Quantifying Emergent Behaviors in Agent-Based Models using Mean Information Gain

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10381
• Title: Quantifying Emergent Behaviors in Agent-Based Models using Mean Information Gain
• Authors: Sebastián Rodríguez-Falcón (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú), Luciano Stucchi (Universidad del Pacífico)
• Classification: physics.soc-ph nlin.AO
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10381

Abstract

Emergent behaviors are defining characteristics of complex systems, yet their quantitative characterization remains an open challenge, with traditional classification relying primarily on visual inspection of spatiotemporal patterns. This paper proposes using Mean Information Gain (MIG) as a metric for quantifying emergent behaviors in agent-based models. MIG is a measure based on conditional entropy that quantifies the lack of information about other elements in a structure given knowledge of certain properties of the structure. The authors apply this to a multi-agent biased random walk model capable of reproducing Wolfram's four behavioral categories, demonstrating that MIG can distinguish between these behaviors. The metric reconnects emergent behavior analysis with classical concepts of order, disorder, and entropy, enabling quantitative classification of convergent, periodic, complex, and chaotic states.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The fundamental challenge in complex systems research is how to quantitatively characterize and classify emergent behaviors. Traditional methods rely primarily on visual inspection of spatiotemporal patterns, an approach that suffers from subjectivity and ambiguity, particularly near system boundaries and in large-scale systems.

Research Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: Emergent phenomena are fundamental characteristics of complex adaptive systems, present across multiple disciplines including biology (neural and immune systems), neuroscience (neural networks), social sciences (social networks, culture, and language), systems ecology, and economics
2. Practical Value: Quantifying emergent behaviors is crucial for understanding and predicting complex system dynamics, such as flocking behavior, decentralized economies, and evolutionary ecosystems
3. Methodological Need: Existing research lacks universal quantitative measurement methods, with most work relying on system-specific indicators

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Subjectivity: Classification methods based on visual inspection lack objectivity
2. System Specificity: Existing measurement methods are typically designed for specific systems and lack generalizability
3. Boundary Ambiguity: Qualitative methods struggle to accurately distinguish between different behavioral states at boundary regions

Core Contributions

1. Proposes New Quantification Framework: Introduces Mean Information Gain (MIG) as a universal metric for quantifying emergent behaviors
2. Establishes Theoretical Connections: Reconnects emergent behavior analysis with classical physics concepts of order, disorder, and entropy
3. Validates Method Effectiveness: Demonstrates through multi-agent biased random walk models that MIG effectively distinguishes Wolfram's four behavioral categories
4. Provides Quantitative Classification: Enables objective quantitative classification of convergent, periodic, complex, and chaotic states
5. Constructs Scalable Framework: Provides a compact, extensible framework for identifying and comparing emergent behaviors in complex systems

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The research task is to develop a quantitative method to distinguish and classify different emergent behavior patterns in complex systems, specifically including:

• Input: Spatiotemporal configuration data from multi-agent systems
• Output: Quantified emergent behavior metric values
• Objective: Objectively distinguish four behavioral states: convergent, periodic, complex, and chaotic

Model Architecture

Multi-Agent Biased Random Walk Model

The model is implemented in a two-dimensional discrete space with the following core components:

1. Agent Distribution: Agents randomly distributed within a room
2. Movement Rules: Two-step rule implementing biased movement
   • Step 1: Randomly select another agent within the field of vision
   • Step 2: Move one step toward the selected agent
   • If no other agents are nearby, move randomly
3. Key Parameters:
   • Vision: Von Neumann neighborhood or orthogonal neighborhood
   • Superposition: Determines whether agents can share the same cell

Mean Information Gain (MIG) Metric

Basic Definition: $\bar{G}_{X,Y} = -\sum_{x,y} P(x,y) \log_2 P(x|y)$

Where:

• $X$ and $Y$ are discrete random variables
• $P(x|y)$ is the conditional probability of state $x$ given state $y$
• $P(x,y)$ is the joint probability

Application to Multi-Agent Systems: $G_{s_r,s_{\Delta r}} = -\sum_{s_r,s_{\Delta r}} P(s_r, s_{\Delta r}) \log_2 P(s_r|s_{\Delta r})$

Where:

• $s_r$: State of the reference agent (0 = unoccupied, 1 = occupied by at least one agent)
• $s_{\Delta r}$: Agent state at position $\Delta r$ relative to the reference agent's location
• $\Delta r$ considers four directions: up, down, left, right

Technical Innovations

1. Conditional Entropy Method: Uses conditional entropy to quantify information relationships between elements in a structure, providing more objective measurement than traditional visual inspection
2. Spatial Configuration Analysis: Captures system spatial ordering by analyzing patterns of adjacent cell occupancy states
3. Multi-Directional Integration: Provides comprehensive spatial complexity measurement by synthesizing information gain across four directions
4. Temporal Averaging: Improves metric stability and reliability through temporal and repeated experiment averaging

Experimental Setup

Model Implementation

• Platform: NetLogo
• Space: Two-dimensional discrete grid
• Agents: Randomly initialized distribution

Experimental Parameters

Different experimental settings are adopted for different behavioral states to accommodate their dynamic timescales:

Data Collection and Processing

1. Position Recording: Record positions of all agents at each time step
2. State Conversion: Convert position data to binary occupancy states (occupied/unoccupied)
3. MIG Calculation: Calculate MIG values for four directions, then average across time and repeated experiments

Experimental Results

Main Results

MIG Values by Behavioral State:

Directional Analysis: MIG values across four directions (up, down, left, right) are essentially consistent for each behavioral state, demonstrating the spatial symmetry of the metric.

