Towards Understanding Ambiguity Resolution in Multimodal Inference of Meaning

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09815
• Title: Towards Understanding Ambiguity Resolution in Multimodal Inference of Meaning
• Authors: Yufei Wang (University of Pittsburgh), Adriana Kovashka (University of Pittsburgh), Loretta Fernández (University of Pittsburgh), Marc N. Coutanche (University of Pittsburgh), Seth Wiener (Carnegie Mellon University)
• Classification: cs.CV cs.AI
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09815

Abstract

This study explores a novel foreign language learning scenario in which learners must infer the meaning of unfamiliar words within multimodal contexts of image-text pairs. Through human participant experiments with varying image-text pairings, the research analyzes how data characteristics (images and text) influence participants' ability to infer the meaning of masked or unfamiliar words, and the correlation between participants' linguistic backgrounds and success rates. The study finds that only some intuitive features show strong correlation with participant performance, necessitating further investigation into features that predict task success. Additionally, the analysis examines AI systems' capacity to reason about participant performance, identifying promising directions for improving such reasoning capabilities.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed in this research is: In multimodal contexts (image-paired text), what factors influence the difficulty for foreign language learners to infer the meaning of unfamiliar vocabulary, and can AI systems effectively predict human performance in such tasks?

Significance

1. Practical Demand: Over one billion people worldwide learn English as a second language, with multilingual proficiency increasingly demanded in the workplace
2. Educational Value: Immersive and interactive environments are considered ideal for foreign language learning
3. Theoretical Significance: Ambiguity tolerance is closely related to foreign language learning success, yet there is insufficient understanding of ambiguity resolution mechanisms in multimodal contexts

Existing Limitations

• Lack of systematic research on how second language learners process ambiguity in multimodal contexts
• Insufficient quantitative analysis of how specific data features affect learning difficulty
• Unexplored capacity of AI systems in predicting human language learning performance

Research Motivation

Based on the "Zone of Proximal Development" (ZPD) theory and the concept of "desirable difficulty," this research aims to develop AI systems capable of dynamically orchestrating progressively challenging learning materials to support personalized foreign language learning.

Core Contributions

1. Novel Task Formulation: First systematic study of vocabulary meaning inference in multimodal contexts, simulating realistic foreign language learning scenarios
2. Feature Analysis Framework: Establishes a comprehensive analytical framework encompassing textual features, image features, and learner background characteristics
3. Human Experimental Data: Collects participant data across five languages (Spanish, French, German, Korean, Turkish)
4. AI Prediction Capability Assessment: First evaluation of AI systems' ability to predict human foreign language learning performance, identifying improvement directions
5. Strategy Identification: Identifies and categorizes primary reasoning strategies employed by learners

Methodology

Task Definition

Input: Image I and a target language sentence S containing a masked noun Output: Learner's English-language inference of the masked word's meaning Constraints: Learners cannot use translation tools; reasoning must be based on visual and sentential context

Experimental Design

First Study

• Data: 50 randomly selected image-text pairs (Spanish)
• Participants: 8 participants (7 Spanish beginners, 1 intermediate level)
• Task: Fill-in-the-blank task inferring masked noun meanings

Second Study

• Data: 10 carefully curated image-text pairs across 5 languages
• Participants: Approximately 50 participants with diverse linguistic backgrounds
• Enhanced Features:
  • Collection of participant language proficiency information (1-5 scale)
  • Requirement for participants to identify known vocabulary and explain reasoning processes
  • Romanized versions provided for Korean to assist pronunciation

Feature Extraction

Textual Features

1. Sentence Length: Number of words (hypothesis: longer sentences are more difficult to parse)
2. Target Word Position: Distance from sentence beginning/end
3. Noun Proportion: Ratio of nouns to total words in the sentence

Image Features

1. Object Count: Total number of objects in the image
2. Object Size and Position: Salience of the target object
3. Interactivity: Whether humans interact with objects
4. CLIP Similarity: Image-text matching scores from pretrained models

Participant Background Features

1. Target Language Proficiency: Self-rated on 1-5 scale
2. Related Language Proficiency Sum: Grouped by language families
3. Total Languages Known: Indicator of multilingual experience

Experimental Setup

Dataset

Uses the XM3600 dataset, a large-scale multilingual multimodal evaluation dataset containing descriptive image captions.

