Information paradox and island of covariant black holes in LQG

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11921
• Title: Information paradox and island of covariant black holes in LQG
• Authors: Yongbin Du, Jia-Rui Sun, Xiangdong Zhang
• Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11921

Abstract

This paper investigates the information paradox of four-dimensional covariant black holes inspired by Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG), based on two well-motivated solutions. The authors first prepare spacetime in the Hartle-Hawking state, calculate radiation entropy, and recover late-time linear growth. When considering mass loss and incorporating greybody factors, they find that for Solution 1, the LQG parameter ζ preserves the Planck factor of temperature and spectrum, but enhances the near-horizon potential barrier, leading to accelerated evaporation as M decreases. This contrasts sharply with Solution 2, which exhibits slow evaporation at small M and allows non-singular extension, suggesting either a remnant or black hole to white hole transition. Subsequently, applying the island prescription to eternal backgrounds, they find that quantum extremal surfaces exist in Solution 1 geometry; ζ primarily shifts island boundaries and suppresses late-time entropy growth, preserving unitarity.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Issues of the Black Hole Information Paradox

The black hole information paradox originates from the contradiction between quantum mechanical unitarity and black hole evaporation in general relativity:

1. Classical Level: The event horizon as a one-way membrane appears to violate reversibility
2. Quantum Level: Hawking radiation causes the late-time state after pure state collapse to exhibit thermal characteristics, threatening unitarity
3. Core Contradiction: If a pure state collapses and completely evaporates, the late-time state appears thermal, violating fundamental principles of quantum mechanics

Importance of Research Motivation

The significance of this problem is reflected in:

• Involvement of fundamental principles of quantum gravity theory
• Relationship to fundamental physical laws of information preservation
• Serving as an important touchstone for testing different quantum gravity theories

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Limitations of Traditional Views: Most LQG black hole models suffer from implicit covariance issues, with physical predictions depending on coordinate choice
2. Applicability of Island Formula: Primarily developed within the AdS/CFT duality framework, lacking verification in asymptotically flat spacetime
3. Non-universality of LQG Solutions: Different effective solutions may lead to drastically different late-time behaviors

Core Contributions

1. Construction of Covariant LQG Black Hole Model: Employs two different effective metric solutions satisfying minimal covariance constraints
2. Systematic Analysis of Radiation Entropy Evolution: Calculates radiation entropy under both fixed geometric background and mass decay scenarios
3. Quantification of LQG Parameter Effects on Evaporation Rate: Through greybody factor analysis, reveals drastically different behaviors of the two solutions
4. Verification of Island Prescription Applicability in LQG Background: Demonstrates that quantum extremal surfaces still exist in LQG geometry
5. Revelation of Non-universal Late-time Behavior of LQG Black Holes: Different covariant solutions lead to different information paradox resolutions

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of the information paradox in four-dimensional covariant LQG black holes, including:

• Input: Two covariant LQG effective metric solutions, quantum parameter ζ
• Output: Time evolution of radiation entropy, evaporation rate, island boundary location
• Constraints: Satisfaction of minimal covariance requirements, preservation of diffeomorphism invariance

Model Architecture

1. Covariant LQG Black Hole Metric

Both solutions employ Boyer-Lindquist coordinate form:

ds² = -f[r]dt² + (1/f[r]h[r])dr² + r²dΩ²

Solution 1:

f[r] = 1 - 2M/r + (ζ²M²/r²)(1 - 2M/r)²
h[r] = 1

Solution 2:

f[r] = 1 - 2M/r
h[r] = 1 + (ζ²M²/r²)(1 - 2M/r)

where the quantum parameter: ζ = √(4√3πγ³ℓₚ²)/M

2. Radiation Entropy Calculation Method

Employs Hartle-Hawking state preparation, calculating entanglement entropy of external region R = R₋ ∪ R₊:

S_matter^(finite)(R) = -I(R₊; R₋)

3. Island Prescription Implementation

Generalized entropy formula:

S(R) = min{ext[Area(∂I)/(4G_N^(r)) + S_matter^(finite)(R ∪ I)]}

Technical Innovations

1. Covariance Guarantee: Ensures coordinate-independence of physical predictions through minimal covariance constraints
2. Dual-Solution Comparative Analysis: Systematically compares physical behaviors of two different effective solutions
3. Multi-level Analysis: Complete analytical framework from fixed background to dynamic evaporation
4. LQG Island Theory: First verification of island prescription in four-dimensional covariant LQG background

Experimental Setup

Computational Methods

1. Tortoise Coordinate Transformation: Used for handling geometry near the horizon
2. Kruskal Coordinates: Computing conformal distance and entanglement entropy
3. WKB Approximation: Calculating low-frequency approximation of greybody factors
4. Matching Method: Connecting wave function solutions across different regions

Parameter Settings

• LQG parameter: ζ = 0, 1, 2, √3 and other values
• Black hole mass: From Planck scale to classical scale
• Boundary location: Near-horizon region b - rₕ ≪ rₕ

Comparison Benchmarks

• Schwarzschild black hole (ζ → 0 limit)
• Reissner-Nordström black hole (form comparison with Solution 1)

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Radiation Entropy in Fixed Background

Both solutions exhibit late-time linear growth:

S_rad(tᵦ) ∼ (c/6)(tᵦ/rₕ)

LQG corrections appear only as additive constants, not affecting the persistence of the paradox.

