Edge-to-Cloud Computations-as-a-Service in Software-Defined Energy Networks for Smart Grids

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11286
• Title: Edge-to-Cloud Computations-as-a-Service in Software-Defined Energy Networks for Smart Grids
• Authors: Jack Jackman, David Ryan, Arun Narayanan, Pedro Nardelli, Indrakshi Dey
• Classification: eess.SY (Systems and Control), cs.SY (Systems and Control)
• Publication Date: October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11286

Abstract

Modern power grids face a critical mismatch between data generation and processing locations: protective relays, electric vehicle charging, and distributed renewable energy sources require millisecond-level analysis at the edge, while compute-intensive workloads are often located in remote cloud data centers, resulting in missed real-time deadlines and wasted electrical energy. This paper proposes the first SDEN (Software-Defined Energy Network) CaaS (Computations-as-a-Service) architecture that unifies edge, fog, and cloud computing, integrating 5G URLLC (Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication), SDN (Software-Defined Networking), and NFV (Network Function Virtualization) to achieve end-to-end co-optimization of energy consumption, latency, and reliability.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. Spatial Mismatch Problem: Severe misalignment between data generation locations (edge devices) and processing locations (cloud) in smart grids
2. Real-time Requirements: Critical applications such as protective relays and EV charging require millisecond-level response times
3. Energy Efficiency: Traditional cloud computing models result in significant communication and computational energy waste
4. System Fragmentation: Existing solutions focus either exclusively on edge computing or cloud computing, lacking a unified architecture

Research Significance

• Decarbonization transitions require rapid migration of power grids from traditional fossil fuels to distributed energy resources (DERs)
• Smart grids must process large volumes of real-time data and coordinate effectively
• Current ICT resource utilization is inefficient, with computational and transmission bottlenecks

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Centralized Architecture: Suffers from single points of failure, high latency, and congestion issues
• Decentralized Architecture: Reduces latency but compromises coordination effectiveness
• Hybrid Architecture: Increases system complexity and infrastructure requirements

Core Contributions

1. First SDEN-CaaS Architecture: Proposes the first unified edge-fog-cloud computing software-defined energy network implementing computations-as-a-service
2. Joint Task Offloading Optimization: Establishes an optimization model coupling computational placement with network capacity, explicitly considering URLLC constraints
3. Feasibility-Preserving Heuristic Algorithm: Designs a lightweight greedy algorithm that maintains scalability while closely tracking optimal energy-latency trade-offs
4. Hierarchical AI Pipeline: Constructs a three-tier AI architecture with reactive edge, predictive fog, and strategic cloud layers
5. Federated Graph Neural Networks: Implements privacy-preserving fault detection and microgrid coordination

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Task streams generated by edge nodes (measurements, control decisions, anomaly detection events) Output: Optimal task allocation strategy minimizing total latency and energy consumption Constraints: Computational capacity limits, URLLC latency requirements, network bandwidth constraints

Model Architecture

1. System Model

Models the hybrid ICT smart grid environment as a directed graph $G = (N, E)$:

• $N$: Set of computational nodes, including edge devices $N_E$, fog devices $N_F$, and cloud data centers $N_C$
• $E$: Set of directed edges representing available data or control communication paths

2. Optimization Objective Function

Where:

• $x_{i,n}$: Binary decision variable indicating whether task $i$ is assigned to node $n$
• $L_{i,n} = \frac{d_i}{b_{i,n}} + \frac{1}{\mu_n}$: Total latency (transmission + processing)
• $E_{i,n} = d_i \varepsilon^{comm}_{i,n} + c_i \varepsilon^{proc}_n$: Total energy consumption (communication + computation)
• $\omega_1, \omega_2$: Latency and energy consumption weights

3. Constraints

• Unique Task Assignment: $\sum_{n \in N} x_{i,n} = 1, \forall i \in N_E$
• Capacity Constraints: $\sum_{i \in N_E} x_{i,n} \cdot \beta_i \leq \mu_n, \forall n \in N$
• Latency Constraints: $x_{i,n} \cdot L_{i,n} \leq L_{max}, \forall i,n$
• Binary Constraints: $x_{i,n} \in \{0,1\}$

Technical Innovations

1. Joint Optimization Framework

• First unified modeling of computational placement and network capacity planning
• Explicit consideration of URLLC constraints ensuring ultra-low latency requirements
• Simultaneous optimization of energy consumption and latency rather than single objectives

2. Hierarchical AI Architecture

3. Federated Graph Neural Networks

• Implements privacy-preserving distributed learning
• Supports large-scale microgrid coordination
• Avoids raw data transmission, protecting privacy

Experimental Setup

Dataset and Parameters

• Task Generation Rate: $\beta_i \in [0.67, 2]$ tasks/second
• Computational Capacity: Cloud 60 tasks/second, Fog 15 tasks/second, Edge 5 tasks/second
• Energy Parameters:
  • Processing energy: Cloud 2.0 J/bit, Fog 0.5 J/bit, Edge 0.2 J/bit
  • Communication energy: Cloud 1.2 J/bit, Fog 0.3 J/bit, Edge 0.1 J/bit
• Weight Settings: $\omega_1 = 0.6$, $\omega_2 = 0.4$

