How Gravity Can Explain the Collapse of the Wavefunction

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11037
• Title: How Gravity Can Explain the Collapse of the Wavefunction
• Author: Sabine Hossenfelder
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics), hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv Preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11037v1

Abstract

The author presents a simple argument demonstrating how a fundamental theory unifying matter and gravity can produce phenomena that appear as wavefunction collapse. The resulting model is local, parameter-free, and makes testable predictions.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The measurement problem in quantum mechanics involves a fundamental question: why do we typically not observe the complete results of Schrödinger evolution, but instead observe only a single eigenstate of the measurement operator, with probabilities calculable from the wavefunction?

Importance of the Problem

1. Non-locality Difficulty: Traditional wavefunction collapse descriptions are non-local and difficult to reconcile with general relativity
2. Macroscopic Superposition Problem: We have never observed macroscopic superposition states (superpositions of measurement eigenstates), requiring explanation for why collapse can occur locally
3. Limitations of Existing Models: Existing collapse models (such as GRW, Diósi's stochastic gravitational collapse, and Penrose's gravity-induced collapse) all violate Bell's local causality condition

Research Motivation

The author argues that establishing a local collapse model requires employing superdeterminism, since according to Bell's theorem, any local causal model must violate measurement independence. This paper aims to demonstrate how local collapse naturally emerges from general assumptions of quantum gravity within a superdeterministic framework.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a New Local Collapse Model: Establishes a local, parameter-free wavefunction collapse model based on the assumption of unification between matter and geometry
2. Resolves Non-locality Issues: Avoids the non-locality difficulties of traditional collapse models through superdeterministic methods
3. Establishes Testable Predictions: The model provides specific collapse conditions and timescale estimates
4. Recovers the Born Rule: Naturally reproduces the probabilistic rules of quantum mechanics from fundamental assumptions

Detailed Methodology

Fundamental Assumption: Unification of Matter and Geometry

The author's core assumption is that matter, radiation, and geometry are fundamentally the same thing. This implies:

1. Unified Quantum State: There exists a fundamental quantum state $|\Psi\rangle$ in which particles and geometry constitute the same quantum state
2. Hilbert Space Constraint: Rather than the complete product Hilbert space $H = H_m \otimes H_g$, a subset $M := \{|\Psi\rangle \otimes U|\Psi\rangle\}$ is considered
3. Total Hamiltonian: $\hat{H}_{tot} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\hat{H}_u \otimes \mathbf{1} + \mathbf{1} \otimes U\hat{H}_u U^\dagger\right)$

Deviation from Schrödinger Evolution

Due to the product state constraint, time evolution cannot strictly satisfy the Schrödinger equation. The author defines the residual: $R := (i\partial_t - \hat{H})|\Psi\rangle$

and employs the functional: $S := \int dt ||R||$

to quantify the degree of deviation.

Superdeterminism and Teleology

The superdeterministic character of the model manifests in:

1. Constraint Conditions: Time evolution must satisfy the product state constraint
2. Action Principle: The realized time evolution is the path that minimizes the residual action $S$
3. Future Dependence: The evolution path depends on the measurement setup, embodying a "teleological" character

Multi-body System Treatment

For multiple interacting subsystems, the residual takes the form: $||R||^2 = ||R'_A||^2 + ||R'_B||^2 + \langle\Psi|\tilde{V}^2|\Psi\rangle$

where the respective terms correspond to the contributions of each subsystem's deviation from the mean-field path and the interaction contribution.

Model Property Analysis

Treatment of the Penrose Case

Consider a particle of mass $m$ in a superposition of two positions $\vec{x}_1$ and $\vec{x}_2$:

1. Standard Quantum Gravity Evolution: $|\Psi'\rangle = \alpha'_1 e^{-itm\Phi_1}|\chi_1\rangle|\Phi_1\rangle + \alpha'_2 e^{-itm\Phi_2}|\chi_2\rangle|\Phi_2\rangle$
2. Product State Form: $|\Psi\rangle = (\alpha_1|\chi_1\rangle + \alpha_2|\chi_2\rangle)(\alpha_1|\Phi_1\rangle + \alpha_2|\Phi_2\rangle)$
3. Residual Estimate: $\sqrt{|\langle R|R\rangle|} = \frac{1}{2}m|\alpha_1\alpha_2||\Phi_{12}|\sqrt{2-4|\alpha_1\alpha_2|^2}$

Collapse Mechanism

When the system is measured:

