2025-11-10T02:41:59.119846

Noncommutative Laplacian and numerical approximation of Laplace-Beltrami spectrum of compact Riemann surfaces

Tageddine, Nave
We derive a numerical approximation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact surfaces embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with an axial symmetry. To do so we use a noncommutative Laplace operator defined on the space of finite dimensional hermitian matrices. This operator is derived from a foliation of the surface obtained under an $S^1$-action on the surface. We present numerical results in the case of the sphere and a generic ellipsoid.
academic

Noncommutative Laplacian and numerical approximation of Laplace-Beltrami spectrum of compact Riemann surfaces

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.09909
  • Title: Noncommutative Laplacian and numerical approximation of Laplace-Beltrami spectrum of compact Riemann surfaces
  • Authors: Damien Tageddine, Jean-Christophe Nave (McGill University)
  • Classification: math.NA cs.NA
  • Publication Date: October 10, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09909

Abstract

This paper derives a numerical approximation method for the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact surfaces with axial symmetry embedded in R3\mathbb{R}^3. The authors employ a noncommutative Laplacian operator defined on finite-dimensional Hermitian matrix spaces to achieve this goal. This operator originates from the foliation structure acquired by the surface under S1S^1-action. Numerical results are presented for spheres and general ellipsoids.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The fundamental problem addressed in this research is how to numerically approximate the spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact Riemann surfaces: Δgf=λf\Delta_g f = \lambda f

Problem Significance

  1. Central issue in spectral geometry: The spectrum of the Laplace-Beltrami operator is deeply related to surface geometry and constitutes a core problem in spectral geometry and numerical analysis
  2. Broad applications: Important applications in mathematical physics, geometric processing, shape analysis, and other fields
  3. Computational challenges: Closed-form solutions exist only for simple geometries such as spheres and flat tori; numerical methods are needed for general cases

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Finite element methods: Depend on mesh quality and require weak formulation solutions
  2. Closest point methods: Require embedding in high-dimensional Euclidean spaces
  3. Point cloud methods: Such as meshfree Laplace-Beltrami or diffusion maps, with limited accuracy

Research Motivation

The authors propose using a framework based on noncommutative geometry and matrix regularization, providing a structure-preserving discretization scheme by replacing infinite-dimensional function algebras with sequences of finite-dimensional matrix algebras.

Core Contributions

  1. Theoretical framework: Establishes quantization mapping theory from commutative Poisson algebras to noncommutative matrix algebras
  2. Noncommutative Laplacian operator: Constructs a discrete Laplacian operator based on matrix commutators
  3. Convergence theorem: Proves that eigenmatrices of the noncommutative Laplacian converge to eigenfunctions of the classical Laplace-Beltrami operator
  4. Numerical verification: Validates the method's effectiveness on spheres and ellipsoids

Methodology Details

Problem Formulation

Given a compact orientable connected Riemann surface (Σ,g)(\Sigma, g) with S1S^1 axial symmetry embedded in R3\mathbb{R}^3, find a numerical approximation of the Laplace-Beltrami operator Δg\Delta_g and its spectrum.

Theoretical Foundation

Poisson Algebra and Foliation Structure

For a surface Σ\Sigma with local coordinates (u1,u2)(u_1, u_2), define the Poisson bracket: {f,g}=1g(fu1hu2hu1fu2)\{f, g\} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial u_1}\frac{\partial h}{\partial u_2} - \frac{\partial h}{\partial u_1}\frac{\partial f}{\partial u_2}\right)

The Laplace-Beltrami operator can be expressed as: Δgf=i=131g{xi,1g{xi,f}}\Delta_g f = \sum_{i=1}^3 \frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\left\{x^i, \frac{1}{\sqrt{|g|}}\{x^i, f\}\right\}

S1S^1-Action and Foliation Structure

For surfaces with S1S^1 axial symmetry, the projection map p:R3Rp: \mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathbb{R}, p(x,y,z)=zp(x,y,z) = z restricted to Σ\Sigma defines a foliation: ϕ1(λ)={sΣ:ϕ(s)=λ}\phi^{-1}(\lambda) = \{s \in \Sigma : \phi(s) = \lambda\}

Each regular level set ϕ1(λ)\phi^{-1}(\lambda) is a 1-dimensional compact submanifold, isomorphic to nS1\coprod_n S^1.

