Goos-Hänchen shifts of bilayer meta-grating with unidirectional guide resonance

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12052
• Title: Goos-Hänchen shifts of bilayer meta-grating with unidirectional guide resonance
• Authors: Zhihao Xu, Ma Luo (School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Guangdong Technion University of Technology)
• Classification: physics.optics
• Publication Date: October 14, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12052v1

Abstract

Bilayer metasurface gratings with asymmetric structural parameters can support unidirectional guided resonance (UGR). This paper identifies the distribution of unidirectional guided resonance in both structural parameter and synthetic parameter spaces. When incident light beams resonate with unidirectional guided resonance, the Goos-Hänchen (GH) shift of the scattered beam exhibits two anomalous behaviors: the resonance peak of GH shift is accompanied by constant transmittance and reflectance; the amplitude of GH shift is not always proportional to the quality factor of unidirectional guided resonance. Time-domain coupled-mode theory (TCMT) analysis reveals that the first anomalous behavior results from interference between direct scattering and unidirectional guided resonance radiation; the GH shift is proportional to both group velocity and the quality factor of unidirectional guided resonance. Numerical simulations with finite-width Gaussian beam incidence provide intuitive visualization of the GH shift.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Significance of Goos-Hänchen Effect: The Goos-Hänchen (GH) shift is a lateral displacement phenomenon that occurs when light undergoes total internal reflection at an interface. It has important applications in sensors, optical information storage, wavelength demultiplexers, and optical switches.
2. Limitations of Existing Enhancement Methods: Although multiple schemes have been proposed to enhance GH shift, including Brewster effect, surface plasmon polaritons, Fabry-Perot resonance, and quasi-bound states in continuum (quasi-BICs), these methods have certain limitations, such as absorption losses in metallic structures.
3. Advantages of All-Dielectric Metasurface Gratings: All-dielectric metasurface gratings have attracted considerable attention due to their absorption-free advantages, particularly for GH shift enhancement mechanisms based on quasi-BICs.
4. New Opportunities from Unidirectional Guided Resonance: Bilayer metasurface gratings with lateral offset between layers break the mirror symmetry between upper and lower layers, enabling the generation of unidirectional guided resonance (UGR), which provides a new physical mechanism for manipulating GH shifts.

Research Motivation

This paper aims to systematically investigate the UGR-driven GH shift phenomenon in bilayer asymmetric metasurface gratings, with particular focus on its differences from conventional quasi-BIC-driven GH shifts, and to reveal the underlying physical mechanisms through theoretical analysis.

Core Contributions

1. Systematic analysis of UGR parameter space distribution: Identified the distribution patterns of UGR in bilayer metasurface gratings across structural parameter (w₁, w₂) and synthetic parameter (kₓ, Δg) spaces.
2. Discovery of two anomalous behaviors in UGR-driven GH shifts:
   • GH shift resonance peaks accompanied by constant transmittance and reflectance
   • Anomalous suppression in the relationship between GH shift amplitude and quality factor
3. Comprehensive theoretical explanation: Provided analytical solutions based on time-domain coupled-mode theory (TCMT), revealing the physical mechanisms underlying the anomalous behaviors.
4. Establishment of new GH shift relationships: Demonstrated that GH shift is proportional to both group velocity and quality factor, rather than solely dependent on quality factor.
5. Intuitive numerical verification: Provided direct visualization of GH shift phenomena through numerical simulations with finite-width Gaussian beams.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Investigate the GH shift phenomenon generated when UGR in bilayer metasurface grating structures resonates with incident light, analyze its relationship with structural parameters, and establish a theoretical model to explain the observed anomalous behaviors.

