Dual-Waveguide Pinching Antennas for PLS: Parallel Placement or Orthogonal Placement?

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11044
• Title: Dual-Waveguide Pinching Antennas for PLS: Parallel Placement or Orthogonal Placement?
• Authors: Yang Lu, Xinke Xie, Yanqing Xu, Bo Ai, Octavia A. Dobre, Dusit Niyato
• Category: eess.SP (Signal Processing)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11044

Abstract

Pinching Antennas (PAs), as an emerging flexible antenna technology, enable customization of channel conditions over a wide range through movable PAs deployed along waveguides. This paper investigates the application of PAs in physical layer security (PLS), achieving secure communication by expanding the channel condition differences between legitimate users (LUs) and eavesdroppers (Eves). The paper focuses on dual-waveguide scenarios where multiple PAs on two waveguides serve multiple LUs in the presence of a single Eve. Two waveguide placement strategies are specifically considered: parallel placement and orthogonal placement, along with two channel models: intra-waveguide phase shift and intra-waveguide phase shift with attenuation. A two-stage algorithm is proposed to solve the secure sum rate (SSR) and secure energy efficiency (SEE) maximization problems.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Challenges in Physical Layer Security: Traditional PLS is constrained by spatial degrees of freedom (DoF), particularly when eavesdroppers are positioned between base stations and legitimate users, making it difficult to provide high-quality secure coverage
2. Limitations of Existing Technologies:
   • Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) introduce multiplicative fading
   • Most flexible antenna technologies focus only on phase shift adjustment for line-of-sight transmission
   • Path loss dominates RF signal propagation
   • Cell-free networks lack the capability to reconstruct wireless channels

Research Motivation

Pinching Antenna System (PASS) provides large-scale and on-demand wireless channel adjustment, offering new degrees of freedom for enhancing PLS. PAs are implemented by placing small dielectric particles on dielectric waveguides, which can be deployed at scale, allowing PAs to move closer to LUs to mitigate path loss and construct new links bypassing Eves.

Core Contributions

1. Problem Formulation: For dual-waveguide scenarios, considering two waveguide placement strategies (parallel and orthogonal) and two channel models, SSR and SEE maximization problems are established
2. Algorithm Design: A two-stage algorithm is proposed where the first stage employs feasibility-enhanced particle swarm optimization (FeaPSO) for PA position optimization, and the second stage uses successive convex approximation (SCA) to optimize beamforming and artificial noise vectors
3. Performance Comparison: Numerical analysis of average performance for both placement strategies and special cases (Eve positioned ahead of LUs)
4. Validity Verification: Demonstrates that PAs significantly improve SSR and SEE, validating the necessity of orthogonal waveguide placement

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Within a 2D×2D square service area, a dual-waveguide PA system provides secure communication for K LUs in the presence of a single Eve. The objective is to maximize SSR or SEE by optimizing PA positions, beamforming vectors, and artificial noise vectors.

System Model

Waveguide Placement Strategies

1. Parallel Placement: Two waveguides deployed in parallel with spacing D/3, PAs move along the x-axis
2. Orthogonal Placement: Two waveguides deployed orthogonally with intersection at the origin; PAs on the first waveguide move along the y-axis, while PAs on the second waveguide move along the x-axis

Channel Models

1. Intra-Waveguide Phase Shift Model: $g(\psi^{Pin}_{l,n}) = \exp\left(-j\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_G}\|\psi^{Pin}_{l,0} - \psi^{Pin}_{l,n}\|\right)$
2. Intra-Waveguide Phase Shift with Attenuation Model: $g(\psi^{Pin}_{l,n}) = \exp\left(-\zeta\|\psi^{Pin}_{l,0} - \psi^{Pin}_{l,n}\| - j\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_G}\|\psi^{Pin}_{l,0} - \psi^{Pin}_{l,n}\|\right)$

Secure Information Rate

The secure information rate for the k-th user is defined as: $R^{Sec}_k = [R_k - R^{Eve}_k]^+$

Two-Stage Optimization Algorithm

Stage One: FeaPSO Algorithm

• Objective: Optimize PA positions
• Method: Particle swarm optimization combined with feasibility adjustment module
• Innovations:
  • Feasibility adjustment ensures PA placement constraints are satisfied
  • Dynamic adjustment of beamforming vectors to adapt to updated PA positions

