Denoising Diffusion as a New Framework for Underwater Images

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09934
• Title: Denoising Diffusion as a New Framework for Underwater Images
• Authors: Nilesh Jain (University of Witwatersrand), Elie Alhajjar (RAND Corporation)
• Classification: cs.CV cs.AI
• Publication Date: October 11, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09934

Abstract

This paper addresses the critical role of underwater images in marine research and ocean environmental monitoring by proposing a novel framework based on denoising diffusion models to tackle underwater image quality issues. Traditional underwater images suffer from low visibility, blurred textures, color distortion, and noise. While existing image enhancement methods are effective, they have limitations including poor generalization capability and heavy dependence on clean datasets. The authors propose using denoising diffusion models to expand datasets containing diverse image types including stereoscopic, wide-angle, macro, and close-up images, combined with ControlNet technology to improve image quality and enhance marine ecosystem research.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

Underwater images face multiple quality challenges:

1. Physical Environmental Constraints: Color distortion, background and lighting noise, contrast issues, blur, object occlusion, poor illumination conditions
2. Dataset Limitations: Lack of diversity, low image quality, predominantly monocular images, limiting representation across different lighting conditions and viewing angles
3. Method Limitations: Existing enhancement methods have poor generalization capability and heavy reliance on clean datasets

Significance and Impact

• Scientific Research Value: High-quality underwater images are crucial for understanding and protecting marine ecosystems
• Environmental Protection Significance: Marine ecosystems are vital components of climate regulation and ocean conservation
• Practical Application Demands: Fields such as marine archaeology, species tracking, migration pattern research, and geological surveys urgently require high-quality images

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Traditional Methods: Dehazing methods are unreliable for stereoscopic or wide-angle images
2. GAN Methods: Depend on training with synthetically distorted images, with limited generalization performance
3. CNN Methods: Data-hungry, requiring large quantities of clean enhanced datasets
4. Resource Consumption: Acquiring and processing real underwater datasets requires substantial human and computational resources

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a Novel Multi-faceted Denoising Diffusion Pipeline: A comprehensive framework combining Stable Diffusion v2.0 and ControlNet
2. Three-Module Integration Scheme: Image enhancement and artifact removal, inpainting, and data augmentation
3. Multi-type Image Support: Capable of processing monocular, stereoscopic, wide-angle, macro, and close-up images
4. Targeted Solutions: Specifically addresses noise, lighting artifacts, color contrast, haze, color distortion, and clarity issues in underwater images

Methodology

Task Definition

Input: Low-quality underwater images (containing noise, color distortion, lighting issues, etc.) Output: Enhanced high-quality underwater images Constraints: Maintain image authenticity and biological accuracy, support multiple image types

Model Architecture

Overall Framework

Based on Stable Diffusion v2.0 latent diffusion model combined with ControlNet for conditional control, constituting three sub-modules:

1. Image Enhancement and Artifact Removal Module

• Core Technology: Leverages the inherent illumination enhancement characteristics of denoising diffusion models
• ControlNet Integration: Uses depth maps and stable diffusion techniques to enhance lighting and remove objects
• Prompt Engineering: Predefined prompts for removing shadows, light reflections, contrast issues, etc.
• Noise Processing: Uses noise maps as the starting point for denoising diffusion models to remove non-Gaussian noise

2. Inpainting Module

• Functionality: Edits specific image regions, filling missing information or repairing damaged sections
• Applications: Handles occluded objects and artifacts, improving existing images under constraints
• Technical Advantages: Combines ControlNet with inpainting techniques to create clean and accurate images

3. Data Augmentation Module

• Innovation: Uses real images rather than generating synthetic images from scratch
• Diversity Generation: Generates diverse samples with different lighting conditions, angles, etc., through parameter adjustment
• Training Support: Provides rich data for training robust deep learning models

Technical Innovations

1. Diffusion Model Advantages: Superior image quality and stability compared to GANs
2. ControlNet Conditional Control: Provides precise image preprocessing control capabilities
3. Multi-modal Support: Overcomes the limitation of existing methods primarily targeting monocular images
4. End-to-End Processing: Integrates enhancement, inpainting, and augmentation functions within a unified framework

Experimental Setup

Datasets

The paper mentions using the WaterGAN dataset as a foundation, but lacks detailed descriptions of specific experimental dataset configurations, scale, and preprocessing methods.

