PRoH: Dynamic Planning and Reasoning over Knowledge Hypergraphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12434
• Title: PRoH: Dynamic Planning and Reasoning over Knowledge Hypergraphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Authors: Xiangjun Zai, Xingyu Tan, Xiaoyang Wang, Qing Liu, Xiwei Xu, Wenjie Zhang
• Category: cs.CL (Computational Linguistics)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12434

Abstract

Knowledge Hypergraphs (KHs) represent an emerging knowledge representation paradigm for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), offering a structured approach to modeling multi-entity relationships. However, existing KH-based RAG methods suffer from three major limitations: static retrieval planning, non-adaptive retrieval execution, and shallow exploitation of KH structural semantics, which restrict their capability for effective multi-hop question answering. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes PRoH—a dynamic knowledge hypergraph planning and reasoning framework. PRoH incorporates three core innovations: (1) a context-aware planning module that guides structured reasoning plan generation by delineating local KH neighborhoods; (2) a structured question decomposition process that organizes sub-questions into dynamically evolving directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to enable adaptive multi-trajectory exploration; (3) an Entity-Weighted Overlap (EWO)-guided reasoning path retrieval algorithm that prioritizes semantically coherent hyperedge traversal.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Traditional RAG systems primarily rely on semantic similarity for retrieval, failing to capture structured relational knowledge inherent in many information domains, and frequently retrieving redundant or noisy content. While graph-based RAG improves upon this through knowledge graphs (KGs), most existing frameworks only model binary relationships between two entities, overlooking the n-ary nature of many real-world relationships.

Importance Analysis

Many real-world relationships involve multiple entities, such as "Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle is the first major collaboration between Nintendo and Ubisoft," which simultaneously connects three entities. Decomposing such n-ary relationships into multiple binary edges inevitably results in the loss of critical structural and semantic information.

Limitations of Existing Methods

Existing KH-based RAG methods suffer from three major limitations:

1. Static Retrieval Planning: Relies on predefined, hard-coded retrieval pipelines that apply identical operation sequences regardless of query content or graph context
2. Non-Adaptive Retrieval Execution: Employs one-shot, non-iterative retrieval approaches that cannot leverage intermediate reasoning results to optimize retrieval
3. Shallow Exploitation of Graph Structural Semantics: Primarily treats hyperedges as simple links or routing mechanisms to access relevant text blocks, overlooking the rich relational semantics encoded within hyperedges

Core Contributions

1. Proposes the PRoH Framework: A dynamic knowledge hypergraph RAG framework that fully leverages the expressive power of hypergraphs for multi-hop question answering
2. Context-Aware Planning Mechanism: A planning mechanism that delineates the underlying knowledge hypergraph and generates feasible reasoning plans
3. EWO-Guided Reasoning Path Retrieval Strategy: A fine-grained, semantically-aware exploration strategy tailored for knowledge hypergraphs
4. Significant Performance Improvements: Achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple knowledge domains, with average F1 score improvements of 19.73% and Generation Evaluation (G-E) score improvements of 8.41%

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given a question q and a knowledge hypergraph H = (V, E), hypergraph RAG requires retrieving question-relevant knowledge from H (a set of facts F), then generating an answer a(q) based on q and F.

Model Architecture

The PRoH framework comprises four main components:

1. Graph Construction and Indexing

• KH Construction: Adopts the HyperGraphRAG approach to extract hyperedges from documents, identify entities, and construct KH
• Synonym Hyperedge Enhancement: Augments graph connectivity through a three-step process of adding synonym hyperedges:
  • Compute cosine similarity between entity pairs
  • Form similarity subgraphs and compute connected components
  • Use LLM to determine synonym entities and add synonym hyperedges

2. Graph Grounding

• Topic Entity Identification: Uses LLM to extract keywords and links them to candidate entities through similarity matching
• Target Hyperedge Matching: Retrieves hyperedges semantically relevant to the question
• Question Subgraph Construction: Extracts the union of D_max-hop neighborhoods of topic entities and target hyperedges

3. Reasoning Plan Initialization

• Question Subgraph Delineation: Constructs a planning context graph H_p to provide structured input to the LLM
• Initial Reasoning Plan Generation: Generates reasoning plans based on the planning context
• Reasoning DAG Construction: Represents reasoning plans as directed acyclic graphs, applying Hasse reduction to obtain minimal representations

4. Reasoning Process

• State Space Search: Models reasoning as a search problem over DAG states
• State Transitions: Transitions to the next state by resolving sub-questions at the current level
• Dynamic DAG Optimization: Dynamically optimizes the reasoning DAG based on intermediate answers

Technical Innovations

Entity-Weighted Overlap (EWO) Scoring

The EWO algorithm guides search direction selection through two-step computation:

