A quantitative performance analysis of two different interferometric alignment sensing schemes for gravitational wave detectors

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09774
• Title: A quantitative performance analysis of two different interferometric alignment sensing schemes for gravitational wave detectors
• Authors: Raed Diab, Alvaro Herrera, Paul Fulda (University of Florida), Chance Jackson (Syracuse University)
• Classification: astro-ph.IM
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09774

Abstract

This paper reports a tabletop optical experiment comparing two laser alignment sensing schemes: the conventional wavefront sensing (WFS) approach using quadrant photodiodes (QPDs) to recover optical alignment, and a newly developed RF jitter alignment sensing (RFJAS) scheme employing electro-optic beam deflectors (EOBD) to apply rapid angular modulation. The study evaluates RFJAS performance through direct comparison and provides detailed noise budgets for both techniques, with particular focus on low-frequency limitations below 30 Hz. Results demonstrate that WFS performance is limited by technical noise from beam spot motion (BSM) generated primarily by beam eccentricity on the QPD, while RFJAS is primarily limited by residual RF amplitude modulation. A hybrid approach combining both sensing methods may provide the most practical solution for gravitational wave detectors such as Advanced LIGO.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be addressed: Gravitational wave detectors (such as Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, KAGRA) require precise active control of suspended optical cavities to achieve optimal interferometer performance, with alignment noise below 30 Hz continuously limiting LIGO interferometer performance.
2. Importance of the problem: Precise laser alignment is fundamental to high-precision laser interferometry. Alignment errors directly impact gravitational wave detection sensitivity, particularly in the low-frequency band where gravitational wave signals are strongest.
3. Limitations of existing methods:
   • Current WFS methods employ QPDs demodulated at the PDH phase modulation frequency
   • WFS is affected by beam spot motion (BSM), particularly when the beam is eccentric on the QPD
   • Performance is limited in the low-frequency band
4. Research motivation: Develop alternative sensing schemes to improve low-frequency sensitivity and explore RFJAS as a potential alternative or complementary approach to WFS.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed and validated the RFJAS scheme: Developed RF jitter alignment sensing technology using electro-optic beam deflectors
2. Conducted detailed performance comparison: Directly compared RFJAS and WFS performance through tabletop experiments
3. Established comprehensive noise budgets: Detailed analysis of noise sources and limiting factors for both schemes across different frequency bands
4. Provided practical solutions: Proposed hybrid sensing schemes to combine advantages of both methods
5. Theoretical and experimental verification: Validated experimental results using FINESSE3 simulations with theoretical support

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The research objective is to compare the performance of two optical cavity alignment sensing schemes:

• Input: Tilt and lateral misalignment of the optical cavity
• Output: Linearized alignment error signals
• Constraints: Achieve high-precision sensing within frequency ranges relevant to gravitational wave detection (1-1000 Hz)

Model Architecture

RFJAS Scheme

1. Core principle: Apply rapid angular deflection to the laser beam using EOBD, producing RF sidebands in the first-order spatial HG₁₀/HG₀₁ modes
2. Key equations:
   • Tilt misalignment: $V_{\Omega,I} \approx E_0^2 m_\alpha \alpha \frac{\Theta_m}{\Theta_{cav}}$
   • Lateral offset: $V_{\Omega,Q} \approx -E_0^2 m_\alpha a \frac{\Theta_m}{w_{0cav}}$
3. Technical implementation:
   • EOBD modulation frequency equals cavity HOM separation frequency
   • I&Q demodulation to obtain orthogonal alignment signals
   • Single-element photodetector detection

WFS Scheme

1. Core principle: Use EOM to produce RF sidebands in the fundamental mode, with beat detection against first-order HOM on QPD to sense misalignment
2. Key equations:
   • Tilt misalignment: $V_{WFS}^{QPD1} \approx -2E_0^2 \frac{\alpha}{\Theta_{cav}} m$
   • Lateral offset: $V_{WFS}^{QPD2} \approx 2E_0^2 \frac{a}{w_{0cav}} m$
3. Technical implementation:
   • Two QPDs separated by 90° Gouy phase
   • In-phase demodulation to recover alignment information

Technical Innovations

1. RFJAS advantages:
   • Insensitive to beam spot motion (using single-element detector)
   • Can share the same detector with PDH sensor
   • Theoretically achieves comparable shot noise limited performance to WFS
2. Sensing matrix diagonalization:
   • Achieve sensing matrix diagonalization through complex phase rotation
   • RFJAS: rotation phase $\phi = \arctan(Q_{PZT1}/I_{PZT1})$
   • Ensure orthogonal sensing channels
3. Non-degenerate alignment signals:
   • Use bowtie cavity to produce scattered light eigenmodes
   • Different HOM separation frequencies for different planes (34.74 MHz vs 34.44 MHz)

Experimental Setup

Experimental Apparatus

1. Laser source: 1064 nm laser
2. Modulators: EOM (fundamental mode sidebands) + EOBD (HG₁₀ mode sidebands)
3. Cavity: Bowtie cavity
   • Round-trip optical path: 1.6 m
   • Finesse: 990
   • Free spectral range: 186 MHz
   • Round-trip Gouy phase: 66°

Alignment Driving System

• PZT1 and PZT2: Steering mirrors separated by 90° Gouy phase
• Drive matrix: Linear combinations of orthogonal alignment degrees of freedom
• Calibration: PZT1 drives 9 μrad/V, PZT2 drives 11 μrad/V

Detection System

• RFJAS: Single-element RF photodetector with I&Q demodulation
• WFS: Two QPDs (beam sizes ~430 μm and 470 μm)
• PDH: Photodetector for frequency locking

Evaluation Metrics

Primary evaluation metric is noise spectral density in units of $\frac{|HG_{10}/HG_{00}|}{\sqrt{Hz}}$, covering the 1-1000 Hz frequency range.

