Equivalence of quantizations of the dispersionless KdV hierarchy

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10234
• Title: Equivalence of quantizations of the dispersionless KdV hierarchy
• Author: Xavier Blot
• Classification: math-ph math.MP nlin.SI
• Publication Date: October 11, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10234

Abstract

Wang recently constructed a quantization of the dispersionless KdV hierarchy using the Heisenberg vertex algebra. Independently, the author, in collaboration with Rossi, obtained a quantization of the dispersionless KdV hierarchy from the trivial cohomological field theory case of the meromorphic differential hierarchy. This paper proves that these two constructions are equivalent.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

The core problem investigated in this paper concerns the quantization of the dispersionless KdV hierarchy. The equations of the dispersionless KdV hierarchy are: $\frac{\partial u}{\partial t_n} = \frac{u^n}{n!}u_x, \quad n \geq 0$

This is a Hamiltonian system with Hamiltonian: $h_n = \int \frac{u^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}dx$

and the first Poisson bracket (Gardner-Zakharov-Fadeev Poisson bracket): $\{f,g\} = \int \frac{\delta f}{\delta u}\partial_x \frac{\delta g}{\delta u}$

Research Significance

1. Mathematical Physics Significance: The KdV hierarchy is a fundamental object in integrable systems theory, and its quantization is crucial for understanding quantum integrability
2. Geometric Connections: Quantization is deeply connected to intersection theory on curve moduli spaces, double ramification cycles, and other geometric objects
3. Theoretical Unification: Proving the equivalence of quantizations constructed via different methods contributes to understanding the essence of quantum integrable systems

Limitations of Existing Methods

Prior to this work, multiple quantization methods existed:

• Early quantizations by Pogrebkov and symplectic field theory
• Geometric quantization by Buryak-Rossi based on double ramification cycles
• Each method has its merits but lacks a unified understanding framework

Research Motivation

The author's motivation is to prove that two recent quantization methods—Wang's vertex algebra approach and the author's meromorphic differential approach with Rossi—actually yield identical results, thereby establishing bridges between different theoretical frameworks.

Core Contributions

1. Equivalence Proof: Proves that Wang's vertex algebra quantization is completely equivalent to the Blot-Rossi meromorphic differential quantization
2. Theoretical Unification: Establishes connections between intersection theory methods and vertex algebra methods
3. Technical Innovation: Employs a uniqueness lemma (Lemma 2.1) to provide a concise proof strategy
4. Completeness Verification: Confirms that both methods not only have identical Hamiltonians but also consistent quantum brackets

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Prove that for all $d \geq -1$, we have $H^{MD}_d = H^{Wang}_d$, where:

• $H^{MD}_d$ is the Hamiltonian of the meromorphic differential hierarchy
• $H^{Wang}_d$ is the Hamiltonian from Wang's vertex algebra method

Meromorphic Differential Method

The Hamiltonian density of the meromorphic differential hierarchy is defined as: $H^{MD}_d(x) = \sum_{g,n \geq 0, 2g+n>0} \frac{(-i\hbar)^g}{n!} \sum_{\substack{s_1,\ldots,s_n \geq 0 \\ s_1+\cdots+s_n = 2g}} u_{s_1} \cdots u_{s_n} \text{Coef}_{m_1^{s_1}\cdots m_n^{s_n}} \int_{H_g(-1,m_1,\ldots,m_n,2g-1-\sum_{i=1}^n m_i)} \psi_0^{d+1}$

where:

• $H_g(m_0,\ldots,m_{n-1})$ is the moduli space of meromorphic differentials
• $\psi_i$ is the first Chern class of the cotangent line bundle at the $i$-th marked point
• The integral computes Hodge integrals on the meromorphic differential stratum

Wang's Vertex Algebra Method

Wang's Hamiltonian density is expressed as: $H^{Wang}_d = \sum_{k=0}^{d+1} \frac{(-1)^{d+1-k}}{(d-k+2)!} \partial_x^{d+1-k} S_{(k+1)}\bigg|_{u_j \to (\sqrt{-i\hbar})^j u_j}$

where $S_{(k+1)} = [z^{k+1}]\exp\left(\sum_{j \geq 0} \frac{u_j}{(j+1)!}z^{j+1}\right)$.

