Multiplicatively dependent integer vectors on a hyperplane

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10855
• Title: Multiplicatively dependent integer vectors on a hyperplane
• Authors: Muhammad Afifurrahman, Valentio Iverson, Gian Cordana Sanjaya
• Classification: math.NT (Number Theory)
• Publication Date: October 12, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10855

Abstract

This paper establishes several asymptotic formulas and upper bounds for counting multiplicatively dependent integer vectors of bounded height lying on a fixed hyperplane. This work constitutes a direct extension of results obtained by Pappalardi, Sha, Shparlinski, and Stewart.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The paper investigates the counting problem for multiplicatively dependent vectors. For a multiplicative group G and positive integer n, a vector ν = (ν₁, ..., νₙ) ∈ Gⁿ is called multiplicatively dependent if there exists a nonzero vector k = (k₁, ..., kₙ) ∈ Zⁿ such that:

ν₁^k₁ · ... · νₙ^kₙ = 1

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Importance: Multiplicative dependence is a fundamental concept in algebraic number theory, closely related to transcendental number theory, Diophantine equations, and other core problems
2. Existing Limitations: The work of Pappalardi et al. 21 studied statistics of multiplicatively dependent vectors of bounded height, but did not consider hyperplane constraints
3. Natural Extension: Studying multiplicatively dependent vectors under hyperplane constraints is a natural and important generalization
4. Practical Applications: Such problems have close connections to partition theory, combinatorial number theory, and related fields

Core Contributions

1. Established new asymptotic formulas: Provided precise asymptotic formulas for multiplicatively dependent integer vectors lying on the hyperplane α·ν = J
2. Provided unified bounds: Gave corresponding upper bound estimates for different hyperplane parameters k (number of nonzero coordinates)
3. Extended existing theory: Generalized the Pappalardi-Sha-Shparlinski-Stewart results from the unconstrained case to the hyperplane-constrained setting
4. Technical innovations: Combined multiple techniques including the Bombieri-Pila determinant method, volume calculations, and multiplicative rank analysis
5. Corrected literature errors: Identified and corrected an error in 21 concerning the two-dimensional case

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Let α ∈ Zⁿ be a nonzero vector and J ∈ C. Define:

Sₙ(H, J; α) := {ν ∈ Mₙ(C*) ∩ [-H,H]ⁿ : α·ν = J}

where Mₙ(C*) denotes the set of multiplicatively dependent vectors in (C*)ⁿ. The goal is to determine the asymptotic behavior of Sₙ(H, J; α) = #Sₙ(H, J; α).

Core Methodological Framework

1. Multiplicative Rank Decomposition

Introduce the concept of multiplicative rank: for ν ∈ (Q*)ⁿ, its multiplicative rank s is the maximum integer s such that any s coordinates form a multiplicatively independent vector. Decompose the problem via multiplicative rank:

Sₙ(H, J; α) = Sₙ,₀(H, J; α) + Sₙ,₁(H, J; α) + ... + Sₙ,ₙ₋₁(H, J; α)

2. Upper Bound Estimates for Large Rank Vectors

For vectors of large multiplicative rank r, utilize Lemma 2.1 (van der Poorten-Loxton theorem) and combinatorial arguments to obtain:

Sₙ,ᵣ(H, J; α) < cᵣH^(n-1-⌈(r+1)/2⌉) exp(c log H / log log H)  (when r ≤ k-2)
Sₙ,ᵣ(H, J; α) < cᵣH^(n-⌈(r+1)/2⌉) exp(c log H / log log H)    (other cases)

3. Precise Analysis for Small Dimensions

For k ≤ 4, use a quantitative version of the Bombieri-Pila determinant method to obtain more precise bounds:

Theorem 2.7-2.9: For specific systems of equations (such as ν₁^k₁ν₂^k₂ = ν₃^k₃ with linear constraints), the number of solutions is at most:

C(k₁ + k₂ + k₃)³H^(1/2)(log H + k₁ + k₂ + k₃)

4. Volume Calculation Method

Utilize the Davenport lemma and Marichal-Mossinghoff formula to transform integer point counting into volume calculation:

Theorem 3.1: For α ∈ Zⁿ and box B:

#{ν ∈ B ∩ Zⁿ : α·ν = J} = Vα(B; J) + O(Hⁿ⁻²)

where Vα(B; J) = gcd(α)Vol_({ν ∈ B : α·ν = J})/||α||.

Technical Innovations

1. Multi-technique Fusion: Skillfully combines techniques from algebraic geometry (Bombieri-Pila method), analytic number theory (volume estimates), and combinatorial number theory (multiplicative rank analysis)
2. Case-by-case Analysis: Employs different strategies based on the number k of nonzero coordinates in the hyperplane, achieving unified treatment
3. Explicit Coefficients: Provides not only asymptotic orders but also explicit formulas for leading coefficients
4. Positive Integer Case: Specially handles the case where coordinates are positive integers, involving different geometric considerations

Main Results

Core Theorems

Theorem 1.1 (Main Result): Let n ≥ 3, J be an integer, and α ∈ Zⁿ have k ≥ 3 nonzero coordinates. There exist computable constants Cα,J ≥ 0 such that for H ≫ |J|:

