Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12298
• Title: Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics
• Authors: Marek Chalupa, Thomas A. Henzinger, Ana Oliveira da Costa (IST Austria)
• Classification: cs.LO (Logic in Computer Science), cs.FL (Formal Languages)
• Conference: FSTTCS 2025 (45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12298

Abstract

This paper extends hypertrace logic by introducing trace quantifiers that can quantify over all possible sets of traces. In this extended logic, formulas can quantify over two types of trace variables: constrained trace variables (quantifying over a fixed set of traces defined by a model) and unconstrained trace variables (assignable to any trace). The authors prove that unconstrained hypertrace logic is equivalent to monadic second-order logic of one successor (S1S) and thus satisfiable; the trace prefix fragment is equivalent to HyperQPTL; and for constrained trace quantifier alternations restricted to formulas with existential quantifiers preceding universal quantifiers, the satisfiability is decidable, equivalent to unconstrained formulas.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Expressiveness Requirements for Hyperproperties: Traditional temporal logics (such as LTL) can only reason about single execution traces and cannot express hyperproperties involving comparisons across multiple executions, such as information flow security and consistency.
2. Limitations of Existing Hyperlogics: Existing hyperlogics (such as HyperLTL) only have constrained trace quantifiers, meaning they can only quantify over the trace set of a given system, which limits their expressive power.
3. Decidability Issues: The satisfiability problem for hyperlogics is typically undecidable, necessitating the identification of fragments with decidable satisfiability.

Research Motivation

The core motivation of this paper is to enhance the expressive power of hypertrace logic by introducing unconstrained trace quantifiers while systematically studying the impact of different quantifier patterns on decidability. This extension allows quantification over the universe of all possible traces, rather than merely the trace set of a system.

Core Contributions

1. Extension of Hypertrace Logic: Introduces unconstrained trace quantifiers, enabling formulas to quantify over all possible traces, significantly enhancing expressive power.
2. Establishment of Equivalence Relations:
   • Proves that unconstrained hypertrace logic is equivalent to S1S
   • Proves that the trace prefix hypertrace logic is equivalent to HyperQPTL
3. Decidability Results: Identifies new fragments with decidable satisfiability problems, particularly the fragment with constrained quantifier alternation pattern ∃∀.
4. Analysis of Temporal Prefix Fragments: Provides the first systematic study of temporal quantifier-prioritized hyperlogic fragments, yielding new decidability and undecidability results.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Study the satisfiability problem for hypertrace logic formulas: given a hypertrace logic formula φ, does there exist a trace set T such that T ⊨ φ?

Logical Framework Design

Syntax Definition

The syntax of hypertrace logic formula φ:

φ ::= ∃π φ | ∃π::T φ | ∃i φ | ¬φ | φ ∨ φ | i < i | i = i | X(π,i)

Where:

• ∃π φ: unconstrained trace quantifier
• ∃π::T φ: constrained trace quantifier
• ∃i φ: temporal quantifier
• X(π,i): binary predicate representing the property of trace π at time i

Semantic Definition

The satisfaction relation of formulas over trace sets is defined through standard first-order logic semantics:

• Unconstrained quantifier: (T,(ΠT,ΠN)) ⊨ ∃π φ if and only if there exists τ ∈ (2^X)^ω such that (T,(ΠT[π↦τ],ΠN)) ⊨ φ
• Constrained quantifier: (T,(ΠT,ΠN)) ⊨ ∃π::T φ if and only if there exists τ ∈ T such that (T,(ΠT[π↦τ],ΠN)) ⊨ φ

Technical Innovations

1. Flatten Function

Introduces a flatten function to rewrite hypertrace formulas, leveraging the independence of variable assignments in unconstrained trace variables:

flatten(∃π φ, {x₀,...,xₙ}, Vc) = ∃πx₀...∃πxₙ flatten(φ, {x₀,...,xₙ}, Vc∪{π})

Key Insight: Different propositional variables of unconstrained trace variables can be quantified independently, establishing the foundation for equivalence with S1S.

