We classify complex hyperplane arrangements $\mathcal A$ whose intersection posets $L(\mathcal A)$ satisfy $L(\mathcal A)=Ï_i^{-1}\circÏ_i\bigl(L(\mathcal A)\bigr)$ for $i=1,\dots,n$. Here $Ï_i$ denotes the projection from $\mathbb C^n$ onto $\mathbb C^{n-1}$ defined by that forgets the coordinate $x_i$ of $(x_1,\dots,x_n)\in\mathbb C^n$, and $Ï_i\bigl(L(\mathcal A)\bigr)=\{Ï_i(S)\mid S\in L(\mathcal A)\}$. We show that such arrangements $\mathcal A$ arise as pullbacks of the mirror hyperplanes of complex reflection groups of type $A$ or $B$.
This paper classifies complex hyperplane arrangements A satisfying the condition L(A)=πi−1∘πi(L(A)) for i=1,…,n, where πi denotes the projection from Cn to Cn−1 defined by forgetting the coordinate xi. The author proves that such arrangements are precisely the pullbacks of mirror hyperplanes of complex reflection groups of type A or B.
Problem Definition: Investigation of hyperplane arrangements with special stability properties. The intersection lattice L(A) of these arrangements remains invariant under coordinate projections.
Significance:
Hyperplane arrangements are central objects in algebraic combinatorics
Closely related to the theory of complex reflection groups
Important applications in systems of differential equations (particularly Pfaffian systems)
Existing Limitations: Previous lack of systematic classification of stable hyperplane arrangements
Research Motivation:
Arising from the study of Pfaffian systems with logarithmic singularities
Analysis requirements for intermediate convolution operations in preserving singularity locations
Applications to transformation theory of KZ-type systems
Definition 1.3: A vector v ∈ V is called parallel to S ∈ L(A) if and only if ⟨v,S⟩ = S
An arrangement A is called v-closed if and only if for each S ∈ L(A)^(2), we have ⟨v,S⟩ ∈ L(A)
An arrangement A is called stable if and only if there exist n linearly independent vectors
such that A is closed with respect to each of them
Let A be a stable, reduced, and indecomposable hyperplane arrangement in Cn with #L(2)>1. In appropriate coordinates, there exist positive integers m, non-negative integers r, and nonzero complex numbers α1,…,αr such that:
Notation:
Ω:={e2πk−1/m:k=1,…,m}
Ac:={{xi=ωαj}:ω∈Ω,i=1,…,n,j=1,…,r}
A0:={{xi=0}:1≤i≤n}
Classification Results:
Case n=2: r≥1 and
A={{x1=ωx2}:ω∈Ω′}∪Ac∪A0
where 1∈Ω′⊂Ω
Case n≥3:
A=A′ (when m=1 and n>3) or A=A′∪Ac∪A0
where A′:={{xi=ωxj}:ω∈Ω,1≤i<j≤n}
For n=2, the core is analyzing combinations of hyperplanes of the form {y=α1x},{y=α2x+α3}:
Lemma 3.1: If a finite set F⊂C satisfies T1(F)=T2(F)=F, where T1(z)=α1z and T2(z)=α2z+α3, then necessarily α3=0 and there exists an integer m≥2 such that α1m=α2m=1.
More general transformation theory of Pfaffian systems
Further connections with special function theory
This paper provides important structural results for hyperplane arrangement theory. Its classification theorem not only has theoretical value but also provides a solid combinatorial foundation for related differential equation theory.