Mathematical aspects of the decomposition of diagonal U(N) operators

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11735
• Title: Mathematical aspects of the decomposition of diagonal U(N) operators
• Authors: M. M. Fedin, A. A. Morozov (from ITEP, NRC "Kurchatov Institute", MIPT)
• Classification: quant-ph (quantum physics), hep-th (high energy theoretical physics), math.GR (group theory)
• Publication Date: October 10, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11735

Abstract

This paper proves that arbitrary diagonal operators can be decomposed into tensor products and matrix products of smaller matrices, with emphasis on the analytic structure of the resulting formulas and their inherent symmetries. The article introduces graphical representations that provide clear visualization of the structure of these decompositions. The symmetries of the proposed decompositions are also discussed. The methods and representations developed in this work are applicable to various fields, including quantum computing algorithm optimization, complex biological analysis, crystallography, and AI model optimization.

Research Background and Motivation

Importance of the Problem

Tensor decomposition is widely applied across various fields of modern natural science for multidimensional data analysis:

1. AI Model Compression: Achieving compression and optimization of large-scale AI models
2. Quantum Entanglement Classification: Supporting classification analysis of quantum entangled states
3. Biological Network Analysis: Analyzing complex multilayer biological networks
4. Crystallography Applications: Solving highly specialized crystallographic problems

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Computational Complexity: Finding optimal decomposition is an NP-hard problem
2. Approximate Methods: Existing numerical methods typically only provide approximate solutions
3. Lack of General Solutions: For specific applications, there is a lack of general analytical solutions

Research Motivation

The primary motivation for this work stems from quantum computing, particularly:

1. Quantum Gate Precision Differences: SU(2) operations achieve ~99.7% precision, while SU(4) operations achieve ~96.5% precision, with error probabilities differing by approximately one order of magnitude
2. Universal Basis Decomposition: Need to decompose operators into universal basis {H, T, CNOT} to achieve portability of quantum algorithms
3. Recursive Construction: Seeking recursive decomposition schemes that minimize the number of SU(4) operators

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proves a recursive decomposition theorem for diagonal matrices $D_n \in U(2^n)$, providing an analytical solution
2. Linear Bijective Mapping: Constructs linear bijective mappings $L$ and $L^{-1}$ between parameters
3. Graphical Representation: Introduces graphical representation using perfect binary trees (PBT), providing clear visualization
4. Symmetry Analysis: Systematically analyzes decomposition symmetries, including cases with constant and growing L(k) operators
5. Universality Proof: Proves that decomposition capability for $U(2^n)$ implies decomposition capability for arbitrary $U(N)$ (N < 2^n)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Decompose diagonal matrices $D_n(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_{2^n})$ in $U(2^n)$ into products of elements from SU(4), SU(2), and U(1) groups.

Core Theorem (Theorem 1)

Recursive Decomposition Theorem: Any diagonal matrix $D_n$ can always be decomposed using the recursive formula:

$D_n(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_{2^n}) = (D_{n-1}(\bar{\alpha}_1, \bar{\alpha}_2, \ldots, \bar{\alpha}_{2^{n-1}}) \otimes I) \cdot U_{tail}$

where: $U_{tail} = \prod_{i=1}^{2^{n-1}} ((I_{2^{n-1}} \otimes D_1(\beta_i, -\beta_i)) \cdot L(A_n(i)))$

Key Definitions

Diagonal Matrix $D_n$

$D_n(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ldots, \alpha_{2^n}) = \text{diag}(e^{i\alpha_1}, e^{i\alpha_2}, \ldots, e^{i\alpha_{2^n}})$

Control Matrix $L(k)$

$L(k) = I^{\otimes(k-1)} \otimes \pi_0 \otimes I^{\otimes(n-k)} + I^{\otimes(k-1)} \otimes \pi_1 \otimes I^{\otimes(n-k-1)} \otimes X$

where $\pi_0 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}$, $\pi_1 = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$

Properties of Matrix X

$X \in U(2), \quad X^2 = I, \quad \text{Tr}(IX) = 0, \quad \text{Tr}(ZX) = 0$

Linear Mapping Construction

Forward Mapping L: $L: \alpha_i = \bar{\alpha}_{\lceil i/2 \rceil} + (-1)^{i+1} \beta_j r^j_{\lceil i/2 \rceil, n}$

Inverse Mapping $L^{-1}$: $\bar{\alpha}_i = \frac{\alpha_{2i-1} + \alpha_{2i}}{2}, \quad \beta_i = \frac{1}{2^n}(\alpha_{2i-1} - \alpha_{2i})r_{ij,n}^T$

