Stabilizing the Staking Rate, Dynamically Distributed Inflation and Delay Induced Oscillations

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11065
• Title: Stabilizing the Staking Rate, Dynamically Distributed Inflation and Delay Induced Oscillations
• Authors: Carlo Brunetta, Amit Chaudhary, Stefano Galatolo, Massimiliano Sala
• Categories: cs.CR (Cryptography and Security), econ.GN (General Economics), math.DS (Dynamical Systems), q-fin.EC (Quantitative Finance - Economics)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11065

Abstract

Dynamic distributed inflation is a commonly used mechanism to guide blockchain staking rates toward an ideal balance between network security and token liquidity. However, the high sensitivity of annualized yield rates to staking rate changes, combined with inherent feedback delays in staker responses, may trigger undesirable oscillations around the equilibrium point. This paper investigates such instability phenomena, analyzes the dynamics of inflation-based reward systems, and proposes a novel distribution model designed to stabilize staking rates. The solution effectively suppresses oscillations and stabilizes yield rates within the target staking range.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The core problem addressed by this research is the dynamic instability of staking rates in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains. Specifically manifested as:

1. Staking Rate Oscillations: Under dynamic inflation mechanisms, staking rates exhibit sustained oscillations around target values
2. System Instability: The combination of high-sensitivity yield curves with delayed feedback leads to system overcorrection
3. Equilibrium Dilemma: The trade-off between network security and token liquidity is difficult to maintain in a stable manner

Problem Significance

The importance of this problem is evident in:

• Network Security Risks: Low staking rates reduce the cost of malicious attacks, threatening consensus mechanism security
• Economic Vitality Impact: High staking rates reduce circulating supply, leading to insufficient on-chain liquidity and price volatility
• Protocol Stability: Oscillatory behavior affects staker confidence and the predictability of protocol governance

Limitations of Existing Approaches

Existing dynamic inflation mechanisms, exemplified by Polkadot, have the following limitations:

1. High-Sensitivity Design: The gradient of the yield curve near the target point is too steep
2. Delay Amplification Effect: Structural delays (lockup periods, exit queues) compound with behavioral delays
3. Overcorrection Tendency: Small deviations trigger strong corrective responses, causing system overshoot

Research Motivation

Based on control theory and dynamical systems theory, this paper argues that high sensitivity in delayed feedback systems is the fundamental driver of oscillations, proposing to address this issue through redesigning the inflation distribution curve.

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Modeling: Establishes a discrete-time delayed difference equation model for staking rate dynamic evolution, quantitatively analyzing the impact of sensitivity and delay on system stability
2. Stability Analysis: Derives analytical conditions for system stability through linearization analysis, quantitatively linking stability to the derivative of the inflation curve at the equilibrium point
3. Innovative Mechanism Design: Proposes a "stability corridor" inflation distribution model that eliminates sensitivity by creating a yield rate platform within the target range
4. Numerical Verification: Validates the dynamic behavior of three different inflation mechanisms through simulation experiments, demonstrating the effectiveness of the stability corridor approach

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Current staking rate σ ∈ 0,1, inflation distribution function I(σ), target yield rate Y_t Output: Stable staking rate evolution trajectory Constraints: The system has a 7-day structural delay; staker sensitivity to yield rate differences is parameterized by b

Model Architecture

1. Dynamics Model

Staking rate evolution follows the recursive relation:

σ_n = max(0, min(1, σ_{n-1} + (Y(σ_{n-7}) - Y_t) · b))

where yield rate is defined as: Y(σ) = I(σ)/σ

2. Three Inflation Distribution Mechanisms

Constant Inflation Model:

• I(σ) = 0.1 (constant)
• Yield rate: Y(σ) = 0.1/σ
• Equilibrium point: σ_eq = I_tot/Y_t

Polkadot-style Model:

I(σ) = {
  I_0 + (σ/σ_id) · (I_M - I_0),           if 0 < σ ≤ σ_id
  I_0 + (I_M - I_0) · 2^((σ_id-σ)/d),     if σ > σ_id
}

Parameters: σ_id = 0.5, I_0 = 0.03, I_M = 0.10, d = 0.05

Stability Corridor Model:

I(σ) = {
  0.03 + 0.025 · σ,        if 0 ≤ σ < 0.4
  0.1 · σ,                 if 0.4 ≤ σ ≤ 0.6  (stability corridor)
  0.105 - 0.075 · σ,       if 0.6 < σ ≤ 1.0
}

Technical Innovation Points

1. Stability Corridor Design

The core innovation lies in designing a yield rate platform within the target range 0.4, 0.6:

• Zero Sensitivity: Within the corridor Y'(σ) = 0, eliminating oscillation drivers
• Continuity: The three-segment function is continuous at boundary points, avoiding discontinuities
• Bidirectional Incentives: Strong incentive mechanisms maintained outside the corridor

2. Theoretical Stability Analysis

Through linearization, the stability parameter is obtained: K_eq = b(I'(σ*) - Y_t) Stability condition: -2sin(π/26) < K_eq < 0, i.e., -0.241 < K_eq < 0

