2025-11-10T03:14:57.953506

B-RNS-GSS formalism and $L_{\infty}$-actions

Mikhailov
Pure spinor formalism and RNS formalism are related by a chain of equivalences constructed by introducing and integrating-out BRST quartets. This is known as B-RNS-GSS formalism. One of the steps can be understood as adding auxiliary fields to lift a strong homotopy action of the SUSY Lie superalgebra in the large Hilbert space to a strict action. We develop a general prescription for this ``strictification'' procedure, which can be applied for any strong homotopy action of a Lie superalgebra. We explain how it is related to the B-RNS-GSS formalism.
academic

B-RNS-GSS formalism and LL_{\infty}-actions

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.10400
  • Title: B-RNS-GSS formalism and LL_{\infty}-actions
  • Author: Andrei Mikhailov (Instituto de Fisica Teorica, Universidade Estadual Paulista)
  • Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
  • Publication Date: October 12, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10400

Abstract

Pure spinor formalism and RNS formalism are related by a chain of equivalences constructed by introducing and integrating-out BRST quartets. This is known as B-RNS-GSS formalism. One of the steps can be understood as adding auxiliary fields to lift a strong homotopy action of the SUSY Lie superalgebra in the large Hilbert space to a strict action. We develop a general prescription for this "strictification" procedure, which can be applied for any strong homotopy action of a Lie superalgebra. We explain how it is related to the B-RNS-GSS formalism.

Research Background and Motivation

  1. Core Problem: This research aims to understand the relationship between pure spinor formalism and RNS formalism, particularly the chain of equivalences established through B-RNS-GSS formalism.
  2. Problem Significance:
    • Supersymmetry in pure spinor formalism is geometric, corresponding to vector fields on target spacetime with strict action
    • The large Hilbert space of RNS formalism exhibits strong homotopy action (LL_{\infty}-action) of the supersymmetric Lie superalgebra
    • Understanding the relationship between these two formalisms is crucial for the development of superstring theory
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Work by Berkovits et al. 3 established this relationship but only provided leading-order formulas in θ-expansion
    • Lack of a general treatment for "strictifying" LL_{\infty}-actions
  4. Research Motivation:
    • Develop a general "strictification" procedure to convert strong homotopy actions of arbitrary Lie superalgebras into strict actions
    • Provide exact formulas for similarity transformations in B-RNS-GSS formalism

Core Contributions

  1. Theoretical Framework: Develops a general treatment for "strictifying" LL_{\infty}-actions applicable to strong homotopy actions of arbitrary Lie superalgebras
  2. Mathematical Tools: Constructs similarity transformation FF, proving that any LL_{\infty}-action is equivalent to a strict action on a larger quasi-isomorphic Q-manifold
  3. Concrete Applications: Applies the general theory to the B-RNS-GSS model, deriving exact formulas for the similarity transformation in Berkovits' work 3
  4. Geometric Interpretation: Provides geometric interpretation of LL_{\infty}-actions through odd tangent bundles ΠTG\Pi TG and fiber bundle structures

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Given an LL_{\infty}-action of Lie superalgebra gg on Q-manifold (M,q0)(M, q_0), construct a larger quasi-isomorphic Q-manifold (M^,q^0)(\hat{M}, \hat{q}_0) such that gg has a strict action on it, and the original LL_{\infty}-action can be recovered through homotopy transfer.

Core Mathematical Structures

1. Definition of LL_{\infty}-action

The LL_{\infty}-action is defined by the following nilpotent vector field: Q=12CaCbfabcCc+q0+Caqa1+CaCbqab2+Q = \frac{1}{2}C^aC^bf_{ab}^c \frac{\partial}{\partial C^c} + q_0 + C^aq_a^1 + C^aC^bq_{ab}^2 + \cdots

where q0,qa1,qab2,q_0, q_a^1, q_{ab}^2, \ldots are vector fields on MM.

2. Strictification Construction

The extended Q-manifold is defined as: M^=G×Πg×M\hat{M} = G \times \Pi g \times M

The nilpotent vector field on it is: q^0=12CRaCRbfabcCRc+q0+CRa(qa1+ra)+CRaCRbqab2+\hat{q}_0 = \frac{1}{2}C_R^aC_R^bf_{ab}^c \frac{\partial}{\partial C_R^c} + q_0 + C_R^a(q_a^1 + r_a) + C_R^aC_R^bq_{ab}^2 + \cdots

where rar_a are left-invariant vector fields on group GG (infinitesimal right translations).

3. Similarity Transformation

The key similarity transformation FF is constructed through a continuous family: C=dtu+e(1t)adu1eadu1CL+etadu1eadu1CRC = -dt u + \frac{e^{(1-t)\text{ad}u} - 1}{e^{\text{ad}u} - 1}C_L + \frac{e^{-t\text{ad}u} - 1}{e^{-\text{ad}u} - 1}C_R

satisfying boundary conditions:

  • Ct=0,dt=0=CLC|_{t=0,dt=0} = C_L
  • Ct=1,dt=0=CRC|_{t=1,dt=0} = C_R

The similarity transformation is: F=Pexp01dtA(t)F = P\exp\int_0^1 dt A(t)

where A(t)A(t) is determined by the nilpotency condition Q2=0Q^2 = 0.

