2025-11-10T02:55:55.966071

A Continuum Beck-type Theorem for Hyperplanes

Bright, Ortiz, Zakharov
We prove a sharp continuum Beck-type theorem for hyperplanes. Our work is inspired by foundational work of Beck on the discrete problem, as well as refinements due to Do and Lund. The inductive proof uses recent breakthrough results in projection theory by Orponen--Shmerkin--Wang and Ren, who proved continuum Beck-type theorems for lines in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$.
academic

A Continuum Beck-type Theorem for Hyperplanes

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.10907
  • Title: A Continuum Beck-type Theorem for Hyperplanes
  • Authors: Paige Bright (MIT), Alexander Ortiz (Rice University), Dmitrii Zakharov (MIT)
  • Classification: math.CA (Harmonic Analysis), math.CO (Combinatorics)
  • Publication Date: October 13, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10907v1

Abstract

This paper establishes a sharp continuum Beck-type theorem for hyperplanes. The research is motivated by Beck's foundational work on discrete problems and subsequent improvements by Do and Lund. The inductive proof employs recent breakthrough results in projection theory by Orponen-Shmerkin-Wang and Ren, who proved continuum Beck-type theorems for lines in R2\mathbb{R}^2 and Rn\mathbb{R}^n.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Origins

In 1983, József Beck studied discrete problems concerning points and lines in Euclidean space. Given a finite set XRnX \subset \mathbb{R}^n with X=N|X| = N, Beck proved a dichotomy: either approximately NN points lie on a single line, or P1(X)P_1(X) (the collection of affine lines spanned by at least two points in XX) contains approximately N2N^2 distinct lines.

Continuum Development

Recently, Orponen, Shmerkin, and Wang proved a continuum Beck theorem for lines in the plane, which Ren subsequently generalized to higher dimensions. For a Borel set XRnX \subset \mathbb{R}^n, either there exists an mm-dimensional affine subspace FF such that dim(XF)<dimX\dim(X \setminus F) < \dim X, or dimP1(X)2min{dimX,m}\dim P_1(X) \geq 2\min\{\dim X, m\}.

The Hyperplane Problem

Beck also studied hyperplanes in Rn\mathbb{R}^n spanned by nn affinely independent points. Do and Lund improved Beck's hyperplane theorem in 2016, introducing more refined non-concentration assumptions. This paper aims to establish the continuum analogue for hyperplanes.

Core Contributions

  1. Main Theorem: Proves a sharp continuum Beck-type hyperplane theorem (Theorem 1.2)
  2. Non-concentration Concept: Introduces the non-concentration (NC) property for Borel sets as a continuum analogue of the discrete case
  3. Technical Innovations:
    • Develops the concept of "thin kk-planes," generalizing thin tube theory
    • Establishes an inductive framework from irreducible measures to thin hyperplanes
    • Introduces the notion of cc-stable position for handling geometric configurations
  4. Dimension Lower Bounds: Obtains the sharp lower bound dimPn1(X)nmin{dimX,1}\dim P_{n-1}(X) \geq n\min\{\dim X, 1\}

Detailed Methodology

Core Definitions

Definition 1.1 (Non-concentrated Sets): Let XRnX \subset \mathbb{R}^n be a Borel set. We say XX is non-concentrated (NC) if for any r1r \geq 1 and affine subspaces F1,,FrRnF_1, \ldots, F_r \subset \mathbb{R}^n satisfying i=1rdimFin1\sum_{i=1}^r \dim F_i \leq n-1, we have dim(Xi=1rFi)=dimX\dim\left(X \setminus \bigcup_{i=1}^r F_i\right) = \dim X

Theorem 1.2 (Main Result): Let XRnX \subset \mathbb{R}^n be a Borel NC set. Then dimPn1(X)nmin{dimX,1}\dim P_{n-1}(X) \geq n\min\{\dim X, 1\}

Technical Framework

1. Thin kk-Plane Theory

Definition 3.3: Let μ0,,μk\mu_0, \ldots, \mu_k be probability measures on Rn\mathbb{R}^n in good position. We say (μ0,,μk)(\mu_0, \ldots, \mu_k) spans a (σ,K,c)(\sigma, K, c)-thin kk-plane if there exists a Borel set GsuppμiG \subset \prod \text{supp}\mu_i such that:

  • (μ0××μk)(G)c(\mu_0 \times \cdots \times \mu_k)(G) \geq c
  • For any (x0,,xk)G(x_0, \ldots, x_k) \in G and δ>0\delta > 0, j=0,,kj = 0, \ldots, k, we have μj(Vx0,,xk(δ))Kδσ\mu_j(V_{x_0,\ldots,x_k}(\delta)) \leq K\delta^\sigma

Lemma 3.4: Thin kk-planes generate (k+1)σ(k+1)\sigma-Frostman measures, thereby yielding dimension lower bounds.

2. Decomposition Algorithm

Lemma 2.1: For an NC set XX and any 0<s<dimX0 < s < \dim X, there exist affine subspaces V1,,VmV_1, \ldots, V_m and ss-Frostman measures μi\mu_i such that:

  • Each μi\mu_i is irreducible on ViV_i
  • Their supports are pairwise disjoint
  • For any covering ViFj\bigcup V_i \subset \bigcup F_j, we have dimFjn\sum \dim F_j \geq n

3. Inductive Proof Strategy

The proof divides into two main cases:

Case 1 (Irreducible Case): If μ\mu is irreducible on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, directly apply Ren's radial projection theorem.

Theorem 4.1: If XX supports an irreducible ss-Frostman measure, then dimPk(X)(k+1)min{s,nk}\dim P_k(X) \geq (k+1)\min\{s, n-k\}

Case 2 (Reducible Case): Use the decomposition algorithm to decompose the measure into irreducible pieces, then "glue" them together to construct hyperplanes.

