On the Combinatorics of Pseudo-Latin Squares

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.11980
• Title: On the Combinatorics of Pseudo-Latin Squares
• Author: Andrew Pendleton
• Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics)
• Publication Date: September 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11980

Abstract

This paper introduces a new class of combinatorial objects—consecutive pseudo-Latin squares (CPLSs), which are variants of Latin squares where at least one row or column is in consecutive or reverse-consecutive order, but each element is not necessarily present in every row or column. The author derives exact and asymptotic formulas for the number of n-order CPLSs, proving that as n→∞, the proportion of CPLSs among all pseudo-Latin squares (PLSs) rapidly approaches zero. The paper further analyzes the distribution of CPLSs under uniform random sampling, explores connections with algebraic structures by interpreting CPLSs as Cayley tables associated with unital magmas, and verifies theoretical results for small n values through Monte Carlo simulations.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem Formulation

This research stems from exploring the combinatorial properties of Latin square variants. Traditional Latin squares require each element to appear exactly once in each row and column, while pseudo-Latin squares relax this constraint, allowing elements to appear different numbers of times across rows and columns. The author particularly focuses on pseudo-Latin squares with consecutive properties.

2. Research Motivation

• Game Inspiration: The research is inspired by the "FOX in Boxes" game from the website donotfindthefox.com, which involves randomly placing letters in a 4×4 grid while avoiding spelling specific words
• Theoretical Value: Consecutiveness is an important property in combinatorial structures, and studying its manifestation in pseudo-Latin squares has theoretical significance
• Application Prospects: Latin squares and their variants have widespread applications in experimental design, cryptography, error-correcting codes, and other fields

3. Limitations of Existing Research

• Traditional Latin square theory primarily focuses on completely balanced structures
• For pseudo-Latin squares with relaxed constraints, particularly variants with special properties (such as consecutiveness), systematic theoretical analysis is lacking
• There is insufficient understanding of the asymptotic behavior of such objects at large scales

Core Contributions

1. Novel Concept Definition: First systematic definition of consecutive pseudo-Latin squares (CPLSs) as a new combinatorial object
2. Exact Counting Formula: Derivation of exact combinatorial formulas for the number of n-order CPLSs
3. Asymptotic Analysis: Proof that the proportion of CPLSs among all PLSs approaches zero at the rate $\frac{4n^{n+1}(n^2-n)!}{(n^2)!}$
4. Probability Distribution: Complete characterization of the probability mass function for the number of consecutive rows and columns in random PLSs
5. Algebraic Interpretation: Establishment of correspondence between CPLSs and Cayley tables of near-unital magmas
6. Computational Verification: Large-scale Monte Carlo simulations verify the accuracy of theoretical results

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Pseudo-Latin Square (PLS): An n-order pseudo-Latin square is an n×n array with elements from the multiset $\{1,1,\ldots,1,2,2,\ldots,n,n,\ldots,n\}$, where each element has multiplicity n.

Consecutive Pseudo-Latin Square (CPLS): A pseudo-Latin square where at least one row or column is in consecutive or reverse-consecutive order.

Core Methodological Framework

1. Counting Theory Framework

The author employs the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion (PIE) as the primary counting tool:

• Let $R$ denote the set of n-order PLSs with at least one consecutive row
• Let $C$ denote the set of n-order PLSs with at least one consecutive column
• Then $\Sigma_n = R \cup C$, and $|\Sigma_n| = |R| + |C| - |R \cap C|$

2. Constructive Counting Method

The number of various PLSs is calculated through the following steps:

1. Selection of Consecutive Rows/Columns: Determine which rows or columns will be consecutive
2. Order Determination: Choose consecutive or reverse-consecutive arrangements
3. Filling Remaining Positions: Place remaining elements in non-consecutive positions
4. Application of PIE: Avoid double counting

3. Key Lemma System

Lemma 2.1: The total number of PLSs is $|\Omega_n| = \frac{(n^2)!}{(n!)^n}$

Lemma 2.2: The number of PLSs with at least one consecutive row: $|R| = \sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i+1} \cdot 2^i \cdot \frac{n!(n^2-in)!}{(n-i)!^{n+1}i!}$

Technical Innovations

1. Hierarchical Counting Strategy

• Decompose complex counting problems into multiple levels
• Systematically handle intersections of different numbers of consecutive rows and columns
• Cleverly avoid combinatorial explosion in direct counting

2. Symmetry Exploitation

• Utilize 90° rotation to establish bijections between rows and columns
• Simplify redundant calculations through transformations such as reflection
• Specially handle differences between odd and even orders

3. Asymptotic Analysis Techniques

• Identify dominant terms: prove that the first term $2|R|$ dominates the entire expression
• Precise error estimation: provide convergence rates for asymptotic approximations

Experimental Setup

Data Generation

• Random PLS Generation: Generate uniformly distributed n-order PLSs through random permutations of elements
• Scale Settings: Conduct $10^8$ independent trials for n∈{3,4,5}
• Verification Range: Small-scale exact verification and large-scale asymptotic behavior testing

