Nonanalyticities and Ergodicity Breaking in Noninteracting Many-Body Dynamics via Stochastic Resetting and Global Measurements

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11450
• Title: Nonanalyticities and Ergodicity Breaking in Noninteracting Many-Body Dynamics via Stochastic Resetting and Global Measurements
• Authors: David Soldner, Igor Lesanovsky, Gabriele Perfetto
• Classification: cond-mat.stat-mech
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11450

Abstract

This paper investigates nonanalyticities and ergodicity breaking in noninteracting many-body dynamics generated through stochastic resetting and global measurements. Stochastic resetting generates nonequilibrium steady states by interspersing amplitude evolution and resets at random time intervals. When reset states are conditionally selected based on results from global spatially-resolved measurements, steady states can exhibit collective behavior similar to that observed in phase transitions. The study examines conditional resetting protocols in noninteracting spin systems, where reset states are selected as magnetization eigenstates conditionally chosen based on prior magnetization measurement outcomes. The resulting steady states are characterized by spin density distributions within given magnetization eigenstates, equivalent to order parameters. The obtained steady-state phase diagrams exhibit multiple nonanalytic points: first-order type for half-integer spins, while multicritical behavior is found for integer spins, manifesting as both first- and second-order discontinuities. The study further demonstrates that the associated dynamics are non-ergodic, meaning the final steady state assumed by the system is determined by its initial state.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

Stochastic resetting is a phenomenon relevant across multiple disciplines including biology, ecology, computer science, and physics. In quantum systems, the simplest implementation of resetting is reinitializing the system state to a predefined (pure or mixed) state. Such resetting can be viewed as external monitoring of quantum dynamics, with similarities to measurement.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Challenge: Existing research has been primarily limited to simple spin-1/2 systems, lacking systematic investigation of collective behavior classification for higher spin values
2. Experimental Relevance: This research may be exploited in sensing protocols and metrology applications, where different spin S values can be distinguished based on different nonanalytic behaviors
3. Novel Mechanism Exploration: Seeking new mechanisms that produce emergent nonlinear behavior without relying on interactions

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• For spin-1/2 systems, the nonanalyticities observed are strongly restricted to discontinuities in excited spin density due to algebraic simplicity, similar to first-order phase transitions
• Continuous nonanalytic points are not permitted
• Lack of systematic classification for general spin S systems

Core Contributions

1. Systematic Classification Framework: Provides comprehensive classification of collective behavior in noninteracting many-body spin-S systems based on time-reversal symmetry
2. Markov Chain Mapping: Establishes exact mapping between quantum dynamics and Markov chain models on the reset state space
3. Multicritical Behavior Discovery: Reveals multicritical behavior in integer spin systems where first- and second-order nonanalyticities coexist
4. Non-ergodicity Mechanism: Elucidates the mechanism by which absorbing reset states lead to non-ergodic dynamics
5. Interaction-Free Collective Behavior: Demonstrates that collective behavior in noninteracting systems can be induced solely through global monitoring

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Study steady-state behavior of N noninteracting spins under conditional resetting protocols, where:

• Input: Initial spin state, Hamiltonian parameters (Ω, Δ)
• Output: Steady-state spin density distribution
• Constraints: Global magnetization measurement and majority-rule reset selection

Model Architecture

1. Hamiltonian Model

The system consists of N noninteracting spins:

H = Ω∑(α=1 to N) Ŝx_α + Δ∑(α=1 to N) Ŝz_α

2. Conditional Resetting Protocol

• Measurement Phase: Perform global projective measurement on total magnetization density sz = (1/N)∑Sz_α
• Reset Selection: Select reset state |r⟩N according to majority rule, where r = argmax_j n_j
• Time Distribution: Reset time intervals τ follow Poisson distribution f(τ) = γe^(-γτ)

3. Markov Chain Mapping

Map reset event sequences to Markov chain jumps on 2S+1 reset states:

Transition probability matrix:

R_jk^(N) = ∫₀^∞ dτ γe^(-γτ) W_jk^(N)(τ)

where W_jk^(N)(τ) is the probability of transitioning from state j to state k after time τ before resetting.

Technical Innovations

1. Time-Reversal Symmetry Classification

Utilize properties of time-reversal operator Θ = ie^(-iπŜy)K:

• Half-integer spins: Θ²|j⟩ = -|j⟩
• Integer spins: Θ²|j⟩ = |j⟩

This symmetry determines different types of nonanalytic behavior.

2. Absorbing State Identification

In the thermodynamic limit N→∞, certain transition probabilities vanish:

p^F_jj(τ) > p^F_js(τ), ∀s≠j → R_j* = 0, R_jj = 1

Define absorbing reset states; once the system resets to these states, all subsequent resets occur in the same state.

3. Multicritical Behavior Mechanism

Integer spin systems possess a central state (sz = 0) whose transition probabilities differ from other paired states, leading to simultaneous first- and second-order nonanalyticities.

