2025-11-15T22:37:12.021193

Features of preparable entangled states in Gaussian quantum networks

Du, Bai
Large-scale quantum networks have been employed to overcome practical constraints on transmission and storage for single entangled systems. The deterministic preparation of entangled states is one of the key factors for realization of quantum networks. There is no efficient method to verify whether single multipartite entanglement can be prepared by multisource quantum networks. Here, we theoretically analysize under what conditions entangled states can be prepared in three kinds of basic Gaussian quantum networks, named triangle networks, star-shaped networks and chain-type networks. Some necessity criteria are derived for all preparable entangled Gaussian states in such networks. It shows that the network structure imposes strong constraints on the set of preparable entangled Gaussian states, which is fundamentally different with the standard single multipartite entanglement. This takes the first step towards understanding network mechanism for preparing entangled Gaussian states.
academic

Features of preparable entangled states in Gaussian quantum networks

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.10167
  • Title: Features of preparable entangled states in Gaussian quantum networks
  • Authors: Shuanping Du, Zhaofang Bai (School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University)
  • Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
  • Publication Date: October 11, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10167v1

Abstract

Large-scale quantum networks are employed to overcome practical limitations in transmission and storage of single entangled systems. Deterministic preparation of entangled states is one of the key factors for implementing quantum networks. Currently, there is no effective method to verify whether multi-source quantum networks can prepare a single many-body entanglement. This paper theoretically analyzes the conditions for preparing entangled states in three fundamental Gaussian quantum networks (triangular, star, and chain networks). Necessary criteria for all preparable entangled Gaussian states in these networks are derived. The study demonstrates that network structure imposes strong constraints on the set of preparable entangled Gaussian states, which fundamentally differs from standard single many-body entanglement. This represents a first step toward understanding the network mechanisms for preparing entangled Gaussian states.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core question addressed in this research is: Which entangled states can be prepared in Gaussian quantum networks? Specifically, it is necessary to determine what kind of many-body entangled states can be prepared through bipartite entangled Gaussian states distributed by independent sources and local Gaussian unitary operations in three fundamental network topologies (triangular, star, and chain networks).

Significance

  1. Practical Value: Quantum networks form the infrastructure for future quantum technologies; understanding their preparation capabilities is crucial for designing practical quantum communication protocols
  2. Theoretical Significance: This is the first systematic study of many-body quantum correlations in continuous-variable Gaussian quantum networks
  3. Technical Challenge: Light, as the sole carrier of quantum information in networks, is a bosonic system requiring continuous-variable treatment

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Existing research primarily focuses on discrete-variable quantum networks
  2. Lack of effective methods to verify whether multi-source quantum networks can prepare specific many-body entanglement
  3. Very limited understanding of many-body quantum correlations in continuous-variable Gaussian quantum networks

Research Motivation

Inspired by recent developments in quantum network entanglement theory, the authors aim to reveal the possibilities and constraints of entanglement preparation in Gaussian quantum networks, providing a theoretical foundation for understanding the mechanisms of entanglement state preparation in Gaussian quantum networks.

Core Contributions

  1. Established mathematical framework for Gaussian quantum networks: Provided rigorous mathematical definitions of three fundamental network topologies
  2. Derived necessary conditions for many-body mutual information: Proved that the many-body mutual information of all preparable states must be zero
  3. Established monogamy relations for entanglement: Proved that preparable states satisfy strict monogamy equalities under the squashed entanglement measure
  4. Provided anti-monogamy results for Gaussian correlations: Proved that preparable states violate monogamy inequalities under specific Gaussian correlation measures
  5. Provided examples of non-preparable states: Proved that completely symmetric pure Gaussian states cannot be prepared by these networks