Structure Design

Bilayer Metasurface Grating Structure:

• Materials: Si grating (refractive index n_Si = 3.4767) in SiO₂ background (refractive index n_SiO₂ = 1.444)
• Geometric parameters:
  • Period: a = 1000 nm
  • Interlayer spacing: G = 45 nm
  • Grating thickness: t = 355 nm
  • Slot widths of upper and lower layers: w₁, w₂ (variable)
  • Lateral offset: Δg (variable)

Key Parameter Definitions:

• Directionality: η = (|c_up|² - |c_down|²)/(|c_up|² + |c_down|²)
• Radiation phase difference: δ = Arg(c_up/c_down)
• UGR condition: radiation on one side equals zero (η = ±1)

Theoretical Framework

1. Static Phase Theory GH shift is given by the angular derivative of reflection (transmission) phase:

S_GH,r(t) = -λ/(2π) × ∂φ_r(φ_t)/∂θ_inc

2. Time-Domain Coupled-Mode Theory (TCMT) Established a four-channel scattering model where the scattered field consists of direct scattering and resonant radiation components:

|s⁻⟩ = (Ĉ + |d⟩⟨κ*|/(-i(ω-ω_b)+γ_b))|s⁺⟩

3. Key Theoretical Results For UGR-driven GH shift, an analytical expression was derived:

S_GH,t = δλω_U,1ω_U/n_b cos θ_inc,U/(πcγ_U)

where ω_U,1 is the group velocity and ω_U/γ_U is the quality factor.

Technical Innovations

1. Synthetic parameter space analysis: First systematic analysis of UGR distribution in the four-dimensional (k_x, Δg, w₁, w₂) parameter space.
2. Discovery and explanation of anomalous phenomena: Identified and explained two anomalous behaviors in UGR-driven GH shifts, distinguishing them from conventional quasi-BIC mechanisms.
3. Revelation of group velocity effects: Demonstrated that GH shift depends not only on quality factor but also closely on group velocity.
4. Clarification of interference mechanism: TCMT analysis revealed the constant transmittance phenomenon resulting from interference between direct scattering and resonant radiation.

Experimental Setup

Numerical Simulation Methods

• Finite Element Method: Angular spectrum calculations using COMSOL Multiphysics for plane wave incidence
• Eigenmode Analysis: Computation of eigenfrequencies and decay rates of leaky resonant modes
• Gaussian Beam Simulation: Verification of GH shift under finite beam width conditions

Parameter Scanning Range

• Structural parameters: w₁ ∈ 0.174a, 0.497a, w₂ = 0.296a
• Incident angles: Small range scan around resonance angle θ_r = 14.95° 14°, 16°
• Frequency: Fixed at UGR resonance frequency af/c = 0.4456

Evaluation Metrics

• Reflectance/Transmittance: |r|², |t|²
• Phase: φ_r = Arg(r), φ_t = Arg(t)
• GH shift: Calculated through phase derivatives
• Quality factor: Q = ω_U/γ_U
• Directionality: η value

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. UGR Parameter Distribution

• UGR1 branch exists in w₁ ∈ 0.245a, 0.497a
• UGR2 branch exists in w₁ ∈ 0.174a, 0.346a
• Coexistence region of both branches: w₁ ∈ 0.245a, 0.346a

2. Verification of Anomalous Behaviors

• Constant transmittance phenomenon: Transmittance remains at approximately 1 at GH shift resonance peaks
• Selective excitation: Significant GH shift is excited only for specific incident directions (upper-right and lower-left backgrounds)
• GH shift suppression: GH shift of certain UGRs is suppressed to near-zero values

3. Quantitative Results

• Maximum GH shift reaches 180λ (for high-Q UGR1)
• Partial UGR2 exhibits complete GH shift suppression when w₁ approaches lower bound
• Quality factor range: 200-1000

Ablation Studies

1. Incident Direction Dependence Verified UGR unidirectionality through four incident conditions (upper-right, lower-right, upper-left, lower-left):

• Upper-right and lower-left incidence: produce significant GH shift
• Lower-right and upper-left incidence: GH shift approaches zero

2. Structural Parameter Effects

• Impact of w₁ variation on UGR position and strength
• Regulatory effect of symmetry-breaking degree on anomalous behaviors

Case Studies

Gaussian Beam Visualization:

• When beam width is comparable to GH shift, incident and transmitted beams are spatially separated
• Local fields generated by UGR excitation radiate in opposite directions after propagating a certain distance
• Non-resonant incidence results in direct beam transmission without displacement

Experimental Findings

1. Critical role of group velocity: When UGR approaches the valley of the band structure, group velocity approaches zero, leading to GH shift suppression.
2. Interference mechanism: Interference between direct scattering and UGR radiation results in constant transmittance but rapidly varying phase.
3. Time-reversal symmetry: GH shifts for opposite incident directions are equal, confirming theoretical predictions.

