TreeNet: Layered Decision Ensembles

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09654
• Title: TreeNet: Layered Decision Ensembles
• Author: Zeshan Khan (FAST School of Computing, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan)
• Category: cs.CV (Computer Vision)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09654

Abstract

In the field of medical image analysis, neural networks, decision trees, and ensemble learning-based algorithms have demonstrated good accuracy in detecting gastrointestinal abnormalities. However, the primary challenges facing medical image analysis are limited data availability and insufficient data confidence. This paper proposes TreeNet, a layered decision ensemble learning method specifically tailored for medical image analysis. By integrating key features of neural networks, ensemble learning, and tree-based decision models, TreeNet becomes a robust and adaptive model. The method achieves an F1-score of 0.85 on complete training data, 0.77 on 50% training data, with inference speed reaching 32 frames per second, making it suitable for real-time applications.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Core Problem: Data scarcity and insufficient confidence issues in medical image analysis
2. Application Scenarios: Medical imaging diagnostic tasks such as gastrointestinal abnormality detection
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Neural networks require large amounts of data and lengthy training periods
   • Decision trees are prone to overfitting with limited expressiveness
   • Ensemble methods have high computational complexity

Research Motivation

Medical image analysis requires achieving high precision and rapid inference with limited data. Existing single-method approaches struggle to simultaneously satisfy requirements for accuracy, interpretability, and efficiency.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed TreeNet Architecture: Innovatively integrates hierarchical processing of neural networks, interpretability of decision trees, and robustness of ensemble learning
2. Efficient Training Implementation: Employs forward propagation mechanism, avoiding gradient descent complexity and significantly reducing training time
3. Data Efficiency Optimization: With 50% data reduction, F1-score decreases by only 0.08
4. Real-time Inference Capability: Achieves 450 FPS inference speed, over 40 times faster than traditional deep networks
5. Open-source Python Package: Releases DtreeNetwork package for research and application

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Medical images (CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, etc.) Output: Multi-class classification results (normal tissue, pathological findings, anatomical landmarks, etc.) Constraints: Limited annotated data, real-time inference requirements, interpretability requirements

Model Architecture

TreeNet employs a layered decision ensemble architecture, specifically including:

1. Feature Extraction Layer:
   • Uses texture feature descriptors (histogram, GLCM, GLRLM)
   • Avoids complex convolutional operations, reducing computational complexity
2. Layered Decision Structure:

   Layer 1: Random Forest → Feature Transformation
   Layer 2: Random Forest → Feature Refinement  
   Layer n: Random Forest → Final Decision
   

3. Ensemble Mechanism:
   • Each layer contains multiple random forests
   • Aggregates prediction results through voting/averaging mechanisms
   • Employs forward propagation between layers without requiring backpropagation gradient computation

Technical Innovations

1. Forward Propagation Architecture: Eliminates gradient descent requirements, significantly reducing training time
2. Layered Feature Transformation: Hierarchical processing similar to neural networks but implemented using decision trees
3. Multi-layer Ensemble: Employs ensemble learning at each layer to enhance model robustness
4. Feature Priority Organization: Automatically identifies and prioritizes important features

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Kvasir V1: 4,000 gastrointestinal images, 8 classes, 500 images per class
2. Kvasir V2: 14,033 images, 16 classes, 5,293 training samples, 8,740 test samples
3. Hyper Kvasir: 110,800 images, 23 classes, severe class imbalance
4. DowPK: 844 unlabeled gastrointestinal images

Evaluation Metrics

• Accuracy
• Precision
• Recall
• F1-score
• Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC)
• Training Time
• Inference Time (FPS)

Comparison Methods

• DenseNet169
• ResNet152
• Thambawita et al. method

Implementation Details

• Uses different proportions of training data (5%, 10%, 40%, 50%, 90%, 100%)
• Employs texture features as input descriptors
• Conducts training and testing in CPU environment

Experimental Results

Main Results

Inference Speed Comparison

Key Findings

1. Data Efficiency: TreeNet demonstrates superior performance on small datasets, particularly outperforming deep networks on Kvasir V3
2. Speed Advantage: Inference speed is 32-40 times faster than traditional methods
3. Stability: Maintains stable precision-recall balance across different data volumes

Ablation Studies

The paper demonstrates performance variations across different data proportions:

• With 50% data reduction, F1-score decreases by only 0.08
• Training time exhibits linear relationship with data volume
• Precision and recall remain stable across various data scales

Related Work

Neural Network Methods

• CNN Architectures: Demonstrate excellent performance in medical image analysis but require large amounts of data and computational resources
• Time Complexity: Forward propagation O(∑L(nl-1×nl)), backpropagation time doubles
• Limitations: Gradient descent issues, hyperparameter sensitivity, high model complexity

Ensemble Learning Methods

• Random Forest: Successfully handles complex medical data
• Advantages: Improves generalization ability, reduces overfitting
• Characteristics: Diversity-driven performance improvement

Decision Tree Methods

• Strong Interpretability: Provides transparent decision paths
• Feature Importance: Automatically identifies critical features
• Limitations: Prone to overfitting, limited expressiveness

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. TreeNet successfully integrates advantages of three approaches, significantly improving efficiency while maintaining competitive accuracy
2. The method is particularly suitable for data-scarce medical image analysis scenarios
3. Achieves good balance among accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency

Limitations

1. F1-score on certain datasets is slightly lower than state-of-the-art deep learning methods
2. Relies on hand-crafted texture features, potentially limiting feature expressiveness
3. Modeling capability for complex image patterns may be inferior to deep networks

Future Directions

1. Extension to more medical imaging modalities
2. Techniques for improving data efficiency
3. Benchmarking with latest models
4. Integration of semi-supervised and transfer learning

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation: Cleverly integrates advantages of three different paradigms, forming a novel hybrid architecture
2. High Practical Value: Addresses practical challenges in medical image analysis (data scarcity, real-time requirements)
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Thorough evaluation across multiple benchmark datasets
4. Open-source Contribution: Provides reproducible Python package

Weaknesses

1. Feature Engineering Dependency: Still relies on traditional texture features, not fully leveraging advantages of deep feature learning
2. Insufficient Theoretical Analysis: Lacks theoretical analysis of convergence and generalization capability
3. Limited Comparative Experiments: Primarily compares with traditional deep networks, lacks comparison with latest hybrid methods

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new methodological insights for medical image analysis
2. Practical Value: Particularly suitable for resource-constrained medical environments
3. Reproducibility: Provides open-source implementation facilitating verification and extension

Applicable Scenarios

1. Data-scarce Scenarios: Medical image analysis tasks with limited annotated data
2. Real-time Applications: Clinical scenarios requiring rapid diagnostic feedback
3. Edge Computing: Medical devices with limited computational resources
4. Explainable AI: Medical diagnostic systems requiring decision transparency

References

The paper cites 118 relevant references covering multiple domains including medical image analysis, deep learning, ensemble learning, and decision trees, providing solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This paper proposes an innovative hybrid architecture that successfully addresses key challenges in medical image analysis. While slightly inferior to deep learning methods on certain metrics, its advantages in efficiency, interpretability, and data efficiency provide significant practical value. This work offers a valuable tool for the medical AI field, particularly suitable for resource-constrained clinical environments.