2025-11-10T03:15:44.877459

Holomorphic line bundles on a special abelian surface

Yang
We consider a special abelian surface $A_Ω$ deduced from the work of Tianze Wang, Tianqin Wang and Hongwen Lu \cite{WWL}. We study holomorphic line bundles over a special abelian surface explicitly.
academic

Holomorphic line bundles on a special abelian surface

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.10768
  • Title: Holomorphic line bundles on a special abelian surface
  • Author: Jae-Hyun Yang
  • Classification: math.AG (Algebraic Geometry)
  • Publication Date: October 12, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10768

Abstract

This paper considers a special abelian surface AΩA_Ω arising from work by Tianze Wang, Tianqin Wang, and Hongwen Lu. The author explicitly studies holomorphic line bundles on this special abelian surface.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Setting

The core problem addressed in this paper is understanding the structure of holomorphic line bundles on special abelian surfaces. Specifically:

  1. Construction of special abelian surfaces: Based on a novel Siegel upper half-space H^2\hat{H}_2 introduced by Wang et al., special abelian surfaces are constructed
  2. Explicit description of line bundles: Concrete constructions and properties of holomorphic line bundles on such special abelian surfaces are provided

Research Significance

  1. Theoretical value: Abelian surfaces are fundamental objects in algebraic geometry, and line bundle theory on them is closely related to complex geometry and algebraic geometry
  2. Geometric meaning: Special abelian surfaces possess additional symmetries, making the line bundle theory richer
  3. Application prospects: Provides new geometric frameworks for modular form theory and complex analytic geometry

Limitations of Existing Methods

Traditional abelian surface theory primarily addresses general cases. For abelian surfaces with special symmetries, explicit construction methods and concrete line bundle descriptions are lacking.

Core Contributions

  1. Introduction of novel Siegel upper half-space: Detailed study of the geometric properties of H^2={Ω∈H2∣Q⟨Ω⟩=Ω}\hat{H}_2 = \{Ω ∈ H_2 | Q⟨Ω⟩ = Ω\}
  2. Construction of special abelian surfaces: For Ω=(τzzτ)∈H^2Ω = \begin{pmatrix} τ & z \\ z & τ \end{pmatrix} ∈ \hat{H}_2, constructs AΩ=C2/LΩA_Ω = C^2/L_Ω
  3. Explicit line bundle construction: Provides concrete descriptions of holomorphic line bundles L(H,χ)L(H,χ) under various Riemann forms
  4. Dimension formula computation: Provides explicit formulas for the dimensions of line bundle section spaces

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

Study holomorphic line bundles on the special abelian surface AΩ=C2/LΩA_Ω = C^2/L_Ω, where:

  • LΩ=Z2Ω+Z2L_Ω = Z^2Ω + Z^2 is the lattice determined by Ω∈H^2Ω ∈ \hat{H}_2
  • H^2\hat{H}_2 is the novel Siegel upper half-space

Core Construction

1. Novel Siegel Upper Half-Space

Define H^2:={Ω∈H2∣Q⟨Ω⟩=Ω}\hat{H}_2 := \{Ω ∈ H_2 | Q⟨Ω⟩ = Ω\}, where Q=(q00q)Q = \begin{pmatrix} q & 0 \\ 0 & q \end{pmatrix}, q=(0110)q = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

Explicitly: H^2={Ω=(τzzτ)∈H2∣τ,z∈C,Imτ>∣Imz∣≥0}\hat{H}_2 = \left\{\Omega = \begin{pmatrix} τ & z \\ z & τ \end{pmatrix} ∈ H_2 \mid τ,z ∈ C, \text{Im}τ > |\text{Im}z| ≥ 0\right\}

2. Group Actions and Geometric Structure

  • Defines G^:={M∈G∣M⟨Ω⟩∈H^2 for all Ω∈H^2}\hat{G} := \{M ∈ G | M⟨Ω⟩ ∈ \hat{H}_2 \text{ for all } Ω ∈ \hat{H}_2\}
  • Proves transitive action of G^\hat{G} on H^2\hat{H}_2
  • Establishes biholomorphic correspondence with bounded symmetric domain D^2\hat{D}_2

3. Line Bundle Construction

For a Hermitian form H:C2×C2→CH: C^2 × C^2 → C and semi-character χ:LΩ→Tχ: L_Ω → T, constructs line bundle L(H,χ)L(H,χ):

Automorphic factor: JH,χ(α,z):=χ(α)exp⁡{πH(z,α)+π2H(α,α)}J_{H,χ}(α,z) := χ(α)\exp\left\{πH(z,α) + \frac{π}{2}H(α,α)\right\}

Technical Innovations

  1. Exploitation of special symmetry: Fully utilizes QQ-invariance, greatly simplifying computations
  2. Explicit dimension formulas: For different Riemann forms, provides dim⁡H0(AΩ,L(H,χ))=det⁡E\dim H^0(A_Ω, L(H,χ)) = \sqrt{\det E}
  3. Multiple line bundle constructions: Provides three different Riemann form constructions applicable to different scenarios

Experimental Setup

Concrete Computational Cases

Case 1: Standard Hermitian Form

For HΩ((z1,z2),(w1,w2)):=z1w1+z2w2H_Ω((z_1,z_2),(w_1,w_2)) := z_1w_1 + z_2w_2:

