The Adoption Paradox: A Comparative Analysis of Veterinary AI Adoption in China and North America

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11758
• Title: The Adoption Paradox: A Comparative Analysis of Veterinary AI Adoption in China and North America
• Authors: Shumin Li (College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University), Xiaoyun Lai (Jiangsu Veterinary Practitioners Conference)
• Classification: cs.CY cs.AI
• Publication Date: 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11758

Abstract

This study validates the hypothesis that AI adoption patterns are influenced by regional market and demographic factors through a comparative analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) awareness, adoption, and application among veterinary professionals in China and North America. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 455 Chinese veterinary professionals and compared with survey data from 3,968 veterinary professionals in the United States and Canada in 2024. The Chinese cohort was primarily composed of clinicians (81.5%), and despite lower AI familiarity (55.4%), demonstrated high adoption rates (71.0%), primarily for clinical tasks such as disease diagnosis (50.1%) and prescription calculation (44.8%). In contrast, the North American cohort exhibited high familiarity (83.8%) but lower adoption rates (39.2%), prioritizing administrative tasks such as image analysis (39.0%) and record management (39.0%). The study reveals an "adoption paradox": the Chinese market demonstrates a practitioner-driven bottom-up adoption model, while the North American market exhibits a more cautious top-down integration approach.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

This study addresses the differential patterns of AI adoption in the global veterinary field. Existing research has primarily focused on the North American market, lacking in-depth understanding of other important international markets, such as China.

Research Significance

1. Market Scale: China possesses a multi-billion-dollar pet care industry and an extensive network of modern veterinary facilities
2. Global Perspective: Understanding regional AI adoption patterns is crucial for guiding globally responsible technology development
3. Practical Guidance: Provides region-specific strategic guidance for AI developers, educators, and regulatory bodies

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Limited geographic scope, primarily concentrated on the North American market
• Lack of cross-cultural and cross-market comparative analysis
• Insufficient understanding of AI adoption patterns in emerging markets

Research Hypothesis

AI adoption patterns are not universally applicable but are significantly influenced by regional factors, including workforce demographics, market maturity, and local technological environments.

Core Contributions

1. First detailed analysis of veterinary AI adoption in China: Fills an important knowledge gap in the field
2. Discovery of the "adoption paradox" phenomenon: Low familiarity but high adoption rates in the Chinese market; high familiarity but low adoption rates in North America
3. Identification of two distinct AI integration pathways: China's "bottom-up" clinically-oriented model versus North America's "top-down" administratively-oriented model
4. Provision of global AI development strategy recommendations: Emphasizes the need for region-specific technology design, professional education, and regulatory oversight strategies

Methodology

Research Design

A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was employed, with participants recruited through convenience sampling methods.

Data Collection

• Timeline: May to July 2025
• Sample: 455 Chinese veterinary professionals
• Channels:
  • Offline: West-East Small Animal Veterinarians Conference (WESAC)
  • Online: Chinese Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) professional networks

Survey Instrument

• Questionnaire Structure: 26-item questionnaire comprising 21 categorical questions and 5 open-ended questions
• Language: Chinese version distributed via Questionnaire Star platform
• Content Modules:
  1. Demographic and professional information
  2. AI tool familiarity and usage
  3. Perceptions, attitudes, and trust regarding AI
  4. Qualitative feedback

Statistical Analysis Methods

• Tools: Python 3.8.8
• Significance Level: α < 0.001
• Primary Methods:
  • Chi-square goodness-of-fit test
  • Chi-square test of independence
  • Cramér's V effect size calculation
  • Significance testing of proportion differences

Experimental Setup

Dataset Characteristics

• Chinese Cohort: n=455, primarily clinicians (81.5%)
• North American Control Group: n=3,968, derived from published 2024 data
• Demographic Characteristics: Chinese cohort predominantly composed of post-1990s professionals (57.8%) and early-career practitioners

Evaluation Metrics

• AI familiarity
• AI adoption rate
• Application priorities
• Perceived barriers
• Usage frequency
• Trust level

Comparison Benchmark

The 2024 North American veterinary AI survey published by Gabor et al. served as the primary comparison benchmark.

Experimental Results

Main Findings

Chinese Cohort Characteristics

• High adoption rate, low familiarity: 71.0% adoption rate versus 55.4% familiarity
• Clinically-oriented applications:
  • Disease diagnosis: 50.1%
  • Prescription calculation: 44.8%
  • Treatment planning: 36.3%
• Primary tools used: Chinese large language models such as Deepseek (67.5%)
• Usage frequency: 19.8% daily use, 30.1% weekly use

North American Cohort Characteristics

• High familiarity, low adoption rate: 83.8% familiarity versus 39.2% adoption rate
• Administratively-oriented applications:
  • Image analysis: 39.0%
  • Record management: 39.0%
  • Speech-to-text: 36.9%

Statistical Significance

All major comparison items yielded p-values < 0.001, indicating significant differences between the two cohorts.