2. Evaporation Rate Comparison

• Solution 1: Evaporation rate accelerates as M decreases, ζ parameter enhances near-horizon potential barrier
• Solution 2: Evaporation rate significantly slows at small M, potentially leading to remnant or black hole to white hole transition

3. Greybody Factor Corrections

Transmission probability for Solution 1:

T₀(ω) = 4r²ₕω²/[(1-ω²r²ₕ)² + (4-α²)ω²r²ₕ]

where α = -ζ²/4 encodes ζ-dependent corrections.

4. Island Boundary Location

Quantum extremal surface location:

a = rₕ + (Gck)²/(4rₕβ₀⁶)

where β₀ = β + c₁c₂β³/3 contains LQG corrections.

Important Findings

1. Non-universal Behavior: The two covariant solutions exhibit drastically different late-time evolution
2. Island Mechanism Validity: Quantum extremal surfaces still exist in LQG geometry
3. Parameter Effects: ζ primarily affects island boundary location rather than eliminating the mechanism itself
4. Geometric Regulation: The minimal radius r_Δ in Solution 2 may naturally terminate entropy growth

Related Work

LQG Black Hole Theory

• Quantum geometry approach by Ashtekar et al.
• Effective Hamiltonian under covariance constraints
• Quantum corrections to black hole interior

Island Prescription Development

• Original proposal by Penington, Almheiri et al.
• Successful applications within AdS/CFT framework
• Extensions to higher dimensions and asymptotically flat spacetime

Information Paradox Resolution Approaches

• Page curve and unitarity requirements
• Different interpretations of holographic principle
• Information preservation mechanisms in quantum gravity

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Covariant LQG Black Holes Do Not Exhibit Universal Late-time Behavior: Different effective solutions lead to different physical results
2. Island Prescription is Effective in LQG: The quantum extremal surface mechanism extends beyond holographic toy models
3. Dual Role of Geometric Corrections: Can either accelerate evaporation (Solution 1) or decelerate it (Solution 2)
4. Multiple Pathways for Information Preservation: Island mechanism vs. geometric self-regulation

Limitations

1. Semi-classical Approximation: Does not account for complete quantum gravity effects
2. Eternal Black Hole Assumption: Simplifies the complexity of dynamical evolution
3. Parameter Dependence: Results strongly depend on specific effective solution choice
4. Experimental Verification Difficulty: Lacks direct observational testing methods

Future Directions

1. Dynamical Background Analysis: Study island evolution in time-dependent LQG backgrounds
2. Complete Quantum Theory: Full quantum gravity description beyond effective theory framework
3. Observational Effects: Seek possible observational signals to distinguish different theoretical predictions
4. Numerical Simulations: Develop numerical methods to verify analytical results

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Strictly satisfies covariance constraints, avoiding coordinate dependence issues
2. Systematic Analysis: Comprehensive investigation from multiple perspectives (fixed background, dynamic evaporation, island prescription)
3. Important Findings: Reveals non-universality of LQG black holes, providing significant theoretical insights
4. Methodological Innovation: First application of island prescription in four-dimensional covariant LQG background

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Assumptions: Depends on specific effective theory framework, may not reflect complete quantum gravity
2. Parameter Sensitivity: Results strongly depend on chosen effective solution, lacking universality
3. Approximation Limitations: Multiple uses of approximation methods may affect result precision
4. Physical Interpretation: Physical meaning of minimal radius in Solution 2 requires further clarification

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important covariance framework for LQG black hole theory
2. Cross-field Connection: Establishes bridge between LQG and island prescription
3. Future Research: Opens new directions for information paradox research in quantum gravity
4. Methodological Value: Provides standard framework for studying different quantum gravity models

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Physics Research: Development and verification of quantum gravity theory
2. Black Hole Physics: Understanding black hole evaporation and information preservation mechanisms
3. Cosmological Applications: Research on early universe and extreme gravity environments
4. Mathematical Physics: Cross-application of differential geometry and quantum field theory

References

The paper cites 49 important references, covering:

• Black hole physics foundations (Hawking, Page, et al.)
• LQG theory development (Ashtekar, Rovelli, et al.)
• Island prescription (Penington, Almheiri, et al.)
• Holographic duality theory (Maldacena, Ryu-Takayanagi, et al.)

Summary: This is an important work at the frontier of quantum gravity theory. Through rigorous covariance analysis and systematic calculations, it reveals the complexity and diversity of the LQG black hole information paradox, providing new perspectives for understanding information preservation mechanisms in quantum gravity.