2025-11-13T12:16:10.820154

Cosmology in the Hoyle Narlikar gravity

Singh, Aggarwal, Shaily et al.
In this paper, we study the late time cosmic acceleration of the Quintessence model within the framework of Hoyle Narlikar Gravity, consisting of a creation field. Using the Hubble tension as a function of the density parameter for matter, the density parameter for radiation, and the density parameter for dark energy in the covariant formulation, we find the gravitational field equations in the spatially flat, homogeneous, and isotropic spacetime to examine the dynamical mechanism that leads to cosmic acceleration in the late-time universe. We analyze the observational constraints on the late-time density parameters using various recent observational datasets, including the Hubble datasets, Pantheon+, and joint compilation, Pantheon++BAO. Consequently, it is explicitly demonstrated that late-time cosmic acceleration can be consistent with recent observational data in Hoyle Narlikar Gravity with non-minimal matter interaction. In contrast with other modified theories of gravity, it is observed that the creation field theory with non-minimal matter interaction renders more compact constraints on the Hubble tension together with density parameters, and extensively explains the accelerating expansion of the universe, which makes it a more plausible option compared to the ΛCDM model. Furthermore, the w dw phase analysis confirms alternating thawing and freezing behaviour of the model, with all trajectories ultimately converging toward the ΛCDM point, thereby confirming the model stability and the observational consistency.
academic

Cosmology in the Hoyle–Narlikar gravity

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.11762
  • Title: Cosmology in the Hoyle–Narlikar gravity
  • Authors: J. K. Singh, Sonal Aggarwal, Shaily, Hamid Shabani
  • Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
  • Publication Date: October 13, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11762v1

Abstract

This paper investigates the late-time cosmic acceleration of quintessence models within the Hoyle–Narlikar gravitational framework incorporating a creation field. By expressing the Hubble tension as a function of matter, radiation, and dark energy density parameters, the gravitational field equations are solved in covariant form for spatially flat, homogeneous, and isotropic spacetime to explore the dynamical mechanisms driving late-time cosmic acceleration. The study employs multiple recent observational datasets (including Hubble data, Pantheon+, and the joint compilation Pantheon++BAO) to analyze observational constraints on late-time density parameters. The results explicitly demonstrate that late-time cosmic acceleration in Hoyle–Narlikar gravity with non-minimal matter interactions is consistent with the latest observational data. Compared to other modified gravity theories, the creation field theory with non-minimal matter interactions provides tighter constraints on the Hubble tension and density parameters, and broadly explains cosmic accelerated expansion, making it a more reasonable choice than the ΛCDM model.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Issues

  1. Mechanism of cosmic accelerated expansion: The discovery in the late 1990s through Type Ia supernovae observations that the universe is accelerating requires the introduction of an unknown energy component with strong negative pressure (dark energy) to explain this phenomenon
  2. Hubble tension problem: Significant discrepancies exist between Hubble constant values obtained from different observational methods, constituting an important challenge in modern cosmology
  3. Limitations of the ΛCDM model: The standard cosmological model exhibits insufficiencies in explaining certain observational phenomena

Research Significance

  • Dark energy is believed to constitute approximately 2/3 of the total energy density of the universe; understanding its nature is crucial for cosmology
  • The universe has undergone a phase transition from early decelerated expansion to late-time accelerated expansion, occurring approximately 6 billion years after the Big Bang
  • A unified theoretical framework is needed that can simultaneously explain both early inflation and late-time acceleration

Limitations of Existing Approaches

  • Traditional FLRW-type models yield predictions that are not entirely consistent with certain observational results
  • Interpretations of cosmic microwave background radiation remain controversial
  • The introduction of exotic dark energy components lacks a solid theoretical foundation

Research Motivation

The Hoyle–Narlikar theory describes matter production through the introduction of a massless, uncharged scalar creation field C, avoiding the violation of matter conservation inherent in steady-state theory, and provides a new theoretical framework for explaining cosmic acceleration.