Sₙ(H, J; α) = Cα,J H^(n-2) + {O(H^(n-5/2) + |J|²H^(n-4))     if k ≥ 5
                               {O(H^(n-5/2)(log H)²⁴ + |J|H^(n-3)) if k = 3,4 and J ≠ 0

Theorem 1.3 (Case k=2): When J ≠ 0 and α has two nonzero elements:

Sₙ(H, J; α) = Cα,J H^(n-2) + O(H^(n-5/2)(log H)²⁴)

Theorem 1.4 (Case k=1): When n ≥ 3 and J ≠ 0:

Sₙ(H, J; e₁) = {(2H)^(n-1)                                      if |J| = 1
                {C_J^(1) H^(n-2)⌊log H/log f(|J|)⌋ + C_J^(0) H^(n-2) + O(H^(n-5/2)) if |J| > 1

where f(A) is the smallest positive integer B such that A is a power of B.

Coefficient Formulas

The leading coefficient Cα,J is composed of:

Cα,J = C_α,J^(0) + C_α,J^(1) + [additional terms]

where:

• C_α,J^(0) corresponds to the contribution from rank 0 vectors (containing ±1 coordinates)
• C_α,J^(1) corresponds to the contribution from rank 1 vectors (containing equal coordinate pairs)
• Additional terms arise from rank 2 vectors' special contributions when k=3

Positive Integer Case

Theorem 1.5-1.6: For the case where coordinates are positive integers, similar results hold under appropriate conditions, with main differences in coefficient formulas and boundary condition handling.

Technical Details

Key Lemmas

1. Lemma 2.1 (van der Poorten-Loxton): Multiplicatively dependent vectors admit multiplicative relations with small exponents
2. Lemma 2.5 (Bombieri-Pila): Upper bounds for counting integer points on algebraic curves
3. Lemma 3.2 (Davenport): Volume approximation for lattice points in convex bodies

Proof Strategy

1. Step One: Decompose the problem via multiplicative rank
2. Step Two: Apply general upper bounds for large rank cases
3. Step Three: Perform precise calculations for small rank cases
4. Step Four: Transform integer point counting into volume calculation
5. Step Five: Compute volumes using explicit formulas

Applications and Extensions

Theoretical Applications

1. Partition Theory: Applicable to counting multiplicatively dependent partitions
2. Diophantine Equations: Provides solution counting for certain exponential Diophantine equations
3. Transcendental Number Theory: Related to algebraic independence problems

Practical Examples

The paper mentions a problem from the Indonesian Mathematical Olympiad involving the concept of "fatal triples," demonstrating the practical application value of the theory.

Related Work

The paper builds upon and extends the following important works:

1. Pappalardi-Sha-Shparlinski-Stewart 21: Statistics of unconstrained multiplicatively dependent vectors
2. Bombieri-Pila 6: Determinant method for counting integer points on algebraic curves
3. Davenport 11: Lattice point estimation in convex bodies
4. Marichal-Mossinghoff 18: Volume formulas for hypercube cross-sections

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully generalized Pappalardi et al.'s results to the hyperplane-constrained setting
2. Provided unified asymptotic formulas covering different parameter ranges
3. The error term O(H^(n-5/2)) is optimal, arising from contributions of special form vectors

Limitations

1. For the k=2 case, complete results for fixed J are not provided
2. Certain technical conditions (such as sign patterns of α) limit the generality of results
3. Generalization to algebraic numbers requires further work

Future Directions

1. More General Varieties: Extend to higher-dimensional algebraic varieties
2. Algebraic Number Case: Consider algebraic integers or fixed-degree algebraic numbers
3. Rational Number Case: Study analogous problems for Farey fractions or Egyptian fractions
4. Computational Aspects: Make coefficient formulas more explicit and computable

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Technical Depth: Skillfully combines profound techniques from multiple branches of number theory
2. Complete Results: Provides precise asymptotic formulas rather than merely order estimates
3. Methodological Innovation: Introduces volume calculation methods to the study of multiplicative dependence
4. Practical Value: Provides computable explicit formulas
5. Clear Exposition: Well-structured with sufficient technical detail

Weaknesses

1. Technical Conditions: Some results require relatively strong technical assumptions
2. Computational Complexity: Practical computation of leading coefficients may be complex
3. Generalization Limits: Extension to more general settings faces technical obstacles

Impact and Significance

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new research directions for multiplicative dependence theory
2. Methodological Significance: Demonstrates the power of geometric methods in number theory problems
3. Practical Value: Provides effective tools for related counting problems
4. Reproducibility: Results have clear constructive nature, facilitating verification and application

Applicable Scenarios

1. Counting problems in algebraic number theory
2. Distribution of solutions to Diophantine equations
3. Partition problems in combinatorial number theory
4. Relevance analysis in cryptography

References

The paper cites 33 related references, primarily including:

• 21 Foundational work by Pappalardi, Sha, Shparlinski, Stewart
• 6 Classical determinant method by Bombieri-Pila
• 11 Lattice point counting theory by Davenport
• 18 Volume calculation formulas by Marichal-Mossinghoff

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality number theory research paper with significant technical innovations and important theoretical value. The authors successfully combine multiple profound number-theoretic techniques to solve a natural and important generalization problem. Despite some technical limitations, it establishes a solid foundation for further development in this field.