2025-11-21T21:25:15.189475

Fractional Aharonov-Bohm effect for retarded potentials

Franson
It has been suggested that the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect can be interpreted equally well as being due to a phase shift associated with an electron in an interferometer enclosing a magnetic flux, or as a phase shift associated with the electrons in the solenoid that generates the field. Here the Aharonov-Bohm effect is derived using second-quantized field theory to describe all the electrons as well as the electromagnetic field in a consistent way. The results are in agreement with the usual expression for the Aharonov-Bohm effect when the retardation of the electromagnetic field is negligible, but they predict the possibility of a fractional phase shift when retardation effects are significant.
academic

Fractional Aharonov-Bohm effect for retarded potentials

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.10333
  • Title: Fractional Aharonov-Bohm effect for retarded potentials
  • Author: J.D. Franson (University of Maryland Baltimore County)
  • Classification: quant-ph hep-ph
  • Publication Date: October 14, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10333

Abstract

This paper proposes that the magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect can be equivalently interpreted as either a phase shift of electrons in an interferometer enclosing magnetic flux, or a phase shift of electrons in the solenoid producing the magnetic field. The author derives the Aharonov-Bohm effect using second-quantized field theory to consistently describe all electrons and electromagnetic fields. The results show that when retardation effects of the electromagnetic field are negligible, the expression is consistent with the conventional Aharonov-Bohm effect, but when retardation effects are significant, fractional phase shifts may be predicted.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics, demonstrating that the vector potential can produce observable effects on electrons passing through an interferometer enclosing magnetic flux, even when the electric and magnetic fields along the electron's path are zero. This effect raises profound questions about whether the vector potential is more fundamental than the electric and magnetic fields.

Research Motivation

  1. Controversy in theoretical interpretation: Two equivalent interpretations exist—the phase shift can be attributed to electrons in the interferometer or to electrons in the solenoid producing the magnetic flux
  2. Neglect of retardation effects: Conventional theory typically ignores retardation effects of the electromagnetic field
  3. Need for quantum field theory description: A unified second-quantized field theory is needed to treat all electrons and electromagnetic fields consistently

Significance

  • Involves fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics and the nature of electromagnetic interactions
  • May impact applications of high-precision SQUID magnetometers
  • Provides new insights into understanding retarded electromagnetic interactions

Core Contributions

  1. Unified quantum field theory description: Consistently describes all electrons and electromagnetic fields using second-quantized field theory
  2. Theoretical prediction of retardation effects: Predicts fractional Aharonov-Bohm phase shifts when retardation effects are significant
  3. Feynman propagator method: Employs Feynman propagators to directly derive the AB effect
  4. Experimental verification scheme: Proposes using SQUID devices to verify the fractional AB effect

Detailed Methodology

Theoretical Framework

Interaction Hamiltonian

Employs the covariant form of the interaction Hamiltonian:

Ĥ'(t) = -∫ d³r Âμ(r,t)ĵμ(r,t)

where Âμ is the second-quantized vector potential and ĵμ is the electron current operator.

Time Evolution Operator

In the interaction picture, the time evolution operator is given by the Dyson formula:

Û(tf,ti) = T̂ exp[-i∫[ti to tf] Ĥ'(t)dt]

Phase Shift Calculation

Basic Method

The phase shift φ₁ is determined through:

e^(iφ₁) = ⟨Ψ₀|Û(Δt)|Ψ₀⟩

Taylor Expansion

Expanding the exponential to second order:

e^(iφ₁) = ⟨Ψ₀|Ψ₀⟩ + i⟨Ψ₀|∫d³r∫dt Â(r,t)·ĵ(r,t)|Ψ₀⟩ 
         - (1/2)⟨Ψ₀|∫d³r∫d³r'∫dt∫dt' T̂[Â(r,t)·ĵ(r,t) Â(r',t')·ĵ(r',t')]|Ψ₀⟩

Feynman Propagator

Introducing the Feynman propagator for photons:

Dμν(r,t;r',t') = ⟨0|T̂[Âμ(r,t)Âν(r',t')]|0⟩

Treatment of Retardation Effects

Propagator Decomposition

The Feynman propagator can be decomposed as:

Dμν(x-x') = (1/2)[Δᴿμν(x-x') + Δᴬμν(x-x')] + (i/2)Δ¹μν(x-x')

where Δᴿμν is the retarded propagator, related to the retarded Green's function in classical electrodynamics.