Core Contributions

  1. Established a cosmological model within the Hoyle–Narlikar gravitational framework, modifying Einstein's field equations through the creation field C
  2. Proposed a specific parameterization of the Hubble parameter: H(z)=H0(1+z)3Ωm+(1+z)4Ωr+ΩΛH(z) = H_0\sqrt{(1+z)^3\Omega_m + (1+z)^4\Omega_r + \Omega_\Lambda}
  3. Applied constraints using multiple recent observational datasets, including 77 Hubble parameter measurements, 1701 Pantheon+ supernovae data, and BAO data
  4. Demonstrated consistency between the model and observational data, providing tighter parameter constraints compared to the ΛCDM model
  5. Confirmed model stability through w-w' phase space analysis, exhibiting alternating thawing and freezing behavior, ultimately converging to the ΛCDM point

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

To investigate how cosmological models incorporating a creation field within the Hoyle–Narlikar gravitational theory framework explain late-time cosmic accelerated expansion, and to constrain model parameters through observational data.

Theoretical Framework

Modified Field Equations

The Einstein field equations modified by the creation field C are:

R_{ij} - (1/2)Rg_{ij} = -8π[T^{(m)}_{ij} + T^{(C)}_{ij}]

where the energy-momentum tensors for matter and creation field are respectively:

T^{(m)}_{ij} = (ρ + p)u_i u_j + pg_{ij}
T^{(C)}_{ij} = -sζ(C_i C_j - (1/2)C^2 g_{ij})

Creation Field Evolution

The creation field adopts a specific temporal evolution form:

C(t) = k tanh(αt)

where k = 0.18 sets the late-time value, and α = 1.05 controls the characteristic time scale.

Cosmological Equations

Under the flat FLRW metric, the modified Friedmann equations are:

8πρ = 3H² + 4πsζĊ²
8πp = -(2Ḣ + 3H²) + 4πsζĊ²

Parameterization Scheme

A specific parameterization of the Hubble parameter is adopted:

H(z) = H₀√[(1+z)³Ωₘ + (1+z)⁴Ωᵣ + Ω_Λ]

Observational Constraint Methods

Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are employed, combined with three classes of observational data:

  1. Hubble data: 77 H(z) measurements covering 0 ≤ z ≤ 2.360
  2. Pantheon+ data: 1701 Type Ia supernovae covering 0.001 < z < 2.2613
  3. BAO data: Baryon Acoustic Oscillation measurements

Experimental Setup

Dataset Description

  • Hubble dataset: 77 H(z) measurements obtained from passively evolving galaxies using the differential age method
  • Pantheon+ + SH0ES: Latest compilation containing 1701 Type Ia supernovae with improved systematic uncertainties
  • BAO data: Baryon Acoustic Oscillation observations from SDSS, 6dFGS, and BOSS

Evaluation Metrics

Chi-squared statistics are employed:

χ²_HD = Σ[(H_th(z_i) - H_obs(z_i))/σ_H(z_i)]²  (Hubble data)
χ²_SNe = D^T C^{-1}_SNe D                        (Supernovae data)
χ²_BAO = A^T C^{-1}_BAO A                        (BAO data)

Parameter Prior Ranges

  • H₀ ∈ 60, 80 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹
  • Ωₘ ∈ 0.2, 1
  • Ωᵣ ∈ 0, 0.2
  • Ω_Λ ∈ 0.5, 1

Experimental Results

Primary Constraint Results

DatasetH₀ΩₘΩᵣΩ_Λz_trq₀
H(z)72.00±0.000100.40⁺⁰·⁰⁰⁰¹⁰₋₀.₀₀₀₀₈₈0.009±0.000110.70⁺⁰·⁰⁰⁰¹¹₋₀.₀₀₀₀₉₅0.482-0.441
Pantheon+70.99±0.0000930.30±0.0000910.01±0.000110.69±0.000110.584-0.514
Pantheon++BAO72.00±0.0120.398±0.0100.012±0.0110.69±0.0110.477-0.440