Stable Position Technique

Definition 5.1: A collection of measures (μj,i)(\mu_{j,i}) is in cc-stable position if for all index sets I,JI, J and choices of xx, the matrix (BI(x),AJ)(B_I(x), A_J) has rank r(I,J)r(I,J) and the absolute value of the maximal rr-minor is c\geq c.

This ensures that various "sums" V+WV + W and "intersections" VWV \cap W have the expected dimensions.

Technical Innovations

1. Generalization of Thin kk-Planes

Extends the thin tube concept of Orponen-Shmerkin-Wang to planes of arbitrary dimension, establishing a unified framework for handling geometric objects of different dimensions.

2. Minimality Reduction

Definition 1.8 (Minimal Plane Collections): A collection of planes F1,,FkF_1, \ldots, F_k is minimal if dimF[k]=ndimFj\dim F_{[k]} = n \leq \sum \dim F_j and for any proper subset J[k]J \subsetneq [k], we have dimFJjJdimFj\dim F_J \geq \sum_{j \in J} \dim F_j.

By reducing to the minimal case, the complexity of geometric analysis is simplified.

3. Key Lemma (Key Lemma 7.10)

For typical choices of xIcx_{I^c}, there exist subsets Ei(xIc)E_i(x_{I^c}) such that the restricted measure νxIciEi(xIc)\nu_{x_{I^c}}^i|_{E_i(x_{I^c})} is (C~,σ)(\tilde{C}, \sigma)-Frostman, and the graph HxIcH_{x_{I^c}} is a thin (p1)(p-1)-plane graph.

Proof Structure

Phase One: Decomposition

  1. Use the NC condition to find affine subspaces ViV_i and corresponding irreducible measures μi\mu_i
  2. Apply the irreducible case to obtain thin planes on each ViV_i

Phase Two: Combination

  1. Place measures in cc-stable position
  2. Reduce to the minimal case
  3. Use induction to handle the general case p1p \geq 1

Key Technical Challenges

Dimension Calculation: For minimal plane collections F1,,FkF_1, \ldots, F_k:

  • r(I,)=nIr(I, \emptyset) = n_I
  • r(I,J)nIJ+1r(I, J) \geq n_{I \cup J} + 1 (when J,J[k]IJ \neq \emptyset, J \neq [k] \setminus I)
  • r(I,[k]I)=n+1r(I, [k] \setminus I) = n + 1

Angle Separation: The cc-stable position ensures (Fj,P[k]{j}(x))c\angle(F_j, P_{[k]\setminus\{j\}}(x)) \gtrsim c.

Development of Discrete Beck Theorem

  • Beck (1983): Original point-line dichotomy
  • Do (2020), Lund (2016): Improved non-concentration conditions

Continuum Theory

  • Orponen-Shmerkin-Wang (2024): Continuum Beck theorem for lines in the plane
  • Ren (2023): Generalization to higher-dimensional lines
  • Radial Projection Theory: Key tool in this paper

Applications of Projection Theory

  • Furstenberg set estimates
  • Improved upper bounds for Falconer distance set problem

Main Results

Sharpness of Theorem 1.2

The lower bound nmin{dimX,1}n\min\{\dim X, 1\} is sharp. Counterexample: if XX is contained in a union of disjoint planes Fi\bigcup F_i where dimFin1\sum \dim F_i \leq n-1, then dimPn1(X)(n2)min{dimX,1}\dim P_{n-1}(X) \leq (n-2)\min\{\dim X, 1\}

Quantitative Version (Theorem 6.3)

For NC plane collections and measures in cc-stable position, there exist parameters such that the measures possess thin hyperplane properties.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Establishes a sharp continuum Beck-type theorem for hyperplanes
  2. Proves the necessity and sufficiency of the NC condition
  3. Develops new technical tools for handling high-dimensional geometric configurations

Technical Contributions

  • Systematic development of thin kk-plane theory
  • Introduction of the stable position concept
  • Establishment of an inductive proof framework

Future Directions

  1. Generalization to other geometric objects (e.g., spheres, surfaces)
  2. Applications to other harmonic analysis problems
  3. Improvement of constant dependencies in quantitative estimates

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Establishes a complete theoretical framework from discrete to continuum
  2. Technical Innovation: The concepts of thin kk-planes and stable position have independent value
  3. Rigorous Proof: Clear inductive structure with careful technical details
  4. Sharp Results: Obtains optimal dimension lower bounds

Technical Highlights

  1. Unified Framework: Incorporates geometric problems of different dimensions into a unified treatment
  2. Quantitative Control: Provides explicit dependence relationships for all parameters
  3. Geometric Insight: The stable position concept reveals the essential structure of high-dimensional geometry

Limitations

  1. Constant Dependencies: Some estimates may have suboptimal constants
  2. Technical Complexity: The proof involves multiple layers of induction with high comprehension barriers
  3. Scope of Applications: Primarily limited to affine geometric settings

Impact

This work has significant importance at the intersection of harmonic analysis and geometric combinatorics, providing new technical tools and theoretical frameworks for related research. The thin kk-plane theory is expected to find applications in other geometric problems.

References

  1. Beck, J. (1983). On the lattice property of the plane and some problems of Dirac, Motzkin and Erdős in combinatorial geometry.
  2. Orponen, T., Shmerkin, P., Wang, H. (2024). Kaufman and Falconer estimates for radial projections and a continuum version of Beck's theorem.
  3. Ren, K. (2023). Discretized Radial Projections in Rd.
  4. Do, T. (2020). Extending Erdős–Beck's theorem to higher dimensions.