The Algorithmic Regulator

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10300
• Title: The Algorithmic Regulator
• Author: Giulio Ruffini
• Classification: cs.CC cs.AI cs.IT cs.SY eess.SY math.IT q-bio.NC
• Publication Date: Oct 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10300

Abstract

This paper revisits the classical regulator theorem through the lens of Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT). The theorem states that under certain conditions, any optimal controller must contain a model of the system it regulates. The author treats a deterministic world-regulator coupled system $(W,R)$ as a single self-delimiting program, analyzing regulation from the perspective of algorithmic complexity $K(x)$ of the output. A "good algorithmic regulator" is defined as one that reduces the algorithmic complexity of the output relative to an unregulated baseline, i.e., $\Delta = K(O_{W,\varnothing}) - K(O_{W,R}) > 0$. The paper proves that the larger the complexity gap $\Delta$, the more world-regulator pairs with high mutual algorithmic information are favored, making low $M(W:R)$ exponentially impossible as $\Delta$ increases.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Limitations of the Classical Regulator Theorem: The Good Regulator Theorem (GRT) proposed by Conant and Ashby (1970) claims that "every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system," but the theorem is overly broad in its definitions of "model" and "good," and its proof lacks rigor.
2. Constraints of the Internal Model Principle: While the Internal Model Principle (IMP) in modern control theory is rigorous, it primarily applies to linear time-invariant (LTI) systems, and its extension to nonlinear systems requires additional structural assumptions.
3. Neuroscience Theory Requirements: Predictive brain theories such as the Free Energy Principle and Kolmogorov/algorithmic agent theory require a more general theoretical foundation to support the view that "agents must contain a model of the world."

Research Motivation

The author aims to:

• Provide a distribution-free regulation theory applicable to individual sequences
• Overcome limitations of linear assumptions and probabilistic models
• Establish a regulator theorem within the algorithmic information theory framework
• Provide a more rigorous theoretical foundation for neuroscience and cognitive science

Core Contributions

1. Proposes an Algorithmic Regulator Framework: Redefines the "goodness" standard of regulators based on algorithmic information theory, using output compressibility as the evaluation criterion
2. Establishes Three Main Theorems:
   • Posterior Form Theorem: Posterior distribution of programs given observed output x
   • Contrastive Regulator Theorem: Proves the exponential relationship between complexity gap and mutual algorithmic information
   • Target Function Inference Theorem: Identifies a canonical scalar objective function
3. Provides Distribution-Free Theory: Does not depend on probabilistic distribution assumptions and applies to single realized sequences
4. Complements the Internal Model Principle: Supplements the structural necessary conditions of IMP at the information-theoretic level

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Studies deterministically coupled world-regulator systems $(W,R)$, where:

• $W$: World program (3-tape Turing machine)
• $R$: Regulator program (3-tape Turing machine)
• $N$: Fixed time horizon
• $x = O^{(N)}_{W,R}$: World output with regulator enabled
• $y = O^{(N)}_{W,\varnothing}$: World output with regulator disabled

Core Definitions

Algorithmic "Internal Model" Definition

Given fixed horizon $N$, if $M(W:R) > 0$ (equivalent to $K(W|R) < K(W)$), then $R$ is said to contain an internal model of $W$ in the algorithmic sense.

Good Algorithmic Regulator Definition

Define the complexity gap: $\Delta := K(O^{(N)}_{W,\varnothing}) - K(O^{(N)}_{W,R})$

If $\Delta > 0$, then $R$ is called a good algorithmic regulator for $W$ at horizon $N$.

Main Theorems

Theorem 3.1: Program Posterior Form

$P((W,R)|x) \in \left[\frac{1}{\tilde{c}_2}, \frac{1}{\tilde{c}_1}\right] \cdot 2^{K(x)-K(W,R)} < \frac{1}{\tilde{c}} 2^{M(W:R)}$

Theorem 3.2: Probabilistic Regulator Theorem

Let $\Delta := K(O^{(N)}_{W,\varnothing}) - K(O^{(N)}_{W,R})$. Then there exists a constant $C > 0$ such that: $P((W,R)|O^{(N)}_{W,R}, E^R_b) \leq C \cdot 2^{M(W:R)} 2^{-\Delta}$

This means that for each bit reduction in $M(W:R)$, the posterior support loses approximately a factor of $2^{-1}$.

Theorem 3.3: Target Function Inference

Under the universal prior measure: $\log_2 \frac{m(O^{(N)}_{W,R})}{m(O^{(N)}_{W,\varnothing})} = K(O^{(N)}_{W,\varnothing}) - K(O^{(N)}_{W,R}) \pm O(1)$

That is, on the realized episode, the regulator behaves as if minimizing $K(O^{(N)}_{W,R})$.

