Generalized Fokker-Planck equation for the active Brownian motion

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12240
• Title: Generalized Fokker-Planck equation for the active Brownian motion
• Authors: Sanju S Pillai, M. Muhsin, M. Sahoo (Department of Physics, University of Kerala)
• Classification: cond-mat.soft (Soft Condensed Matter Physics)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12240

Abstract

This paper investigates the dynamics of inertial active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles suspended in non-Markovian environments. The particles are additionally subjected to external forces such as harmonic confinement and magnetic fields. Based on the importance of understanding non-Markovian behavior in complex environments, the authors employ a Jeffreys fluid framework to model particle motion, effectively capturing both viscous and elastic contributions of the environment. Within this model, the Fokker-Planck equation corresponding to each case is explicitly derived. Building upon this foundation, the analysis is extended to a general non-Markovian framework, yielding a generalized Fokker-Planck equation for free active particles. Furthermore, probability distribution functions valid for arbitrary memory kernels under various conditions are obtained, including both free and confined motion with and without magnetic fields. To the authors' knowledge, this represents the first comprehensive formal framework for probabilistically describing active particles subject to non-Markovian memory effects.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed in this research is: how to establish a complete probabilistic description framework for active particle dynamics in non-Markovian environments. Traditional active matter theory is primarily based on the Markovian assumption, wherein the environment is memoryless and dynamics depend only on the instantaneous state of the particle.

Research Significance

1. Biological Relevance: Actual biological systems (such as bacterial motion in mucus, colloidal suspension in polymer solutions, molecular motor transport through crowded cytoplasm) all exhibit memory effects
2. Physical Implications: Non-Markovian environments manifest as viscoelastic responses, where the medium both dissipates and stores energy, leading to long-range correlations, anomalous diffusion, and non-trivial relaxation phenomena
3. Theoretical Gap: Existing Markovian models cannot reproduce these non-equilibrium features inherent to non-Markovian environments

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Active Brownian Particles (ABPs): Describe propulsion with rotational diffusion, primarily used for synthetic and biological active matter
• Run-and-Tumble Particles (RTPs): Model the intermittent propulsion characteristics of bacterial motion
• Active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Particles (AOUPs): Describe self-propulsion through random forces with exponential temporal correlations

These frameworks all assume Markovian environments and cannot handle memory effects.

Core Contributions

1. First establishment of a complete probabilistic description framework for active particles in non-Markovian environments
2. Derivation of generalized Fokker-Planck equations for four distinct physical scenarios:
   • Free active particles
   • Active particles under harmonic confinement
   • Active particles in magnetic fields
   • Active particles subject to both harmonic confinement and magnetic fields
3. Derivation of probability distribution functions valid for arbitrary memory kernels
4. Demonstration that results smoothly transition to familiar Markovian expressions in appropriate limits
5. Provision of specific implementation of the Jeffreys fluid framework and extension to general non-Markovian kernels

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Establish a probabilistic dynamics description for inertial active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles in a viscoelastic bath, subject to a two-dimensional potential field V(x,y) and external magnetic field.

Model Architecture

Fundamental Equation

Generalized Langevin equation:

mr̈ = -∫₀ᵗ γ(t-t')ṙ(t')dt' - ∇V + q(ṙ×B) + η(t) + Ω(t)

Where:

• First term: Viscoelastic friction
• Second term: Conservative force
• Third term: Non-conservative magnetic force
• η(t): Thermal fluctuations satisfying ⟨ηᵢ(t)ηⱼ(t')⟩ = δᵢⱼkᵦTγ(t-t')
• Ω(t): Active force following an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

Jeffreys Fluid Model

Memory kernel adopts the Jeffreys fluid form:

γ(t-t') = (γf/2)δ(t-t') + (γs/2ts)e^(-(t-t')/2ts)

• γf: Viscosity coefficient
• γs, ts: Elastic response parameters

Active Force Modeling

tcΩ̇ = -Ω + DΩζ(t)

Correlation function: ⟨Ωᵢ(t)Ωⱼ(t')⟩ = δᵢⱼD²Ωe^(-|t-t'|/tc)

Technical Innovations

1. Matrix Representation

Express the system in matrix form: Ẋ = AX + Gη(t), where A is the drift matrix, G is the noise coupling matrix, and B = GGᵀ is the diffusion matrix.

2. Response Function Method

For general memory kernels, define response functions:

χ̃₁(s) = 1/(s + γ̃(s)/m)
χ̃₂(s) = 1/(s + 1/tc)

3. Fluctuation Decomposition

Introduce fluctuation terms gᵢ(t), decomposing the solution into deterministic and random parts, expressing random contributions through convolution integrals.

