Age of Information-Aware Cognitive Shared Access Networks with Energy Harvesting

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11198
• Title: Age of Information-Aware Cognitive Shared Access Networks with Energy Harvesting
• Authors: Georgios Smpokos (Linköping University), Dionysis Xenakis (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Marios Kountouris (University of Granada), Nikolaos Pappas (Linköping University)
• Classification: cs.NI (Networking and Internet Architecture)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11198

Abstract

This research investigates a cognitive shared access network with energy harvesting capabilities operating under Age of Information (AoI) constraints on the primary user. Secondary transmitters are spatially distributed according to a homogeneous Poisson Point Process (PPP), while the primary user is located at a fixed position. The primary transmitter processes bursty packet arrivals, while secondary users operate under saturated traffic conditions. To manage interference and energy, two distinct regions are introduced: an energy harvesting zone around the primary transmitter and a protection zone around the primary receiver, where secondary transmissions are prohibited. Secondary users access the channel probabilistically, with access decisions depending on their current battery state (charged or depleted) and their location relative to the protection zone. The research objective is to analyze the AoI performance of the primary user under three different packet management strategies.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Information Freshness Challenge: In modern wireless networks, particularly in IoT, UAV networks, and sensor networks, the freshness of information has become critically important. Traditional throughput and delay metrics fail to adequately capture information timeliness.
2. Rise of Energy Harvesting Networks: In environments where battery replacement or wired power supply is impractical, energy harvesting technology—where devices capture electromagnetic energy to charge batteries—has become increasingly important.
3. Interference Management in Cognitive Radio Networks: In cognitive shared access networks, secondary users need to opportunistically access the spectrum without severely impacting primary user performance.

Research Motivation

• Multi-constraint Optimization: The need to balance energy harvesting, interference management, and information freshness
• Spatial Randomness Modeling: The spatial distribution and mobility of secondary users add complexity to system modeling
• Impact of Packet Management Strategies: Different packet handling strategies have significant effects on AoI performance

Core Contributions

1. Innovative System Model: Proposes a comprehensive cognitive network model that simultaneously considers energy harvesting, spatial distribution, and AoI constraints, introducing a dual-zone concept with energy harvesting and protection zones.
2. Mathematical Analysis Framework: Establishes a battery state evolution model based on discrete-time Markov chains (DTMC) and derives transmission and success probabilities for secondary users.
3. Multi-strategy AoI Analysis: Provides in-depth analysis of primary user AoI performance under three packet management strategies:
   • First-Come First-Served (FCFS)
   • Queue with Replacement (QR)
   • Generate-at-Will (GW)
4. Performance Trade-off Insights: Reveals the mechanisms by which energy harvesting zone radius and protection zone radius influence system performance.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The research objective is to analyze the average AoI performance of the primary user in a cognitive shared access network under different packet management strategies, while considering the energy harvesting capabilities and spatial distribution characteristics of secondary users.

Inputs:

• System parameters: coverage radius R, secondary user density λs, energy harvesting zone radius reh, protection zone radius rgz
• Network parameters: primary user power Pp, secondary user power Ps, path loss exponent α, noise power σ²
• Protocol parameters: access probability ps, arrival rate λ

Outputs:

• Average AoI of the primary user
• Average throughput of secondary users
• System performance trade-off analysis

Model Architecture

1. Spatial Network Model

• Primary User Configuration: Primary transmitter (PT) located at the center of a circular coverage area with radius R, primary receiver (PR) fixed at distance dp
• Secondary User Distribution: Secondary transmitters (ST) distributed according to a homogeneous PPP with intensity λs, each ST paired with a secondary receiver (SR) at distance ds

2. Energy Harvesting Model

Employs a single time-slot charge-discharge model, with ST battery state represented by a two-state DTMC:

• State F: Battery full, can transmit
• State E: Battery empty, cannot transmit

Battery full probability:

pch = peh / (peh + ps - pgzps)

3. Interference Management Mechanism

Defines two critical zones:

• Energy Harvesting Zone: Radius reh, where ST can harvest energy from PT
• Protection Zone: Radius rgz, where ST transmission is prohibited

Active ST set:

SA = S \ (Φs ∩ Cgz(y0, rgz))

4. SINR Model

Primary receiver SINR:

SINRp = (Pp|hP|²dp^(-α)) / (σ² + Σ(i∈Str) Ps|hi|²di^(-α))

Technical Innovations

1. Dual-zone Design: Innovatively introduces energy harvesting and protection zones, achieving decoupled design of energy management and interference control.
2. Probabilistic Access Mechanism: ST transmission probability comprehensively considers battery state, spatial location, and random access:

   ptr = pch · (1-pgz) · ps
   

3. Multi-strategy AoI Modeling: Establishes mathematical models for three packet management strategies addressing different application scenarios.

