2025-11-24T03:01:25.087318

Field Theoretic Approach to Interacting Two Body Tunneling

Ye
Two body tunneling problems are hard to treat analytically due to the incompatibility between tunneling and perturbation theory. The lack of classical solutions of the Euclidean Lagrangian of continuous systems further thwarts semi-classical expansions. To develop an analytic theory which provides insight on interacting two-particle tunneling, we use new results to derive the Bethe-Salpeter equation of a tunneling field theory with Yukawa coupling. We show that in the one plus one dimensional case a closed solution in the instantaneous positive-energy regime is permitted. We then compute the scattering amplitude in first-order perturbation theory and recover the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to confirm physical consistency and relevancy.
academic

Field Theoretic Approach to Interacting Two Body Tunneling

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.11656
  • Title: Field Theoretic Approach to Interacting Two Body Tunneling
  • Author: YE Guo (Reed College)
  • Classification: nucl-th (Nuclear Theory), hep-th (High Energy Theory)
  • Publication Date: October 28, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11656

Abstract

The two-body tunneling problem presents analytical challenges due to the incompatibility between tunneling effects and perturbation theory. The absence of classical solutions in the Euclidean Lagrangian of continuous systems further obstructs semiclassical expansion. To develop an analytical theory providing insights into interacting two-body tunneling, this work derives the Bethe-Salpeter equation for tunneling field theory with Yukawa coupling using new results. The study demonstrates that in the 1+1 dimensional case, closed-form solutions exist within the instantaneous positive-energy (Salpeter) region. Subsequently, scattering amplitudes are computed through perturbative calculations of inter-particle interactions, and the Lippmann-Schwinger equation is recovered to confirm physical consistency and relevance.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

  1. Experimental Requirements: Recent advances in cold atom physics experimental techniques have enabled precise manipulation and measurement of quantum tunneling processes, even allowing investigation of phenomena beneath potential barriers
  2. Technical Applications: Two-body tunneling phenomena are ubiquitous in tunnel diodes, Josephson junctions, scanning tunneling microscopes, and other technologies
  3. Nuclear Physics Problems: Provides simplified models for nuclear physics problems such as two-proton decay, where the third body is treated as a background field

Limitations of Existing Methods

  1. Perturbation Theory Failure: The non-perturbative nature of tunneling renders traditional perturbative methods inapplicable
  2. Absence of Classical Solutions: The Euclidean Lagrangian of continuous systems lacks classical solutions, obstructing semiclassical expansion
  3. Separability Issues: The inseparability of x1x_1 and x2x_2 in the Hamiltonian H^=h^(1)+h^(2)+α(W(x^1)+W(x^2))+βU(x^1x^2)\hat{H} = \hat{h}^{(1)} + \hat{h}^{(2)} + \alpha(W(\hat{x}_1) + W(\hat{x}_2)) + \beta U(\hat{x}_1 - \hat{x}_2) and the breaking of translational symmetry prevent obtaining exact solutions

Research Motivation

Develop a field-theoretic approach to handle interacting two-body tunneling that can:

  • Naturally incorporate multi-particle effects
  • Handle meson creation and annihilation
  • Provide a non-perturbative analytical framework

Core Contributions

  1. Establishing Field Theory Framework: Based on Zielinski et al.'s single-particle tunneling theory, constructs an interacting two-body tunneling field theory model with Yukawa coupling
  2. Deriving Bethe-Salpeter Equation: Obtains the BS equation for the four-point correlation function of tunneling field theory through ladder diagram resummation
  3. 1+1 Dimensional Closed-Form Solution: Proves the existence of closed-form solutions in the 1+1 dimensional case under the instantaneous positive-energy approximation, solved via generalized Wiener-Hopf technique
  4. Physical Consistency Verification: Verifies the physical consistency of the theory through perturbative computation of scattering amplitudes and recovery of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation
  5. Non-relativistic Limit: Demonstrates that the model is equivalent to the classical Hamiltonian form (1) in the non-relativistic limit