2. Equivalence Proof with S1S

Establishes bidirectional equivalence between unconstrained hypertrace logic and S1S through the following translation:

From Hypertrace to S1S:

• Rewrite formulas using flatten
• Reinterpret each πx as a second-order variable
• Apply substitution σ = {x(πx,i) ↦ πx(i)}

From S1S to Hypertrace:

• Each second-order variable X becomes a trace variable τX
• Use standard translation from Succ to ≤

3. Constrained Quantifier Elimination Technique

For formulas with quantifier pattern ∃::T ∀::T, provides a method for eliminating universal constrained quantifiers:

By expanding universal quantifiers into combinations of all existing existential trace variables:

∀π₁::T...∀πₘ::T φ ≡ ⋀ⱼ₁₌₁ⁿ...⋀ⱼₘ₌₁ⁿ φ[π₁↦πⱼ₁,...,πₘ↦πⱼₘ]

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

This work is primarily theoretical, with results verified through rigorous mathematical proofs:

1. Constructive Proofs: Prove equivalence through explicit construction of translation functions
2. Inductive Proofs: Use structural induction to prove correctness of translations
3. Reduction Proofs: Prove undecidability through reduction from known undecidable problems

Decidability Analysis Framework

Establishes a systematic analysis framework:

• Trace Prefix Fragment: All trace quantifiers precede temporal quantifiers
• Temporal Prefix Fragment: All temporal quantifiers precede trace quantifiers
• Quantifier Alternation Patterns: Analyze different ∃ and ∀ alternation patterns

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

1. Equivalence Theorems

• Theorem 7: Unconstrained hypertrace logic is expressively equivalent to S1S
• Theorem 20: Trace prefix hypertrace logic is equivalent to HyperQPTL

2. Decidability Results Summary

3. Key Technical Results

• Lemma 5: The flatten function preserves equisatisfiability of formulas
• Theorem 12: Formulas with ∃::T ∀::T pattern can be transformed to unconstrained formulas
• Proposition 17: Removing constraints on existential constrained quantifiers preserves models

Undecidability Proofs

Theorem 22 proves undecidability of specific temporal prefix fragments through reduction from the non-halting problem of 2-counter Minsky machines. The core idea of the reduction:

• Each trace encodes a configuration and transition relation
• Uses unconstrained trace quantifiers to guess the time points where operations occur
• Employs complex constraints to ensure correct encoding

Related Work

Development of Hyperlogics

1. HyperLTL: The earliest hypertemporal logic, supporting only constrained trace quantifiers
2. HyperQPTL: Extends HyperLTL with propositional quantification
3. Hypertrace Logic: Two-sorted first-order logic approach proposed by Bartocci et al.
4. FO<,E: Ranked predicate approach by Finkbeiner and Zimmermann

Positioning of This Work

Building upon existing hypertrace logic, this paper:

• Introduces unconstrained quantifiers to enhance expressive power
• Systematically analyzes the impact of quantifier patterns on decidability
• Provides the first study of temporal prefix fragments

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Enhanced Expressive Power: Unconstrained trace quantifiers significantly enhance the expressive power of hypertrace logic
2. Decidability Boundaries: Identifies new decidable fragments, particularly those with ∃∀ pattern
3. Theoretical Unification: Establishes connections between hypertrace logic and classical logic (S1S) and hypertemporal logic (HyperQPTL)

Limitations

1. Practical Considerations: The practical applicability of theoretical results requires further verification
2. Complexity Analysis: Lacks complexity analysis for decidable fragments
3. Tool Support: Requires development of corresponding automated verification tools

Future Directions

1. Comparative Expressiveness: Relative expressive power of trace prefix versus temporal prefix fragments
2. Complexity Theory: Precise complexity analysis of decidable fragments
3. Practical Implementation: Development of efficient solving algorithms and tools

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: Provides in-depth theoretical analysis with several important equivalence results
2. Systematicity: Comprehensively analyzes the impact of different quantifier patterns on decidability
3. Novelty: The idea of introducing unconstrained quantifiers is novel and significantly extends expressive power
4. Rigor: All results are supported by complete mathematical proofs

Weaknesses

1. Absence of Experimental Validation: As purely theoretical work, lacks verification through practical application cases
2. Complexity Analysis Gap: Insufficient analysis of computational complexity for decidable fragments
3. Low Level of Tool Implementation: Theoretical results have not yet been implemented as tools

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important theoretical foundations for hyperlogic theory
2. Methodological Value: The flatten technique and quantifier elimination methods have general applicability
3. Foundation for Future Work: Establishes basis for subsequent complexity analysis and tool development

Applicable Scenarios

1. Formal Verification: Formal specification and verification of system security properties
2. Concurrent Systems: Consistency analysis of multithreaded programs
3. Information Flow Control: Verification of information flow properties in secure systems

References

The paper cites important works in the field, including:

• Kamp (1968): Equivalence between temporal logic and first-order logic
• Finkbeiner & Hahn (2016): HyperLTL decidability
• Bartocci et al. (2022): Foundational theory of hypertrace logic
• Büchi (1960): Decidability theory of S1S

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to hyperlogic theory, particularly in quantifier expressiveness and decidability analysis. While lacking practical application validation, its theoretical depth and systematic analysis provide a solid foundation for subsequent research in this field.