Homomorphic Mappings for Value-Preserving State Aggregation in Markov Decision Processes

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.09965
• Title: Homomorphic Mappings for Value-Preserving State Aggregation in Markov Decision Processes
• Authors: Shuo Zhao, Yongqiang Li, Yu Feng, Zhongsheng Hou, Yuanjing Feng
• Classification: cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09965

Abstract

This paper proposes an abstraction framework based on homomorphic mappings to address the state aggregation problem in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). The framework defines homomorphism by establishing linear relationships between value functions across two Markov chains, thereby reducing computational complexity while preserving optimal policy equivalence. The paper introduces two algorithms, HPG and EBHPG, which provide theoretical guarantees when sufficient conditions are satisfied and not satisfied, respectively, with experimental validation of the theoretical results.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

As MDPs are increasingly applied to complex real-world problems, the computational complexity arising from large-scale state spaces has become increasingly prominent. State aggregation serves as a key strategy to reduce computational costs by compressing the state space; however, the core challenge lies in ensuring that policies optimized in the abstract space remain optimal in the original MDP.

Research Significance

1. Computational Efficiency: Solution complexity for large-scale MDPs grows exponentially with state space size
2. Practical Applications: Urgent demands from multi-agent coordination, visual representation learning, operational systems, and other domains
3. Theoretical Importance: Lack of systematic theoretical analysis tools for optimal policy equivalence

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Feature-based Methods: Require substantial computational resources, particularly in high-dimensional settings
2. Value-based Aggregation: While focusing on minimizing value function errors, they lack theoretical tools for optimal policy equivalence
3. Homomorphic MDP Theory: Requires abstract MDPs to completely preserve reward and transition dynamics of the original MDP, imposing overly strict conditions

Core Contributions

1. Proposes Homomorphic Markov Chain Framework: Establishes a more relaxed theoretical framework than traditional homomorphic MDPs, requiring only linear relationships between value functions
2. Establishes Sufficient Conditions for Optimal Policy Equivalence: Proves that optimal policy equivalence holds when the row space of the encoding matrix contains the span of fundamental transition vectors
3. Develops HPG Algorithm: A policy gradient algorithm that guarantees optimal policy equivalence when sufficient conditions are satisfied
4. Designs EBHPG Algorithm: An extended algorithm handling cases where sufficient conditions are not satisfied, providing performance lower bound guarantees
5. Provides Error Bound Analysis: Derives approximation error upper bounds and objective function performance lower bounds

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given an infinite-horizon MDP $M_S = (S,A,P_{SA},\gamma,r)$, the objective is to find an encoding matrix $P_\nu$ and abstract state space $U$ such that policies optimized in the abstract space remain optimal in the original MDP.

Core Theoretical Framework

Homomorphic Markov Chain Definition

Definition 1: Given a base Markov chain $M^\pi_S$ induced by policy $\pi$ and an abstract Markov chain $M^\mu_U$, $M^\mu_U$ is called a homomorphic Markov chain of $M^\pi_S$ if the following conditions hold:

$P^\mu_U P_\nu = P_\nu P^\pi_S$$R^{\pi,\nu}_U = P_\nu R^\pi_S$

where $P_\nu \in \mathbb{R}^{|U| \times |S|}$ is the encoding matrix.

Linear Relationship of Value Functions

Theorem 1: If $M^\mu_U$ is a homomorphic Markov chain of $M^\pi_S$, then their value functions satisfy a linear relationship: $V^\mu_U = P_\nu V^\pi_S$

Existence Conditions for Homomorphic Mappings

Theorem 3: Given a base MDP $M_S$ and encoding matrix $P_\nu$, a homomorphic mapping $f_\nu: \Pi_S \to \Pi_U$ exists if and only if the row space of $P_\nu$ contains $\text{span}(F)$, where $F$ is the maximal linearly independent subset of all fundamental transition vectors.

Algorithm Design

HPG Algorithm (Algorithm 1)

When sufficient conditions are satisfied:

1. Compute the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse $P_\nu^\dagger$ of $P_\nu$
2. Calculate the abstract transition matrix via $C^{\pi_{\theta_t}} = P^{\pi_{\theta_t}}_S P_\nu^\dagger$
3. Evaluate the abstract value function $V^{f_\nu(\pi_{\theta_t})}_U$
4. Update policy parameters $\theta_{t+1}$

Computational Complexity: $O(|S||A| + |U||S|^2 + |U|^3)$, which is significantly better than standard policy evaluation's $O(|S||A| + |S|^3)$ when $|U| \ll |S|$.

EBHPG Algorithm (Algorithm 2)

When sufficient conditions are not satisfied, optimize the performance lower bound: $J_S(\tilde{\pi}) \geq J_U(f_\nu(\tilde{\pi})) - \frac{\|g(\tilde{\pi},\nu)\|}{1-\gamma}$

where $\frac{\|g(\pi,\nu)\|}{1-\gamma}$ is an upper bound on the performance difference.