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given a Gaussian quantum network, determine which many-body entangled Gaussian states ρ\rho can be expressed as: ρ=(UA1⊗⋯⊗UAn+1)(ρ1⊗⋯⊗ρs)(UA1†⊗⋯⊗UAn+1†)\rho = (U_{A_1} \otimes \cdots \otimes U_{A_{n+1}})(\rho_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes \rho_s)(U_{A_1}^\dagger \otimes \cdots \otimes U_{A_{n+1}}^\dagger)

where:

  • ρi\rho_i are bipartite entangled Gaussian states
  • UAiU_{A_i} are local Gaussian unitary operations

Theoretical Framework

Mathematical Description of Gaussian States

Gaussian states are completely determined by their covariance matrix VV and mean vector dd. The characteristic function is: Xρ(λ)=exp⁡(−14r⃗⊤ΩVΩ⊤r⃗−i(Ωd)⊤r⃗)X_\rho(\lambda) = \exp\left(-\frac{1}{4}\vec{r}^\top \Omega V \Omega^\top \vec{r} - i(\Omega d)^\top \vec{r}\right)

where Ω=⨁k=1m(01−10)\Omega = \bigoplus_{k=1}^m \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

Definition of Many-Body Mutual Information

For an nn-body Gaussian state, the many-body mutual information is defined as: I(A1:A2:⋯:An)=∑k=1n(−1)k−1∑∣S∣=kS2(ρS)I(A_1 : A_2 : \cdots : A_n) = \sum_{k=1}^n (-1)^{k-1} \sum_{|S|=k} S_2(\rho_S)

where S2(ρ)=12ln⁡(det⁡V)S_2(\rho) = \frac{1}{2}\ln(\det V) is the Rényi-2 entropy.

Network Topology Structures

  1. Triangular Network: Three parties A, B, C pairwise share bipartite entangled states
  2. Star Network: Central node A1A_1 shares bipartite entangled states with nn other nodes respectively
  3. Chain Network: Adjacent nodes AiA_i and Ai+1A_{i+1} share bipartite entangled states

Technical Innovations

1. Network Extension of Many-Body Mutual Information

Systematically extended the bipartite mutual information concept to the many-body case for the first time, proving its invariance under local unitary operations.

2. Mathematical Characterization of Network Structure Constraints

Through rigorous mathematical proofs, revealed the fundamental constraints that network topology imposes on preparable states.

3. Continuous-Variable Extension of Squashed Entanglement

Utilized the universal extension of squashed entanglement in continuous-variable systems E^sq\hat{E}_{sq} to establish monogamy equalities for network states.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

This paper employs pure theoretical analysis methods, verifying the proposed necessary conditions through mathematical proofs:

  1. Covariance Matrix Analysis: Computing covariance matrices of reduced density matrices of network states
  2. Symmetry Analysis: Utilizing known spectral structures of completely symmetric Gaussian states
  3. Mathematical Induction: Proving anti-monogamy of Gaussian correlation measures

Specific Example Verification

Taking a 4-body completely symmetric pure Gaussian state as an example, its covariance matrix has a special structure:

\sigma & \epsilon & \cdots & \epsilon \\ \epsilon & \sigma & \epsilon & \vdots \\ \vdots & \epsilon & \ddots & \epsilon \\ \epsilon & \cdots & \epsilon & \sigma \end{pmatrix}_{6 \times 6}$$ where $\sigma = \text{diag}(b,b)$, $\epsilon = \text{diag}(e_1, e_2)$. ## Experimental Results ### Main Theoretical Results #### Theorem 1: Many-Body Mutual Information Constraint For any preparable entangled Gaussian state $\rho$: - Triangular network: $I(A:B:C) = 0$ - Star network: $I(A_1:A_2:\cdots:A_{n+1}) = 0$ - Chain network: $I(A_1:A_2:\cdots:A_{n+1}) = 0$ #### Theorems 2-4: Monogamy Equalities for Squashed Entanglement For preparable states, the squashed entanglement measure satisfies strict additive relations: - Triangular network: $\hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{X|YZ}) = \hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{XY}) + \hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{XZ})$ - Star network: $\hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{A_1|A_2\cdots A_{n+1}}) = \sum_{i=2}^{n+1} \hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{A_1A_i})$ - Chain network: $\hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{A_i|A_1\cdots A_{i-1}A_{i+1}\cdots A_{n+1}}) = \hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{A_{i-1}A_i}) + \hat{E}_{sq}(\rho_{A_iA_{i+1}})$ #### Theorem 5: Anti-Monogamy of Gaussian Correlations For Gaussian correlation measure $M(\cdot)$, preparable states violate the monogamy inequality: $$M_{X|YZ}(\rho_{XYZ}) - M_{X|Y}(\rho_{XY}) - M_{X|Z}(\rho_{XZ}) \leq 0$$ ### Specific Application Results #### Non-Preparability of Completely Symmetric Gaussian States For a 6-mode 4-body pure symmetric Gaussian state, the many-body mutual information is zero if and only if $b=1, e_1=e_2=0$, i.e., the state is a product state. Therefore, all non-trivial completely symmetric pure entangled Gaussian states cannot be prepared by star and chain networks. #### Numerical Verification By solving the equation: $$225b^8 - 612b^6 + 576b^4 - 216b^2 + 27 = 0$$ it is proved that the unique solution is $b=1$, corresponding to a product state. ## Related Work ### Discrete-Variable Quantum Networks - Generalization of Bell non-locality in quantum networks - Characterization of many-body quantum correlations in networks - Entanglement swapping and network entanglement distribution ### Continuous-Variable Quantum Information - Theory of Gaussian states and Gaussian operations - Continuous-variable entanglement measures - Gaussian quantum communication protocols ### Advantages Compared to Related Work 1. First systematic study of continuous-variable quantum networks 2. Provides computable necessary conditions 3. Establishes deep connections between network topology and entanglement structure ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Network structure imposes strong constraints**: Network topology fundamentally limits the set of preparable entangled states 2. **Zero many-body mutual information is necessary**: All preparable states must satisfy zero many-body mutual information 3. **Saturation of monogamy relations**: Preparable states achieve monogamy equalities under squashed entanglement 4. **Complete symmetry states are non-preparable**: Except for product states, all completely symmetric entangled states cannot be prepared by fundamental networks ### Limitations 1. **Only necessary conditions provided**: Sufficient conditions have not yet been provided 2. **Limited to fundamental network topologies**: More complex network structures not considered 3. **Primarily theoretical analysis**: Lacks experimental verification ### Future Directions 1. Finding sufficient conditions for preparable states 2. Extension to more general network topologies 3. Study of information-theoretic characterization of network entanglement 4. Exploration of practical quantum network implementations ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Strong theoretical innovation**: First systematic study of entanglement preparation in continuous-variable quantum networks 2. **High mathematical rigor**: All conclusions have rigorous mathematical proofs 3. **Universal applicability**: Applicable to all Gaussian quantum networks 4. **Deep physical insights**: Reveals deep connections between network structure and quantum correlations ### Weaknesses 1. **Limited practical applicability**: Only provides necessary conditions, cannot completely characterize the set of preparable states 2. **Restricted network types**: Only considers three fundamental network topologies 3. **Lack of constructive results**: Does not provide specific preparation schemes ### Impact 1. **Pioneering contribution**: Lays foundation for continuous-variable quantum network theory 2. **High theoretical value**: Provides theoretical guidance for future quantum network design 3. **Strong extensibility**: Methods can be generalized to other network structures ### Applicable Scenarios 1. Theoretical analysis of quantum network protocol design 2. Performance evaluation of continuous-variable quantum communication systems 3. Theoretical guidance for quantum network topology selection 4. Feasibility analysis of many-body entangled state preparation schemes ## References The paper cites 63 related references, covering important works in quantum networks, continuous-variable quantum information, entanglement theory and other fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.