4. Generalized FPE Coefficients

For arbitrary memory kernels, the FPE takes the form:

∂P/∂t = Q₁(t)∂/∂v(vP) + Q₂(t)∂/∂v(ΩP) + Q₃(t)∂²P/∂v² + Q₄(t)∂/∂Ω(ΩP) + Q₅(t)∂²P/∂Ω²

The coefficients Qᵢ(t) are time-dependent, reflecting non-Markovian characteristics.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This is a purely theoretical work, verified through:

1. Markovian Limit: When γ(t-t') = 2γδ(t-t'), coefficients simplify to:

   Q₁ = γ/m, Q₂ = -1/m, Q₃ = kᵦTγ/m², Q₄ = 1/tc, Q₅ = D²Ω/tc
   

2. Consistency Checks: Ensure probability distribution normalization and satisfaction of physical constraints in all cases
3. Symmetry Verification: Verify symmetry breaking in magnetic field cases

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Free Particle Case

• Successfully derived 5-dimensional FPE in Jeffreys fluid (Equation 24)
• Obtained generalized FPE for arbitrary memory kernels (Equation 47)
• Demonstrated correctness of Markovian limit

2. Harmonic Confinement Case

• Derived FPE in 6-dimensional phase space (Equation 58)
• Obtained Gaussian probability distribution (Equation 78)
• Response functions incorporate coupling effects with harmonic frequency ω

3. Magnetic Field Case

• Established FPE for 8-dimensional system (Equation 84)
• Introduced cyclotron frequency ψ = qB/m
• Demonstrated x-y coupling and symmetry breaking

4. Combined Case

• Handled 10-dimensional phase space (position, velocity, auxiliary variables, noise, active force)
• Obtained complete probability distribution for the most complex scenario (Equation 149)

Key Findings

1. Time-Dependent Coefficients: Non-Markovian FPE coefficients Qᵢ(t) explicitly depend on time, reflecting memory effects
2. Dimensional Growth: Each additional physical effect (confinement, magnetic field) significantly increases phase space dimensionality
3. Coupling Structure: Magnetic field induces strong x-y coupling; confinement introduces position-velocity coupling
4. Memory Integrals: Memory integral terms appear in all cases, embodying historical dependence

Related Work

Active Matter Theory

• Classical Frameworks: ABPs, RTPs, AOUPs primarily address Markovian cases
• Non-Markovian Extensions: This work systematically addresses non-Markovian dynamics of active particles for the first time

Generalized Langevin Equation

• Trajectory Description: Existing work primarily focuses on single-particle trajectories
• Probabilistic Description: This work fills the gap in probabilistic frameworks

Viscoelastic Media

• Jeffreys Fluid: Provides a simplified model for handling viscoelasticity
• Arbitrary Memory Kernels: This work extends to the most general case

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Complete Framework: Establishes a complete probabilistic description of non-Markovian dynamics for active particles
2. Universality: The method applies to arbitrary memory kernels and various external field configurations
3. Consistency: All results revert to classical expressions in the Markovian limit
4. Practicality: Provides theoretical foundation for studying active matter in complex environments

Limitations

1. Linear Assumption: The linear nature of the equations limits description of strong nonlinear effects
2. Gaussian Approximation: The Gaussian form of probability distributions may fail to capture all non-equilibrium features
3. Computational Complexity: Numerical implementation in high-dimensional phase space presents challenges
4. Experimental Verification: Lacks direct experimental comparison

Future Directions

1. Numerical Simulations: Develop efficient algorithms for solving generalized FPE
2. Nonlinear Extensions: Consider nonlinear memory kernels and interactions
3. Experimental Verification: Design experiments to test theoretical predictions
4. Multi-particle Systems: Extend to collective behavior and phase transitions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: First comprehensive theoretical framework in this field
2. Mathematical Rigor: Derivations are rigorous and results are self-consistent
3. Physical Intuition: Clearly demonstrates the physical origins of non-Markovian effects
4. Practical Value: Provides theoretical tools for practical applications

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Numerical Verification: Theoretical results require numerical simulation support
2. Insufficient Experimental Connection: Correspondence with specific experimental systems needs strengthening
3. Incomplete Approximation Discussion: Discussion of applicability ranges for various approximations is insufficient

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Fills an important gap in active matter theory
2. Application Prospects: Provides new tools for biophysics, soft matter, and related fields
3. Methodological Value: The established mathematical framework is generalizable to other non-Markovian systems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Biological Systems: Bacterial motion in mucus, intracellular transport
2. Soft Matter: Colloidal dynamics in polymer solutions
3. Artificial Systems: Magnetic microswimmers, optically trapped active particles
4. Engineering Applications: Drug delivery, microfluidic transport

References

The paper cites 56 important references covering:

• Foundational active matter theory 1-5
• Experimental systems 6-9
• Non-Markovian dynamics 38-41
• Application domains 42-54

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical physics paper making pioneering contributions to non-Markovian dynamics of active matter. The theoretical framework is comprehensive, mathematical derivations are rigorous, and it establishes a solid foundation for further development in this field.