The role of the overlap function in describing angular distributions of single-nucleon transfer reactions

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12103
• Title: The role of the overlap function in describing angular distributions of single-nucleon transfer reactions
• Authors: M. R. Xie, J.G. Li, N. Keeley, N. Michel, W. Zuo
• Classification: nucl-th (Nuclear Theory)
• Submission Date: October 14, 2025 to arXiv
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12103

Abstract

Single-nucleon transfer reactions provide an important tool for probing nuclear structure. This paper investigates the effects of directly incorporating overlap functions calculated from the Gamow Shell Model (GSM) into reaction calculations, using the single-proton overlap ⟨⁷Li|⁶He+p⟩ as a case study. By combining nucleon correlations and continuum coupling, the GSM provides accurate overlap functions and corresponding spectroscopic factors (SFs) in both the interior and asymptotic regions. These theoretical SFs and overlap functions are incorporated into coupled-channel Born approximation (CCBA) analysis of the ⁶He(d,n)⁷Li transfer reaction. Comparisons are also made with overlap functions calculated from ab initio no-core shell model (NCSM) and standard single-particle (s.p.) wave functions. The results show significant differences between angular distributions calculated using theoretical SFs combined with standard s.p. wave functions and those using complete theoretical overlap functions. Differences also exist between angular distributions calculated with GSM and NCSM overlap functions, highlighting the importance of internal structure and correct asymptotic behavior in reliable reaction calculations.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Nuclear structure probing requirements: The development of radioactive ion beams has made it possible to study the spectroscopy of exotic nuclei. Single-nucleon transfer reactions such as (d,p) and (d,n) play important roles in determining single-particle energy levels and spectroscopic factors.
2. Limitations of traditional methods: Existing transfer reaction theory typically expresses the cross section as the product of theoretical single-particle cross section and spectroscopic factor:

   (dσ/dΩ) ~ C²S · (dσ/dΩ)sp
   

   
   This single-particle approximation neglects the internal structure of the overlap function.
3. Challenges in weakly-bound systems: For transfer reactions involving weakly-bound or resonant states, systems exhibit extended spatial distributions and enhanced continuum coupling, making angular distributions highly sensitive to both the interior and asymptotic parts of the overlap function.

Research Motivation

• In traditional methods, single-particle spectroscopic factors strongly depend on the geometric parameters of the binding potential, with variations up to 30% even with reasonable parameter choices
• More precise nuclear structure inputs are needed to improve direct reaction theory
• GSM can simultaneously handle nucleon correlations and continuum coupling, providing reliable overlap functions and spectroscopic factors

Core Contributions

1. First systematic comparison: First systematic comparison of the effects of GSM overlap functions, NCSM overlap functions, and standard single-particle wave functions in transfer reaction calculations
2. Methodological improvement: Proposes an improved method of directly using theoretical overlap functions rather than single-particle approximations, significantly improving the accuracy of angular distribution calculations
3. Experimental verification: Validates the effectiveness of GSM overlap functions through experimental data from ⁶He(d,n)⁷Li and ²⁰⁸Pb(⁷Li,⁶He)²⁰⁹Bi reactions
4. Theoretical insights: Reveals the important influence of overlap function internal structure on the shape and magnitude of reaction angular distributions, emphasizing the necessity of correct asymptotic behavior

Detailed Methodology

Nuclear Structure Model: Gamow Shell Model (GSM)

Model Foundation

The GSM employs a one-body Berggren basis, including bound states, resonant states, and scattering states. Within the GSM framework, the nucleus is described as valence nucleons interacting outside a closed ⁴He core.

Hamiltonian Composition

H = T_core-valence + V_two-body + T_recoil

• Core-valence potential: Woods-Saxon potential, including central, spin-orbit, and Coulomb terms
• Two-body interaction: Furutani-Horiuchi-Tamagaki (FHT) effective nucleon-nucleon force
• Recoil term: Accounts for center-of-mass motion corrections

Overlap Function Definition

The overlap function within the GSM framework is defined as:

O_ℓj(r) = (1/√(2J_A + 1)) Σ_n ⟨Ψ^J_A_A ||a^+_nℓj|| Ψ^J_{A-1}_{A-1}⟩ u^(ℓj)_n(r)

Spectroscopic Factor Calculation

C²S_ℓj = ∫₀^∞ O²_ℓj(r) dr

Nuclear Reaction Model: Coupled-Channel Born Approximation (CCBA)

Method Selection

CCBA is adopted rather than traditional DWBA because it is necessary to account for coupling between the ⁷Li ground state 3/2⁻ and first excited state 1/2⁻, as well as ground state reorientation effects.

Computational Details

• All reaction calculations performed using the fresco code
• Post-form DWBA formalism employed, including complete complex residual terms
• Transfer step described by DWBA, with non-elastic coupling in the exit channel explicitly included in coupled-channel formalism

Experimental Setup

Experimental Data

1. ⁶He(d,n)⁷Li reaction:
   • Incident energy: E₆He = 36.4 MeV
   • Inverse kinematics measurement
   • Using Beijing HI-13 tandem accelerator
   • 0.0 MeV 3/2⁻ and 0.478 MeV 1/2⁻ levels unresolved
2. ²⁰⁸Pb(⁷Li,⁶He)²⁰⁹Bi reaction:
   • 52 MeV incident energy
   • Angular distribution data for multiple ²⁰⁹Bi excited states

Optical Potential Parameters

• Entrance channel (d+⁶He): Six parameter sets D1-D5 and YH06 employed
• Exit channel (n+⁷Li): CH89 global optical potential adopted
• ⟨d|n+p⟩ overlap: Calculated using Reid soft-core potential

