A Symmetric-Key Cryptosystem Based on the Burnside Ring of a Compact Lie Group

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10901
• Title: A Symmetric-Key Cryptosystem Based on the Burnside Ring of a Compact Lie Group
• Author: Ziad Ghanem
• Classification: cs.CR (Cryptography and Security), math.RA (Rings and Algebras)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10901

Abstract

Traditional linear ciphers (such as the Hill cipher) operate on fixed finite-dimensional modules and are therefore vulnerable to direct known-plaintext attacks, where attackers can recover completely determined linear operator keys through linear algebra methods. This paper proposes a symmetric-key cryptosystem whose linear operations are performed in the Burnside ring A(G) of a compact Lie group G, with particular focus on the case G = O(2). The key consists of three components: (i) a compact Lie group G; (ii) a secret total order on the orbit basis of subgroup conjugacy classes of A(G); (iii) a finite set S of indices of irreducible G-representations, whose associated fundamental degrees define an involutory multiplier k ∈ A(G). Arbitrary finite-length messages are encoded as finitely supported elements of A(G) and encrypted via the Burnside product with k.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Vulnerability of Traditional Linear Ciphers: Classical linear ciphers such as the Hill cipher operate in fixed finite-dimensional spaces, allowing attackers to construct systems of linear equations by collecting sufficient plaintext-ciphertext pairs, thereby completely recovering the key.
2. Post-Quantum Cryptography Requirements: The threat of quantum computing has motivated researchers to seek cryptographic primitives based on non-traditional number-theoretic assumptions, including schemes based on group theory and graph theory.
3. Fundamental Limitations of Finite-Dimensional Platforms: Although existing algebraic cryptosystems provide important alternatives, they still operate on finite-dimensional platforms with conceptual vulnerabilities—sufficient plaintext-ciphertext pairs can completely constrain the key operator.

Research Motivation

The core motivation of this paper is to transcend the limitations of finite-dimensional settings by transferring encryption operations to infinite-rank modules—the Burnside ring of compact Lie groups—thereby theoretically avoiding the fundamental weaknesses of traditional linear ciphers.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a Novel Symmetric Cryptosystem Based on the Burnside Ring: First application of the Burnside ring of compact Lie groups to cryptography, particularly for the O(2) group.
2. Proved Support-Preserving Property: For G = O(2), proved that the encryption process preserves the support of plaintext in the generators {(D₁),...,(D_L),(SO(2)),(O(2))}, avoiding ciphertext expansion and security leakage.
3. Established Security Analysis in the Passive Model: Proved that any finite observation set can only constrain operations on a finite-rank submodule W_L ⊂ A(O(2)), and demonstrated information-theoretic unidentifiability of the key from finite data.
4. Proved IND-CPA Insecurity: Through a single-query chosen-plaintext distinguisher based on dihedral probing, proved that the scheme does not satisfy IND-CPA security.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Design a symmetric-key encryption scheme where:

• Input: Arbitrary finite-length messages
• Output: Encrypted elements in the Burnside ring
• Constraint: Utilize infinite-dimensional structure to resist traditional linear algebra attacks

Burnside Ring Theoretical Foundation

Construction of the Burnside Ring

For a compact Lie group G, the Burnside ring A(G) is defined as:

• Basis: The set of conjugacy classes of subgroups Φ₀(G) = {(H) : H ≤ G, W(H) is finite}
• Structure: Free Z-module A(G) = ZΦ₀(G)
• Product: Burnside product defined through orbit counting

Burnside Ring of O(2)

For G = O(2), the basis elements include:

• (O(2)): The conjugacy class of the group itself
• (SO(2)): The conjugacy class of the special orthogonal group
• (Dₖ): Conjugacy classes of finite dihedral subgroups, k ≥ 1

The multiplication rules are shown in the table:

Cryptosystem Design

Key Structure

The key consists of a triple (G, O, S) where:

1. Group G: A compact Lie group, such as G = O(2)
2. Order O: A secret total order on the basis elements Φ₀(G)
3. Representation Index Set S: A finite set S = {k₁, k₂, ..., kₘ}

Key Element Construction

Construct the key element from the set S: $k = \prod_{j \in S} \deg_{V_j}$

where deg_ is the fundamental degree of the j-th irreducible representation. For O(2):

• deg_ = (O(2)) (trivial representation)
• deg_ = (O(2)) - (Dₘ) (non-trivial representation)

Encryption/Decryption Protocol

1. Preprocessing: Convert raw data to an integer vector p⃗ ∈ Z^L
2. Ring Encoding: Use the secret order O to map the vector to p ∈ A(G)
3. Encryption: Compute ciphertext c = p · k
4. Transmission: Send the finitely supported ciphertext
5. Decryption: Since k is involutory, compute p = c · k
6. Decoding: Recover the original data

Technical Innovations

1. Infinite-Dimensional Platform: Transcend finite-dimensional limitations by operating in infinite-rank modules
2. Involutory Property: The key element k satisfies k² = (O(2)), simplifying the decryption process
3. Support Preservation: Encryption does not increase the maximum dihedral index of plaintext, avoiding ciphertext expansion

Theoretical Analysis

Support-Preserving Theorem

Proposition 3.1: Let the plaintext be p = Σᵢ₌₁ᴸ aᵢ(Dᵢ). If the key k is a product of arbitrary fundamental degrees, then the ciphertext c = p·k is also an element of the submodule Z{(D₁),...,(D_L)}.

