SpikeGrasp: A Benchmark for 6-DoF Grasp Pose Detection from Stereo Spike Streams

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10602
• Title: SpikeGrasp: A Benchmark for 6-DoF Grasp Pose Detection from Stereo Spike Streams
• Authors: Zhuoheng Gao, Jiyao Zhang, Zhiyong Xie, Hao Dong, Zhaofei Yu, Rongmei Chen, Guozhang Chen, Tiejun Huang
• Categories: cs.RO (Robotics), cs.CV (Computer Vision)
• Publication Date: October 12, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10602

Abstract

Traditional robotic grasping systems typically rely on converting sensor data into explicit 3D point clouds, a computational step absent in biological intelligence. This paper explores a fundamentally different, neuromorphically-inspired paradigm for 6-DoF grasp detection. The research introduces the SpikeGrasp framework, which mimics the biological visual-motor pathway by processing raw asynchronous events from stereo spike cameras (analogous to the retina) to directly infer grasp poses. The model fuses stereo spike streams using recurrent spiking neural networks (analogous to higher-level visual processing) to iteratively refine grasp hypotheses without point cloud reconstruction. To validate this approach, the authors construct a large-scale synthetic benchmark dataset. Experiments demonstrate that SpikeGrasp surpasses traditional point cloud-based baseline methods, particularly in cluttered and textureless scenes, while exhibiting superior data efficiency.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The fundamental challenge faced by traditional robotic grasping systems is their dependence on a "geometry-first" processing pipeline: scene capture → 3D geometric model reconstruction (typically point clouds) → model analysis to identify feasible grasps. While this paradigm is reasonable from a computer graphics perspective, it differs significantly from how biological systems operate.

Problem Significance

1. Lack of Biological Inspiration: The brain does not compute or store explicit point clouds to decide how to grasp objects; instead, it processes continuous sensory information streams through efficient neural architectures
2. Computational Complexity: Point cloud reconstruction is computationally intensive and fragile, sensitive to sensor noise and lighting conditions
3. Dynamic Environment Limitations: Traditional methods have limited robustness when interacting with dynamic environments

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Point Cloud-Based Methods: Require explicit 3D reconstruction steps with high computational overhead
2. Traditional Deep Learning Methods: Lack biological plausibility and struggle with high-dynamic scenes
3. Event Camera Applications: While neuromorphic sensing has been explored, standardized benchmarks and task-specific architectures for 6-DoF grasping are lacking

Research Motivation

To explore a different pathway inspired by the efficiency and elegance of the brain's visual-motor system, directly inferring grasp poses from spike streams without intermediate geometric representations.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a Biologically-Inspired SpikeGrasp Architecture: Processes asynchronous spike data through iterative updates, achieving detection quality superior to previous methods on synthetic datasets
2. Constructed the First Large-Scale Synthetic Spike Stream Dataset: Designed for 6-DoF grasp pose detection, providing an evaluation benchmark for this emerging field
3. Validated Framework Data Efficiency: Demonstrated strong generalization capabilities even with limited training samples

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given continuous binary spike streams $S_{t_1}^N \in \{0,1\}^{H \times W \times N}$, the objective is to estimate the 6-DoF grasp pose corresponding to time $t_1$. The grasp pose is represented as: $G = (R, t, w)$ where $R \in \mathbb{R}^{3 \times 3}$ is the rotation matrix, $t \in \mathbb{R}^{3 \times 1}$ is the translation vector, and $w \in \mathbb{R}$ is the gripper width.

Model Architecture

1. Spike Camera Principles

Spike cameras simulate the integrate-and-fire architecture of the retinal fovea. Each pixel contains a photoreceptor, integrator, and comparator. When the accumulated value exceeds threshold θ, the pixel emits a binary event: $A(x,y,t) = \left(\int_0^t I(x,y,s)ds\right) \bmod \theta$

2. Visual Pathway Network

• Spike Feature Extraction: Uses 7×7 convolutions and residual blocks to process left and right spike streams $S_l, S_r$
• Correlation Volume Computation: Constructs multi-scale correlation pyramids $C_{i,j,k} = \sum_h f_h^l{}_{i,j} f_h^r{}_{i,k}$
• Iterative Updates: Maintains hidden state field $h$, updated via RSNN: $h^{k+1} = h^k + \Delta h$

3. Graspable Network

Decodes the final hidden state $h^K$ to generate a two-channel probability map $M \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times H \times W}$:

• First channel: objectness
• Second channel: graspness

4. Grasp Detection Network

Employs a crop-and-refine strategy to predict complete 6-DoF grasp configurations from hidden states and graspable locations.