Technical Innovations

1. Relaxed Conditions: Compared to traditional homomorphic MDPs requiring complete equality of transition probabilities, this work only requires linear dependency relationships
2. Optimized Matrix Operations: Achieves aggregation through matrix operations rather than iterative loops, improving computational efficiency
3. Error Bounds: Provides theoretical guarantees and optimization directions when ideal conditions are not satisfied

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Random Models: $|S|=100, |A|=10$, transition matrix density 10%-100%
2. Weakly-Coupled MDPs: $|S|=3600, |A|=10$, simulating hierarchical decision-making
3. Four-Room Gridworld: $|S|=6400, |A|=4$, classic navigation task
4. Tandem Queue Management: $|S|=6084, |A|=3$, inspired by real server systems

Evaluation Metrics

• Policy Performance: $J_S(\pi) = \mathbb{E}_{s_0 \sim \xi_S}[V^\pi_S(s_0)]$
• Computational Time: Wall-clock time measuring actual efficiency
• Convergence: Policy iteration convergence to optimal solution

Baseline Methods

Seven baseline methods including:

• Standard Policy Iteration (PolicyIter)
• Classical Aggregation Techniques (Bertsekas)
• Recent Methods: Ayoub et al., Chen, Forghieri et al., Ishfaq et al., Lee et al.

Implementation Details

• Learning Rate: $1 \times 10^{-3}$
• Abstract State Count: $|U| = \text{int}(0.5 \times r)$
• Hardware: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X CPU + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 GPU

Experimental Results

Theoretical Verification Experiments

Figure 2 presents verification results on small-scale tasks with $|S|=100$:

1. When Sufficient Conditions are Satisfied: Curves marked "100%" (corresponding to $|U|=r$) converge to optimal values across all tasks, validating Theorems 2 and 3
2. When Sufficient Conditions are Not Satisfied: Curves marked "80%", "50%", "20%" exhibit significant oscillations and cannot guarantee convergence to optimal solutions
3. EBHPG Performance: Actual performance (solid lines) improves with performance lower bounds (dashed lines), validating Theorems 5 and 6

Large-Scale Performance Comparison

Figure 3 presents performance comparisons on large-scale tasks:

1. Computational Efficiency: The proposed method significantly outperforms baseline methods on all tasks except the four-room environment
2. Model-based vs Model-free: Model-based methods generally outperform model-free methods due to exact planning rather than sampling
3. Matrix Operation Advantages: Matrix operations provide significant efficiency improvements compared to nested loop implementations in baseline methods

Special Case Analysis

All methods struggle to exceed baselines in the four-room environment, likely due to:

• Extremely sparse reward structure
• Difficulty in exploration from the combination of large state space and sparse rewards
• Reward function sparsity potentially slowing policy iteration efficiency

Related Work

Classification of State Abstraction Methods

1. Feature-based Methods: Utilize hand-crafted or learned feature functions, such as dynamic Bayesian networks and spectral analysis
2. Value-based Aggregation: Focus on minimizing value function approximation errors, such as adaptive iterative aggregation algorithms

Development of Theoretical Frameworks

1. Homomorphic MDP Theory: Structure-preserving mapping framework proposed by Ravindran
2. Bisimulation Theory: Extension of classical behavioral equivalence concepts to MDPs
3. Continuous Space Extensions: Extension of bisimulation metrics to continuous state spaces by Ferns et al.

Relative Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing methods, this paper provides more relaxed sufficient conditions and more efficient computational implementations.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Establishes a theoretical framework for state aggregation based on homomorphic mappings
2. Provides sufficient conditions for optimal policy equivalence that are more relaxed than traditional homomorphic MDPs
3. Develops two practical algorithms, HPG and EBHPG, verified both theoretically and experimentally

Limitations

1. Sufficient Condition Constraints: In some cases, the computational cost of satisfying sufficient conditions may still be high
2. Convergence Guarantees: Cannot guarantee convergence to optimal policies when approximation errors exist
3. Continuous Spaces: Analysis has not been extended to continuous state spaces

Future Directions

1. Relax sufficient conditions for optimal policy equivalence
2. Extend to continuous state spaces
3. Improve convergence guarantees in the presence of approximation errors

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Contribution: Proposes a more general theoretical framework than existing methods
2. Practicality: Algorithm design considers computational efficiency, suitable for large-scale applications
3. Completeness: Forms a complete research chain from theoretical analysis to algorithm design to experimental validation
4. Rigor: Mathematical derivations are rigorous and experimental design is sound

Weaknesses

1. Scope of Applicability: Sufficient conditions may still be overly strict in certain cases
2. Experimental Coverage: Anomalous results in the four-room environment warrant deeper analysis
3. Baseline Comparisons: Some baseline methods may not represent the latest state-of-the-art approaches

Impact

1. Theoretical Value: Provides new theoretical tools for MDP state aggregation
2. Practical Value: Algorithms demonstrate advantages across multiple practical tasks
3. Extensibility: Framework has potential for extension to other problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Large-scale MDP solving
2. Hierarchical reinforcement learning
3. Multi-agent systems
4. Decision problems with structured state spaces

References

The paper cites 50 related references covering important works in MDP theory, state abstraction, reinforcement learning, and other domains, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper that balances theory and practice, making important contributions to the field of MDP state aggregation. The theoretical framework is novel and practical, the algorithm design is sound, and the experimental validation is comprehensive. Despite some limitations, the paper provides valuable theoretical tools and practical methods for advancing the field.