Technical Innovations

1. Compression-Based Regulation Perspective: Defines regulation as the process of making output more compressible, connecting control theory and information theory
2. Contrastive Analysis: Evaluates regulation effectiveness by comparing complexity differences with and without the regulator
3. Universal Prior: Utilizes the Solomonoff-Levin universal distribution to provide a distribution-free analytical framework
4. Three-Tape Turing Machine Model: Uses standard computational models to ensure universality of results

Theoretical Analysis

Relationship with the Internal Model Principle

The paper provides a detailed comparison between the AIT framework and IMP:

Practical Estimation

Since Kolmogorov complexity is uncomputable, practice uses:

• Lempel-Ziv Compressor: As an upper bound estimate of $K(\cdot)$
• Block Decomposition Method (BDM): Via lookup tables of complexity for small blocks
• Neural Network Compressors: Based on variational autoencoders, etc.

Household Thermostat Example

The paper illustrates the framework using a thermostat example:

• World $W$: Room thermodynamics + external disturbances
• Regulator $R$: Thermostat logic
• Output $x$: Indoor temperature or error signal
• Good Regulator: Maintains temperature in a regular dead-band pattern, more compressible than the unregulated case

Related Work

Classical Regulation Theory

1. Conant-Ashby GRT (1970): Pioneering work, but with vague definitions
2. Francis-Wonham IMP (1975-76): Rigorous results for linear systems
3. Nonlinear Output Regulation: Requires additional solvability and stability conditions

Algorithmic Information Theory

1. Solomonoff Induction: Universal prior and coding theorems
2. Kolmogorov Complexity: Complexity measure for individual sequences
3. Minimum Description Length: Connection between model selection and compression

Neuroscience Theory

1. Free Energy Principle: Biological agents minimize variational free energy
2. Predictive Coding: Brain as a prediction machine
3. Algorithmic Agent Theory: Consciousness theory based on compression models

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Algorithmic Necessity: Sustained complexity advantage $\Delta > 0$ makes low $M(W:R)$ exponentially impossible
2. Canonical Objective: The coding theorem computationally identifies a canonical scalar objective function
3. Agent Interpretation: The regulator behaves as if minimizing description length

Limitations

1. Computational Infeasibility: Kolmogorov complexity is uncomputable, requiring approximations
2. Single-Episode Limitation: Results are based on individual realizations and may require multiple observations to enhance confidence
3. Diagnostic Requirements: Requires selection of appropriate readout signals to ensure effective contrast
4. Constant Factors: Machine-dependent constants may be large in practice

Future Directions

1. Multi-Episode Extension: Study cumulative evidence across multiple episodes
2. Approximate Algorithms: Develop better estimation methods for Kolmogorov complexity
3. Experimental Validation: Test the framework on actual control systems
4. Neuroscience Applications: Apply the theory to brain function research

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides a rigorous algorithmic information-theoretic version of the classical regulator theorem
2. Universal Applicability: Does not depend on linear or probabilistic assumptions with broader scope
3. Deep Insights: Connects regulation with compression, providing new theoretical perspectives
4. Interdisciplinary Value: Provides theoretical foundation for neuroscience and cognitive science

Weaknesses

1. Practical Challenges: The uncomputability of Kolmogorov complexity limits direct application
2. Insufficient Empirical Validation: Lacks verification on large-scale real systems
3. Constant Dependence: Constant factors in results may affect practical effectiveness
4. Single Perspective: Primarily focuses on information-theoretic perspective, potentially overlooking other important factors

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new information-theoretic foundations for control theory
2. Interdisciplinary Bridge: Connects control theory, information theory, and neuroscience
3. Methodological Innovation: Demonstrates the application potential of AIT in systems theory
4. Future Research: Establishes foundation for subsequent research in related fields

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Analysis: Suitable for theoretical analysis and understanding of regulation systems
2. System Diagnosis: Can be used to evaluate whether control systems contain appropriate world models
3. Neuroscience Research: Provides a quantitative framework for studying predictive functions of the brain
4. Artificial Intelligence: Provides guidance for designing intelligent systems with world models

References

The paper cites 65 important references, primarily including:

1. Conant & Ashby (1970): "Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system"
2. Francis & Wonham (1975, 1976): Original work on the Internal Model Principle
3. Li & Vitányi (2019): Authoritative textbook on Kolmogorov complexity
4. Solomonoff (1964): Foundational work on algorithmic probability theory
5. Grünwald (2007): Minimum Description Length Principle
6. Friston: Related work on the Free Energy Principle
7. Ruffini: Author's prior work on algorithmic agent theory

Overall Assessment: This is a theoretically rigorous and profound paper that successfully introduces algorithmic information theory into control theory, providing new perspectives on the classical regulator theorem. While facing practical challenges, its theoretical contributions and interdisciplinary value make it an important work in related fields.