Pingmark: A Textual Protocol for Universal Spatial Mentions

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09672
• Title: Pingmark: A Textual Protocol for Universal Spatial Mentions
• Author: Kalin Dimitrov (Independent Researcher, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria)
• Classification: cs.CR (Cryptography and Security), cs.HC (Human-Computer Interaction), cs.NI (Networking and Internet Architecture)
• Publication Date: October 8, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09672

Abstract

Pingmark defines a universal textual protocol for expressing spatial context through the minimalist symbol "!@". Unlike embedding coordinates or using proprietary map links, Pingmark introduces a semantic trigger that compatible client applications can interpret and generate standardized resolver links in the format https://pingmark.me/lat/lon/[timestamp]. This enables location expression to function like existing textual conventions—"@" for identity, "#" for topics, and "!@" for physical space. The protocol requires no user registration, relies on open map technology, and protects privacy through locally generated temporary location data.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Identification

Current digital communication treats location as a platform feature rather than a language element. Each major messaging platform provides its own "share location" functionality, but these features typically:

1. Are hidden behind multiple operational steps
2. Are incompatible across ecosystems
3. Require specific operations rather than simple syntax
4. Lack a unified textual expression method

Research Motivation

Pingmark reconceptualizes location as a semantic marker rather than an operation. By entering the shorthand "!@" to convey the intent "I am here," any compatible system can interpret this form. The protocol's design philosophy is to transform location expression into a universal semantic marker similar to "@" and "#" symbols.

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• geo: URI (RFC 5870): Lacks intuitive conversational syntax; requires manual input or complex parsing
• Google Maps/Apple Maps links: Closed format, bound to specific applications and data ecosystems
• Plus Codes and what3words: Static address systems that identify fixed points rather than real-time temporary location mentions

Core Contributions

1. Proposed Pingmark Protocol Specification (PPS v0.1): Defines a universal textual protocol for spatial mentions
2. Designed minimalist semantic trigger: Uses the "!@" symbol as standardized syntax for location expression
3. Implemented privacy protection mechanisms: Protects privacy through client-side local coordinate generation without central storage
4. Built reference implementation: Developed pingmark.me as an open resolver service
5. Established open standard framework: Creates universal textual conventions for spatial mentions analogous to "@" and "#"

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: User enters "!@" symbol in text Output: Automatically generates standardized location resolver link Constraints: Protect user privacy, require no registration, support cross-platform compatibility

Protocol Architecture

Core Syntax Design

• Symbol: !@
• Semantics: "I am at"
• Characteristics: Does not embed coordinates; functions solely as semantic trigger

Automatic Parsing Rules

Detection of !@ → https://pingmark.me/⟨latitude⟩/⟨longitude⟩[/⟨timestamp⟩]

Parameter Handling

• latitude/longitude: Handled internally by client application; no manual user input required
• timestamp: Optional ISO 8601 format timestamp to distinguish real-time from historical locations
• Privacy Protection: No user identifiers; locally generated links; no central storage

Protocol Hierarchy

Pingmark Protocol (PPS v0.1) → Symbol !@ → Client (generates coordinates) → Resolver (pingmark.me)

Implementation Layers

1. L1 Resolver: Browser/keyboard extensions that detect "!@" symbol
2. L2 Resolver: Open maps that display location points
3. L3 SDK/API: Interfaces for integration into existing platforms

Technical Innovations

1. Separation of Semantics and Implementation: Text intent (!@) completely separated from data generation (coordinates)
2. Client-Side Data Generation: Location data generated locally on device, protecting privacy
3. Open Resolver Model: Does not depend on single domain or service provider
4. Backward Compatibility: Text remains human-readable even if unresolved

Experimental Setup

Use Case Validation

The paper validates protocol feasibility through multiple real-world application scenarios:

1. Instant Messaging: "We are waiting at the south gate !@" - client replaces !@ with real-time temporary link
2. Email/Documents: Team leads insert specific work location in project updates
3. Microblogs/Social Media: Users mark current event location without requiring platform-native location services

Evaluation Methods

• User Intuition Testing: Informal testing shows users intuitively understand "!@" as "I am here"
• Privacy Assessment: Verifies that client-side parsing and coordinate generation do not compromise user privacy policies
• Integration Feasibility: Tests integration capabilities in browsers, chat applications, and text editors

