Delayed 1T to 2H Phase Transition Upon Electrochemical Delithiation of LiMoS2

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.10911
• Title: Delayed 1T to 2H Phase Transition Upon Electrochemical Delithiation of LiMoS2
• Authors: Yerin Hong, Juhwan Lim, Jinhong Min, Nishkarsh Agarwal, Robert Hovden, Ageeth A. Bol, Yiyang Li
• Affiliation: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
• Classification: cond-mat.mtrl-sci eess.AS
• Corresponding Author: yiyangli@umich.edu

Abstract

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a widely studied layered material with significant importance in electronic, optical, and catalytic applications. It can accommodate lithium ions within van der Waals interstices, triggering phase transitions between the semiconducting 2H phase and the metallic 1T phase. While lithium ion intercalation triggers the transition to the 1T phase, the phase behavior during electrochemical delithiation remains unresolved. This study employs microelectrode arrays to investigate electrochemical (de)lithiation of monolithic MoS2. Through electrochemical voltage analysis and complementary Raman spectroscopy characterization, the results demonstrate that MoS2 flakes initially retain the 1T phase following electrochemical cycling and delithiation. However, over the course of several days, it gradually transforms back to the thermodynamically stable 2H phase. These findings resolve the phase transition pathway during delithiation and demonstrate the capability for electrochemical synthesis of metastable 1T-MoS2 phases.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Importance of MoS2: As a transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD), MoS2 has widespread applications in lubricants, transistors, memory devices, batteries, and catalysts
2. Phase Transition Mechanism: MoS2 can undergo phase transitions between the semiconducting 2H phase (trigonal prismatic Mo-S coordination) and the metallic 1T phase (octahedral Mo-S coordination)
3. Lithium Ion Intercalation: Insertion and extraction of lithium ions within van der Waals interstices alter the material's physical properties, including phase structure

Key Research Questions

Existing studies present conflicting views on the phase transition dynamics during electrochemical delithiation of MoS2:

• Some studies suggest the phase transition is reversible, with the 1T phase reverting to 2H upon delithiation
• Other studies indicate MoS2 remains trapped in a metastable 1T phase after delithiation
• Most studies employ porous electrodes, making it difficult to elucidate intrinsic phase transition dynamics

Research Motivation

1. Resolve Phase Transition Mechanism Controversy: Clarify the phase transition pathway during electrochemical delithiation
2. Single-Flake Level Precision Study: Avoid the complexity of porous electrodes and obtain intrinsic phase behavior
3. Device Application Guidance: Provide theoretical foundation for MoS2-based electrochemical device design

Core Contributions

1. First Electrochemical Cycling of Monolithic MoS2: Utilizing microelectrode array technology to conduct precise electrochemical (de)lithiation studies at the single flake level
2. Reveal Delayed Phase Transition Mechanism: Demonstrate that delithiated MoS2 flakes initially retain the 1T phase, gradually transforming back to the 2H phase over several days
3. Provide Method for Electrochemical Synthesis of 1T-MoS2: Demonstrate the feasibility of preparing metastable 1T-MoS2 phases through electrochemical methods
4. Resolve Field Controversy: Clarify the phase transition dynamics during delithiation through combined electrochemical voltage analysis and Raman spectroscopy

Methodology Details

Experimental Design

Microelectrode Array Platform:

• 15 μm square, 50 nm thick Au microelectrodes as working electrodes
• Li0.6FePO4 porous electrode as counter and reference electrodes
• 1 M LiPF6/propylene carbonate electrolyte
• All electrochemical operations conducted in Ar glovebox

Key Techniques

1. Monolithic Flake Preparation: PDMS mechanical exfoliation method to transfer MoS2 flakes onto microelectrodes
2. Electrochemical Cycling:
   • Constant current mode: lithiation current -3.6 pA, delithiation current +2.4 pA
   • Voltage window: 0.8-3.4 V vs Li/Li+
   • Cyclic voltammetry: scan rate 2 mV/s
3. In-situ Characterization: Combined electrochemical measurements and Raman spectroscopy analysis

Characterization Methods

• Electrochemical Analysis: Voltage curves, dQ/dV analysis, capacity integration
• Raman Spectroscopy: 532 nm laser, 50× long working distance objective, 0.5% power
• Phase Identification:
  • 2H phase: E2g (384 cm⁻¹) and A1g (410 cm⁻¹) peaks
  • 1T phase: J1 peak (156 cm⁻¹)

Experimental Setup

Sample Preparation

• MoS2 Crystal: Purchased from HQ graphene
• Flake Size: ~15 μm, thickness ~80 nm
• Electrode Fabrication: Standard photolithography, Ti/Au (5 nm/100 nm) metal layers
• Passivation Layer: 50 nm SiN layer to minimize parasitic reactions

Electrochemical Conditions

• Electrolyte: 1 M LiPF6 in anhydrous propylene carbonate
• Atmosphere: Ar glovebox (<1 ppm O2 and H2O)
• Temperature: Room temperature
• Pre-cycling: 3 cyclic voltammetry cycles in 1.3-3.5 V range to eliminate side reactions