Experimental Setup

System Parameters

• Spin Values: S = 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2
• Reset Rate: γ = Δ = 1 (normalized)
• Parameter Ratio: Ω̃ = Ω/Δ as primary tuning parameter
• System Size: Thermodynamic limit N → ∞

Evaluation Metrics

Primary order parameter is steady-state spin density:

p^NESS_j = Tr[|j⟩_α⟨j|_α ρ^NESS]

Critical Point Identification

Determine critical values Ω̃_c numerically, defined as:

Ω̃_c = min{Ω̃ | R_jk > 0}

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Spin S=1/2 System

• Single critical point Ω̃_c = 1
• Only first-order jump discontinuities present
• Non-ergodic region: Ω̃ < 1, ergodic region: Ω̃ > 1

2. Spin S=1 System

Three critical points discovered:

• Ω̃_c1 ≈ 0.52 (R₂₁ = R₂₃ ≠ 0)
• Ω̃_c2 ≈ 0.71 (R₁₂ = R₃₂ ≠ 0)
• Ω̃_c3 ≈ 1.41 (R₁₃ = R₃₁ ≠ 0)

Multicritical behavior observed at Ω̃_c2: p^NESS_1 simultaneously displays first-order jump and second-order discontinuity in p^NESS_2.

3. Spin S=3/2 System

Five critical points, all nonanalyticities are first-order type (consistent with half-integer spin expectation).

4. Spin S=2 System

Ten critical points, multicritical behavior observed at Ω̃_c2 and Ω̃_c4.

Ablation Studies

• Unconditional Reset Comparison: Demonstrates importance of conditional measurement
• Different Initial States: Verifies initial-state dependence of non-ergodicity
• Parameter Scanning: Systematically studies evolution of critical behavior with parameters

Experimental Findings

1. Symmetry Determines Critical Behavior

• Half-integer spins: Only first-order discontinuities
• Integer spins: Multicritical behavior with coexisting first- and second-order transitions

2. Universal Non-ergodicity

All studied spin values display non-ergodic regions, with steady states dependent on initial conditions.

3. Measurement-Induced Correlations

Despite non-interacting Hamiltonian, global measurements effectively couple spins.

Related Work

Stochastic Resetting Theory

• Pioneering work by Evans and Majumdar established foundational theory of classical stochastic resetting
• Quantum resetting research is relatively recent, primarily focused on simple systems

Quantum Measurement and Monitoring

• Measurement-induced phase transitions are a current research hotspot
• This work provides new interaction-free implementation mechanisms

Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions

• Differs from traditional interaction-driven phase transitions
• Provides new paradigm based on monitoring

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Universal Classification: Collective behavior classification based on time-reversal symmetry applies to all spin values
2. Markov Chain Correspondence: Deep connection between quantum dynamics and classical stochastic processes
3. Measurement-Driven Phase Transitions: Demonstrates that phase transitions can be induced solely through measurement
4. Experimental Feasibility: Protocol can be implemented on existing quantum simulator platforms

Limitations

1. Thermodynamic Limit: Results strictly apply to N→∞; finite-size effects require further investigation
2. Specific Measurement Protocol: Results depend on majority rule; other selection rules may produce different behavior
3. Poisson Resetting: Only considers exponential waiting time distribution

Future Directions

1. Finite-Size Analysis: Study how collective behavior emerges at experimental scales
2. Dynamic Correlation Functions: Characterization beyond average spin density
3. First Passage Time: Connect to quantum first passage protocols
4. Interaction Effects: Investigate how weak interactions modify results

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides complete mathematical framework and exact solutions
2. Deep Physical Insight: Reveals novel mechanisms of measurement-induced collective behavior
3. Systematic Approach: Comprehensive study across multiple spin values
4. Experimental Relevance: Matches current quantum simulator capabilities
5. Interdisciplinary Significance: Bridges quantum physics and stochastic process theory

Weaknesses

1. Computational Complexity: Numerical calculations become complex for high spin values
2. Physical Intuition: Physical pictures of certain mathematical results could be clearer
3. Application Exploration: Discussion of practical application scenarios is relatively limited

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new paradigm for nonequilibrium quantum many-body physics
2. Experimental Guidance: Offers concrete protocols for quantum simulation experiments
3. Methodological Value: Markov chain mapping method has broad applicability
4. Cross-disciplinary Impact: May inspire related research in other fields

Application Scenarios

1. Quantum Sensing: Utilize critical behavior of different spins for precision measurement
2. Quantum Simulation: Implementation in cold atom or ion trap systems
3. Quantum Computing: Optimization of reset protocols in quantum error correction
4. Fundamental Research: Nonequilibrium state physics and measurement theory

References

This paper cites 86 relevant references, primarily including:

• Foundational work on stochastic resetting theory (Evans & Majumdar, 2011)
• Recent advances in quantum measurement and monitoring
• Theoretical frameworks of nonequilibrium statistical physics
• Technical references for experimental implementation

Overall Assessment: This is an excellent paper with significant theoretical importance and experimental value, providing new perspectives and tools for understanding collective phenomena in noninteracting quantum many-body systems. Its rigorous theoretical analysis and systematic numerical investigations establish a solid foundation for further development in this field.