Key Association Analysis

Strongest associations identified through Cramér's V analysis:

1. AI adoption rate and usage frequency (V=0.619)
2. Training importance and clinic competitiveness perception (V=0.415)
3. AI familiarity and AI adoption rate (V=0.412)

Comparative Barrier Factors

Related Work

Medical AI Research Development

The paper builds upon a decade of medical AI research, particularly regarding AI capabilities in data analysis, pattern recognition, and task automation.

Veterinary AI Applications

Multiple commercialized veterinary AI applications are cited, including:

• Digitail: Integrated practice management software
• VetScan Imagyst: Diagnostic image analysis
• SignalPET: Real-time radiology results
• ImpriMed: Canine lymphoma chemotherapy drug selection

Benchmark Studies

The 2024 North American veterinary AI survey by Gabor et al. serves as the primary comparison benchmark, establishing the association between AI familiarity and professional optimism.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

Explanation of the "Adoption Paradox"

China's high adoption rate stems from:

1. Young digitally-native workforce: Creative application of general-purpose AI tools to clinical challenges
2. Pragmatic approach: Utilization for low-risk, efficiency-enhancing tasks
3. Knowledge gap mitigation: AI as a digital decision support tool

North America's cautious approach reflects:

1. Mature market characteristics: Awaiting specialized, validated veterinary systems
2. High-standard educational systems: Greater focus on operational and administrative bottlenecks
3. Risk management: Prioritization of data security and legal liability

Differences in Application Priorities

• China's "inside-out" model: Prioritizes clinical functionality to bridge technology gaps
• North America's "outside-in" model: Prioritizes administrative efficiency to establish integration foundations

Limitations

1. Self-reported data: Risk of recall bias
2. Sampling bias: Potential bias toward technology-oriented professionals
3. Temporal differences: One-year gap between the two surveys
4. Comparative estimation: Based on published data estimates rather than direct comparison of raw datasets

Future Directions

1. Qualitative in-depth research: Explore underlying reasons behind quantitative findings
2. Longitudinal tracking: Observe cognitive evolution as technology matures
3. Client acceptance studies: Understand pet owner acceptance of AI-assisted diagnosis
4. Global expansion: Incorporate comparative analysis from additional countries and regions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

Methodological Advantages

1. Innovative comparative perspective: First systematic comparison of Chinese and American veterinary AI adoption
2. Rigorous statistical analysis: Multiple statistical methods employed to validate findings
3. Clear theoretical framework: The "adoption paradox" concept demonstrates strong explanatory power
4. Practical guidance value: Provides specific recommendations for global AI development

Academic Contributions

1. Fills research gap: Extends geographic scope of veterinary AI research
2. Theoretical construction: Proposes theory of regionalized AI adoption patterns
3. Policy implications: Emphasizes importance of region-specific strategies

Limitations

Methodological Constraints

1. Cross-sectional design: Cannot establish causal relationships
2. Convenience sampling: Potential selection bias
3. Comparative data limitations: Relies on published summary statistics, lacking access to raw data
4. Cultural factors: Insufficient exploration of cultural differences' influence on adoption patterns

Analytical Depth

1. Insufficient qualitative analysis: Thematic analysis of open-ended responses relatively superficial
2. Mechanism explanation: Mechanism explanation of the "paradox" requires additional supporting evidence
3. Long-term impact: Lacks assessment of long-term impacts of AI adoption

Impact Assessment

Academic Impact

• Opens new comparative research directions in veterinary AI research
• Provides important baseline data for subsequent research
• Emphasizes importance of cross-cultural research in technology adoption

Practical Value

• Provides market segmentation strategy guidance for AI developers
• Offers curriculum design reference for educational institutions
• Supplies evidence basis for regulatory policy formulation

Reproducibility

The study provides detailed methodological descriptions and complete questionnaire content, demonstrating good reproducibility.

Applicable Scenarios

1. AI product development: Guides product design strategies for different markets
2. Educational planning: Provides reference for veterinary institutions designing AI-related curricula
3. Policy formulation: Supplies evidence basis for regulatory frameworks
4. Market entry: Provides strategic guidance for international AI companies entering different regional markets

References

This study cites 22 important references, encompassing:

• Medical AI development reviews (Esteva et al., 2019; Fahrner et al., 2025)
• Commercial veterinary AI applications (Digitail, SignalPET, ImpriMed, etc.)
• Benchmark survey studies (Gabor et al., 2025)
• Methodological guidance (Kelley, 2003; Fricker, 2017)
• Technology adoption theory (Cresswell & Sheikh, 2013)

Summary: This is a groundbreaking cross-cultural comparative study that systematically reveals significant differences in veterinary AI adoption between China and North America for the first time. The "adoption paradox" phenomenon identified in this research possesses important theoretical and practical value, providing new perspectives for understanding technology dissemination patterns across different cultural and market environments. Despite certain methodological limitations, the study's innovation, rigor, and practical utility make it an important contribution to the field.