Technical Innovations

1. Recursive Structure of $r_n$ Matrix: Proves that $r_{n+1} = \sigma(r_2^{\otimes n})$ (in the sense of permutation)
2. Perfect Binary Tree Correspondence: Establishes one-to-one correspondence between sequence $A_n$ and perfect binary trees
3. Systematic Symmetry Analysis: Analyzes all possible symmetric transformations through graphical methods

Experimental Setup

Matrix Verification

The paper verifies matrix forms in small-scale cases through explicit calculation:

For $n=2$: $r_2 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$

For $n=3$: $r_3 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}$

Theoretical Verification

1. Invertibility Verification: $r_n^{-1} = \frac{1}{2^{n-1}}r_n^T$
2. Determinant Relations: $|\det(r_n)| = |\det(r_2)|^{(n-1) \cdot 2^{n-2}}$
3. Commutativity Proof: $[L(k), L(m)] = 0$ for all $k, m$

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Completeness: Proves that decomposition is complete for all diagonal matrices in $U(2^n)$
2. Optimality: The number of L(k) operators achieves the theoretical minimum of $2^{n-1}$
3. Non-degeneracy: The constructed linear mapping L is bijective and invertible

Symmetry Analysis Results

1. Constant L(k) Case: Provides symmetric transformations that preserve the number of L(k) operators
2. Growing L(k) Case: Demonstrates generalized decompositions allowing more L(k) operators

Effectiveness of Graphical Representation

Through perfect binary tree diagrams, successfully visualizes:

• Dependencies between parameters
• Geometric structure of symmetric transformations
• Fractal characteristics of recursive construction

Related Work

Major Related Research

1. Shende et al. (2006): Synthesis methods for quantum logic circuits
2. Crooks (2024): Systematic study of quantum gates, states, and circuits
3. Solovay-Kitaev Theorem: Theoretical foundation for universal quantum gate sets

Advantages of This Work

1. Analytical Solutions: Provides exact analytical decomposition rather than numerical approximation
2. Recursive Structure: Systematic recursive construction method facilitating theoretical analysis
3. Symmetry Analysis: In-depth symmetry analysis providing theoretical guidance for optimization

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully proves the recursive decomposition theorem for arbitrary diagonal unitary matrices
2. Constructs linear bijective mappings between parameters
3. Establishes correspondence between graphical representation and mathematical structure
4. Systematically analyzes all possible symmetries of decomposition

Limitations

1. Restriction to Diagonal Matrices: Method applies only to diagonal unitary matrices and cannot be directly extended to general unitary matrices
2. Recursive Depth: For large matrices, recursive depth may cause difficulties in practical implementation
3. Quantum Noise: Theoretical decomposition does not account for noise effects in actual quantum systems

Future Directions

1. Non-diagonal Cases: Extension to decomposition of general unitary matrices
2. Noise Optimization: Optimization of decomposition considering noise in actual quantum systems
3. Algorithm Implementation: Development of efficient algorithmic implementations and optimization strategies

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Mathematical proofs are complete and rigorous with clear logic
2. Practical Value: Direct application to quantum computing algorithm optimization
3. Innovative Methods: Graphical representation provides new analytical tools
4. Systematicity: Systematic analysis of symmetries is highly valuable

Weaknesses

1. Limited Application Scope: Restricted to diagonal matrices with limited practical applications
2. Missing Complexity Analysis: Lacks detailed computational complexity analysis
3. Insufficient Numerical Experiments: Primarily theoretical proofs with lack of large-scale numerical verification

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new recursive methods for matrix decomposition theory
2. Quantum Computing Applications: Direct guidance for quantum algorithm optimization
3. Cross-disciplinary Potential: Methods may extend to other fields requiring matrix decomposition

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantum Circuit Design: Optimization of quantum gate sequence design
2. Quantum Algorithm Optimization: Reduction of error rates in quantum operations
3. Theoretical Research: Foundation for studying more general matrix decompositions

References

The paper cites 23 important references covering:

• Quantum computing foundational theory (Nielsen & Chuang, Kitaev, et al.)
• Tensor decomposition methods (Oseledets, Tyrtyshnikov, et al.)
• Quantum circuit synthesis (Shende, et al., Crooks, et al.)
• Mathematical foundations (Knuth, Aroyo, et al.)

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical paper achieving significant progress in diagonal unitary matrix decomposition. Although the application scope is limited, it establishes a solid foundation for related theoretical research, particularly with important practical value in the quantum computing field.