Experimental Results

Reference Implementation Validation

pingmark.me as reference implementation successfully validates protocol feasibility:

• Uses open-source map technology (OpenStreetMap + Leaflet.js)
• Requires no cookies, accounts, or analytics tools
• Provides quick-access buttons such as "Open in Map" and "Get Directions"
• Demonstrates protocol viability without dependence on single domain

Advantage Validation

1. Universal Textual Syntax: Successfully establishes standardized cross-platform expression method
2. Open Resolver Model: Avoids vendor lock-in issues
3. Privacy Protection: Implements temporary and local data processing
4. Backward Compatibility: Maintains readability even when unresolved

Limitation Identification

1. Resolver Support Dependency: Requires widespread resolver support for universal adoption
2. Governance Challenges: Lack of unified governance may lead to resolver fragmentation

Related Work

Geolocation Exchange Technology Comparison

• geo: URI (RFC 5870): Formal coordinate expression standard, but lacks intuitive conversational syntax
• Proprietary Map Links: Closed formats such as Google Maps/Apple Maps
• Static Address Systems: Plus Codes and what3words for fixed point identification
• Semantic Marker Precedent: @ and # symbols demonstrate feasibility of universal semantic markers
• W3C Open Annotation Model: Demonstrates how textual markup can be formalized into interoperable Web semantics

Innovation Positioning

Pingmark extends this linguistic spectrum by defining markup for space—a lightweight, human-friendly standard enabling open interpretation of location intent across any textual medium.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

Pingmark establishes a minimal yet expressive spatial mention protocol, transforming location into a first-class textual concept. By separating syntax (!@) from implementation (resolvers), it achieves universality comparable to @ and # for identity and topics respectively.

Future Work Directions

1. Formal Specification Release: Publish formal RFC-style specification (PPS v1.0)
2. Standardized Governance: Ensure protocol remains open and unified through standards bodies such as IETF or W3C
3. URI Scheme Definition: Define dedicated pingmark:// URI scheme
4. SDK Development: Develop SDKs and plugins for messaging and IoT applications

Limitation Analysis

• Requires widespread resolver support for true universal adoption
• Lack of unified governance mechanism may lead to protocol fragmentation
• Depends on availability and accuracy of client-side location services

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Conceptual Innovation: Pioneering approach of transforming location expression from platform feature to language element
2. Design Simplicity: "!@" symbol is intuitive and simple, lowering adoption barriers
3. Privacy Protection: Client-side generation and registration-free design effectively protects user privacy
4. Open Standards: Avoids vendor lock-in and promotes open ecosystem development
5. Backward Compatibility: Maintains readability even in unsupported systems

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient Experimental Validation: Lacks large-scale user studies and performance evaluation
2. Missing Technical Details: Insufficient description of client implementation, error handling, and security considerations
3. Unclear Standardization Path: Specific pathway and timeline for transition to formal standards unclear
4. Shallow Competitive Analysis: Relatively superficial comparison with existing solutions
5. Scalability Concerns: Insufficient discussion of performance and scalability issues in large-scale deployment

Impact Assessment

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new theoretical framework for spatial information expression
2. Practical Value: Has potential to become unified standard for cross-platform location sharing
3. Industry Impact: May promote openness and standardization of geospatial information services
4. Technology Promotion: Requires broad industry support to achieve anticipated impact

Applicable Scenarios

1. Instant Messaging: Quick sharing of current location
2. Collaborative Work: Team member location coordination
3. Social Media: Event and activity location marking
4. Internet of Things: Device location status reporting
5. Emergency Response: Rapid location sharing and rescue coordination

References

The paper cites the following key references:

1. RFC 5870: Geolocation Uniform Resource Identifier Standard
2. Google Open Location Code (Plus Codes)
3. what3words System Overview
4. OpenStreetMap Foundation Documentation
5. Leaflet.js Documentation

Overall Assessment: This is an innovative protocol design paper presenting an interesting idea of semanticizing location expression. While technical implementation details and experimental validation require further refinement, its core concept possesses significant theoretical and practical value. Should this protocol gain widespread support and achieve successful standardization, it has potential to become an important standard for spatial information expression.