We derive a numerical approximation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact surfaces embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with an axial symmetry. To do so we use a noncommutative Laplace operator defined on the space of finite dimensional hermitian matrices. This operator is derived from a foliation of the surface obtained under an $S^1$-action on the surface. We present numerical results in the case of the sphere and a generic ellipsoid.
Noncommutative Laplacian and numerical approximation of Laplace-Beltrami spectrum of compact Riemann surfaces Paper ID : 2510.09909Title : Noncommutative Laplacian and numerical approximation of Laplace-Beltrami spectrum of compact Riemann surfacesAuthors : Damien Tageddine, Jean-Christophe Nave (McGill University)Classification : math.NA cs.NAPublication Date : October 10, 2025Paper Link : https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09909 This paper derives a numerical approximation method for the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact surfaces with axial symmetry embedded in R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 . The authors employ a noncommutative Laplacian operator defined on finite-dimensional Hermitian matrix spaces to achieve this goal. This operator originates from the foliation structure acquired by the surface under S 1 S^1 S 1 -action. Numerical results are presented for spheres and general ellipsoids.
The fundamental problem addressed in this research is how to numerically approximate the spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact Riemann surfaces:
Δ g f = λ f \Delta_g f = \lambda f Δ g f = λ f
Central issue in spectral geometry : The spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator is deeply related to surface geometry and constitutes a core problem in spectral geometry and numerical analysisBroad applications : Important applications in mathematical physics, geometric processing, shape analysis, and other fieldsComputational challenges : Closed-form solutions exist only for simple geometries such as spheres and flat tori; numerical methods are needed for general casesFinite element methods : Depend on mesh quality and require weak formulation solutionsClosest point methods : Require embedding in high-dimensional Euclidean spacesPoint cloud methods : Such as meshfree Laplace-Beltrami or diffusion maps, with limited accuracyThe authors propose using a framework based on noncommutative geometry and matrix regularization, providing a structure-preserving discretization scheme by replacing infinite-dimensional function algebras with sequences of finite-dimensional matrix algebras.
Theoretical framework : Establishes quantization mapping theory from commutative Poisson algebras to noncommutative matrix algebrasNoncommutative Laplacian operator : Constructs a discrete Laplacian operator based on matrix commutatorsConvergence theorem : Proves that eigenmatrices of the noncommutative Laplacian converge to eigenfunctions of the classical Laplace-Beltrami operatorNumerical verification : Validates the method's effectiveness on spheres and ellipsoidsGiven a compact orientable connected Riemann surface ( Σ , g ) (\Sigma, g) ( Σ , g ) with S 1 S^1 S 1 axial symmetry embedded in R 3 \mathbb{R}^3 R 3 , find a numerical approximation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator Δ g \Delta_g Δ g and its spectrum.
For a surface Σ \Sigma Σ with local coordinates ( u 1 , u 2 ) (u_1, u_2) ( u 1 , u 2 ) , define the Poisson bracket:
{ f , g } = 1 ∣ g ∣ ( ∂ f ∂ u 1 ∂ h ∂ u 2 − ∂ h ∂ u 1 ∂ f ∂ u 2 ) \{f, g\} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u_1}\frac{\partial h}{\partial u_2} - \frac{\partial h}{\partial u_1}\frac{\partial f}{\partial u_2}\right) { f , g } = ∣ g ∣ 1 ( ∂ u 1 ∂ f ∂ u 2 ∂ h − ∂ u 1 ∂ h ∂ u 2 ∂ f )
The Laplace-Beltrami operator can be expressed as:
Δ g f = ∑ i = 1 3 1 ∣ g ∣ { x i , 1 ∣ g ∣ { x i , f } } \Delta_g f = \sum_{i=1}^3 \frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\left\{x^i, \frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\{x^i, f\}\right\} Δ g f = ∑ i = 1 3 ∣ g ∣ 1 { x i , ∣ g ∣ 1 { x i , f } }
For surfaces with S 1 S^1 S 1 axial symmetry, the projection map p : R 3 → R p: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R} p : R 3 → R , p ( x , y , z ) = z p(x,y,z) = z p ( x , y , z ) = z restricted to Σ \Sigma Σ defines a foliation:
ϕ − 1 ( λ ) = { s ∈ Σ : ϕ ( s ) = λ } \phi^{-1}(\lambda) = \{s \in \Sigma : \phi(s) = \lambda\} ϕ − 1 ( λ ) = { s ∈ Σ : ϕ ( s ) = λ }
Each regular level set ϕ − 1 ( λ ) \phi^{-1}(\lambda) ϕ − 1 ( λ ) is a 1-dimensional compact submanifold, isomorphic to ∐ n S 1 \coprod_n S^1 ∐ n S 1 .