Behavioral Pattern Analysis

Low MIG States (Convergent and Periodic)

• Convergent State: Agents ultimately converge to a single point with minimal spatial redistribution
• Periodic State: Forms oscillating clusters, possibly with multiple clusters oscillating in different directions, resulting in larger standard deviation

High MIG States (Complex and Chaotic)

• Complex State: Manifests as coordinated two-dimensional random walk with agents collectively exploring space
• Chaotic State: Lacks identifiable structure, maintains localized movement near initial configuration

Trajectory Analysis

Through analysis of average agent position trajectories:

• Complex State: Resembles coordinated macroscopic agent performing two-dimensional random walk
• Chaotic State: Lacks collective coordination, remains localized near starting point

Related Work

Complex System Modeling Methods

1. Agent-Based Modeling (ABM): Focuses on understanding how agent characteristics, decision processes, or rule changes affect system dynamics
2. Cellular Automata (CA): Primarily investigates large-scale patterns generated by local interactions
3. Wolfram Classification: Classical four-category behavioral classification scheme (convergent, periodic, chaotic, complex)

Quantification Methods for Emergent Behaviors

Existing research largely relies on system-specific metric indicators, lacking universal quantitative methods. This paper's MIG approach fills this gap by providing a universal information-theoretic framework.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Validity Verification: MIG successfully distinguishes Wolfram's four behavioral categories, providing an objective quantitative classification method
2. Theoretical Connection: Reconnects emergent behavior analysis with classical concepts of order, disorder, and entropy
3. Practical Framework: Provides an extensible framework applicable to identifying emergent behaviors in larger-scale systems

Limitations

1. Spatial Resolution Constraints: Limited spatial resolution of captured differences due to model spatial constraints and binary occupancy states (occupied/unoccupied)
2. Similar MIG Values: MIG values for complex and chaotic states, as well as convergent and periodic states, are relatively close, requiring additional analysis for distinction
3. Parameter Sensitivity: Model parameter settings (vision, superposition) may affect the clarity of behavioral state classification

Future Directions

1. Continuous Vision Parameters: Extend vision parameters from binary to continuous values, enabling smooth transitions between behavioral states
2. Multi-Level States: Consider the number of agents per cell rather than simple occupied/unoccupied states
3. High-Dimensional Extension: Explore method application in high-dimensional spaces or alternative spatial topologies
4. Practical Applications: Identify real-world systems exhibiting similar emergent movement patterns

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation: First systematic application of MIG to quantify emergent behaviors in ABMs, providing new theoretical perspectives
2. Solid Theoretical Foundation: Information-theoretic and conditional entropy-based methods possess rigorous mathematical foundations
3. Reasonable Experimental Design: Different experimental settings for different behavioral states' dynamic timescales reflect scientific rigor
4. Result Consistency: Consistency of MIG values across four directions validates method stability

Weaknesses

1. Model Simplification: The toy model used is relatively simple and may not fully represent complex real-world systems
2. Resolution Limitations: Binary state encoding limits the method's ability to capture subtle differences
3. Limited Verification Scope: Validation on only one specific ABM lacks verification across other complex systems
4. Insufficient Theoretical Analysis: Lacks in-depth theoretical analysis of relationships between MIG and other complexity measures

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new quantitative tools for complex systems research, potentially advancing methodological development in the field
2. Interdisciplinary Application: Method generalizability enables application potential across multiple disciplines including biology, social sciences, and economics
3. Reproducibility: NetLogo implementation with clear code and method descriptions facilitates reproduction and extension

Applicable Scenarios

1. Complex System Modeling: Applicable to various complex system research requiring objective quantification of emergent behaviors
2. Behavior Classification: Can be used for automated identification and classification of different system behavior patterns
3. System Comparison: Provides standardized measurement methods facilitating behavior comparison across different systems
4. Parameter Optimization: Can serve as objective function for parameter tuning in complex systems

References

The paper cites 20 important references covering multiple related fields including complex systems theory, agent-based modeling, cellular automata, and information theory, providing solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This paper proposes an innovative and practical method for quantifying emergent behaviors in complex systems. While it has certain limitations in model complexity and verification scope, its theoretical contributions and methodological value are significant, providing valuable new tools for complex systems research.