  • Condition: Both Imτ\text{Im}τ and Imz\text{Im}z are integers
  • Result: dim⁡H0(AΩ,L(HΩ,χΩ))=(Imτ)2−(Imz)2\dim H^0(A_Ω, L(H_Ω,χ_Ω)) = (\text{Im}τ)^2 - (\text{Im}z)^2

Case 2: Diagonal Case

For Ω=(τ00τ)Ω = \begin{pmatrix} τ & 0 \\ 0 & τ \end{pmatrix} and Hτ((z1,z2),(w1,w2)):=1Imτ(z1w1+z2w2)H_τ((z_1,z_2),(w_1,w_2)) := \frac{1}{\text{Im}τ}(z_1w_1 + z_2w_2):

  • Result: dim⁡H0(AΩ,L(Hτ,χτ))=1\dim H^0(A_Ω, L(H_τ,χ_τ)) = 1

Case 3: Mixed Hermitian Form

For H∗((z1,z2),(w1,w2)):=2z1w1+2z2w2+z1w2+z2w1H_*((z_1,z_2),(w_1,w_2)) := 2z_1w_1 + 2z_2w_2 + z_1w_2 + z_2w_1:

  • Condition: Both Im(2τ+z)\text{Im}(2τ+z) and Im(τ+2z)\text{Im}(τ+2z) are integers
  • Result: dim⁡H0(AΩ,L(H∗,χ∗))=3{(Imτ)2−(Imz)2}\dim H^0(A_Ω, L(H_*,χ_*)) = 3\{(\text{Im}τ)^2 - (\text{Im}z)^2\}

Verification Method

Verification is performed by directly computing the determinant det⁡E\det E, where EE is the imaginary part of the Hermitian form.

Experimental Results

Main Results

  1. Transitivity theorem: Proves that both G^\hat{G} and G^+\hat{G}_+ act transitively on H^2\hat{H}_2
  2. Biholomorphic equivalence: Establishes biholomorphic correspondence between H^2\hat{H}_2 and D^2\hat{D}_2
  3. Line bundle classification: Completely classifies line bundles on special abelian surfaces via the Appell-Humbert theorem

Specific Computational Results

For different Riemann forms, explicit dimensions of section spaces are obtained:

  • Standard case: (Imτ)2−(Imz)2(\text{Im}τ)^2 - (\text{Im}z)^2
  • Diagonal case: 11
  • Mixed case: 3{(Imτ)2−(Imz)2}3\{(\text{Im}τ)^2 - (\text{Im}z)^2\}

Geometric Insights

Proves that all constructed line bundles are ample, thus providing embeddings of abelian surfaces into projective spaces.

Related Work

Main Research Directions

  1. Classical abelian surface theory: Foundational work by Mumford and others
  2. Siegel modular form theory: Connections with moduli spaces
  3. Complex analytic geometry: Theory of Hermitian symmetric spaces

Relationship to Related Work

This paper builds upon Wang et al.'s work on novel Siegel upper half-spaces, applying it to line bundle theory on abelian surfaces, representing an important extension of classical theory.

Advantages over Related Work

  1. Explicitness: Provides concrete computational formulas rather than abstract existence results
  2. Specialization: Obtains more precise results by exploiting symmetries
  3. Completeness: Forms a complete theoretical framework from group actions to line bundle constructions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Successfully constructs special abelian surfaces based on the novel Siegel upper half-space
  2. Explicitly describes holomorphic line bundles on such surfaces and their properties
  3. Provides computational formulas for dimensions of line bundle section spaces

Limitations

  1. Restriction to special cases: Applies only to abelian surfaces with specific symmetries
  2. Computational complexity: Calculations remain complex for general Ω∈H^2Ω ∈ \hat{H}_2
  3. Application scope: Practical applications of theoretical results require further exploration

Future Directions

  1. Generalization to higher-dimensional abelian varieties
  2. Investigation of concrete connections with modular forms
  3. Exploration of applications in arithmetic geometry

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical completeness: Forms a complete theoretical system from group theory to geometric construction
  2. Computational explicitness: Provides concrete computable formulas rather than abstract results
  3. Methodological innovation: Cleverly exploits symmetries to simplify complex geometric constructions
  4. Clarity of exposition: Clear logic and accurate mathematical presentation

Weaknesses

  1. Limited applicability: Practical application scenarios for theoretical results are not sufficiently clear
  2. Generalizability: Unclear whether methods can be generalized to more general cases
  3. Computational efficiency: Some computations remain quite complex

Impact

  1. Theoretical contribution: Provides new perspectives and tools for abelian surface theory
  2. Methodological value: The symmetry-exploitation method has general significance
  3. Foundation for future research: Provides foundation for further research in related fields

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Algebraic geometry research: Particularly classification and property studies of abelian varieties
  2. Complex geometry: Concrete realizations of Hermitian symmetric spaces
  3. Modular form theory: Provides geometric foundations for constructing new modular forms

References

The paper primarily references the following important works:

  • Mumford's Abelian Varieties - Classical theory of abelian varieties
  • Preprints by Wang et al. - Theory of novel Siegel upper half-spaces
  • Griffiths-Harris's Principles of Algebraic Geometry - Foundations of algebraic geometry

Overall Assessment: This is a paper making significant contributions to abelian surface theory. By introducing new geometric objects and exploiting symmetries, it provides new perspectives on classical theory. While its application scope is limited, its theoretical value is substantial and it establishes important foundations for subsequent research.