Methodology Details

Field Theory Lagrangian

The model's Lagrangian is: L=12(μψ)(μψ)12m2ψ212eu(x)ψ2+12(μϕ)(μϕ)12μ2ϕ212gϕψ2L = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\psi)(\partial^\mu\psi) - \frac{1}{2}m^2\psi^2 - \frac{1}{2}e^{u(x)}\psi^2 + \frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\phi)(\partial^\mu\phi) - \frac{1}{2}\mu^2\phi^2 - \frac{1}{2}g\phi\psi^2

where:

  • ψ\psi: tunneling field with mass mm
  • ϕ\phi: meson field with mass μ\mu, coupling strength to ψ\psi is gg
  • u(x)=aV0δ(x3)u(x) = aV_0\delta(x_3): potential barrier term

Resummation of Tunneling Propagator

Using results from reference 10, the resummated ψ\psi propagator is: Dψ(p,k)=δ4(pk)iΔψ(p)+(1+ieaV02f(pμ))1ieaV0(2π)3Δψ(p)δ3(pμkμ)Δψ(k)D_\psi(p,k) = \delta^4(p-k)i\Delta_\psi(p) + (1 + \frac{ieaV_0}{2f(p_\mu)})^{-1}ieaV_0(2\pi)^3\Delta_\psi(p)\delta^3(p_\mu - k_\mu)\Delta_\psi(k)

where f(pμ)=p02p12p22m2f(p_\mu) = \sqrt{p_0^2 - p_1^2 - p_2^2 - m^2}.

Bethe-Salpeter Equation Derivation

Through resummation of all ladder diagrams, the recursive relation satisfied by the four-point correlation function LL is obtained: L(pa,pb;ua,ub)=Dψ(pa,ua)Dψ(pb,ub)+g2Dψ(pa,ka)Dψ(pb,kb)Dϕ(q)L(va,vb;ua,ub)×δ2(ka+qva)δ2(kbqvb)d4kad4kbd4qd4vad4vbL(p^a, p^b; u^a, u^b) = D_\psi(p^a, u^a)D_\psi(p^b, u^b) + g^2\int D_\psi(p^a, k^a)D_\psi(p^b, k^b)D_\phi(q)L(v^a, v^b; u^a, u^b) \times \delta^2(k^a + q - v^a)\delta^2(k^b - q - v^b)d^4k^ad^4k^bd^4qd^4v^ad^4v^b

Through coordinate transformation to total and relative momenta, and simplification in the P=0P=0 frame, this reduces to: L(P,p;U,u)=Dψ(P+p2,U+u2)Dψ(Pp2,Uu2)+Γ(P+p2)Γ(Pp2)g2i(vp)2/4μ2+iϵL(P,v;U,u)d4vL(P,p;U,u) = D_\psi\left(\frac{P+p}{2}, \frac{U+u}{2}\right)D_\psi\left(\frac{P-p}{2}, \frac{U-u}{2}\right) + \Gamma\left(\frac{P+p}{2}\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{P-p}{2}\right)g^2\int \frac{i}{(v-p')^2/4 - \mu^2 + i\epsilon}L(P',v;U,u)d^4v

1+1 Dimensional Instantaneous Positive-Energy Solution

Dimensional Reduction and Instantaneous Approximation

The problem is simplified to 1+1 dimensions (retaining the energy dimension and tunneling dimension x3x_3), employing the instantaneous approximation: iL(v)(vp)2/4μ2+iϵd2vi(v1p1)2/4+μ2iϵ(L(v)dv0)dv1\int \frac{iL(v)}{(v-p')^2/4 - \mu^2 + i\epsilon}d^2v \approx \int \frac{-i}{(v_1-p'_1)^2/4 + \mu^2 - i\epsilon}\left(\int L(v)dv_0\right)dv_1

