Fair Assignment of Indivisible Chores to Asymmetric Agents

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10698
• Title: Fair Assignment of Indivisible Chores to Asymmetric Agents
• Authors: Masoud Seddighin, Saeed Seddighin
• Classification: cs.GT (Computer Science - Game Theory)
• Publication Date: October 12, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10698v1

Abstract

This paper investigates the fair allocation problem of assigning indivisible chores to agents with heterogeneous entitlements under the Maximin Share (MMS) framework. While constant-factor MMS allocations/allocations for goods and chores are guaranteed to exist in symmetric settings, the situation becomes significantly more complex when agents possess different entitlements. For indivisible goods allocation, it has been proven that n-WMMS (Weighted MMS) guarantee is optimal. However, for indivisible chores, recent work has shown that O(log n)-WMMS allocation guarantee exists. This paper improves this upper bound to a constant-factor WMMS guarantee, specifically proving the existence of 20-WMMS allocation.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: This paper addresses the fair allocation of indivisible chores among asymmetric agents. Unlike classical cake-cutting problems, this work deals with discrete, indivisible tasks (chores) where agents possess different entitlements.
2. Problem Significance:
   • In real-world scenarios, unequal entitlements frequently occur, such as inheritance laws in various cultures and religions that typically prescribe unequal distributions
   • Allocation of natural resources (such as oil and fisheries) is typically based on geographic, economic, or political considerations
   • These practical demands highlight the importance of studying fair allocation under unequal entitlements
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Constant-factor approximation methods from symmetric settings cannot be directly applied to asymmetric cases
   • For goods allocation, n-WMMS has been proven to be the optimal guarantee
   • For chores allocation, the previous best result was O(log n)-WMMS guarantee
4. Research Motivation: Improving the approximation ratio for chores allocation from logarithmic to constant level represents a significant theoretical breakthrough.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theoretical Contribution: Proves the existence of 20-WMMS allocation for asymmetric chores allocation, the first constant-factor WMMS guarantee
2. Algorithmic Innovation: Proposes a novel Layered Moving Knife Algorithm that extends the moving knife method to asymmetric settings
3. Small-Scale Optimization: Provides improved upper bounds for cases with n=3 and n=4 compared to log n+1
4. Task-Agnostic Analysis: Develops task-agnostic analysis techniques that improve bounds for small numbers of agents

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Input:

• N = {a₁, a₂, ..., aₙ}: n agents
• M = {b₁, b₂, ..., bₘ}: m chores
• Vᵢ: additive cost function of agent aᵢ
• wᵢ: entitlement of agent aᵢ, satisfying ∑wᵢ = 1

Output: Allocation of chores to agents such that each agent aᵢ receives a bundle Sᵢ satisfying Vᵢ(Sᵢ) ≤ α·WMMSᵢ

Key Definitions:

• Weighted Maximin Share: WMMSᵢ = min⟨A₁,...,Aₙ⟩∈Π(M) maxⱼ∈N Vᵢ(Aⱼ)·(wᵢ/wⱼ)
• α-WMMS allocation: All agents' costs do not exceed α times their respective WMMS values

Model Architecture

1. Preprocessing Phase

Lemma 4.1 (Sorted Chores Setting Reduction): If α-WMMS allocation is guaranteed to exist in the sorted chores setting, then it also exists in the general case.

Lemma 4.2 (Entitlement Divisibility Reduction): If α-WMMS allocation is guaranteed to exist in the divisible entitlements setting, then 2α-WMMS allocation exists in the general case.

2. Layered Moving Knife Algorithm

The algorithm maintains three agent sets:

• Dead Agents (D): Agents whose allocation is complete
• Processing Agents (P): Agents participating in the current round
• Queue Agents (Q): Agents awaiting allocation

Safety Measures:

• ∑aᵢ∈P wᵢ ≥ ∑aᵢ∈D wᵢ
• m - s ≥ ∑ᵢ>minp wᵢ/wminp (where minp is the minimum-indexed agent in P)

Core Procedure:

1. Allocate chores sequentially from bₘ to b₁
2. Create 2wᵢ/wminp copies for each agent aᵢ in P to form P'
3. Use knife interval (ℓ,r), expanding the interval as much as possible until no agent's cost ≤ 5wminp
4. Allocate all chores within the interval to one agent copy satisfying the condition
5. Update D, P, Q sets when P' becomes empty