Experimental Results

Main Results

EOBD Modulation Frequency Sweep

• Achieved diagonal sensing matrix at HOM separation frequency
• Experimental data shows good agreement with FINESSE3 simulations
• In-phase demodulation signal of PZT2 crosses zero at HOM frequency, confirming successful diagonalization

Noise Budget Comparison

1. WFS noise limitations:
   • Low frequency (<30 Hz): Beam spot motion (BSM) noise dominates
   • High frequency (>30 Hz): Electronics noise limited
   • Overall performance: ~10⁻⁵ |HG₁₀/HG₀₀|/√Hz @ 10 Hz
2. RFJAS noise limitations:
   • Primary limitation: Residual RF amplitude modulation (RFAM)
   • Essentially insensitive to BSM
   • Overall performance: ~10⁻⁶ |HG₁₀/HG₀₀|/√Hz @ 10 Hz

Beam Spot Motion Coupling Measurement

• WFS: BSM coupling increases with mode mismatch
• At 0.6% mismatch, two QPD responses are similar
• With increasing mismatch, BSM response differences between different QPDs become significant
• RFJAS: Theoretically insensitive to BSM

Coherence Analysis

• Both schemes maintain high coherence below 30 Hz (approaching 1)
• Coherence drops sharply above 30 Hz, primarily limited by WFS electronics noise

Shot Noise Analysis

• RFJAS shot noise: $2.71 \times 10^{-7}$ |HG₁₀/HG₀₀|/√Hz
• WFS shot noise: $2.26 \times 10^{-7}$ |HG₁₀/HG₀₀|/√Hz
• Shot noise levels are comparable for both, but masked by technical noise

Related Work

The paper systematically reviews the development of alignment sensing for gravitational wave detectors:

1. Conventional WFS approach: Automatic alignment systems developed by Morrison et al.
2. PDH locking technique: Pound-Drever-Hall frequency stabilization technology
3. HOM formalism: Theoretical framework for understanding alignment sensing
4. LIGO performance limitations: Low-frequency alignment noise as current primary limiting factor

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Primary WFS limitation: Low-frequency band limited by BSM noise, high-frequency band limited by electronics noise
2. RFJAS advantages: Insensitive to BSM, primarily limited by RFAM
3. Hybrid scheme potential: Using RFJAS at low frequencies and WFS at high frequencies may be optimal
4. Practicality: RFJAS can share detectors with existing PDH systems, reducing implementation complexity

Limitations

1. Shot noise performance: RFJAS shot noise limited performance may be inferior to WFS
2. Hardware complexity: RFJAS implementation requires two independently modulated beam deflectors
3. RFAM noise: Requires further optimization to reduce residual amplitude modulation
4. Experimental environment: Tabletop experiments differ from actual LIGO environment

Future Directions

1. Hybrid scheme testing: Actual testing of combined scheme performance
2. Closed-loop control: Implement alignment loop closure for both schemes
3. aLIGO application research: Specialized theoretical and experimental studies for Advanced LIGO
4. BSM contribution quantification: Quantify BSM contribution to ASC noise budget at LIGO site

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Rigorous experimental design: Direct comparison of both schemes provides fair performance assessment
2. Comprehensive theoretical analysis: Complete analysis from fundamental principles to noise budgets
3. Simulation verification: FINESSE3 simulations verify experimental results, enhancing credibility
4. High practical value: Provides concrete solutions for actual improvements to gravitational wave detectors
5. Technical innovation: RFJAS scheme offers new approach to addressing BSM problems

Weaknesses

1. Environmental limitations: Tabletop experiments cannot fully simulate LIGO's complex environment
2. Long-term stability: Long-term stability and drift characteristics of both schemes not evaluated
3. Cost analysis: Lacks detailed comparison of implementation costs and technical complexity
4. Frequency range: Primarily focuses on 1-1000 Hz, potentially overlooking other important frequency bands

Impact

1. Academic contribution: Provides new technical pathways for gravitational wave detector alignment sensing
2. Practical value: Directly relevant to performance improvements in next-generation gravitational wave detectors
3. Technology dissemination: RFJAS technology may be applicable to other high-precision optical systems
4. Reproducibility: Detailed experimental parameters and theoretical analysis support result reproduction

Applicable Scenarios

1. Gravitational wave detectors: Primary application target, particularly Advanced LIGO upgrades
2. High-precision interferometers: Other optical systems requiring precise alignment control
3. Space gravitational wave detection: Potentially applicable to space missions such as LISA
4. Precision measurement: Precision optical measurement systems requiring low-frequency noise suppression

References

The paper cites 17 important references covering:

• Gravitational wave detector technology (LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA)
• Alignment sensing theory and experiments
• PDH locking technology
• Optical simulation software (FINESSE3)
• Related noise analysis and performance evaluation

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality technical paper that, through rigorous experimental and theoretical analysis, provides valuable solutions for critical technological improvements in gravitational wave detectors. The paper's innovation, practicality, and scientific rigor are commendable and have significant implications for advancing gravitational wave detection technology.