Let p1, p2,..., pn be distinct prime numbers, and let Nn be their product. We prove that, for any positive integer L that is divisible by the least common multiple of p1 minus one, p2 minus one, and so on, and for integers a1, a2,..., an satisfying that each ai is relatively prime to Nn and shares the same prime factor pi, a certain congruence relation holds among their Lth powers.
- Paper ID: 2510.10418
- Title: A Congruence for Sums of Integer Powers Modulo Products of Distinct Primes
- Authors: Shao-Yuan Huang, Hsiu-Yu Wu (Department of Mathematics and Information Education, National Taipei University of Education)
- Classification: math.NT (Number Theory)
- Publication Date: October 12, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10418
Let p1,p2,…,pn be distinct primes and Nn=p1p2⋯pn. The paper proves that for any positive integer L divisible by lcm(p1−1,p2−1,…,pn−1), and natural numbers ai satisfying gcd(ai,Nn)=pi, there exists the congruence relation: a1L+a2L+⋯+anL≡n−1(modNn). Furthermore, for the cases n=2,3, the paper provides complete solutions to the remainder problem for aη(modNn).
- Fundamental Nature of Remainder Problems: Determining remainders of the form aη≡?(modp1p2⋯pn) is a classical problem in number theory with widespread applications in cryptography, primality testing, and computational number theory.
- Limitations of Existing Methods:
- Fermat's Little Theorem applies only to prime moduli
- Euler's theorem, while applicable to composite moduli, requires the Euler totient function
- Handling composite moduli typically requires combining the Chinese Remainder Theorem, making the process complex
- Need for a Unified Framework: Existing methods lack a unified treatment framework. The paper aims to establish more direct formula systems that enable broader application of these formulas to obtain corresponding remainders.
- Discovery of New Congruence Properties: The research process uncovered interesting congruence properties regarding sums of prime powers.
- Main Theorem: Proves congruence relations for sums of integer powers under moduli that are products of distinct primes, satisfying specific conditions (Theorem 4)
- Complete Solutions to Remainder Problems: Provides complete formulas for aη(modNn) in the cases n=2,3 (Theorems 3 and 5)
- Unified Theoretical Framework: Establishes a unified method based on Fermat's Little Theorem, extending several classical remainder formulas
- Concrete Computational Formulas: Provides directly applicable remainder calculation formulas, avoiding complex Chinese Remainder Theorem computations
The paper is based on the following classical theorems:
- Fermat's Little Theorem: If p is prime, a∈N, and gcd(a,p)=1, then ap−1≡1(modp)
- Euler's Theorem: If gcd(a,n)=1, then aϕ(n)≡1(modn)
Let p and q be distinct primes, a∈N. Then:
- If gcd(a,pq)=pq, then aη≡0(modpq)
- If gcd(a,pq)=1, then alcm(p−1,q−1)η≡1(modpq)
- If gcd(a,pq)=q, then a(p−1)η≡qqp(modpq)
- If gcd(a,pq)=p, then a(q−1)η≡1−qqp(modpq)
where qp is the multiplicative inverse of q in Zp.
Let p1,p2,…,pn be distinct primes, and a1,a2,…,an∈N satisfy gcd(ai,p1p2⋯pn)=pi. Then for any positive integer L divisible by lcm(p1−1,p2−1,…,pn−1):
a1L+a2L+⋯+anL≡n−1(modp1p2⋯pn)
Let p<q<r be primes, L=lcm(p−1,q−1,r−1), and assume qr≡1(modp). Then specific remainder formulas for aL are provided for various values of gcd(a,pqr).
