2025-11-10T02:54:05.416382

Fixed Point Theory For Singh-Chatterjea Type Contractive Mappings

Bekri, Fabiano
In this paper, we introduce a new contraction condition that combines the framework of Singh's extension with the classical Chatterjea contraction. This generalized form, called the Singh-Chatterjea contraction, is defined on the p-th iterate of a mapping. We establish fixed point theorems for such mappings in complete metric spaces and show that our results extend and unify both Singh's and Chatterjea's classical fixed point theorems. Illustrative examples and a simple numerical implementation are provided to demonstrate the applicability of the obtained results.
academic

Fixed Point Theory For Singh-Chatterjea Type Contractive Mappings

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.11975
  • Title: Fixed Point Theory For Singh-Chatterjea Type Contractive Mappings
  • Authors: Zouaoui Bekri (University of Oran 1, Algeria), Nicola Fabiano (University of Belgrade, Serbia)
  • Classification: math.FA (Functional Analysis)
  • Publication Date: October 13, 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11975v1

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel contraction condition that combines the Singh extension framework with the classical Chatterjea contraction. This generalized form, termed Singh-Chatterjea contraction, is defined on the p-th iterate of the mapping. The authors establish fixed point theorems for such mappings in complete metric spaces, demonstrating that the results extend and unify the classical fixed point theorems of Singh and Chatterjea. Illustrative examples and straightforward numerical implementations are provided to demonstrate the applicability of the obtained results.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Classical Theoretical Foundation: The Banach contraction principle (1922) serves as the cornerstone of fixed point theory with widespread applications in differential equations, integral equations, and optimization problems.
  2. Theoretical Development Timeline:
    • Kannan (1968) introduced a novel contraction involving distances between points and their images
    • Chatterjea (1972) proposed a different condition involving cross terms d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx)
    • Singh (1977) extended the Kannan condition to p-th iterates of mappings

Research Motivation

Despite these advances, similar extensions of Chatterjea contractions have received limited attention. Inspired by Singh's methodology, the authors propose a Singh-type generalization of Chatterjea contractions, unifying and extending both concepts.

Core Contributions

  1. Novel Contraction Condition: Introduces Singh-Chatterjea contractions, combining Singh's iterative framework with Chatterjea's cross-term structure
  2. Theoretical Unification: Proves that the new condition unifies and extends the classical fixed point theorems of Singh and Chatterjea
  3. Existence and Uniqueness: Establishes existence and uniqueness theorems for fixed points in complete metric spaces
  4. Concrete Examples: Constructs specific mappings satisfying the Singh-Chatterjea condition but not Banach contractions
  5. Inclusion Relations: Demonstrates that every Banach contraction becomes a Singh-Chatterjea contraction after finitely many iterations

Methodology Details

Problem Formulation

The study investigates self-mappings T: X → X on complete metric spaces (X,d), seeking to identify classes of mappings satisfying specific contraction conditions and establish their fixed point theory.

Core Definitions

Review of Classical Contraction Conditions

  1. Banach Contraction: d(Tx,Ty)≤αd(x,y)d(Tx,Ty) \leq \alpha d(x,y), where α∈(0,1)\alpha \in (0,1)
  2. Kannan Contraction: d(Tx,Ty)≤α(d(x,Tx)+d(y,Ty))d(Tx,Ty) \leq \alpha(d(x,Tx) + d(y,Ty)), where α∈(0,12)\alpha \in (0,\frac{1}{2})
  3. Chatterjea Contraction: d(Tx,Ty)≤α(d(x,Ty)+d(y,Tx))d(Tx,Ty) \leq \alpha(d(x,Ty) + d(y,Tx)), where α∈(0,12)\alpha \in (0,\frac{1}{2})
  4. Singh Contraction: d(Tpx,Tpy)≤α(d(x,Tpx)+d(y,Tpy))d(T^px,T^py) \leq \alpha(d(x,T^px) + d(y,T^py))

Singh-Chatterjea Contraction

Definition: A mapping T is called a Singh-Chatterjea contraction if there exist p∈Np \in \mathbb{N} and α∈(0,12)\alpha \in (0,\frac{1}{2}) such that: d(Tpx,Tpy)≤α(d(x,Tpy)+d(y,Tpx)),∀x,y∈Xd(T^px,T^py) \leq \alpha(d(x,T^py) + d(y,T^px)), \quad \forall x,y \in X

Main Theorems

Theorem 3.1: Let (X,d) be a complete metric space and T: X → X satisfy the Singh-Chatterjea condition. Then T has a unique fixed point x∗∈Xx^* \in X, and for any initial value x0∈Xx_0 \in X, the iterative sequence {Tnx0}\{T^nx_0\} converges to x∗x^*.