Related Work

Traditional GH Shift Enhancement Methods

• Surface Plasmon Polaritons: Subject to metal absorption losses
• Fabry-Perot Resonance: Requires special cavity structures
• Quasi-BICs: GH shift proportional to quality factor, but requires precise symmetry control

UGR-Related Research

• Topological Photonics: UGR as topologically protected optical states
• Asymmetric Scattering: Applications of radiation asymmetry
• Unidirectional Waveguides: Unidirectional light transmission based on UGR

Advantages of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper is the first to systematically investigate UGR-driven GH shifts, discovering new physical mechanisms and anomalous phenomena, with complete theoretical explanations provided.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Unique properties of UGR-driven GH shifts: Unlike conventional quasi-BIC mechanisms, they exhibit anomalous behaviors of constant transmittance accompanied by phase resonance.
2. Group velocity as a key factor: GH shift depends on both group velocity and quality factor; shift is completely suppressed when group velocity is zero.
3. Interference mechanism explains anomalous phenomena: Interference between direct scattering and UGR radiation is the physical origin of anomalous behaviors.
4. Controllable unidirectional effects: Selective GH shift enhancement can be achieved through structural parameter tuning.

Limitations

1. Parameter range restrictions: UGR exists only within specific structural parameter ranges.
2. Frequency dependence: Precise matching of UGR resonance frequency is required.
3. Angle sensitivity: GH shift enhancement is effective only within narrow angular ranges.
4. Theoretical simplifications: TCMT analysis is based on weak coupling approximation; strong coupling cases may require more complex theories.

Future Directions

1. Extension to multilayer structures: Investigation of UGR phenomena in more complex multilayer structures.
2. Nonlinear effects: Exploration of UGR-driven GH shifts in nonlinear materials.
3. Dynamic modulation: Realization of dynamic control of GH shifts through external field modulation.
4. Device applications: Development of novel optical devices based on UGR-driven GH shifts.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Significant theoretical contributions: First establishment of a complete theoretical framework for UGR-driven GH shifts, revealing new physical mechanisms.
2. Important phenomenon discovery: The two discovered anomalous behaviors provide new insights for optical manipulation.
3. Rigorous analytical methods: Comprehensive and in-depth analysis combining numerical simulations, analytical theory, and intuitive visualization.
4. Clear physical picture: TCMT analysis clearly explains the physical essence of the interference mechanism.

Weaknesses

1. Lack of experimental verification: As a theoretical and numerical study, it lacks experimental validation.
2. Limited application prospects: Practical applications may be restricted due to stringent resonance condition requirements.
3. Insufficient parameter optimization: Limited discussion on how to optimize structural parameters for optimal performance.
4. Lack of loss analysis: Insufficient detailed analysis of the impact of actual material losses on results.

Impact

1. High academic value: Opens new directions for cross-disciplinary research between UGR and GH shifts.
2. Significant theoretical significance: Discovery of group velocity effects enriches understanding of GH shift physical mechanisms.
3. Application potential: Provides theoretical foundation for designing novel optical sensors and beam manipulation devices.

Application Scenarios

1. Precision optical measurement: Utilization of anomalous GH shifts for high-precision displacement or angle measurement.
2. Optical beam splitters: Direction-selective unidirectional beam separation based on incident direction.
3. Optical sensing: High-sensitivity sensing utilizing the high quality factor of UGR.
4. Photonic integrated circuits: Implementation of beam routing functions in chip-level optical devices.

References

The paper cites 63 relevant references covering important works in multiple research fields including GH shifts, metasurface gratings, quasi-BICs, and UGR, providing a solid theoretical foundation and comparative references for this research.