Matrix Quantization

Quantization Map Definition

Define a linear map TN:C(Σ)MN(C)T_N: C^{\infty}(\Sigma) \to M_N(\mathbb{C}): TN(f)=n,m=1Nfnm(z(n,m))En,mT_N(f) = \sum_{n,m=1}^N f_{n-m}(z_{(n,m)})E_{n,m}

where:

  • fnm(z)f_{n-m}(z) are Fourier coefficients of function ff on the leaf ϕ1(z)\phi^{-1}(z)
  • z(n,m)=a+(ba)β2N(n+m)z_{(n,m)} = a + \frac{(b-a)\beta}{2N}(n+m)
  • En,mE_{n,m} are standard matrix basis elements
  • N=(ba)βN\hbar_N = \frac{(b-a)\beta}{N} is the quantization parameter

Quantization Properties

This quantization map satisfies three fundamental properties of matrix regularization:

  1. Boundedness: limαTα(f)<\lim_{\alpha \to \infty} \|T_\alpha(f)\| < \infty
  2. Product approximation: limαTα(f)Tα(g)Tα(fg)=0\lim_{\alpha \to \infty} \|T_\alpha(f)T_\alpha(g) - T_\alpha(fg)\| = 0
  3. Poisson bracket approximation: limα1iα[Tα(f),Tα(g)]Tα({f,g})=0\lim_{\alpha \to \infty} \left\|\frac{1}{i\hbar_\alpha}[T_\alpha(f), T_\alpha(g)] - T_\alpha(\{f,g\})\right\| = 0

Noncommutative Laplacian Operator

Operator Construction

The noncommutative Laplacian operator is defined as: ΔN=12γN1[Xi,γN1[Xi,]]\Delta_N = -\frac{1}{\hbar^2}\gamma_N^{-1}[X^i, \gamma_N^{-1}[X^i, \cdot]]

where:

  • Xi=TN(xi)X^i = T_N(x^i) are quantized coordinate functions
  • γN=i>j([Xi,Xj])2\gamma_N = \sqrt{\sum_{i>j} -\left(\frac{[X^i, X^j]}{\hbar}\right)^2} is the square root of the quantized metric determinant

Specific Implementation for Spheres

For local parametrization of the unit sphere: x(z,ϕ)=1z2cos(ϕ),y(z,ϕ)=1z2sin(ϕ)x(z,\phi) = \sqrt{1-z^2}\cos(\phi), \quad y(z,\phi) = \sqrt{1-z^2}\sin(\phi)

The quantized coordinate matrices are: TN(x)=121z(n,n+1)2En,n+1+121z(n+1,n)2En+1,nT_N(x) = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-z_{(n,n+1)}^2}E_{n,n+1} + \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-z_{(n+1,n)}^2}E_{n+1,n}TN(y)=12i1z(n,n+1)2En,n+112i1z(n+1,n)2En+1,nT_N(y) = \frac{1}{2i}\sqrt{1-z_{(n,n+1)}^2}E_{n,n+1} - \frac{1}{2i}\sqrt{1-z_{(n+1,n)}^2}E_{n+1,n}TN(z)=z(n,n)En,nT_N(z) = z_{(n,n)}E_{n,n}

Technical Innovations

  1. Structure-preserving discretization: Maintains original algebraic structure through matrix algebra
  2. Geometric invariance: Naturally preserves symmetries such as rotational invariance
  3. Meshfree method: Independent of triangulation, avoiding mesh quality issues
  4. Operator-theoretic framework: Based on rigorous mathematics, guaranteeing convergence

Experimental Setup

Test Geometries

  1. Unit sphere: With known analytical eigenvalues λk=k(k+1)\lambda_k = k(k+1)
  2. Ellipsoid: Equation x2a2+y2b2+z2c2=1\frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1
  3. Embedded torus: As an example of higher genus surfaces