Define a linear map T N : C ∞ ( Σ ) → M N ( C ) T_N: C^{\infty}(\Sigma) \to M_N(\mathbb{C}) T N : C ∞ ( Σ ) → M N ( C ) :
T N ( f ) = ∑ n , m = 1 N f n − m ( z ( n , m ) ) E n , m T_N(f) = \sum_{n,m=1}^N f_{n-m}(z_{(n,m)})E_{n,m} T N ( f ) = ∑ n , m = 1 N f n − m ( z ( n , m ) ) E n , m
where:
f n − m ( z ) f_{n-m}(z) f n − m ( z ) are Fourier coefficients of function f f f on the leaf ϕ − 1 ( z ) \phi^{-1}(z) ϕ − 1 ( z ) z ( n , m ) = a + ( b − a ) β 2 N ( n + m ) z_{(n,m)} = a + \frac{(b-a)\beta}{2N}(n+m) z ( n , m ) = a + 2 N ( b − a ) β ( n + m ) E n , m E_{n,m} E n , m are standard matrix basis elementsℏ N = ( b − a ) β N \hbar_N = \frac{(b-a)\beta}{N} ℏ N = N ( b − a ) β is the quantization parameterThis quantization map satisfies three fundamental properties of matrix regularization:
Boundedness : lim α → ∞ ∥ T α ( f ) ∥ < ∞ \lim_{\alpha \to \infty} \|T_\alpha(f)\| < \infty lim α → ∞ ∥ T α ( f ) ∥ < ∞ Product approximation : lim α → ∞ ∥ T α ( f ) T α ( g ) − T α ( f g ) ∥ = 0 \lim_{\alpha \to \infty} \|T_\alpha(f)T_\alpha(g) - T_\alpha(fg)\| = 0 lim α → ∞ ∥ T α ( f ) T α ( g ) − T α ( f g ) ∥ = 0 Poisson bracket approximation : lim α → ∞ ∥ 1 i ℏ α [ T α ( f ) , T α ( g ) ] − T α ( { f , g } ) ∥ = 0 \lim_{\alpha \to \infty} \left\|\frac{1}{i\hbar_\alpha}[T_\alpha(f), T_\alpha(g)] - T_\alpha(\{f,g\})\right\| = 0 lim α → ∞ i ℏ α 1 [ T α ( f ) , T α ( g )] − T α ({ f , g }) = 0 The noncommutative Laplacian operator is defined as:
Δ N = − 1 ℏ 2 γ N − 1 [ X i , γ N − 1 [ X i , ⋅ ] ] \Delta_N = -\frac{1}{\hbar^2}\gamma_N^{-1}[X^i, \gamma_N^{-1}[X^i, \cdot]] Δ N = − ℏ 2 1 γ N − 1 [ X i , γ N − 1 [ X i , ⋅ ]]
where:
X i = T N ( x i ) X^i = T_N(x^i) X i = T N ( x i ) are quantized coordinate functionsγ N = ∑ i > j − ( [ X i , X j ] ℏ ) 2 \gamma_N = \sqrt{\sum_{i>j} -\left(\frac{[X^i, X^j]}{\hbar}\right)^2} γ N = ∑ i > j − ( ℏ [ X i , X j ] ) 2 is the square root of the quantized metric determinantFor local parametrization of the unit sphere:
x ( z , ϕ ) = 1 − z 2 cos ( ϕ ) , y ( z , ϕ ) = 1 − z 2 sin ( ϕ ) x(z,\phi) = \sqrt{1-z^2}\cos(\phi), \quad y(z,\phi) = \sqrt{1-z^2}\sin(\phi) x ( z , ϕ ) = 1 − z 2 cos ( ϕ ) , y ( z , ϕ ) = 1 − z 2 sin ( ϕ )
The quantized coordinate matrices are:
T N ( x ) = 1 2 1 − z ( n , n + 1 ) 2 E n , n + 1 + 1 2 1 − z ( n + 1 , n ) 2 E n + 1 , n T_N(x) = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-z_{(n,n+1)}^2}E_{n,n+1} + \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-z_{(n+1,n)}^2}E_{n+1,n} T N ( x ) = 2 1 1 − z ( n , n + 1 ) 2 E n , n + 1 + 2 1 1 − z ( n + 1 , n ) 2 E n + 1 , n T N ( y ) = 1 2 i 1 − z ( n , n + 1 ) 2 E n , n + 1 − 1 2 i 1 − z ( n + 1 , n ) 2 E n + 1 , n T_N(y) = \frac{1}{2i}\sqrt{1-z_{(n,n+1)}^2}E_{n,n+1} - \frac{1}{2i}\sqrt{1-z_{(n+1,n)}^2}E_{n+1,n} T N ( y ) = 2 i 1 1 − z ( n , n + 1 ) 2 E n , n + 1 − 2 i 1 1 − z ( n + 1 , n ) 2 E n + 1 , n T N ( z ) = z ( n , n ) E n , n T_N(z) = z_{(n,n)}E_{n,n} T N ( z ) = z ( n , n ) E n , n
Structure-preserving discretization : Maintains original algebraic structure through matrix algebraGeometric invariance : Naturally preserves symmetries such as rotational invarianceMeshfree method : Independent of triangulation, avoiding mesh quality issuesOperator-theoretic framework : Based on rigorous mathematics, guaranteeing convergenceUnit sphere : With known analytical eigenvalues λ k = k ( k + 1 ) \lambda_k = k(k+1) λ k = k ( k + 1 ) Ellipsoid : Equation x 2 a 2 + y 2 b 2 + z 2 c 2 = 1 \frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1 a 2 x 2 + b 2 y 2 + c 2 z 2 = 1 Embedded torus : As an example of higher genus surfacesNumerical accuracy of eigenvalues Relative error compared to analytical solutions Convergence rate analysis Quantization parameter: ℏ = 0.001 \hbar = 0.001 ℏ = 0.001 Matrix dimension: N = 64 N = 64 N = 64 Parameter β \beta β determined by surface volume: β = vol g ( Σ ) 2 π ( b − a ) \beta = \frac{\text{vol}_g(\Sigma)}{2\pi(b-a)} β = 2 π ( b − a ) vol g ( Σ ) Comparison of theoretical eigenvalues with numerical results for the sphere:
n Analytical Eigenvalue Numerical Eigenvalue (ℏ = 0.001 \hbar = 0.001 ℏ = 0.001 ) 0 0 − 1.903 × 10 − 12 -1.903 \times 10^{-12} − 1.903 × 1 0 − 12 1 2 − 2.000012087392884 -2.000012087392884 − 2.000012087392884 2 6 − 6.000039448443108 -6.000039448443108 − 6.000039448443108
Results show numerical errors on the order of ℏ \hbar ℏ , verifying theoretical convergence.
Comparison with approximate analytical values from literature for the ellipsoid:
Analytical Eigenvalue Numerical Eigenvalue (ℏ = 0.001 \hbar = 0.001 ℏ = 0.001 ) 0 − 1.903 × 10 − 12 -1.903 \times 10^{-12} − 1.903 × 1 0 − 12 9.4963551264 − 9.497207579877351 -9.497207579877351 − 9.497207579877351 32.9870647190 − 32.99092636681126 -32.99092636681126 − 32.99092636681126 70.0448683054 − 70.02397573246742 -70.02397573246742 − 70.02397573246742
Convergence verification : Numerical eigenvalues converge to theoretical values as matrix dimension increasesGeometric adaptability : Method maintains stability across different geometric shapesSymmetry preservation : Rotational invariance of the sphere is preserved at the discrete levelFinite element methods : Dziuk and Elliott's finite element methods for surface PDEsClosest point methods : Macdonald and Ruuth's embedding methodsQuantization methods : Berezin-Toeplitz quantization, fuzzy geometry approachesTheoretical rigor : Based on rigorous quantization theoryStructure preservation : Maintains original geometric and algebraic structuresComputational efficiency : Avoids mesh-dependency issuesEstablishes noncommutative discretization theory for the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact Riemann surfaces Proves that eigenmatrices of the noncommutative Laplacian converge to classical eigenfunctions Numerical experiments verify method effectiveness on spheres and ellipsoids Symmetry requirements : Current method requires surfaces with S 1 S^1 S 1 axial symmetryHigher genus extension : Extension to more complex topological structures requires further researchComputational complexity : Eigenvalue computation for large matrices remains challengingExtension to higher genus Riemann surfaces Applications to time-dependent partial differential equations Deeper investigation of connections with Berezin-Toeplitz quantization Applications in computational geometry and computer graphics Theoretical innovation : Introduces noncommutative geometry into numerical analysis, providing new theoretical perspectivesMathematical rigor : Complete convergence proofs and theoretical analysisMethod generality : Framework extensible to broader geometric settingsExperimental validation : Sufficient numerical experiments support theoretical resultsLimited application scope : Currently applicable only to surfaces with specific symmetriesInsufficient computational efficiency analysis : Lacks detailed computational complexity comparison with existing methodsHigher-dimensional extensibility : Extension of method to higher-dimensional manifolds unclearAcademic contribution : Provides new theoretical tools for numerical methods in spectral geometryInterdisciplinary value : Connects differential geometry, noncommutative geometry, and numerical analysisPractical potential : Applications in shape analysis, computational physics, and related fieldsSpectral analysis of axially symmetric surfaces Geometric computation independent of mesh quality Numerical computation requiring preservation of geometric symmetries Numerical research in quantum geometry and string theory The paper cites 37 relevant references covering multiple domains including noncommutative geometry, spectral geometry, numerical analysis, and quantization theory, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.