Evaluation Metrics

The paper does not explicitly specify concrete quantitative evaluation metrics, which represents a notable deficiency.

Comparison Methods

Related methods mentioned in the paper include:

• WaterGAN-related methods
• Traditional dehazing methods
• CNN-based methods
• Hybrid deep learning and statistical analysis methods

Implementation Details

The paper lacks detailed implementation specifics such as hyperparameter settings, training strategies, and computational resource requirements.

Experimental Results

Important Limitation: The paper provides no concrete experimental results, quantitative analysis, or comparative experimental data. This represents one of the paper's most significant shortcomings.

Expected Performance

According to the paper's description, the proposed method is expected to:

1. Significantly improve visibility and clarity of underwater images
2. Effectively remove color distortion and noise
3. Support processing of multiple image types
4. Generate high-quality training data

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Traditional Image Enhancement: Color correction, dehazing, contrast enhancement
2. Deep Learning Methods: CNN, GAN, attention mechanisms
3. Synthetic Data Generation: Model-based simulation, data augmentation techniques
4. Domain-Specific Applications: Marine species recognition, object detection

Technical Evolution

• Early Methods: Physics-based traditional image processing
• GAN Era: CycleGAN, WaterGAN, and other generative adversarial networks
• Diffusion Models: Latest generative model technology, surpassing GANs in image quality

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Proposes a novel framework for underwater image processing based on denoising diffusion models
2. Integrates three major functionalities: image enhancement, inpainting, and data augmentation
3. Supports processing of multiple underwater image types
4. Promises to significantly improve image quality for marine ecosystem research

Limitations

1. Lack of Experimental Validation: The paper provides no quantitative experimental results
2. Insufficient Method Details: Lacks detailed technical implementation specifics
3. Unknown Computational Complexity: Does not analyze computational cost and efficiency
4. Unverified Generalization: Lacks cross-domain and cross-environment validation

Future Directions

1. Deep marine species tracking and exploration
2. Marine archaeology application expansion
3. Geological survey and resource exploration
4. Robust deep learning model development

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Clear Problem Definition: Accurately identifies core challenges in underwater image processing
2. Method Innovation: First systematic application of denoising diffusion models to underwater image processing
3. Framework Completeness: Provides a comprehensive solution from enhancement to data augmentation
4. High Application Value: Significant importance for marine science research
5. Technical Foresight: Adopts cutting-edge diffusion model technology

Weaknesses

1. Missing Experiments: This is the paper's most serious issue, completely lacking experimental validation
2. Insufficient Technical Details: Method description is too high-level, lacking reproducible technical specifics
3. Missing Evaluation Framework: No appropriate evaluation metrics and benchmarks established
4. Insufficient Comparative Analysis: Lacks quantitative comparisons with existing methods
5. Writing Quality: Contains some issues with missing author information

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides a new technical pathway for underwater image processing
2. Practical Potential: Broad application prospects in marine science
3. Technology Advancement: May promote development of diffusion model applications in specific domains
4. Limitations: Short-term impact limited due to lack of experimental validation

Applicable Scenarios

1. Marine Biology Research: Species identification, behavior analysis, ecological monitoring
2. Marine Archaeology: Underwater artifact discovery and documentation
3. Marine Engineering: Underwater equipment inspection, seafloor topography measurement
4. Environmental Protection: Ocean pollution monitoring, coral reef health assessment

References

The paper cites 28 relevant references covering multiple domains including underwater image processing, generative adversarial networks, and diffusion models, including:

• Diffusion Model Foundations: Stable Diffusion, ControlNet, and other core technologies
• Underwater Image Processing: WaterGAN, traditional dehazing methods, etc.
• Deep Learning Applications: CNN applications in marine species recognition
• Data Augmentation Techniques: Generative model-based data augmentation methods

Overall Assessment: This paper presents an innovative idea applying cutting-edge diffusion model technology to the important field of underwater image processing. However, the lack of experimental validation is its most significant shortcoming, making it read more like a technical proposal than a complete research work. The authors are encouraged to supplement detailed experimental validation, quantitative analysis, and comparisons with existing methods in subsequent work to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.