Revisiting the soft-hard separation in the transverse momentum spectra of $pp$ collisions

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09692
• Title: Revisiting the soft-hard separation in the transverse momentum spectra of $pp$ collisions
• Authors: Gábor Bíró, Guy Paić, Leonid Serkin, Gergely Gábor Barnaföldi
• Classification: hep-ph nucl-th
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09692

Abstract

This study analyzes the soft-hard component separation in the transverse momentum spectra of charged particles from proton-proton collisions measured by the ALICE experiment at the LHC. The research covers three collision energies: $\sqrt{s}= 2.76$ TeV, 5.02 TeV, and 13 TeV. The soft component is described by Boltzmann distribution fitting, while the residual spectrum is identified as hard QCD-type fragmentation processes. Following separation, the subtracted spectrum exhibits invariance in shape and peak position with respect to multiplicity evolution, supporting the two-component interpretation. The average transverse momentum of both contributions remains nearly constant, and Pythia 8 Monte Carlo simulations confirm these trends. The results support the two-component description as a reliable alternative to hydrodynamic explanations.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This study addresses a fundamental controversy in high-energy nuclear collisions: whether hadron production mechanisms should be explained using a two-component model (soft + hard) or a hydrodynamic model for transverse momentum spectra.

Problem Significance

1. Theoretical Foundation: The dual nature of strong interactions leaves soft processes in the low $p_T$ region without first-principles theoretical description, while hard processes in the high $p_T$ region can be described by perturbative QCD.
2. Experimental Controversy: Since SPS heavy-ion experiments, two competing theoretical frameworks have existed.
3. Physical Picture: Different explanations lead to fundamentally different understandings of the physics mechanisms in pp collisions.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Hydrodynamic Approach: The application of the Blast Wave model to pp collisions remains controversial, potentially mixing fragmentation and soft production processes.
2. Tsallis-Pareto Distribution: While effectively fitting the full $p_T$ range, it may obscure underlying physical mechanisms.
3. Component Mixing: Fragmentation functions produce substantial particles at low transverse momentum, creating analytical difficulties when superimposed with soft processes.

Research Motivation

The paper aims to demonstrate that experimental data more naturally support the two-component framework, providing a qualitatively different perspective from hydrodynamic explanations.

Core Contributions

1. Systematic Separation Method: Establishes a systematic soft-hard component separation procedure based on Boltzmann distribution.
2. Multiplicity Independence Discovery: Demonstrates that the shape and peak position of separated soft and hard components do not evolve with multiplicity.
3. Average Transverse Momentum Analysis: Reveals that the growth of total $\langle p_T \rangle$ with multiplicity is primarily driven by increased weight of hard processes.
4. Monte Carlo Verification: Pythia 8 simulations confirm the validity of the two-component model.
5. Theoretical Framework Support: Provides new experimental evidence for QCD-expected two-component processes.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles from ALICE measurements across different multiplicity classes Output: Separated soft component (Boltzmann distribution) and hard component (fragmentation contribution) Constraints: Principle of minimal assumptions, avoiding introduction of additional intermediate sources

Model Architecture

1. Soft Component Modeling

The low-momentum region is described using the Boltzmann function: $f(p_T) = A \exp[-\beta p_T]$ where:

• $\beta = 1/T$: slope parameter or inverse of effective temperature
• $A$: normalization constant

2. Separation Procedure

1. Cutoff Parameter Optimization: Select cutoff momentum $p_0$ to minimize $\chi^2/ndf$ closest to 1
2. Multiplicity Classification: Repeat fitting procedure for each multiplicity class
3. Hard Component Extraction: Obtain fragmentation component by subtracting Boltzmann fit from total spectrum

3. Analysis Metrics

• Average transverse momentum $\langle p_T \rangle$ of each component
• Spectrum shape evolution with multiplicity
• Stability of peak position

Technical Innovations

1. Adaptive Cutoff: Automatically determine soft-hard separation boundary through $\chi^2/ndf$ minimization
2. Shape Invariance Testing: Systematically check multiplicity independence of separated components
3. Monte Carlo Comparison: Verify physical reasonableness of method using Pythia 8
4. Multi-energy Comparison: Cover three LHC energies (2.76, 5.02, and 13 TeV)