Evaluation Metrics

• Theory vs. Experimental Probability Difference: Measure deviation between Monte Carlo estimates and theoretical predictions
• Convergence Analysis: Observe convergence behavior as iterations increase
• Confidence Intervals: Use $\max\{5\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{N}}, \frac{p}{100}\}$ as error bounds

Implementation Details

• Programming Language: Python
• Random Number Generation: Standard library uniform random number generator
• Parallelization: Progress tracking via tqdm library
• Memory Optimization: Stream processing to avoid storing all generated matrices

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. CPLS Probability Verification

For small n values, theoretical predictions align closely with experimental results:

2. Asymptotic Approximation Accuracy

The quality of asymptotic formula $S(n)$ approximation improves rapidly with increasing n:

| n | |Σₙ|/S(n) | |---|----------| | 5 | 0.995 | | 6 | 0.9996 | | 7 | 0.99997 | | 8 | 0.999998 |

3. Probability Mass Function Verification

For the distribution of consecutive rows and columns, all experimental values fall within the confidence intervals of theoretical predictions.

Ablation Studies

1. Behavioral Differences Across Different n Values

• n=3: CPLSs still constitute a considerable proportion (~49%)
• n=4: Proportion drops significantly (~9%)
• n≥5: Rapidly approaches zero (<1%)

2. Consecutive Rows vs. Consecutive Columns

Through 90° rotation symmetry, the equal contribution of rows and columns is verified.

3. Importance of Intersection Terms

Demonstrates that higher-order intersection terms in PIE calculations contribute negligibly to the final result.

Experimental Findings

1. Rapid Decay: The decay rate of CPLS proportion is faster than expected
2. Small n Anomalies: n≤4 exhibits behavior patterns different from large n
3. Numerical Stability: Monte Carlo estimates maintain high precision even for $10^8$ trials

Related Work

Latin Square Theory

• Euler's 36 Officers Problem: A classical problem that historically promoted Latin square research
• Modern Developments: Connections with quasigroups, experimental design, and error-correcting codes
• Counting Problems: Counting traditional Latin squares remains an open problem

Pseudo-Latin Square Research

• Norton's Work: First introduction of pseudo-Latin squares for studying orthogonal Latin square sets
• Algebraic Applications: Connections with magma theory

Unique Contributions of This Paper

• First systematic study of pseudo-Latin squares with consecutive properties
• Establishment of exact counting theory
• Provision of new perspectives on algebraic structures

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Rarity Theorem: Proves that CPLSs are extremely rare for large n, with proportion approaching zero at rate $O(\frac{4n^{n+1}}{(n^2-n+1)^n})$
2. Complete Distribution Characterization: Provides complete probability mass function for the number of consecutive rows and columns
3. Algebraic Correspondence: Establishes theoretical connection between CPLSs and near-unital magmas

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Exact formulas involve complex combinatorial expressions with computational costs growing rapidly with n
2. Applicable Range: Main results concentrate on small to medium-scale cases
3. Practical Applications: Connections with real-world application scenarios require further exploration

Future Directions

1. Generalization Research: Consider other types of "structured" pseudo-Latin squares
2. Algorithm Optimization: Develop more efficient counting and generation algorithms
3. Application Exploration: Potential applications in cryptography and coding theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Complete mathematical derivations with clear proof logic
2. Methodological Innovation: Clever combination of constructive counting with inclusion-exclusion principle
3. Sufficient Experimentation: Large-scale Monte Carlo verification enhances result credibility
4. Cross-disciplinary Perspective: Connects combinatorial problems with algebraic structures

Weaknesses

1. Application Motivation: While game-inspired, practical application value is not sufficiently clear
2. Computational Efficiency: Formula computation becomes impractical for large n values
3. Generalizability: Results primarily target specific consecutiveness properties with limited potential for generalization to other structural properties

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new research directions for pseudo-Latin square theory
2. Methodological Value: Counting techniques may apply to other combinatorial structures
3. Reproducibility: Complete code implementation facilitates verification and extension

Applicable Scenarios

1. Combinatorics Research: Serves as theoretical foundation for Latin square variants
2. Probabilistic Analysis: Study of properties in random combinatorial structures
3. Algorithm Design: Combinatorial optimization problems under special constraints

References

This paper cites 13 important references covering the historical development, modern applications, and related theories of Latin squares. Particularly noteworthy are:

• McKay et al. (2007): Systematic study of small Latin squares, quasigroups, and loops
• van Lint & Wilson (1992): Latin squares chapter in combinatorics textbook
• Norton (1952): Pioneering work on orthogonal sets of Latin rows

Overall Assessment: This is a rigorous paper with theoretical value in the field of combinatorics. While its application prospects require further exploration, its methodological innovations and theoretical contributions provide a valuable foundation for related research.