Comparison Methods

1. GSM spectroscopic factors + standard single-particle wave functions
2. Complete GSM overlap functions
3. NCSM overlap functions
4. Standard Woods-Saxon single-particle wave functions

Experimental Results

Overlap Function Comparison

Figure 1 displays overlap functions ⟨⁷Li|⁶He+p⟩ calculated by various methods:

• Amplitude differences: Single-particle wave function amplitudes are noticeably larger than theoretical models, primarily due to normalization differences
• Internal structure: GSM and other models display different shape features in the 2-4 fm region
• Asymptotic behavior: NCSM significantly deviates in the asymptotic region due to lack of continuum coupling; VMC and GFMC exhibit statistical uncertainties

Asymptotic Normalization Coefficients (ANC)

ANC values extracted from GSM:

• ⁷Li ground state: 2.587 fm⁻¹/²
• ⁷Li first excited state: 2.361 fm⁻¹/²
• Good agreement with experimental averages (2.400 and 2.040 fm⁻¹/²) and shell model predictions

⁶He(d,n)⁷Li Reaction Angular Distributions

Main Findings

1. Single-particle approximation limitations: Calculations using GSM spectroscopic factors combined with standard single-particle wave functions significantly underestimate the experimental data amplitude and fail to fully capture the angular distribution shape
2. GSM overlap function advantages: Calculations directly using GSM overlap functions better describe experimental data in both amplitude and shape, with the D4 optical potential parameter set showing the best results
3. NCSM comparison: NCSM overlap function calculations yield results similar to single-particle wave functions, despite lacking correct asymptotic behavior

²⁰⁸Pb(⁷Li,⁶He)²⁰⁹Bi Reaction Verification

Using coupled reaction channel (CRC) formalism, GSM overlap functions provide good descriptions of angular distribution data for multiple ²⁰⁹Bi energy levels, supporting conclusions from the ⁶He(d,n)⁷Li analysis.

Spectroscopic Factor and ANC Extraction

Experimental Spectroscopic Factors

Single-proton spectroscopic factors for ⁷Li ground state extracted by fitting experimental data:

• Present work (s.p.): Consistent with Clarke92
• Present work (GSM O.F.): 0.29 ± 0.04, significantly smaller than other experimental values
• Reflects the effect of nucleon correlations in reducing GSM overlap function amplitude at small radii

Quenching Factor

A quenching factor Q = 0.78 ± 0.09 is introduced to adjust theoretical and experimental cross sections, reflecting long-standing discrepancies between theoretical and experimental spectroscopic factors.

Related Work

Traditional Methods

• Single-particle approximation: cross section = spectroscopic factor × single-particle cross section
• Woods-Saxon potential parameter adjustment to match separation energy
• Exhibits 30% geometric parameter dependence

Theoretical Developments

• No-core shell model (NCSM): Lacks continuum coupling
• Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) and Green's function Monte Carlo (GFMC): Large statistical errors
• Gamow shell model: Simultaneously handles correlations and continuum

Reaction Theory

• Distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA)
• Coupled-channel Born approximation (CCBA)
• Coupled reaction channels (CRC)

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Internal structure of overlap function is crucial: Direct use of GSM overlap functions significantly improves angular distribution calculations compared to single-particle approximations
2. Asymptotic behavior and internal structure equally important: Both correct asymptotic behavior and internal structure are necessary for reliable reaction calculations
3. Model dependence: Different nuclear structure models (GSM vs NCSM) produce overlap functions leading to distinctly different angular distributions

Limitations

1. Numerical precision: GSM overlap functions exhibit oscillations at r > 15 fm, requiring increased continuum state density
2. Many-body effects: Simultaneous breakup effects for weakly-bound systems require more complete four-body CDCC treatment
3. Optical potential uncertainty: Lack of suitable elastic scattering data introduces additional uncertainties

Future Directions

1. Self-consistent calculations: Develop fully self-consistent reaction calculations for bound and scattering states
2. Dispersive optical model: Implement self-consistent treatment using dispersive optical model in knockout reactions
3. Four-body methods: Develop advanced theoretical methods for handling complex reaction mechanisms in weakly-bound systems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological innovation: First systematic application of GSM overlap functions directly to transfer reaction calculations, avoiding limitations of single-particle approximations
2. Theoretical rigor: GSM simultaneously considers nucleon correlations and continuum coupling, providing more realistic nuclear structure inputs
3. Sufficient experimental verification: Validates method effectiveness through two different types of transfer reactions
4. Thorough analysis: Detailed comparison of different methods' advantages and disadvantages, revealing the importance of overlap function internal structure

Weaknesses

1. Computational complexity: GSM calculations are more complex than traditional methods, requiring more computational resources
2. Applicable range: Primarily focused on light nuclear systems; applicability to heavy nuclei requires further verification
3. Uncertainty analysis: Insufficient discussion of theoretical uncertainties in GSM calculations

Impact

1. Field contribution: Provides new precise methods for nuclear reaction theory, potentially changing traditional spectroscopic factor extraction approaches
2. Practical value: Important application prospects for exotic nuclei research, particularly weakly-bound systems
3. Reproducibility: Detailed description of methods and parameters ensures good reproducibility

Applicable Scenarios

• Transfer reaction studies of light exotic nuclei
• Precise spectroscopic studies of weakly-bound nuclear systems
• Nuclear reaction calculations requiring high-precision overlap functions
• Theoretical prediction and experimental extraction of spectroscopic factors

References

The paper cites 78 relevant references, covering various aspects of nuclear structure theory, reaction theory, and experimental techniques, providing solid theoretical foundation and experimental support for the research.