1. Entity Scoring:

EW(v|qj) = {
    LLMScore(v, qj), if SE(v|qj) ≥ θemb
    0, otherwise
}

2. Hyperedge Scoring:

EWO(e'|q,e) = Aggregate({SE(v,q) | v ∈ V(e) ∩ V(e')})

Structured Question Decomposition

• Organizes sub-questions into dynamically evolving DAGs rather than linear sequences
• Supports coexistence of multiple candidate answers and multiple reasoning trajectories
• Enables recovery from local errors

Experimental Setup

Datasets

• KHQA Dataset: Covers five domains—medicine, agriculture, computer science, law, and mixed
• Long-Horizon Question Extension: Generates an additional 200 questions per domain with 3-6 hops to evaluate multi-hop reasoning capability

Evaluation Metrics

• F1 Score: Measures answer accuracy
• Retrieval Similarity (R-S): Evaluates quality of retrieved content
• Generation Evaluation (G-E): Assesses quality of generated answers

Baseline Methods

• LLM-only: Uses only LLM's intrinsic knowledge
• StandardRAG: Traditional block-based RAG
• PathRAG: Path-based RAG method
• HippoRAG2: Neurobiology-inspired long-term memory method
• HyperGraphRAG: Current state-of-the-art hypergraph RAG method

Implementation Details

• LLM: GPT-4o-mini
• Embedding Model: text-embedding-3-small
• Key Parameters: Planning depth d_p=3, KH exploration depth limit d_max=3, initial plan count n_0=2

Experimental Results

Main Results

PRoH achieves state-of-the-art performance in F1 and G-E scores across all domains:

Ablation Studies

Ablation experiments demonstrate the importance of each component:

• Removing EWO guidance: F1 decreases by up to 5.3%
• Removing synonym merging: F1 decreases by up to 5.2%
• Removing planning context: F1 decreases by up to 5.8%
• Removing target hyperedge matching: F1 decreases by up to 8.6%

Long-Horizon Reasoning Performance

On long-horizon multi-hop question answering tasks, PRoH demonstrates robust performance with average F1 improvements of 26.68%, reaching maximum improvements of 44.87% in the computer science domain.

Efficiency Analysis

The PRoH-L variant maintains competitive performance while significantly reducing token usage, achieving 30.07% token reduction in the agriculture domain while improving F1 by 16.58%.

Related Work

Graph-Based RAG

Existing graph-based RAG methods achieve more precise retrieval and relationship-aware reasoning through knowledge graphs, but are mostly limited to binary relationship representations.

Knowledge Hypergraph RAG

Early systems such as HyperGraphRAG and Hyper-RAG extract hyperedges to capture higher-order relationships, but still rely on heuristic one-shot retrieval pipelines lacking context-awareness and iterative reasoning capabilities.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

PRoH successfully addresses three major limitations of existing KH-based RAG methods by introducing context-aware planning, structured iterative question decomposition, and EWO-guided reasoning path retrieval, achieving significant performance improvements across multiple knowledge domains.

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: Dynamic planning and state space search may introduce additional computational overhead
2. Parameter Sensitivity: Multiple hyperparameters (such as d_p, d_max, n_0) require domain-specific tuning
3. Graph Quality Dependency: Performance is highly dependent on the quality and completeness of the initial knowledge hypergraph

Future Directions

1. Explore more efficient state space search strategies
2. Investigate adaptive parameter adjustment mechanisms
3. Extend to larger-scale knowledge hypergraphs and more complex reasoning tasks

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: First to propose a dynamic planning and reasoning KH-RAG framework, addressing core limitations of existing methods
2. Significant Technical Contributions: The EWO scoring mechanism and structured question decomposition represent important innovations tailored to hypergraph characteristics
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Covers multiple domains and long-horizon reasoning tasks with thorough ablation studies
4. Substantial Performance Gains: Consistent and significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods

Weaknesses

1. High Complexity: The method comprises multiple modules and parameters, potentially affecting practical deployment convenience
2. Insufficient Computational Cost Analysis: While token usage analysis is provided, detailed time complexity analysis is lacking
3. Limited Generalization Verification: Experiments primarily focus on the specific KHQA dataset

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new research directions and technical frameworks for the KH-RAG field
2. Practical Value: Holds significant value for application scenarios requiring complex multi-hop reasoning
3. Reproducibility: Provides detailed algorithm descriptions and implementation details

Applicable Scenarios

PRoH is particularly suitable for:

1. Complex question-answering systems requiring multi-hop reasoning
2. Knowledge-intensive tasks involving multi-entity relationships
3. Application scenarios requiring interpretable reasoning paths

References

The paper cites 40 relevant references covering important works in graph-based RAG, knowledge hypergraphs, multi-hop reasoning, and related fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.