Evaluation Metrics

• Accuracy: Proportion of participants correctly inferring word meanings
• Correlation Analysis: Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients
• AI Prediction Accuracy: Accuracy of AI systems in predicting human performance

Comparative Methods

• Manual Annotation vs. Automatic Extraction: Comparing effects of human annotation and AI-extracted features
• Different AI Models: InternVL (vision-language model) vs. InternLM (language-only model)

Experimental Results

Main Findings

Feature Correlation Analysis

Significantly Correlated Features:

• Object Count: Significantly negatively correlated with success rate (r = -0.4012, p < 0.05)
• Sentence Length: Significantly negatively correlated with success rate (r = -0.4758, p < 0.05)
• Noun Proportion: Positively correlated with success rate (r = 0.2666, p < 0.10)

Non-Significant Features:

• Target object size and position
• CLIP similarity scores
• Target word position in sentence

Language Background Effects

Performance variations across languages:

• Spanish: Mean accuracy 7.1/10 (SD 1.8)
• Korean: Mean accuracy 6.6/10 (SD 2.3)
• German: Mean accuracy 6.4/10 (SD 2.1)
• French: Mean accuracy 6.2/10 (SD 1.5)
• Turkish: Mean accuracy 6.2/10 (SD 1.9)

Strategy Identification

Learners primarily employed four strategies:

1. Elimination Principle: Identifying known vocabulary and excluding corresponding objects
2. Grammatical Analysis: Utilizing grammatical structure to infer word class and relationships
3. Visual Analysis: Reasoning based on object salience and position
4. Lexical Similarity: Leveraging cross-linguistic similarity (including false cognates)

AI Prediction Capability Assessment

Best Configuration Performance

• InternLM + Text Description + Background Information + Strategy Summary: Mean accuracy 57.4%
• InternVL + Raw Image + Background Information + Strategy Summary: Mean accuracy 56.8%

Key Findings

1. Importance of Strategy Information: Adding strategy information improved accuracy by 16-32%
2. Text Description Superior to Direct Image: Using image text descriptions outperformed direct image input
3. Language Differences: Turkish was most difficult to predict; Spanish was easiest
4. AI-Human Discrepancy: AI systems' task difficulty rankings showed weak correlation with human performance (r = 0.529, p = 0.359)

Related Work

Multimodal Foreign Language Learning

• Multimodal learning improves memory consolidation through integrating visual, auditory, and kinesthetic inputs
• Effectiveness of film-assisted English language learning
• Referential uncertainty and mutual exclusivity strategies in children's vocabulary learning

Ambiguity Tolerance Research

• Strong correlation between ambiguity tolerance and foreign language learning success
• Role of ambiguity in classroom engagement and academic challenge response

AI-Assisted Language Learning

• Using AI tools to understand children's noun and verb learning
• Application of vision-language datasets in computer vision tasks

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Limited Feature Predictiveness: Only a few intuitive features (object count, sentence length) significantly correlate with reasoning success
2. Complexity of Language Background: Correlation between language proficiency and task performance varies by language
3. AI Prediction Challenges: Current AI systems have limited capacity to predict human performance, though strategy information significantly improves predictions
4. Strategy Diversity: Learners employ multiple reasoning strategies, with variations in usage frequency and effectiveness

Limitations

1. Sample Size: Relatively limited participant numbers may affect statistical significance
2. Language Coverage: Only five languages tested; lacks broader linguistic family representation
3. Task Simplification: Uses descriptive captions rather than natural social media text
4. AI Bias: Insufficient consideration of potential AI system biases

Future Directions

1. Feature Engineering: Develop more effective predictive features, particularly cognitive load-related metrics
2. Strategy Training: Design learning materials targeting specific reasoning strategies
3. Personalization Systems: Adaptive material recommendations based on learner background and ability
4. Cross-Linguistic Extension: Expansion to more languages and cultural backgrounds

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. High Innovation: First systematic study of ambiguity resolution in multimodal foreign language learning
2. Rigorous Methodology: Combines human experiments and AI analysis, providing multi-perspective insights
3. High Practical Value: Provides important reference for intelligent language learning system design
4. Interdisciplinary Integration: Synthesizes computer vision, natural language processing, and educational psychology

Weaknesses

1. Coarse Feature Engineering: Current features may be overly simplistic, insufficiently capturing cognitive complexity
2. Overlooked Cultural Factors: Does not consider cultural background effects on vocabulary reasoning
3. Missing Temporal Dynamics: Does not investigate dynamic changes during the learning process
4. Subjective Evaluation Standards: Some subjectivity in accuracy judgments

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Opens new directions for multimodal language learning research
2. Application Prospects: Can guide intelligent education systems and language learning application development
3. Methodological Value: Provides new paradigm for human-machine collaborative research on language learning

Applicable Scenarios

1. Intelligent Educational Platforms: Personalized foreign language learning material recommendations
2. Language Assessment Systems: Automated language proficiency testing
3. Cognitive Science Research: Investigation of multimodal information processing mechanisms
4. Cross-Cultural Communication Training: Enhancing ambiguity tolerance training

References

The paper cites 72 relevant references spanning foreign language education, multimodal learning, computer vision, natural language processing, and other important research domains, providing solid theoretical foundation and technical support for this research.

Overall Assessment: This is an innovative interdisciplinary research project with significant scholarly merit, offering new perspectives and methodologies for understanding and improving multimodal foreign language learning. Despite certain limitations, its pioneering research approach and practical value make it an important contribution to the field.