Evaluation Metrics

1. Energy Savings: $\Delta E = E_{base} - E_{opt}$
2. Active Power Generation Reduction: $(P_{gen} - P_{exported})/P_{gen} \times 100\%$
3. Packet Loss Rate: $\sum_{i=1}^N \beta_i \cdot p_{i,n} / \sum_{i=1}^N \beta_i \times 100\%$
4. Availability: $T_{up}/T \times 100\%$

Comparison Methods

• Cloud-Only Baseline: All tasks processed in cloud
• Edge-First Allocation: Prioritizes edge devices until saturation
• Round-Robin Allocation: Distributes tasks evenly across layers
• Greedy Heuristic: Dynamic allocation based on composite cost function

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Energy Efficiency

• Maximum Savings: 69.65% energy savings compared to cloud-only processing
• Median Savings: 30.2% energy savings
• Savings primarily from shorter transmission paths and more efficient edge processors

2. Latency Performance

• URLLC Optimization: 15% reduction in transmission latency, 25% reduction in jitter
• End-to-End Latency: Remains within constraints as load increases
• Real-Time Response: Supports millisecond-level fault detection and control

3. System Reliability

4. Bandwidth Utilization

• Edge Processing: 90% reduction in bandwidth usage
• Fog Processing: 50% reduction in bandwidth usage
• Local Preprocessing: Significantly reduces backbone network transmission requirements

Ablation Studies

AI Component Contributions

• Baseline Threshold System: F1=0.67, Latency 150ms
• Edge-Fog Intelligence: F1=0.86, Latency 90ms
• Federated GNN: F1=0.95, Latency 35ms, Precision 0.96, Recall 0.94

Network Optimization Effects

• Static Routing: High packet loss, especially under saturation
• SDN Routing: Improved packet transmission through adaptive routing
• URLLC + Heuristic: Further loss reduction through congestion prediction

Case Studies

Disaster Recovery Microgrid

• Enables rapid autonomous microgrid reconfiguration
• Minimizes cloud connectivity dependency
• Supports islanding operation mode

Energy Community Coordination

• Centralized optimization faces scalability limitations
• Federated GNN converges consistently within 15 seconds
• Achieves global coordination while preserving privacy

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Edge Computing and Smart Grids: Existing research primarily focuses on single-layer optimization
2. 5G Network Slicing: Priority control for protection traffic
3. Task Offloading Algorithms: Multi-objective optimization lacking grid-specific constraints
4. Software-Defined Networks: Network energy efficiency optimization without computational co-design

Advantages of This Work

• First complete unified edge-fog-cloud architecture
• Co-design incorporating 5G URLLC characteristics
• Considers grid-specific real-time and reliability requirements
• Achieves joint optimization of computation and networking

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Hybrid SDEN architecture achieves multi-objective optimization of latency, energy efficiency, bandwidth, and reliability
2. Lightweight greedy heuristic algorithm effectively approximates optimal solutions
3. Hierarchical AI pipeline significantly enhances fault detection and system response capabilities
4. Federated GNN enables privacy-preserving large-scale coordination

Limitations

1. Parameter Sensitivity: Weight selection significantly impacts results
2. Homogeneity Assumptions: Current assumptions treat same-layer nodes as homogeneous
3. Dynamic Loads: Insufficient consideration of time-varying load characteristics
4. Security: Limited consideration of adversarial attacks and security threats

Future Directions

1. Hardware-in-the-loop and field trial validation
2. Interoperability with DERMS and traditional SCADA systems
3. Enhanced security and attack resilience
4. Carbon-aware and price-aware scheduling optimization

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: First SDEN-CaaS concept with pioneering significance
2. Theoretical Completeness: Rigorous mathematical modeling and comprehensive optimization framework
3. High Practical Value: Addresses actual pain points in smart grids
4. Comprehensive Experiments: Multi-faceted validation of method effectiveness
5. Clear Presentation: Logical structure and detailed technical exposition

Weaknesses

1. Simulation Limitations: Lacks real-world validation; parameter settings may be overly idealistic
2. Complexity Analysis: Insufficient discussion of system implementation complexity
3. Cost Considerations: Inadequate consideration of deployment and maintenance costs
4. Standardization: Insufficient analysis of compatibility with existing grid standards
5. Scalability Verification: Large-scale deployment feasibility requires further validation

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides new paradigm for smart grid computing architecture research
2. Practical Value: Offers technical roadmap for next-generation smart grid design
3. Interdisciplinary Integration: Promotes deep fusion of power systems and computer networking
4. Standards Development: May influence future smart grid-related standard formulation

Applicable Scenarios

1. New Smart Grids: Particularly suitable for modern grids designed from scratch
2. Microgrid Systems: Environments with abundant distributed energy resources
3. Urban Energy Systems: City-level grids requiring fine-grained management
4. Industrial Parks: Industrial power consumption scenarios with extreme real-time requirements

References

The paper cites 30 relevant studies covering multiple domains including smart grids, edge computing, 5G networks, and software-defined networking, providing solid theoretical foundation and technical support for this research.

This paper holds significant theoretical and practical importance in smart grid computing architecture research. The proposed SDEN-CaaS architecture provides an innovative solution to address computational and communication challenges faced by modern power grids. Although further work is needed for real-world deployment validation, its technical approach and optimization methodology point the direction for future smart grid development.