Stage Two: SCA Algorithm

• Objective: Optimize beamforming and artificial noise vectors
• Method: Successive convex approximation
• Processing Strategies:
  • Introduce auxiliary variables for variable substitution
  • First-order Taylor approximation for handling non-convex constraints
  • Unified treatment of SSR and SEE maximization problems

Experimental Setup

Simulation Parameters

Comparison Methods

• Exhaustive search (ES-0.4) as baseline
• Fixed-position antenna systems
• Performance comparison of two waveguide placement strategies

Evaluation Metrics

• Secure sum rate (SSR) bit/s/Hz
• Secure energy efficiency (SEE) bit/J/Hz
• Cumulative distribution function (CDF) analysis

Experimental Results

Algorithm Validity Verification

Parallel Placement Results

Orthogonal Placement Results

Key Parameter Impact Analysis

1. Power Budget Impact: SSR increases monotonically with power budget; PAs significantly outperform fixed antennas
2. PA Quantity Impact: Increasing the number of PAs improves SSR and SEE, providing more design degrees of freedom
3. Attenuation Coefficient Impact: As the attenuation coefficient increases, the performance gap between the two channel models gradually widens

Placement Strategy Comparison

Theoretical Analysis

• Parallel Placement: Expected average LU-waveguide distance is $\frac{13}{36}D^2 + h^2$
• Orthogonal Placement: Expected average LU-waveguide distance is $\frac{D^2}{3} + h^2$

Experimental Findings

1. Both strategies exhibit similar average performance, with orthogonal placement showing slight superiority
2. Orthogonal placement demonstrates significant advantages in special cases (Eve positioned ahead of LUs)
3. Orthogonal placement provides more diverse channel conditions, enhancing PLS performance

Related Work

PA Optimization Technology Classification

1. Alternating Optimization-based Convex Optimization (AO-CVXopt): Suitable for system insight exploration
2. Search-Assisted CVXopt: Combines search algorithms with convex optimization
3. Learning-Based Optimization: Focuses on fast real-time implementation

Current State of PA-Enabled PLS Research

The paper demonstrates existing work limitations through detailed comparison tables:

• Most work considers only parallel waveguide placement
• Simple intra-waveguide channel models (phase shift only)
• Primary focus on SSR while neglecting SEE

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Algorithm Validity: The proposed two-stage algorithm approaches exhaustive search performance with significantly lower computational complexity
2. PA Advantages: PAs significantly outperform traditional fixed antenna systems in both SSR and SEE
3. Placement Strategy: Orthogonal placement demonstrates clear advantages in special scenarios, validating its necessity
4. Channel Model: Intra-waveguide attenuation has important impact on system performance and cannot be simply ignored

Limitations

1. Optimization Complexity: PA positions and transmission parameters are deeply coupled, requiring new optimization techniques
2. Channel Modeling: Accurate PA channel models remain a key challenge
3. Practical Deployment: Waveguide placement strategies need adjustment based on specific application scenarios

Future Directions

1. Develop new optimization techniques and deep learning methods to handle deeply coupled variables
2. Investigate open problems in waveguide placement strategies
3. Integrate PAs with existing flexible antenna technologies to achieve combined gains

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: First systematic study of dual-waveguide PA systems for PLS applications, considering multiple placement strategies and channel models
2. Complete Methodology: Well-designed two-stage algorithm balancing feasibility and performance
3. In-Depth Analysis: Combines theoretical analysis with numerical experiments, providing deep performance insights
4. Practical Value: Provides important guidance for practical deployment of PA systems

Weaknesses

1. Scenario Limitations: Primarily considers dual-waveguide scenarios with limited extensibility to multiple waveguides
2. Optimization Algorithm: First stage still relies on heuristic algorithms, potentially converging to local optima
3. Practical Constraints: Insufficient consideration of hardware constraints and cost factors in actual deployment

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important theoretical foundation and methodological framework for PA-enabled PLS research
2. Practical Value: Offers guidance for flexible antenna technology applications in 6G communication systems
3. Reproducibility: Detailed algorithm descriptions and complete simulation parameters ensure good reproducibility

Applicable Scenarios

• Wireless communication systems requiring high security
• Adaptive communication in dynamic environments
• Flexible antenna deployment in future 6G networks
• Secure communication in IoT and edge computing scenarios

References

The paper cites 31 relevant references covering multiple research domains including physical layer security, flexible antenna technologies, and optimization algorithms, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.