Final Phase Shift Expression

After detailed derivation, the phase shift is obtained as:

φ₁ = (1/2)∫d³r dt [Je·As + Js·Ae]

where Je and Js are the expectation values of current density for electrons in the interferometer and solenoid respectively, and As and Ae are the corresponding retarded vector potentials.

Main Results

Quasi-static Case

When retardation effects are negligible, the conventional AB effect is recovered:

Δφ = (q/ℏ)∮ As·dl

Case with Significant Retardation Effects

When retardation effects are important (as in the experimental configuration shown in Figure 2), a fractional AB effect is predicted:

Δφ = (1/2)(q/ℏ)∮ As·dl

Physical Interpretation

  • The factor 1/2 arises because half of the phase shift is associated with electrons in the interferometer and the other half with electrons in the static magnetic field source
  • This non-locality is analogous to non-local interference of two entangled photons passing through two distant interferometers

Experimental Proposals

SQUID Verification Scheme

  • Uses superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) for testing
  • SQUID response time as short as 1 μs, during which light can propagate 300 m
  • Separation distance between source and SQUID must exceed this value to eliminate retarded vector potential effects at the source

Experimental Conditions

  • Constant current source S produces static magnetic field
  • Distance D sufficiently large such that cΔt << D
  • Electron current Je outside the interferometer is zero

Historical Development

  • Reviews classical theory and experimental verification of the AB effect
  • Analyzes previous attempts at quantizing the electromagnetic field
  • Points out that most early work did not predict fractional AB phase shifts

Technical Differences

  • Differs from conventional approaches that quantize only electrons while treating the vector potential classically
  • Avoids double-counting problems in certain early methods
  • Provides a more consistent quantum field theory description

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Second-quantized field theory can provide a unified description of the AB effect
  2. Retardation effects can lead to fractional AB phase shifts
  3. Conventional theory is a special case in the quasi-static limit

Physical Significance

  • Reveals the quantum nature of retarded electromagnetic interactions
  • Provides new perspectives for understanding non-local quantum effects
  • May impact high-precision magnetic measurements

Limitations

  1. Assumes interactions are sufficiently weak to satisfy perturbation theory conditions
  2. Neglects correlations between electrons
  3. Requires specific geometric configurations to observe fractional effects

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical rigor: Employs a complete quantum field theory framework, avoiding semi-classical approximations
  2. Physical insight: Reveals the non-local nature of the AB effect and the importance of retardation effects
  3. Novel predictions: The fractional AB effect is a testable new prediction
  4. Methodological innovation: Uses Feynman propagators for direct derivation, avoiding complexity of traditional methods

Weaknesses

  1. Experimental challenges: Required experimental conditions (large spatial separation) are difficult to achieve in practice
  2. Approximation limitations: Multiple approximation conditions limit the applicability of the theory
  3. Lack of numerical calculations: Does not provide specific numerical estimates or error analysis

Impact

  • Theoretical contribution: Provides a more complete quantum field theory description of the AB effect
  • Experimental guidance: Provides theoretical foundation for designing new precision measurement experiments
  • Fundamental physics: Deepens understanding of non-locality in quantum electrodynamics

Applicable Scenarios

  1. High-precision SQUID magnetometer applications
  2. Fundamental quantum electrodynamics research
  3. Quantum systems where retardation effects are significant

References

The paper cites 33 relevant references, covering theoretical foundations of the AB effect, experimental verification, quantum field theory methods, and other aspects, providing a solid theoretical background for the research.


Overall Assessment: This is an important work in theoretical physics that re-examines the classical AB effect through rigorous quantum field theory methods, predicting possible fractional phase shifts when retardation effects are significant. Although experimental verification presents challenges, the theoretical contribution is substantial, providing new perspectives for understanding the fundamental nature of quantum electromagnetic interactions.