Experimental Setup

Simulation Parameters

• Initial Condition: σ_0 = 1%
• Sensitivity Parameter: b = 0.6
• Target Yield Rate: Y_t = 16.6%
• Delay: 7 days
• Simulation Duration: 270 days

Evaluation Metrics

1. Oscillation Amplitude: The degree of staking rate deviation around the equilibrium point
2. Convergence: Whether the system stabilizes within the target range
3. Stability Parameter: The numerical range of K_eq

Comparison Methods

1. Constant Inflation: As a baseline control
2. Polkadot-style: The existing mainstream dynamic inflation mechanism
3. Stability Corridor: The novel mechanism proposed in this paper

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Dynamic Behavior Comparison

• Polkadot-style Model: Produces strong and sustained oscillations, K_eq = -0.938·b, extremely narrow stability range (0 < b < 0.257)
• Constant Inflation Model: Gradual convergence after initial oscillations, K_eq = -0.166·b, wider stability range (0 < b < 1.452)
• Stability Corridor Model: Smooth convergence to target range, K_eq = -0.141·b, widest stability range (0 < b < 1.709)

2. Stability Analysis Results

Through analysis of the characteristic equation λ^7 - λ^6 - K_eq = 0, theoretical stability boundaries are obtained:

• Critical frequency: ω_n = (2n+1)π/13
• Maximum negative value: K_eq = -2sin(π/26) ≈ -0.241

3. Equilibrium Point Analysis

• Constant Inflation: σ* ≈ 60.2%, I'(σ*) = 0
• Polkadot-style: σ* ≈ 51.6%, I'(σ*) ≈ -0.772 (large negative derivative causes instability)
• Stability Corridor: σ* ≈ 21.3%, I'(σ*) = 0.025 (small positive derivative ensures stability)

Case Analysis

Simulations show that the stability corridor model achieves stable state around day 50, while the Polkadot-style model exhibits significant oscillations throughout the entire 270-day period, with amplitudes approximately 20-30% of the target value.

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. PoS Protocol Economics: Research on staking incentive mechanism design and equilibrium point analysis
2. Blockchain Dynamical Systems: Application of control theory and dynamical systems theory to analyze protocol stability
3. Token Economics: Research on the impact of inflation mechanisms on network security and liquidity

Advantages of This Paper

Compared to existing research, this paper is the first to:

• Systematically analyze the impact of delayed feedback on staking rate stability
• Provide quantitative criteria for stability
• Design a concrete stabilization mechanism

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Oscillation Mechanism: The combination of yield rate sensitivity and delayed feedback is the fundamental cause of staking rate oscillations
2. Stability Conditions: System stability is determined by the derivative of the inflation curve at the equilibrium point
3. Design Principles: Oscillations can be effectively suppressed by creating a yield rate platform

Limitations

1. Model Simplification: All stakers are modeled as a single "average" agent
2. Parameter Estimation: The sensitivity parameter b lacks systematic empirical research support
3. External Factors: Does not consider alternative yield opportunities such as lending protocols
4. Proof of Concept: Currently only theoretical analysis; requires actual deployment verification

Future Directions

1. Parameter Estimation: Statistically estimate behavioral parameters from on-chain data
2. Multi-Agent Models: Consider complex interactions among heterogeneous stakers
3. Adaptive Mechanisms: Dynamically adjust the inflation function based on network economic conditions
4. Empirical Verification: Test the stability corridor mechanism in actual protocols

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Combines dynamical systems theory and economics, providing a complete mathematical analysis framework
2. Problem Importance: Addresses a critical stability problem in PoS protocol design
3. Methodological Innovation: The stability corridor design is elegant with solid theoretical foundations
4. Comprehensive Analysis: Includes both numerical simulations and analytical analysis with mutual verification

Weaknesses

1. Model Limitations: Single-agent assumption is overly simplified; real staker behavior is more complex
2. Parameter Dependence: Key parameters (such as sensitivity b) lack empirical support
3. Applicability: The parameter selection of the stability corridor design may require adjustment for different protocols
4. Verification Gap: Lacks implementation and verification in real protocols

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new stability analysis tools for PoS protocol design
2. Practical Value: Can be directly applied to improvements of existing protocols
3. Research Inspiration: Provides important theoretical foundation for subsequent research

Applicable Scenarios

1. New Protocol Design: Design inflation mechanisms for new PoS protocols
2. Existing Protocol Improvement: Improve existing protocols with oscillation problems
3. Parameter Optimization: Provide theoretical guidance for protocol governance parameter adjustments

References

This paper cites 18 relevant references covering important works in multiple fields including PoS protocols, token economics, control theory, and dynamical systems, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with significant theoretical and practical value in the field of PoS protocol economics. Through rigorous mathematical analysis, the authors identify the fundamental causes of staking rate instability and propose an innovative solution. Despite some limitations from model simplifications, its theoretical framework and design approach represent an important advancement in the field.