Time-Scale Study

• Immediate Measurement: 30 minutes post-cycling
• Delayed Measurement: After 4 and 8 days
• Storage Conditions: In Ar glovebox, covered with electrolyte

Experimental Results

Major Findings

1. Electrochemical Cycling Behavior

• First Lithiation: Distinct voltage plateau at 1.1 V, corresponding to 2H→1T phase transition
• Subsequent Cycles: 1.1 V plateau gradually disappears, lithiation primarily occurs at higher voltages
• Delithiation Process: No anodic plateau near 1.1 V, primarily anodic peaks at 1.9 V and 2.4 V

2. Capacity Analysis

• First Cycle: Lithiation capacity primarily below 1.5 V
• Subsequent Cycles: Lithiation capacity above 1.5 V gradually increases
• Capacity Evolution: Confirms 2H→1T phase transition primarily occurs in first cycle

3. Raman Spectroscopy Evidence

Immediate Post-Cycling Measurement:

• J1 peak at 156 cm⁻¹ appears, confirming 1T phase presence
• E2g and A1g peaks remain present, indicating possible mixed phase state

Delayed Phase Transition Study

Lithiated State (Figure 3a)

• 30 minutes: Strong J1 peak, red-shifted E2g and A1g peaks
• 4-8 days: Maintains 1T characteristics, E2g and A1g intensity weakens over time
• Conclusion: 1T phase is relatively stable in lithiated state

Delithiated State (Figure 3b)

• 30 minutes: Strong J1 peak, confirming 1T phase
• 4 days: J1 peak weakens, E2g and A1g peaks strengthen and blue-shift
• 8 days: Further transition toward 2H phase characteristics
• Conclusion: 1T phase gradually transforms back to 2H phase after delithiation

Electrochemical Verification

Cyclic Voltammetry After 8-Day Rest:

• New lithiation peak appears below 1.5 V
• Lithiation capacity recovers from 3 pAh to 5 pAh
• Confirms partial recovery of 2H phase

Related Work

Chemical Intercalation Methods

• n-Butyllithium Method: Simple and scalable, but lacks precise control
• Electrochemical Method: Provides precise, dynamic, and reversible lithium concentration control

Current State of Phase Transition Research

• Cook and Tolbert Groups: Observed 1T phase in porous electrodes after delithiation
• Zhang et al.: Reported reversible ion intercalation
• Advantages of This Study: Single-flake level investigation + better-sealed experimental conditions

Theoretical Background

• Thermodynamics: 2H phase is thermodynamically stable
• Kinetics: 1T→2H transition exhibits kinetic barriers
• Applications: 1T phase exhibits metallic character, suitable for contact electrodes and catalysis

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Clear Phase Transition Pathway: 2H→1T (lithiation) → 1T (delithiation) → 2H (aging)
2. Delayed Transition: 1T phase after delithiation remains stable for several days
3. Controlled Synthesis: Electrochemical method enables preparation of metastable 1T-MoS2

Mechanistic Explanation

• Thermodynamic Driving Force: 2H phase has lower energy
• Kinetic Barriers: 1T→2H transition requires overcoming energy barriers
• Environmental Factors: Moisture and oxygen may influence transition rate

Application Significance

1. Battery Applications: Metallic nature of 1T phase facilitates rapid charge/discharge
2. Neuromorphic Devices: Switching between 1T lithiated and 1T delithiated states
3. Phase Engineering: Provides new pathway for preparing hybrid-phase 2D materials

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Ingenious Experimental Design: Microelectrode arrays enable single-flake level precision studies
2. Comprehensive Characterization: Electrochemistry + Raman spectroscopy provide complementary information
3. Time-Scale Investigation: Reveals kinetic characteristics of phase transition
4. Rigorous Experimental Conditions: Ultra-low moisture/oxygen environment ensures result reliability
5. Resolves Important Controversy: Clarifies phase transition mechanism during delithiation

Limitations

1. Phase Distinction: Cannot differentiate between 1T and 1T' phases
2. Mechanistic Depth: Molecular mechanism of phase transition dynamics insufficiently discussed
3. Temperature Effects: Temperature influence on transition rate not investigated
4. Sample Statistics: Limited statistical significance of single-flake studies

Impact

1. Academic Value: Resolves important controversy in MoS2 phase transition field
2. Technical Value: Provides new method for controlled preparation of 1T-MoS2
3. Application Prospects: Provides important guidance for MoS2-based device design
4. Methodological Contribution: Application of microelectrode array technology in 2D material research

Applicable Scenarios

1. Fundamental Research: Phase transition mechanisms in 2D materials
2. Device Development: MoS2-based batteries, sensors, and catalysts
3. Phase Engineering: Preparation and application of metastable materials
4. Characterization Techniques: Electrochemical studies of individual nanostructures

References

The paper cites 66 relevant references covering multiple aspects of MoS2 including fundamental properties, phase transition mechanisms, electrochemical behavior, and device applications, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Summary: Through ingenious experimental design and rigorous characterization methods, this study successfully resolves the controversy regarding phase transition mechanisms during electrochemical delithiation of MoS2, making important contributions to both theoretical development and practical applications in this field. The discovery of delayed phase transition not only possesses significant scientific value but also provides new insights for device design and optimization.