Key Findings

  1. Hubble constant values show good consistency with the Planck Collaboration result (H₀ = 67.4±0.5)
  2. Deceleration parameter exhibits a phase transition from deceleration to acceleration, with transition redshift z_tr ≈ 0.5
  3. Equation of state parameter at the present epoch: w₀ = -0.65 (H(z)), w₀ = -0.71 (Pantheon+), w₀ = -0.69 (Pantheon++BAO)

Cosmological Analysis

  • Deceleration parameter evolution: Early epoch q > 0 (deceleration), late epoch q < 0 (acceleration)
  • Jerk parameter: j(z) ≈ 1, consistent with the ΛCDM model
  • Energy conditions: NEC and DEC are positive at all redshifts; SEC is violated in the late epoch (consistent with accelerated expansion)

Modified Gravity Theories

  • f(R) gravity, scalar-tensor theories, and other modified gravity models
  • Gravitational modifications in higher-dimensional theories (string theory, M-theory)
  • These theories attempt to modify general relativity at large scales to explain accelerated expansion

Dark Energy Model Classification

  • Quintessence type: -1 < w < -1/3
  • Phantom type: w < -1
  • Quintom type: w can cross the -1 boundary
  • Cosmological constant: w = -1

Development of Hoyle–Narlikar Theory

  • Original steady-state cosmology (Hoyle, Bondi & Gold)
  • Introduction of field-theoretic approaches (Hoyle & Narlikar 1962-1966)
  • Higher-dimensional generalizations and applications to anisotropic cosmologies

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. The Hoyle–Narlikar gravity model successfully describes late-time cosmic accelerated expansion, remaining consistent with multiple observational datasets
  2. Creation field theory provides tighter parameter constraints than ΛCDM, particularly regarding Hubble tension and density parameters
  3. w-w' phase space analysis confirms long-term model stability, with all trajectories ultimately converging to the ΛCDM point
  4. The model exhibits quintessence-type dark energy behavior, approaching the cosmological constant in the late epoch

Limitations

  1. The specific physical mechanism of the creation field requires further theoretical clarification
  2. Theoretical justification for parameter selection (such as k = 0.18, α = 1.05) requires deeper physical argumentation
  3. Compatibility with quantum field theory remains to be investigated
  4. Description of early universe behavior (such as inflation) is insufficiently developed

Future Directions

  1. Investigation of interactions between the creation field and standard model particles
  2. Exploration of model applications in early universe cosmology
  3. Integration with gravitational wave observations
  4. Consideration of quantum correction effects

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Complete theoretical framework: Forms a complete theoretical chain from modified field equations to observational constraints
  2. Comprehensive observational data: Employs multiple recent independent observational datasets for constraints
  3. Rigorous numerical analysis: Adopts standard MCMC methods and statistical analysis
  4. Clear physical picture: Comprehensively analyzes model cosmological behavior through multiple diagnostic tools
  5. Convincing results: Demonstrates stronger consistency with observational data compared to the standard ΛCDM model

Weaknesses

  1. Insufficient theoretical motivation: The introduction of the creation field lacks strong support from fundamental physical principles
  2. Arbitrariness in parameter selection: Certain parameter values appear to be adjusted to fit observations
  3. Limited discussion of relationships with other cosmological problems: Insufficient discussion of issues such as dark matter and structure formation
  4. Model complexity: Introduces additional parameters and complexity compared to ΛCDM

Impact

  1. Academic value: Provides new perspectives for modified gravity theories and dark energy research
  2. Practical value: May offer new approaches to solving observational problems such as Hubble tension
  3. Inspirational significance: Demonstrates how to combine classical steady-state ideas with modern cosmology

Applicable Scenarios

This method is particularly suitable for:

  • Theoretical modeling of late-time cosmic accelerated expansion
  • Alternative solutions to the Hubble tension problem
  • Observational tests of modified gravity theories
  • Research on quintessence-type dark energy models

References

The paper cites 91 important references, encompassing a complete literature trajectory from Einstein's general relativity to the latest observational data, particularly including original literature on Hoyle-Narlikar theory and recent cosmological observations.