Uniformly-S-pseudo-projective modules

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10170
• Title: Uniformly-S-pseudo-projective modules
• Authors: Mohammad Adarbeh, Mohammad Saleh
• Classification: math.AC (Commutative Algebra)
• Publication Date: October 11, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10170

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of uniformly-S-pseudo-projective (u-S-pseudo-projective) modules as a generalization of u-S-projective modules. Let R be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of R. An R-module P is called u-S-pseudo-projective if for any submodule K of P, there exists s ∈ S such that for any u-S-epimorphism f: P → P/K, sf can be lifted to an endomorphism g: P → P. The paper establishes several properties of this concept, including the result that an R-module M is u-S-quasi-projective if and only if M ⊕ M is u-S-pseudo-projective, and provides new characterizations of u-S-semisimple rings.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Theoretical Development: In commutative algebra, projective modules, quasi-projective modules, and pseudo-projective modules are important objects of study. In recent years, scholars have introduced "uniformly-S" versions of various module classes, such as u-S-injective modules and u-S-projective modules.
2. Concept Generalization: W. Qi et al. introduced the concept of u-S-injective modules; X.L. Zhang and W. Qi introduced u-S-projective modules and u-S-semisimple rings. M. Adarbeh and M. Saleh further studied relative u-S-injectivity (projectivity) with respect to modules, as well as u-S-quasi-injective (projective) modules and u-S-pseudo-injective modules.
3. Theoretical Completeness: To establish a comprehensive theoretical framework, it is necessary to introduce the concept of u-S-pseudo-projective modules as the dual concept of u-S-pseudo-injective modules.

Research Motivation

The motivation for this research lies in:

• Filling theoretical gaps and perfecting the u-S-module theory system
• Establishing relationships between u-S-pseudo-projective modules and other module classes
• Providing new characterization methods for u-S-semisimple rings

Core Contributions

1. Introduction of New Concept: Proposes the definition of u-S-pseudo-projective modules and establishes a foundational theoretical framework
2. Establishment of Hierarchical Relationships: Proves the following implication chain: u-S-projective ⇒ u-S-quasi-projective ⇒ u-S-pseudo-projective
3. Key Equivalence Theorem: Proves that an R-module M is u-S-quasi-projective if and only if M ⊕ M is u-S-pseudo-projective
4. Ring Characterization: Provides new characterizations of u-S-semisimple rings: R is u-S-semisimple if and only if every R-module is u-S-pseudo-projective
5. Structural Properties: Investigates structural characteristics of u-S-pseudo-projective modules, including hereditary properties and direct sum properties

Methodology Details

Task Definition

To investigate the properties of u-S-pseudo-projective modules, establish their relationships with other module classes, and apply these results to ring theory.

Definition 2.1: Let S be a multiplicative subset of ring R. An R-module P is called u-S-pseudo-projective if for any submodule K of P, there exists s ∈ S such that for any u-S-epimorphism f: P → P/K, sf can be lifted to an endomorphism g: P → P.

Core Technical Methods

1. Lifting Properties of Modules

The core of u-S-pseudo-projective modules lies in "restricted lifting properties": not all homomorphisms can be lifted, but they can be lifted after scalar multiplication by elements in S.

2. Direct Sum Decomposition Technique

Utilizes direct sum decomposition to study module properties, particularly by analyzing the properties of M ⊕ M to characterize the u-S-quasi-projectivity of M.

3. Duality Method

As the dual concept of u-S-pseudo-injective modules, many properties are obtained through dual arguments.