Through positive-energy projection, the simplified integral equation is obtained: L(p1)=G(p1)ig2C(p1)1(v1p1)2/4+μ2iϵL(v1)dv1L(p_1) = G(p_1) - ig^2C(p_1)\int \frac{1}{(v_1-p_1)^2/4 + \mu^2 - i\epsilon}L(v_1)dv_1

Generalized Wiener-Hopf Solution

Through Fourier transformation, the integral equation is converted to convolution form: l(x)=g(x)ig2(mrs)(x)l(x) = g(x) - ig^2(m * r * s)(x)

where the analytical form of r(x)r(x) is: r(x)=δ(x)+α[ieγxΘ(x)ieγxΘ(x)]+α22γeγxr(x) = \delta(x) + \alpha[ie^{\gamma x}\Theta(-x) - ie^{-\gamma x}\Theta(x)] + \frac{\alpha^2}{2\gamma}e^{-\gamma|x|}

Through Laplace transformation and function decomposition techniques, the closed-form solution is finally obtained: L=(1A)1(G+BK)L = (1-A)^{-1}(G + BK)

where the specific form of (1A)1(1-A)^{-1} is given in Laplace space.

Physical Consistency Verification

Tunneling Amplitude in Born Approximation

In the perturbative limit g/(eaV0)1|g/(eaV_0)| \ll 1, the tunneling amplitude is computed as: t(pa,pb)=F(pa)F(pb)+ig2ρ(P0)Λ(pa)Λ(pb)Ω(pa,pb;pa,pb)t(p^a, p^b) = F(p^a)F(p^b) + ig^2\rho(P_0)\Lambda(p^a)\Lambda(p^b)\Omega(p^a, p^b; p^a, p^b)

where F(pa)=(1+ieaV02p1a)1eaV0(2π)3F(p^a) = (1 + \frac{ieaV_0}{2p^a_1})^{-1}eaV_0(2\pi)^3 is the single-particle tunneling amplitude.

Physical Characteristics Analysis

The heatmap of tunneling amplitude t2|t|^2 displays:

  1. Correlated Tunneling Peak: The peak near the origin is consistent with correlated tunneling; interactions "anomalously" promote tunneling at low momenta
  2. Hourglass Shape: Same-sign momenta favor the correlated channel, while opposite-sign momenta are primarily suppressed
  3. Island Structure: "Islands" appear in the opposite-sign quadrant, possibly indicating sequential or exchange-assisted tunneling processes

Non-relativistic Limit

In the non-relativistic limit p/m1|p|/m \ll 1 and EmE \ll m, the 3D Lippmann-Schwinger equation is recovered: L(p)=G(p)+πg2m2Λ(p3)Λ+(p3)1EH0(p)V(vp)L(v)d3vL(p) = G(p) + \frac{\pi g^2}{m^2}\Lambda_-(p_3)\Lambda_+(p_3)\frac{1}{E-H_0(p)}\int V(v-p)L(v)d^3v

where Λ±(p3)=1±eaV0(2π)4±p3+ieaV0\Lambda_\pm(p_3) = 1 \pm \frac{eaV_0(2\pi)^4}{\pm p_3 + ieaV_0}, demonstrating that the model is equivalent to the Hamiltonian problem with delta-function barrier.

Experimental Results and Analysis

Tunneling Amplitude Structure

Numerical calculations (parameters: m=1.0,μ=0.5,g=8×103,eaV0=1.0m=1.0, \mu=0.5, g=8×10^{-3}, eaV_0=1.0) display:

  1. Low-Momentum Resonance Structure: Rich resonance structures on the (p1a,p1b)(p^a_1, p^b_1) plane
  2. Symmetry Breaking: Mechanistic asymmetry between same-sign and opposite-sign quadrants
  3. Momentum Cutoff: Correlated tunneling effects decrease sharply beyond a certain total momentum cutoff