Technical Innovations

1. Layered Structure: Maintains three-tier agent structure to ensure algorithm safety and effectiveness
2. Copy Mechanism: Creates multiple copies for each agent to balance allocation under different entitlements
3. Moving Knife Extension: Extends the classical moving knife method from symmetric to asymmetric settings
4. Progressive Allocation: Processes all agents through multiple allocation rounds

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Framework

The paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis with experiments focused on:

1. Small-Scale Case Analysis: Precise bound analysis for n=3,4
2. Empirical Verification: Random sampling of one billion entitlement configurations for cases 3≤n≤10
3. Baseline Comparison: Comparison with previous log n+1 upper bounds

Evaluation Metrics

• Approximation Ratio: Multiplicative factor of WMMS guarantee
• Applicable Range: Range of agent numbers for algorithm applicability
• Theoretical Guarantee: Worst-case performance guarantee

Experimental Results

Main Results

Key Theorems

Theorem 4.5: For asymmetric chores allocation, 20-WMMS allocation always exists.

Theorem 5.4: For three agents, approximately 2.1122-WMMS allocation always exists.

Theorem 5.5: For four agents, approximately 2.5404-WMMS allocation always exists.

Experimental Findings

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: First improvement of upper bound from O(log n) to constant
2. Small-Scale Optimization: For n≤10, task-agnostic techniques provide improved bounds
3. Practical Threshold: Constant bounds only outperform logarithmic bounds when n>2¹⁹=524288

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Classical Fair Division: Originating from Steinhaus's cake-cutting problem in 1948
2. Indivisible Goods Allocation: Transition from continuous resources to discrete goods allocation
3. MMS Concept: Budish's introduction of Maximin Share as a fairness measure

Relationship to Related Work

• Aziz et al. 4: First to study chores allocation with unequal entitlements
• Wang et al. 27: Established O(log n)-WMMS upper bound
• Huang et al. 21: Provided specific bounds for small-scale cases

Technical Advantages

Compared to existing work, this paper's advantages include:

1. First achievement of constant approximation ratio
2. Provision of unified algorithmic framework
3. More precise analysis for small-scale cases

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Proves existence of constant-factor WMMS guarantee for asymmetric chores allocation
2. Algorithmic Innovation: Layered moving knife algorithm effectively addresses technical challenges in asymmetric settings
3. Practical Value: Provides theoretical foundation for real-world allocation problems with unequal entitlements

Limitations

1. Constant Factor: The constant 20 is relatively large, potentially insufficient for practical applications
2. Applicability Threshold: Only outperforms previous logarithmic bounds when agent numbers are extremely large
3. Algorithm Complexity: Layered structure increases implementation complexity

Future Directions

1. Constant Optimization: Improve constant factor through more refined analysis
2. Lower Bound Research: Explore theoretical lower bounds of the problem
3. Algorithm Simplification: Seek simpler algorithms achieving constant guarantees

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: Improvement from logarithmic to constant is significant theoretical progress
2. Methodological Innovation: Layered moving knife algorithm is ingeniously designed with rigorous theoretical analysis
3. Completeness: Addresses both general cases and small-scale special cases
4. Clear Presentation: Well-structured paper with detailed and complete proofs

Weaknesses

1. Limited Practical Applicability: Constant 20 is relatively large with limited practical improvement
2. Restricted Applicability Range: Only advantageous at extremely large scales
3. Algorithm Complexity: Relatively complex implementation that may hinder practical application

Impact

1. Theoretical Significance: Makes important contribution to fair allocation theory
2. Methodological Value: Layered moving knife technique may apply to other problems
3. Research Advancement: Provides new technical tools for subsequent research

Applicable Scenarios

1. Large-Scale Resource Allocation: Suitable for scenarios with extremely large numbers of agents
2. Theoretical Research: Provides foundation for related theoretical research
3. Algorithm Design: Layering technique generalizable to other allocation problems

References

The paper cites important works in the field, including:

1. Budish (2011): Introduction of MMS concept
2. Aziz et al. (2019): Pioneering work on asymmetric chores allocation
3. Wang et al. (2024): Previous best O(log n) result
4. Huang et al. (2023): Bound analysis for small-scale cases

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical computer science paper that achieves important theoretical breakthrough in fair allocation. While practical application value is limited, its theoretical contribution and methodological innovation establish important foundations for the field's development. The design of the layered moving knife algorithm demonstrates the authors' deep theoretical expertise and innovative capability.