Technical Innovations

  1. Odd Tangent Bundle Method: Uses odd tangent bundle ΠTG\Pi TG to encode group actions, providing geometric intuition
  2. Spectator Ghost Field Technique: Introduces "spectator" ghost fields CLC_L as coupling constants to track symmetries
  3. BV Formalism: Handles the "integration-out" procedure within the BV formalism framework, making the construction more rigorous
  4. Relative Version: Considers cases where subgroup HGH \subset G acts strictly, applicable to practical string theory applications

Applications in the B-RNS-GSS Model

Model Setup

In the B-RNS-GSS model:

  • MM is the RNS field space
  • g=susyg = \text{susy} (ten-dimensional supersymmetry algebra)
  • hh is generated by translations

BRST Complex

Using coordinates xmx^m and θα\theta^{\alpha} parametrizing G=SUSYG = \text{SUSY}, the BRST ghost fields are: Cα=dθαC^{\alpha} = d\theta^{\alpha}Cm=dxm(dθΓmθ)C^m = dx^m - (d\theta \Gamma^m \theta)

Similarity Transformation Formula

For the B-RNS-GSS model, the explicit form of the similarity transformation is: Cα=dtθα+(1t)CLα+tΛαC^{\alpha} = -dt\theta^{\alpha} + (1-t)C_L^{\alpha} + t\Lambda^{\alpha}Cm=dtxm+(1t)CLm+(1t)22(θαΓαβmCLβ)+tCRm+t22(θαΓαβmΛβ)C^m = -dtx^m + (1-t)C_L^m + \frac{(1-t)^2}{2}(\theta^{\alpha}\Gamma^m_{\alpha\beta}C_L^{\beta}) + tC_R^m + \frac{t^2}{2}(\theta^{\alpha}\Gamma^m_{\alpha\beta}\Lambda^{\beta})

where: A=xmPmθαeϕ/2Σαθα(tΛβ+(1t)CLβ)ΓαβmξeϕψmA = -x^mP_m - \theta^{\alpha}e^{-\phi/2}\Sigma^{\alpha} - \theta^{\alpha}(t\Lambda^{\beta} + (1-t)C_L^{\beta})\Gamma^m_{\alpha\beta}\xi e^{-\phi}\psi^m

Theoretical Significance and Applications

Geometric Interpretation

This construction provides geometric understanding of LL_{\infty}-actions:

  • Any LL_{\infty}-action can be understood as an "effective theory" of a strict action on a larger space
  • Odd tangent bundle ΠTG\Pi TG provides a natural geometric framework

String Theory Applications

  1. RNS Formalism: In the large Hilbert space, supersymmetry can only be generated through insertion of non-integrated vertex operators
  2. Pure Spinor Formalism: Supersymmetry is geometric, corresponding to vector fields on target space
  3. Equivalence: This paper's construction precisely describes the relationship between these two formalisms
  1. Cattaneo et al. 1: General theory of BV quantization
  2. Alexandrov et al. 2: Materialization of super ghosts
  3. Berkovits 3: Established the relationship between pure spinor and RNS formalisms, but only provided leading-order formulas
  4. Movshev and Schwarz 4: Supersymmetric deformations of maximally supersymmetric gauge theories
  5. Mehta and Zambon 6: General theory of LL_{\infty}-algebra actions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Proves that any LL_{\infty}-action of a Lie superalgebra can be "strictified" by introducing auxiliary variables
  2. Provides exact formulas for similarity transformations in B-RNS-GSS formalism
  3. Establishes quasi-isomorphic relationships between LL_{\infty}-actions and strict actions

Limitations

  1. The construction requires working in a formal neighborhood of the group identity
  2. For infinite-dimensional cases (such as string theory), appropriate completions are needed
  3. Rigorous treatment of BV integration requires more refined analysis

Future Directions

  1. Generalize the method to more general LL_{\infty}-algebras
  2. Study relationships with other string theory formalisms
  3. Explore applications in quantum field theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Depth: Provides a general theoretical framework for strictification of LL_{\infty}-actions
  2. Mathematical Rigor: Uses modern geometric and algebraic tools with precise and rigorous construction
  3. Practical Value: Provides concrete formulas in the B-RNS-GSS model, supplementing Berkovits' work
  4. Geometric Intuition: Offers clear geometric picture through odd tangent bundles and fiber bundles

Weaknesses

  1. Technical Threshold: Requires deep background in differential geometry, algebraic topology, and string theory
  2. Application Scope: Primarily limited to string theory; other applications remain to be explored
  3. Computational Complexity: Explicit calculations of similarity transformations can be quite involved

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important tools for understanding relationships between different string theory formalisms
  2. Methodological Value: The strictification procedure may have applications in other physics and mathematics problems
  3. Technical Advancement: Advances the technical development of LL_{\infty}-algebra applications in physics

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Study of equivalence between different formalisms in string theory
  2. BRST analysis of supersymmetric quantum field theory
  3. Applications of LL_{\infty}-algebras in physics
  4. Research on deformation quantization and BV formalism

References

The paper cites 17 important references covering core works in BV quantization, superstring theory, LL_{\infty}-algebras and related fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.