Technical Innovations

1. End-to-End Spike Processing: Directly infers grasp poses from raw spike streams without point cloud reconstruction
2. Biologically-Inspired Architecture: Mimics hierarchical processing in primate visual systems
3. Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks: Leverages RSNN's temporal modeling capabilities
4. Multi-Scale Correlation Matching: Achieves coarse-to-fine matching through correlation pyramids

Experimental Setup

Dataset

Constructed a large-scale synthetic dataset:

• Training Set: 100 scenes, 51,000 spike streams, 25,600 objectness/graspness maps
• Test Set: 90 scenes, divided into three subsets
  • Seen: 30 scenes (seen objects)
  • Similar: 30 scenes (similar objects)
  • Novel: 30 scenes (novel objects)
• Scale: Over 1.1 billion grasp poses, using 88 object models

Evaluation Metrics

• Average Precision (AP): Average precision across multiple friction coefficients
• AP0.8 and AP0.4: Precision at specific friction coefficients
• Success Rate: Success rate in simulation environments

Comparison Methods

Includes 9 representative methods:

• 2D Methods: GG-CNN
• 6-DoF Methods: GraspNet, GSNet, GraspFast, KGNv2, etc.
• Multi-View Methods: ASGrasp, GraspNeRF

Implementation Details

• Training: 18 epochs, Adam optimizer, learning rate 2×10⁻⁴
• Hardware: NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU
• Batch Size: 4
• Iteration Steps: 16 update iterations

Experimental Results

Main Results

Key Findings

1. Overall Performance: SpikeGrasp achieves the highest precision on most subsets
2. Top-1 Success Rate: Seen (78.53%), Similar (72.18%), Novel (36.79%)
3. Simulation Verification: Success rates in Isaac Sim are 91.3%, 85.8%, and 70.9% respectively

Ablation Study

Data Efficiency Analysis

Across different training data proportions, SpikeGrasp consistently outperforms all baseline methods, with more pronounced advantages in data-scarce scenarios, demonstrating strong generalization capabilities.

Computational Efficiency

RSNNs reduce floating-point operations by 2.3× compared to ANNs, achieving 82.5% computational savings, primarily through sparsity-induced efficiency gains.

Related Work

Point Cloud-Based Methods

• Sample-and-Evaluate Pipelines: GPD, PointNetGPD, and others generate candidate grasps and rank them
• End-to-End Methods: GraspNet's variational proposal generation, volumetric or point-based predictors
• Context Reasoning: VoteGrasp and others enhance scene awareness

Methods Without Explicit Point Clouds

• Direct Image Prediction: Inferring grasps from multi-view cues or neural scene encodings
• Neuromorphic Sensing: Using event/spike cameras to drive grasp inference

Spike Camera Applications

• Image Reconstruction: Various methods for reconstructing images from spike data
• Computer Vision Tasks: Object detection, optical flow estimation, depth estimation, etc.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Feasibility Validation: First demonstration of the feasibility of 6-DoF grasp detection directly from spike streams
2. Performance Advantages: Surpasses traditional point cloud-based methods on synthetic datasets
3. Biological Plausibility: Provides a neuromorphically-inspired end-to-end grasp detection paradigm

Limitations

1. Synthetic Data Constraints: Experiments based on synthetic datasets with potential domain gaps from real data
2. Static Scenes: Current methods established on static scenes, not yet fully leveraging spike cameras' dynamic advantages
3. Hardware Dependency: Requires specialized spike camera hardware

Future Directions

1. Real Data Collection: Construct real spike stream datasets
2. Domain Adaptation: Explore mixed-domain transfer and weakly-supervised fine-tuning
3. Dynamic Scene Extension: Fully leverage spike cameras' advantages in dynamic environments

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Novelty: First application of spike cameras to 6-DoF grasp detection, opening new research directions
2. Biologically-Inspired Design: Architecture design exhibits good biological plausibility
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Includes extensive comparative experiments, ablation studies, and data efficiency analysis
4. Dataset Contribution: The constructed large-scale synthetic dataset provides important resources for field development

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient Real-World Validation: Lacks verification experiments in real environments
2. Computational Complexity: While theoretically more efficient, practical deployment has higher hardware requirements
3. Unexploited Dynamic Advantages: Static scene experiments do not fully demonstrate spike cameras' dynamic sensing advantages

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides important reference for neuromorphic vision applications in robotics
2. Practical Prospects: Offers new technical pathways for high-speed, dynamic grasping tasks
3. Technology Advancement: May promote broader application of spike cameras in robotic perception

Applicable Scenarios

1. High-Speed Dynamic Scenes: Rapid motion environments difficult for traditional cameras
2. Low-Power Applications: Mobile robot platforms requiring efficient computation
3. Special Lighting Conditions: High dynamic range or low-light environments

References

The paper cites extensive related work, including:

• Traditional grasp detection methods (GraspNet, GSNet, etc.)
• Spike camera-related research (image reconstruction, object detection, etc.)
• Neuromorphic computing and spiking neural network research

Overall Assessment: This is a groundbreaking paper that introduces spike cameras, an emerging sensing technology, to the robotic grasping domain, proposing a biologically-inspired end-to-end solution. While currently limited to synthetic data validation, it establishes important foundations for future dynamic, efficient robotic grasping systems. The paper's technical contributions, experimental design, and dataset construction all demonstrate high quality, representing significant progress in the interdisciplinary field of neuromorphic vision and robotics.