Experimental Setup

Dataset

• Source: ALICE experiment pp collision data
• Energy: $\sqrt{s} = 2.76, 5.02, 13$ TeV
• Particle Type: Charged particles at mid-rapidity
• Classification Method: $p_T$ spectra classified by multiplicity

Evaluation Metrics

• $\chi^2/ndf$: Fit quality assessment
• $\langle p_T \rangle$: Average transverse momentum of each component
• Spectrum shape stability
• Peak position evolution

Comparison Methods

• Pythia 8 Monte Carlo simulation (Monash tune)
• Qualitative comparison with hydrodynamic Blast Wave model

Implementation Details

• Uses published ALICE experimental data 22-24
• Pythia 8 version 8.309
• Systematically applies the same procedure to all multiplicity classes

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Cutoff Parameter Evolution

• Low multiplicity ($N_{ch} \sim 2.9$): Boltzmann distribution describes up to $p_T \gtrsim 1.1$ GeV/c
• High multiplicity ($N_{ch} \sim 54.1$): Fit deteriorates at lower $p_0$ values due to increased fragmentation contribution

2. Component Separation Performance

• Soft component: Maintains exponential form across all multiplicities
• Hard component: Exhibits power-law tail characteristics
• Shape stability: Peak positions of both components do not evolve with multiplicity

3. Average Transverse Momentum Evolution

• Total $\langle p_T \rangle$: Increases monotonically with multiplicity (known experimental trend)
• Soft component $\langle p_T \rangle$: Remains nearly independent of multiplicity
• Hard component $\langle p_T \rangle$: Shows only modest growth

Monte Carlo Verification

Pythia 8 predictions successfully describe qualitative features, confirming the validity of fitting and subtraction methods.

Experimental Findings

1. Two-Component Stability: Both separated components exhibit weak dependence on multiplicity.
2. Growth Mechanism: Total $\langle p_T \rangle$ growth is primarily driven by increased hard process weight rather than soft sector changes.
3. No Additional Sources Required: No need to introduce collective flow or other intermediate sources to explain the data.

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Two-Component Models: Theoretical work by T. Trainor et al. 7-9
2. Hydrodynamic Approaches: Application of Blast Wave model in small systems 15-17
3. Unified Descriptions: Phenomenological success of Tsallis-Pareto distribution 18-21

Advantages of This Work

• Provides more direct physical picture
• Avoids conceptual difficulties of hydrodynamic models in pp collisions
• Better consistency with QCD theoretical expectations

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Two-component description (soft Boltzmann + hard QCD) naturally explains ALICE pp collision data.
2. Separated soft and hard components both exhibit stable, multiplicity-independent characteristics.
3. Total $\langle p_T \rangle$ growth with multiplicity reflects increased hard process contribution rather than soft sector changes.

Limitations

1. Physical interpretation of Boltzmann form requires further theoretical clarification.
2. Choice of soft-hard separation boundary may affect results.
3. Verification needed across broader system and energy ranges.

Future Directions

1. Extension to heavy-ion collision systems
2. Deeper theoretical understanding of non-perturbative nature of soft component
3. Comparative studies with other experiments

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Method Simplicity: Clear separation procedure based on minimal assumptions
2. Result Robustness: Systematic analysis across multiple energies and multiplicities
3. Physical Intuition: Natural alignment with QCD dual-scale nature
4. Experimental Support: Independent verification through Monte Carlo simulations

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Depth: Lacks deeper theoretical explanation for Boltzmann form
2. Systematic Uncertainties: Insufficient discussion of systematic uncertainties introduced by separation procedure
3. Universality: Method applicability needs verification across more systems

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new perspective on long-standing theoretical controversy
2. Practical Significance: Offers alternative framework for pp collision analysis
3. Reproducibility: Simple method easily verifiable by other experimental groups

Applicable Scenarios

• High-energy pp collision data analysis
• Collective effects in small systems
• QCD soft-hard process separation studies
• Monte Carlo model validation

References

The paper cites 28 important references, covering:

• ALICE experimental data 22-24
• T. Trainor's two-component theoretical work 7-9
• Hydrodynamic model studies 15-17
• Pythia Monte Carlo simulations 26-27

Overall Assessment: This is an important paper in high-energy physics that provides new experimental evidence for a long-standing interpretive controversy regarding pp collisions. The method is simple and effective, and the results are convincing, though there remains room for improvement in theoretical depth and systematic error analysis.