Technical Innovations

1. Moderate Lifting Conditions: Compared to u-S-projective modules which require lifting all homomorphisms, u-S-pseudo-projective modules only need to lift u-S-epimorphisms, making the conditions more relaxed
2. Direct Sum Characterization: Characterizes the u-S-quasi-projectivity of M through the u-S-pseudo-projectivity of M ⊕ M, which is an important structural result
3. Ring-Theoretic Applications: Applies module properties to characterize ring structures, particularly u-S-semisimple rings

Main Results Analysis

Basic Properties (Proposition 2.3)

1. Hereditary Property: If B is u-S-pseudo-projective in a u-S-split u-S-exact sequence 0 → A → B → C → 0, then both A and C are u-S-pseudo-projective
2. Direct Sum Property: If A ⊕ B is u-S-pseudo-projective, then both A and B are u-S-pseudo-projective
3. Isomorphism Invariance: u-S-isomorphism preserves u-S-pseudo-projectivity
4. Splitting Property: Any u-S-epimorphism on a u-S-pseudo-projective module u-S-splits

Key Theorems

Theorem 2.8 (Equivalence Characterization)

An R-module M is u-S-quasi-projective if and only if M ⊕ M is u-S-pseudo-projective.

Proof Strategy:

• (⇒): u-S-quasi-projective modules are u-S-pseudo-projective, and direct sums preserve this property
• (⇐): Using Proposition 2.7, if A ⊕ B is u-S-pseudo-projective, then A is u-S-projective relative to B

Theorem 2.15 (Ring Characterization)

A ring R is u-S-semisimple if and only if every R-module is u-S-pseudo-projective.

Theorem 2.17 (Module Class Relationships)

The following are equivalent:

1. Every u-S-pseudo-projective module is u-S-projective
2. The direct sum of any two u-S-pseudo-projective modules is u-S-pseudo-projective

Concrete Examples

Example 2.11: Let R = ℤ, S = {1, 2, 3, ...}, P the set of all primes, and M = ⊕_{p∈P} ℤ_p. Then M is a u-S-quasi-projective but not u-S-projective module; therefore M ⊕ M is u-S-pseudo-projective but not u-S-projective.

Example 2.14: Since ℤ is a quasi-projective ℤ-module, ℤ ⊕ ℤ is pseudo-projective, and thus for each prime p, ℤ ⊕ ℤ is u-pℤ-pseudo-projective.

Related Work

This paper builds upon the following works:

1. W. Qi et al.: Introduced the concept of u-S-injective modules
2. X.L. Zhang and W. Qi: Introduced u-S-projective modules and u-S-semisimple rings
3. M. Adarbeh and M. Saleh: Studied relative u-S-projectivity and u-S-pseudo-injective modules

The relationship of this paper to these works:

• Serves as the dual concept of u-S-pseudo-injective modules
• Generalizes u-S-projective module theory
• Perfects the u-S-module theory system

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully introduces and investigates the concept of u-S-pseudo-projective modules
2. Establishes a complete system of properties and hierarchical relationships
3. Provides new characterizations of u-S-quasi-projective modules and u-S-semisimple rings
4. Lays theoretical foundations for further research

Theoretical Significance

• Perfects module theory in commutative algebra
• Provides new tools for studying ring structures
• Establishes deep connections between different module classes

Future Directions

The paper lays foundations for the following research directions:

1. Further generalizations of u-S-pseudo-projective modules
2. Generalizations to noncommutative rings
3. Connections with other algebraic structures

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: As a dual concept, it perfects the theoretical system
2. Profound Results: Particularly Theorems 2.8 and 2.15 provide important characterizations
3. Rigorous Methods: The proof process is logically clear with appropriate technical approaches
4. Rich Examples: Provides concrete examples demonstrating the non-triviality of the concepts

Limitations

1. Limited Applications: Primarily theoretical construction with unclear practical application scenarios
2. Degree of Innovation: As a dual concept, the innovation is relatively limited
3. Generalizability: Results are mainly confined to the commutative ring setting

Impact

• Theoretical Value: Contributes to commutative algebra theory
• Subsequent Research: Provides foundations for related research directions
• Methodological Value: Demonstrates the application of duality methods in module theory

Applicable Scenarios

• Commutative algebra theoretical research
• Structure analysis of rings and modules
• Homological algebra related problems

References

The paper cites 9 related references, primarily including:

• Anderson and Fuller's classical textbook "Rings and Categories of Modules"
• Recent research results on u-S-module theory
• Authors' previous related works

Overall Assessment: This is a solid theoretical mathematics paper that makes meaningful contributions to commutative algebra. While the degree of innovation is limited, the theoretical construction is complete and the results possess certain depth, laying foundations for further research in related fields.