effects on low-energy measurements

Future Directions

1. Facility Optimization: Consider expanding laboratory area to 5m×12m to accommodate larger equipment
2. Technology Development: Continue developing novel detection technologies such as Skipper-CCD and opaque scintillators
3. International Collaboration: Establish collaborative relationships with world's major laboratories to share technologies and experience

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Systematic Approach: The paper provides comprehensive analysis from facility design to physics applications
2. International Perspective: Detailed comparison with world's major facilities with accurate positioning
3. Technological Innovation: Proposes multiple innovative detector technologies and beam focusing schemes
4. Practical Value: Provides a concrete and feasible roadmap for Jefferson Lab's future development

Weaknesses

1. Missing Cost Analysis: Lacks detailed estimates of construction and operational costs
2. Insufficient Risk Assessment: Discussion of technical risks and implementation challenges is relatively limited
3. Timeline Planning: Lacks detailed implementation schedule and milestone planning

Impact

1. Academic Impact: Will significantly enhance Jefferson Lab's position in the international particle physics community
2. Technology Advancement: Promotes development of novel detector technologies and accelerator technologies
3. Talent Development: Provides a world-class research platform for next-generation physicists
4. Industrial Applications: Muon imaging and related technologies have important industrial and security applications

Applicable Scenarios

1. Fundamental Physics Research: Dark matter searches, precision tests of the Standard Model
2. Nuclear Physics: Lepton-nucleus interactions, QED correction studies
3. Applied Physics: Muon imaging, materials analysis, nuclear non-proliferation monitoring
4. Technology Development: Verification and testing of key muon collider technologies

References

This paper cites 67 important references covering recent advances in multiple fields including dark matter searches, muon physics, neutrino physics, and detector technologies, providing a solid theoretical and experimental foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a white paper of significant strategic importance that paints an ambitious blueprint for Jefferson Lab's future development. The paper features mature technical schemes, clear scientific objectives, and strong international competitiveness, and will have important implications for the fields of particle physics and nuclear physics.