Physical Insights

  1. Correlated Tunneling Mechanism: Interactions promote tunneling at low momenta, consistent with experimental observations
  2. Sequential Tunneling: The "island" structure may correspond to one particle tunneling first and becoming transiently localized near the barrier, subsequently promoting the second particle's tunneling through residual interactions
  3. Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking: The mechanistic asymmetry in momenta may explain the "spontaneous symmetry breaking" phenomenon discovered in numerical studies

Theoretical Foundations

  1. Zielinski et al.'s Work: Provides field-theoretic foundations for single-particle tunneling and resummation propagators
  2. Classical BS Equation: Wick and Cutkosky's one-boson-exchange BS equation theory
  3. Quasi-potential Methods: Instantaneous approximation methods by Salpeter, Blankenbecler-Sugar, Thompson, and Gross

Experimental Background

  1. Cold Atom Experiments: Ramos et al.'s quantum tunneling time measurements in optical lattices
  2. Direct Observation: Fölling et al.'s direct observation of second-order atomic tunneling
  3. Strongly Correlated Interfaces: Tajima et al.'s multi-particle tunneling transport studies

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Successfully establishes a fully relativistic field theory framework for interacting two-body tunneling
  2. Obtains closed-form solutions in the 1+1 dimensional instantaneous positive-energy approximation
  3. Verifies consistency between theory and classical quantum mechanics
  4. Reveals rich tunneling dynamics structures

Limitations

  1. Mathematical Complexity: The mathematical complexity of fully non-perturbative solutions requires further investigation
  2. Approximation Constraints: Limited applicability range of instantaneous approximation and 1+1 dimensional simplification
  3. Experimental Verification: Phenomena such as the "island" structure predicted by theory require experimental verification
  4. Parameter Range: Theory is valid within specific parameter ranges; extension to broader physical regions is needed

Future Directions

  1. Complete Solutions: Obtain fully non-perturbative solutions of the Bethe-Salpeter equation
  2. Higher-Dimensional Generalization: Extend closed-form solution methods to higher dimensions
  3. Experimental Comparison: Detailed comparison with cold atom and nuclear physics experiments
  4. Phenomenological Applications: Explore applications in tunnel devices and quantum devices

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Innovation: First complete field theory framework for interacting two-body tunneling
  2. Mathematical Rigor: Systematic derivation of Bethe-Salpeter equation from fundamental Lagrangian
  3. Physical Insights: Reveals rich physical mechanisms including correlated and sequential tunneling
  4. Consistency Verification: Multiple methods verify physical consistency of the theory
  5. Technical Breakthrough: Closed-form solutions in 1+1 dimensions are extremely rare in tunneling problems

Weaknesses

  1. Dimensional Limitation: Closed-form solutions only obtained in 1+1 dimensions; actual physical systems are typically three-dimensional
  2. Approximation Dependence: Cumulative errors from multiple approximations (instantaneous approximation, positive-energy projection, etc.) are difficult to assess
  3. Parameter Constraints: Theory is valid in specific parameter regions; universality remains to be verified
  4. Insufficient Experimental Verification: Lacks direct comparison with experimental data

Impact

  1. Academic Value: Provides new research paradigm for multi-particle tunneling theory
  2. Technical Potential: Possible applications in quantum devices and nuclear physics calculations
  3. Methodological Contribution: Application of generalized Wiener-Hopf technique in quantum field theory has methodological value

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical Research: Quantum tunneling, many-body quantum mechanics, nuclear physics theory
  2. Numerical Computation: Provides analytical benchmarks and physical insights for numerical methods
  3. Device Design: Theoretical design guidance for tunnel devices and quantum devices

References

The paper cites 21 important references covering quantum tunneling experiments, field theory methods, and Bethe-Salpeter equation theory, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.


This paper makes significant progress on the challenging problem of interacting two-body tunneling. While constrained by dimensional and approximation limitations, its theoretical framework and methodological contributions possess important academic value and application potential.