Proof Strategy

  1. Auxiliary Mapping Construction: Let S=TpS = T^p, then S satisfies a Chatterjea-type inequality
  2. Iterative Sequence Construction: Fix x0∈Xx_0 \in X and define xn+1:=Sxnx_{n+1} := Sx_n
  3. Contraction Property Proof: Use the inequality to prove δn:=d(xn+1,xn)≤rnδ0\delta_n := d(x_{n+1},x_n) \leq r^n\delta_0, where r=α1−α<1r = \frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha} < 1
  4. Cauchy Property: Demonstrate that the sequence {xn}\{x_n\} is Cauchy
  5. Fixed Point Existence: Utilize completeness to obtain the limit point x∗x^* and prove Sx∗=x∗Sx^* = x^*
  6. Uniqueness: Use the contraction condition to establish uniqueness of the fixed point
  7. Return to Original Mapping: Prove that x∗x^* is also a fixed point of T

Experimental Setup

Concrete Example Construction

The authors construct a mapping T:[0,1]→[0,1]T: [0,1] \to [0,1]:

1-x & \text{if } 0 \leq x \leq \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \text{if } \frac{1}{2} < x \leq 1 \end{cases}$$ ### Verification Steps 1. **Computing the Second Iterate**: $T^2(x) = \frac{1}{2}$ (constant function) 2. **Verifying Singh-Chatterjea Condition**: For $p=2$, $d(T^2x,T^2y) = 0 \leq \alpha[d(x,\frac{1}{2}) + d(y,\frac{1}{2})]$ 3. **Proving Non-Banach Property**: There exist $x,y$ such that $\frac{|Tx-Ty|}{|x-y|} = 1$, violating the Banach condition ## Experimental Results ### Main Results 1. **Existence Verification**: The constructed mapping T indeed satisfies the Singh-Chatterjea condition (with $p=2$) 2. **Non-Banach Property**: T is not a Banach contraction with Lipschitz constant equal to 1 3. **Unique Fixed Point**: T has a unique fixed point $x^* = \frac{1}{2}$ 4. **Convergence**: Numerical experiments demonstrate that sequences from different initial values converge to the fixed point ### Inclusion Relation Results **Theorem 3.3**: Every Banach contraction T (with constant $\lambda < 1$) admits an integer $p \geq 1$ such that T satisfies the Singh-Chatterjea condition, where: $$p_{\min} = \left\lceil \frac{\ln 3}{-\ln \lambda} \right\rceil$$ **Concrete Example**: For a Banach contraction with $\lambda = 0.9$, $p_{\min} = 11$, meaning $T^{11}$ satisfies the Singh-Chatterjea condition. ### Numerical Verification The paper provides visualization results demonstrating the convergence process of iterations from multiple initial values, validating the correctness of the theoretical results. ## Related Work ### Historical Development 1. **Banach Contraction Principle** (1922): Established the foundation of fixed point theory 2. **Kannan Contraction** (1968): Introduced novel contraction forms 3. **Chatterjea Contraction** (1972): Proposed cross-term contraction conditions 4. **Singh Extension** (1977): Generalized Kannan conditions to iterative forms ### Positioning of This Work's Contribution This paper is the first to systematically apply Singh's iterative ideas to Chatterjea contractions, filling a theoretical gap and achieving unification of two important contraction conditions. ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. Singh-Chatterjea contractions are a genuine generalization of Banach contractions 2. This condition unifies the classical results of Singh and Chatterjea 3. It guarantees existence and uniqueness of fixed points in complete metric spaces 4. All Banach contractions can be viewed as certain Singh-Chatterjea contractions ### Theoretical Significance - **Unification**: $\text{Banach} \subset \bigcup_{p=1}^{\infty} \text{SinghChatterjea}_p$ - **Strict Inclusion**: There exist Singh-Chatterjea contractions that are not Banach contractions - **Generality**: The Singh-Chatterjea framework exhibits remarkable generality ### Future Directions 1. Generalizations to other topological spaces 2. Extensions to multivalued mappings 3. Applications in differential and integral equations 4. Further optimization of numerical methods ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Theoretical Innovation**: First to propose Singh-Chatterjea contractions with originality 2. **Unified Framework**: Successfully unifies two important classical contraction conditions 3. **Rigorous Proofs**: Mathematical proofs are complete and rigorous with clear logic 4. **Concrete Examples**: Provides non-trivial counterexamples, enhancing persuasiveness 5. **Practical Value**: Expands the applicability of fixed point theory ### Limitations 1. **Limited Application Examples**: Lacks case studies from practical problems 2. **Simple Numerical Experiments**: Numerical verification is relatively elementary and could be more comprehensive 3. **Optimization Properties**: Does not discuss convergence rates and other optimization properties 4. **Generalization Potential**: Discussion of further generalizations is insufficient ### Impact 1. **Theoretical Contribution**: Provides new tools and perspectives for fixed point theory 2. **Unification Value**: Unifies multiple classical results with significant theoretical importance 3. **Application Prospects**: Has potential applications in nonlinear analysis and numerical methods 4. **Reproducibility**: Results are clear and easily verifiable and generalizable ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Theoretical Research**: Fixed point theory and functional analysis research 2. **Numerical Computation**: Iterative algorithm design and convergence analysis 3. **Applied Mathematics**: Solving differential and integral equations 4. **Optimization Theory**: Applications of fixed point methods in optimization ## References The paper cites classical literature in the field, including: - Banach's original work (1922) - Pioneering works by Kannan, Chatterjea, and Singh - Important monographs and surveys in modern fixed point theory --- **Summary**: This paper makes important theoretical contributions to fixed point theory. The proposed Singh-Chatterjea contraction condition not only unifies existing results but also extends the applicability of the theory. While further exploration in practical applications remains desirable, its theoretical value and innovation are significant.