- Case Analysis: Discusses four cases based on different values of gcd(a,pq)
- Application of Fermat's Little Theorem: Utilizes ap−1≡1(modp) and aq−1≡1(modq)
- Multiplicative Inverse Calculation: Determines specific remainder values through construction and modular arithmetic properties
- Mathematical Induction: Performs induction on the number of primes n
- Base Cases: Cases n=1,2 are established by previous results
- Inductive Step: Assumes the statement holds for n=k and proves it for n=k+1
- Key Observation: Utilizes properties of gcd and applications of Fermat's Little Theorem
- Parameters: 133=7×19, L=18=lcm(6,18)
- Verification Result: 718+1918≡77+57≡1(mod133)
- Parameters: 66=2×3×11, L=10=lcm(1,2,10)
- Verification Result: 210+310+1110≡34+45+55≡2(mod66)
- Parameters: p1=3,p2=7,p3=11,p4=17, L=240
- Verification Result: 3240η+7240η+11240η+17240η≡3(mod3927)
The paper verifies the correctness of theoretical results through concrete numerical calculations, demonstrating the practicality of the formulas.
- Verification of Theorem 4: Multiple concrete examples verify the main congruence relation
- Accuracy of Remainder Formulas: Examples 3 and 4 demonstrate detailed applications of Theorems 3 and 5 in concrete calculations
- Practicality of Formulas: Compared to traditional methods, the new formulas provide more direct computational pathways
- Avoidance of Chinese Remainder Theorem: Directly provides remainder formulas without complex CRT calculations
- Unified Treatment Framework: Uses the same theoretical foundation across different cases
- Clear Condition Determination: Clearly determines applicable formulas through gcd values
- Fermat's Little Theorem: The theoretical foundation of the paper
- Euler's Theorem: Classical method for handling general composite moduli
- Chinese Remainder Theorem: Traditional tool for handling composite moduli
- Direct Formulas: Avoids the complex computational process of CRT
- New Congruence Properties: Discovers interesting congruence relations for sums of prime powers
- Complete Case Classification: Provides comprehensive treatment for different gcd cases
- Establishes New Congruence Relations: Proves the core congruence relation in Theorem 4
- Provides Practical Computational Formulas: Offers complete remainder calculation methods for n=2,3
- Unifies the Theoretical Framework: Establishes a unified treatment method based on Fermat's Little Theorem
- Condition Restrictions: Theorem 5 requires the additional condition qr≡1(modp)
- Complexity Growth: Formulas become increasingly complex as the number of primes increases
- Special Cases: Currently provides complete solutions only for n=2,3
- Extension to Larger n: Establish complete remainder formulas for cases n≥4
- Generalization of Conditions: Investigate whether the additional conditions in Theorem 5 can be relaxed
- Algorithm Optimization: Develop more efficient computational algorithms
- Theoretical Innovation: Discovers new number-theoretic congruence properties with theoretical value
- Practical Value: Provides directly usable computational formulas, avoiding complex CRT calculations
- Rigorous Proofs: Employs strict proof methods such as mathematical induction
- Rich Examples: Verifies theoretical results through multiple concrete examples
- Limited Completeness: Provides complete solutions only for n=2,3
- Stringent Conditions: Some results require additional restrictive conditions
- Difficult Generalization: Technical challenges exist in extending methods to larger n
- Number Theory Contribution: Provides new perspectives and tools for modular arithmetic theory
- Application Potential: Has potential applications in cryptography and computational number theory
- Educational Value: Provides new examples and methods for number theory instruction
- Cryptographic Applications: Modular exponentiation in RSA and other public-key cryptosystems
- Primality Testing: Algorithm optimization based on Fermat's test
- Computational Number Theory: Numerical computation scenarios requiring efficient modular operations
The paper cites classical literature in number theory and cryptography, including:
- Burton's Elementary Number Theory
- Hardy and Wright's An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers
- Menezes et al.'s Handbook of Applied Cryptography
- Original papers on the RSA algorithm, among others
Overall Assessment: This is an innovative paper in the field of number theory that discovers new congruence properties and provides practical computational methods. While improvements are needed in completeness and generalizability, its theoretical contributions and practical value make it a valuable research contribution to the field.