Proof Outline:

• (Dᵢ)·(O(2)) = (Dᵢ)
• (Dᵢ)·(Dₘ) = 2(D_{gcd(i,m)})
• Since gcd(i,m) ≤ i ≤ L, the result's support does not exceed the original range

Passive Security Analysis

Finite Observation Window

Any finite observation set {pⱼ, cⱼ} is restricted to a finite-rank submodule: $W_L := \mathbb{Z}[\{(D_1),...,(D_L)\}] \subset A(O(2))$

Key Indistinguishability

Proposition 4.1: Let S = {s₁,...,sₘ} be the key set, and q be a prime with q > L. Construct S' = {s₁q,...,sₘq}. Then k_S and k_{S'} generate the same linear transformation on W_L.

Corollary 4.1: For any finite observation set in W_L, there exist infinitely many distinct key sets consistent with the observations. The key is information-theoretically unidentifiable.

Chosen-Plaintext Attack Vulnerability

Dihedral Probing Attack

For query p = (Dₓ), the ciphertext is: $c_x = (D_x) \cdot k_S = (D_x) + \sum_{n≥1} 2α_S(n)(D_{gcd(x,n)})$

where α_S(n) is determined by the formula given in Proposition 2.1.

Proposition 4.2: For any two distinct key sets S₀ ≠ S₁, there exists x ∈ ℕ such that (Dₓ)·k_{S₀} ≠ (Dₓ)·k_{S₁}.

Single-Query Distinguisher:

1. Compute β_{S₀}(x) and β_{S₁}(x)
2. Select x satisfying β_{S₀}(x) ≠ β_{S₁}(x)
3. Query p = (Dₓ) and determine the key based on coefficients

Security Assessment

Advantages

1. Resistance to Passive Attacks: The key possesses information-theoretic unidentifiability under ciphertext-only and known-plaintext attacks
2. No Ciphertext Expansion: The support-preserving property avoids ciphertext expansion
3. Theoretical Innovation: First application of algebraic topology tools to cryptography

Limitations

1. Does Not Satisfy IND-CPA: Deterministic linear construction cannot achieve standard indistinguishability
2. Practical Constraints: Complex mathematical structures may impact implementation efficiency
3. Limited Application Scenarios: Primarily suitable for scenarios requiring passive security but accepting deterministic encryption

Related Work

Traditional Linear Ciphers

• Hill cipher and its variants
• Vulnerability analysis of finite-dimensional linear transformations

Post-Quantum Cryptography

• Permutation group mapping (PGM) cryptosystems
• Graph-theoretic symmetric block ciphers
• Minimum spanning tree (MST) and adjacency matrix methods

Algebraic Cryptography

• Applications of group theory in cryptography
• Representation theory and equivariant degree theory

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully constructed a symmetric cryptosystem based on the infinite-dimensional Burnside ring
2. Demonstrated theoretical security under the passive attack model
3. Proved fundamental limitations of deterministic linear schemes

Future Directions

1. Non-Deterministic Extensions: Introduce randomization to avoid CPA attacks
2. Other Lie Groups: Explore cryptographic properties of different compact Lie groups
3. Implementation Optimization: Develop efficient algorithms for Burnside ring operations
4. Hybrid Schemes: Combine traditional cryptographic techniques to enhance practicality

In-Depth Evaluation

Originality

• Theoretical Breakthrough: First application of Burnside ring theory to cryptography
• Conceptual Innovation: Transcends the fundamental limitations of finite-dimensional platforms
• Mathematical Depth: Integrates algebraic topology, representation theory, and cryptography

Technical Contributions

• Rigorous mathematical proofs and theoretical analysis
• Comprehensive security evaluation framework
• Clear description of attack and defense mechanisms

Practical Value

• Provides new perspectives for post-quantum cryptography
• Demonstrates the potential of pure mathematical theory in applications
• Provides a case study for understanding limitations of deterministic encryption

Limitations

• Does not satisfy modern cryptographic security definitions
• Implementation complexity may be high
• Application scenarios are relatively limited

This paper represents an interesting attempt at cross-disciplinary research between cryptography and pure mathematics. While limited in practical applicability, it provides valuable theoretical contributions to the field.