Evaluation Metrics

  • Numerical accuracy of eigenvalues
  • Relative error compared to analytical solutions
  • Convergence rate analysis

Implementation Details

  • Quantization parameter: =0.001\hbar = 0.001
  • Matrix dimension: N=64N = 64
  • Parameter β\beta determined by surface volume: β=volg(Σ)2π(ba)\beta = \frac{\text{vol}_g(\Sigma)}{2\pi(b-a)}

Experimental Results

Sphere Results

Comparison of theoretical eigenvalues with numerical results for the sphere:

nAnalytical EigenvalueNumerical Eigenvalue (=0.001\hbar = 0.001)
001.903×1012-1.903 \times 10^{-12}
122.000012087392884-2.000012087392884
266.000039448443108-6.000039448443108

Results show numerical errors on the order of \hbar, verifying theoretical convergence.

Ellipsoid Results

Comparison with approximate analytical values from literature for the ellipsoid:

Analytical EigenvalueNumerical Eigenvalue (=0.001\hbar = 0.001)
01.903×1012-1.903 \times 10^{-12}
9.49635512649.497207579877351-9.497207579877351
32.987064719032.99092636681126-32.99092636681126
70.044868305470.02397573246742-70.02397573246742

Experimental Findings

  1. Convergence verification: Numerical eigenvalues converge to theoretical values as matrix dimension increases
  2. Geometric adaptability: Method maintains stability across different geometric shapes
  3. Symmetry preservation: Rotational invariance of the sphere is preserved at the discrete level

Main Research Directions

  1. Finite element methods: Dziuk and Elliott's finite element methods for surface PDEs
  2. Closest point methods: Macdonald and Ruuth's embedding methods
  3. Quantization methods: Berezin-Toeplitz quantization, fuzzy geometry approaches

Advantages of This Work

  1. Theoretical rigor: Based on rigorous quantization theory
  2. Structure preservation: Maintains original geometric and algebraic structures
  3. Computational efficiency: Avoids mesh-dependency issues

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Establishes noncommutative discretization theory for the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact Riemann surfaces
  2. Proves that eigenmatrices of the noncommutative Laplacian converge to classical eigenfunctions
  3. Numerical experiments verify method effectiveness on spheres and ellipsoids

Limitations

  1. Symmetry requirements: Current method requires surfaces with S1S^1 axial symmetry
  2. Higher genus extension: Extension to more complex topological structures requires further research
  3. Computational complexity: Eigenvalue computation for large matrices remains challenging

Future Directions

  1. Extension to higher genus Riemann surfaces
  2. Applications to time-dependent partial differential equations
  3. Deeper investigation of connections with Berezin-Toeplitz quantization
  4. Applications in computational geometry and computer graphics

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical innovation: Introduces noncommutative geometry into numerical analysis, providing new theoretical perspectives
  2. Mathematical rigor: Complete convergence proofs and theoretical analysis
  3. Method generality: Framework extensible to broader geometric settings
  4. Experimental validation: Sufficient numerical experiments support theoretical results

Weaknesses

  1. Limited application scope: Currently applicable only to surfaces with specific symmetries
  2. Insufficient computational efficiency analysis: Lacks detailed computational complexity comparison with existing methods
  3. Higher-dimensional extensibility: Extension of method to higher-dimensional manifolds unclear

Impact

  1. Academic contribution: Provides new theoretical tools for numerical methods in spectral geometry
  2. Interdisciplinary value: Connects differential geometry, noncommutative geometry, and numerical analysis
  3. Practical potential: Applications in shape analysis, computational physics, and related fields

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Spectral analysis of axially symmetric surfaces
  2. Geometric computation independent of mesh quality
  3. Numerical computation requiring preservation of geometric symmetries
  4. Numerical research in quantum geometry and string theory

References

The paper cites 37 relevant references covering multiple domains including noncommutative geometry, spectral geometry, numerical analysis, and quantization theory, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.