Experimental Setup

System Parameters

• Coverage Area: Circular area with radius R = 1000m
• User Density: λs ∈ {10⁻³, 2×10⁻³} users/m²
• Zone Parameters: reh = 80m, rgz = 120m
• Power Settings: Pp ≫ Ps (primary user power much greater than secondary user power)
• Path Loss: α > 2

Performance Metrics

1. Average AoI (Δp): Measures information freshness of the primary user
2. Secondary User Throughput (Ts): Successful transmissions per time slot per unit area (packets/slot/m²)
3. Transmission Success Probability: psx for ST, μp for PT

Comparison Strategies

1. FCFS (First-Come First-Served): Standard queue model
2. QR (Queue with Replacement): Single-packet buffer replacement strategy
3. GW (Generate-at-Will): On-demand generation strategy

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. AoI Performance Comparison

According to Figure 4 results under different secondary user densities:

• GW strategy consistently achieves the lowest AoI
• As access probability ps increases, QR strategy demonstrates better AoI performance compared to FCFS
• Increased secondary user density leads to AoI performance degradation for all strategies

2. Parameter Impact Analysis

Impact of Energy Harvesting Zone Radius (reh):

• FCFS strategy: AoI increases sharply with reh
• QR strategy: Relatively moderate AoI growth
• GW strategy: Maintains optimal performance with growth trend similar to QR but lower values

Impact of Protection Zone Radius (rgz):

• AoI for all strategies decreases rapidly with increasing rgz
• Larger protection zones effectively reduce interference, significantly improving AoI performance
• All three strategies demonstrate consistent interference mitigation effects

3. Mathematical Analysis Results

Average AoI for FCFS Strategy:

Δp = 1/λ + (1-λ)/(μp-λ) - λ/μp² + λ/μp

Complex Expression for QR Strategy involves calculations of packet loss probability and effective arrival rate.

Concise Form for GW Strategy:

Δp = 1/(μpq)

Experimental Findings

1. Strategy Performance Ranking: GW > QR > FCFS (in terms of AoI performance)
2. Zone Radius Trade-off: Increasing reh enhances ST activity but increases interference; increasing rgz reduces interference but limits ST transmission opportunities
3. Density Impact: Increased secondary user density negatively affects all strategies, though with varying degrees of impact

Related Work

AoI Research Domain

• Foundational Theory: Kaul et al. 2-4 established the theoretical foundations of AoI
• Application Extensions: UAV-IoT networks 9-11, multicast and ad hoc networks 12-17, sensor networks 18-24
• Caching Systems: AoI optimization in web caching technology 25-28

Energy Harvesting Networks

• D2D Communication: Yang et al. 29 and Sakr et al. 30 studied EH-D2D communication in cellular networks
• Stability Analysis: Pappas et al. 32-34 applied queueing theory to analyze stability regions of EH networks

Novelty of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper is the first to combine AoI constraints, energy harvesting, and cognitive radio networks, providing a comprehensive system modeling and analysis framework.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Clear Strategy Advantages: GW strategy consistently outperforms other strategies in AoI performance, suitable for applications with extremely high information freshness requirements.
2. Parameter Design Guidance:
   • Energy harvesting zone should not be excessively large, requiring balance between energy supply and interference levels
   • Protection zones can significantly improve primary user AoI but sacrifice secondary user opportunities
3. System Trade-offs: Fundamental trade-offs exist between information freshness and secondary user throughput.

Limitations

1. Mobility Assumptions: Assumes ST undergoes completely random movement between time slots, which may not reflect actual mobility patterns
2. Simplified Energy Model: Employs single time-slot charge-discharge model; actual EH processes may be more complex
3. Perfect Channel State Information: Assumes perfect channel estimation and feedback

Future Directions

1. Adaptive Control: Develop adaptive algorithms that dynamically adjust zone radii and access strategies
2. Machine Learning Integration: Leverage ML techniques to optimize trade-offs between throughput and information freshness
3. Heterogeneous Network Extension: Extend to multi-tier heterogeneous network environments
4. Advanced EH Models: Consider more complex energy harvesting and storage models

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Model Completeness: Comprehensively considers AoI, energy harvesting, spatial randomness, and interference management; the model is complete and practical
2. Mathematical Rigor: Analysis based on stochastic geometry and queueing theory is rigorous with clear derivations
3. Comprehensive Strategy Comparison: Three packet management strategies cover different application requirements
4. Deep Parameter Impact Analysis: 3D surface plots clearly demonstrate the effects of key parameters

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experimental Validation: Absence of simulation or practical testing to verify theoretical analysis results
2. Insufficient Justification for Parameter Selection: Some system parameter choices lack sufficient theoretical or practical justification
3. Inadequate Complexity Analysis: Insufficient discussion of algorithm computational complexity and implementation feasibility
4. Limited Boundary Condition Analysis: System behavior under extreme parameter conditions not thoroughly analyzed

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important theoretical foundation for AoI-aware cognitive EH networks
2. Practical Value: Offers guidance for 6G networks, IoT, and edge computing system design
3. Research Inspiration: Provides rich directions for subsequent research extensions

Applicable Scenarios

1. IoT Sensor Networks: Environmental monitoring, smart cities, and other scenarios requiring timely information updates
2. Vehicular Networks: V2V and V2I communication for state information transmission
3. Industry 4.0: Real-time monitoring and control systems in smart manufacturing
4. Edge Computing: State synchronization and updates in mobile edge computing

References

The paper cites 44 relevant references covering important works in multiple domains including AoI theory foundations, energy harvesting networks, cognitive radio, and stochastic geometry, with comprehensive and authoritative citations.

Overall Assessment: This is an excellent paper in theoretical modeling and analysis, successfully integrating multiple important concepts into a unified framework. Although lacking experimental validation, its theoretical contributions and analytical depth are sufficient to support its academic value. It holds significant reference value for scholars and engineers working in related fields.