Proof Strategy

The proof is based on the following key observations:

1. Degree Homogeneity: The Hamiltonians from both methods are homogeneous of degree 0 (with respect to the grading $\deg u_i = i$, $\deg \hbar = -2$)
2. Classical Limit Agreement: When $\hbar = 0$, both methods reduce to the classical Hamiltonian $\frac{u^{d+1}}{(d+1)!}$
3. Identical Quantum Brackets: Both methods use the same quantum bracket as a deformation quantization of the first Poisson bracket
4. Integrability: Both hierarchies satisfy $[H_{d_1}, H_{d_2}] = 0$

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Method

This paper is purely theoretical work with no numerical experiments; rather, it verifies equivalence through rigorous mathematical proof.

Verification Steps

1. Verify that the first non-trivial Hamiltonian $H_1$ is identical in both methods
2. Apply the uniqueness lemma to prove all Hamiltonians are identical
3. Verify consistency through variational derivative relations

Main Results

Core Theorem

Theorem 1.1: For all $d \geq -1$, we have $H^{MD}_d = H^{Wang}_d$.

Key Points of the Proof

1. Base Case: $H^{MD}_1 = \int \frac{u^3}{6}dx = H^{Wang}_1$
2. Uniqueness Application: Using Lemma 2.1, since both Hamiltonians commute with $H_1$ and have the same classical limit, they must be equal
3. Variational Relations: Complete the inductive proof through variational derivative relations $\frac{\delta H_d}{\delta u} = H_{d-1}$

Theoretical Significance

The proof demonstrates that two seemingly different quantization methods are actually equivalent, indicating that:

• Quantization possesses a certain uniqueness property
• Different mathematical frameworks can lead to identical physical results
• A solid foundation is provided for further theoretical development

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Early Quantization: Pioneering work by Pogrebkov and symplectic field theory
2. Geometric Quantization: Buryak-Rossi's geometric interpretation via double ramification cycles
3. Quantum Tau Functions: Quantum tau function theory developed from geometric quantization
4. Modularity Connections: Recently discovered unexpected connections to modularity

Method Comparison

The paper establishes relationships between the following quantization methods:

• Twisted double ramification hierarchy: $H^{DR1}_d = H^{MD}_d$
• Double ramification hierarchy: $H^{MD}_d = (H^{DR}_d)^{[0]}$
• Wang's method: $H^{MD}_d = H^{Wang}_d$ (result of this paper)

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Complete Equivalence: Wang's vertex algebra quantization is completely equivalent to the Blot-Rossi meromorphic differential quantization
2. Theoretical Unification: Establishes a bridge between intersection theory methods and vertex algebra methods
3. Method Verification: Two independently developed methods yield identical results, strengthening theoretical reliability

Theoretical Significance

• Reveals deep connections between different mathematical structures in quantum integrable systems
• Provides new perspectives for further research on quantum tau functions and modularity
• Demonstrates a certain canonicality of quantization

Future Directions

1. Extended Versions: The author mentions possible inclusion of additional connections
2. Broader Applications: Potential extension to other integrable hierarchies
3. Geometric Understanding: Deepen geometric understanding of connections between intersection theory and vertex algebras

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Importance: Resolves the fundamental question of relationships between two important quantization methods
2. Elegant Proof: Provides an elegant proof using the uniqueness lemma
3. Completeness: Not only proves Hamiltonians are identical but also confirms consistency of quantum brackets
4. Clear Presentation: The paper has clear structure and accurate mathematical exposition

Technical Features

1. Innovative Proof Strategy: Avoids complexity of direct computation through uniqueness arguments
2. Multi-level Verification: Complete verification from local functionals to Hamiltonians
3. Theoretical Depth: Connects two different fields—algebraic geometry and vertex algebras

Limitations

1. Pure Existence Result: Primarily proves equivalence without providing new computational methods
2. Technical Details: Some proof steps are relatively brief and may require more detailed exposition
3. Scope of Application: Primarily addresses the dispersionless KdV hierarchy; generalizability remains to be explored

Impact Assessment

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important unification results for quantum integrable systems theory
2. Methodological Significance: Demonstrates how to establish connections between different mathematical frameworks
3. Future Development: Lays foundation for further interdisciplinary research

References

The paper cites key literature in the field, including:

• Buryak-Rossi's geometric quantization work
• Wang's vertex algebra construction
• Related research on quantum tau functions
• Recent developments in modularity and integrable systems

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematical physics paper that resolves the fundamental question of relationships between two important quantization methods. The proof is concise and elegant, with results of significant theoretical importance, providing a new unified perspective for the study of quantum integrable systems.