1. Amplification Effect: The detector correlates the quantum state with increasingly many particles, increasing the total mass in the superposition state
2. Residual Accumulation: Macroscopic superposition states produce large residuals $S \sim \tau m|\Phi_{12}|$
3. Optimal Path: To maintain small residuals, the optimal evolution is to locally "collapse" to one branch in the interaction region

Recovery of the Born Rule

By introducing hidden variables $\lambda$ and probability distribution: $\rho(\lambda|r) = \begin{cases} re^{-r\lambda} & \lambda \geq 0 \\ 0 & \lambda < 0 \end{cases}$

where the rate parameter: $r(|\Psi_s\rangle, |\Psi_e\rangle) := e^{-2A(|\Psi_s\rangle,|\Psi_e\rangle)}$

the probability of measurement outcome is finally obtained as $P_I = |\alpha_I|^2$, completely recovering the Born rule.

Experimental Verification

Parameter Estimates

The collapse timescale predicted by the model:

• Electron: $\tau_e \sim \frac{m_p^2}{m^3} \sim 7 \times 10^{23}$ seconds
• Heavy Nucleus (100 nucleons): $\tau \sim 10^8$ seconds
• Nanoscale Oscillator: To achieve a collapse time of 1 second requires approximately 0.2 nanograms of coherent mass

Existing Experimental Schemes

The most promising experimental approach is to place small objects (such as silicon oscillators) in a superposition of two coherent oscillation states. Current decoherence times in such experiments are on the millisecond scale, approaching the parameter range needed to test this model.

Alternative Testing Methods

1. Matter-Gravity Entanglement Tests: Observe whether matter and gravity can truly be entangled
2. Graviton Emission: Study possible matter state constraints in scattering processes
3. Medium Interactions: Investigate which interactions can produce sufficient residual accumulation

Comparison with Related Work

Distinction from Penrose-Diósi Model

1. Scaling Behavior:
   • PD Model: Effect initially increases then decreases with wavepacket separation
   • Present Model: Effect remains constant after wavepacket orthogonalization, independent of distance
2. Physical Quantity Dependence:
   • PD Model: Depends on variance of gravitational self-energy
   • Present Model: Depends on sum of gravitational potential

Comparison with Other Collapse Models

Traditional models (GRW, Diósi, Penrose) are all non-local, whereas the present model achieves locality through superdeterminism.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Consequences of Unification Assumption: The assumption of matter-geometry unification naturally leads to deviation from Schrödinger evolution
2. Local Collapse Mechanism: By minimizing action, the system tends to evolve toward approximately classical final states
3. Parameter-free Predictions: Collapse conditions are determined by known gravitational strength: $\tau m|\Phi_{12}| \gtrsim 1$

Model Interpretation

The author analogizes massive objects in superposition states to virtual particle pairs in Feynman diagrams: they can temporarily exist but do not appear in "outgoing" states (i.e., detector eigenstates).

Limitations

1. Teleological Character: The model's future dependence may be merely a mathematical artifact
2. Missing Fundamental Theory: This is a phenomenological model lacking a complete underlying theory
3. Experimental Challenges: For fundamental particles, effects are extremely weak and difficult to observe

Future Directions

1. Complete Theory: Development of a complete underlying unified theory
2. Experimental Verification: Testing predictions in nanoscale oscillator experiments
3. Mathematical Refinement: Eliminating teleological features in the model

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Proposes a novel approach to solving the measurement problem, avoiding non-locality difficulties
2. Mathematical Rigor: Provides a concrete mathematical framework and computational methods
3. Testability: Offers explicit experimental predictions and parameter estimates
4. Unification: Connects the quantum measurement problem with quantum gravity

Weaknesses

1. Fundamental Assumptions: The assumption of matter-geometry unification lacks independent theoretical support
2. Teleology Problem: The model's future dependence presents conceptual difficulties
3. Experimental Feasibility: Most predictions are difficult to verify with current technology
4. Completeness: As a phenomenological model, it lacks complete theoretical foundation

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new perspectives for research on quantum gravity and the measurement problem
2. Experimental Guidance: Offers specific parameter guidance for related experimental design
3. Conceptual Value: Challenges traditional quantum mechanics interpretation frameworks

Applicable Scenarios

This model is particularly suitable for:

1. Behavior prediction of macroscopic quantum systems
2. Experimental design for quantum gravity effects
3. Theoretical research on the measurement problem

References

The paper cites 52 important references covering multiple fields including quantum measurement theory, gravitational collapse models, Bell's theorem, and superdeterminism, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a theoretically significant paper proposing an innovative approach to solving the quantum measurement problem. While some issues remain regarding fundamental assumptions and conceptual framework, its mathematical treatment is rigorous, experimental predictions are explicit, and it opens new directions for research in related fields.