2025-11-22T17:31:15.427699

Empirical bounds for commuting dilations of free unitaries and the universal commuting dilation constant

Gerhold, Scherer, Shalit
For a tuple $T$ of Hilbert space operators, the 'commuting dilation constant' is the smallest number $c$ such that the operators of $T$ are a simultaneous compression of commuting normal operators of norm at most $c$. We present numerical experiments giving a strong indication that the commuting dilation constant of a pair of independent random $N{\times}N$ unitary matrices converges to $\sqrt2$ as $N \to \infty$ almost surely. Under the assumption that this is the case, we prove that the commuting dilation constant of an arbitrary pair of contractions is strictly smaller than $2$. Our experiments are based on a simple algorithm that we introduce for the purpose of computing dilation constants between tuples of matrices.
academic

Empirical bounds for commuting dilations of free unitaries and the universal commuting dilation constant

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2510.12540
  • Title: Empirical bounds for commuting dilations of free unitaries and the universal commuting dilation constant
  • Authors: Malte Gerhold (University of Greifswald), Marcel Scherer (Technion), Orr Moshe Shalit (Technion)
  • Classification: math.FA cs.NA math.NA math.OA
  • Submission Date: October 14, 2025 to arXiv
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12540

Abstract

For a tuple of Hilbert space operators TT, the "commuting dilation constant" is the smallest number cc such that the operators in TT are simultaneously compressions of commuting normal operators with norm at most cc. This paper provides strong numerical evidence that the commuting dilation constant of independent random N×NN \times N unitary matrix pairs converges almost surely to 2\sqrt{2} (as NN \to \infty). Under this assumption, it is proven that the commuting dilation constant of any pair of contraction operators is strictly less than 2. The experiments are based on a simple algorithm introduced by the authors for computing dilation constants between matrix tuples.

Research Background and Motivation

  1. Problem to be Solved: Determine the exact value of the universal commuting dilation constant C2C_2, which is the smallest constant cc such that every pair of contraction operators is simultaneously a compression of commuting normal operators with norm at most cc.
  2. Importance of the Problem: Dilation theory techniques and matrix convex set frameworks have important applications in quantum information, optimal control, mathematical physics, operator systems, and operator algebra theory.
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Known bounds: dCd2d\sqrt{d} \leq C_d \leq \sqrt{2d} (for dd-tuples)
    • For the case d=2d=2, the current best upper bound C222=22C_2 \leq \sqrt{2} \cdot 2 = 2\sqrt{2} coincides with the trivial bound CddC_d \leq d
    • The lower bound CddC_d \geq \sqrt{d} is not tight in general
  4. Research Motivation: By combining rigorous limit theorems with numerical experiments, provide evidence for C2<2C_2 < 2 and improve existing upper bounds.

Core Contributions

  1. Numerical Evidence: Provides strong numerical evidence that the dilation constant of independent Haar unitary matrix pairs converges to 2\sqrt{2}
  2. Theoretical Result: Proves that if this convergence holds, then C2223<2C_2 \leq \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3} < 2
  3. Algorithmic Contribution: Introduces a simple algorithm for computing dilation constants of matrix tuples
  4. Rigorous Bounds: Provides strict bounds for finite dimensions in the appendix: C2(n)2+2sin(π2(112n))<2C_2(n) \leq \sqrt{2} + 2\sin(\frac{\pi}{2}(1-\frac{1}{2n})) < 2

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given an operator dd-tuple u,vu, v, the dilation constant c(u,v)c(u,v) is defined as: c(u,v)=inf{c:ucv}c(u,v) = \inf\{c : u \prec cv\} where ucvu \prec cv means there exist a Hilbert space HKH \subseteq K and operator tuples UB(H)dU \in B(H)^d, VB(K)dV \in B(K)^d such that uUu \sim U, vVv \sim V and U=PHcVHU = P_H cV|_H.

Core Theoretical Framework

Theorem 2.1 (Horizontal Convergence and Dilation Constants): If sequences of operator dd-tuples (ξ(N))(\xi^{(N)}) and (η(N))(\eta^{(N)}) have matrix ranges that horizontally converge to ξ()\xi^{(\infty)} and η()\eta^{(\infty)}, then: c(ξ(),η())lim infN,Mc(ξ(N),η(M))c(\xi^{(\infty)}, \eta^{(\infty)}) \leq \liminf_{N,M \to \infty} c(\xi^{(N)}, \eta^{(M)})

Corollary 2.4: For collections of random matrices T(N)T^{(N)} with strong asymptotic freeness, almost surely: c(uf,u0)lim infc(T(N),u0)c(u^f, u_0) \leq \liminf c(T^{(N)}, u_0)

Algorithm Design

Dilation Constant Computation Algorithm:

  1. Construct commuting normal matrices N=(N1,N2)N = (N_1, N_2) whose diagonal values range over all k2k^2 possible pairs in Vk×VkV_k \times V_k, where Vk={exp(2πimk):m=0,1,,k1}V_k = \{\exp(\frac{2\pi im}{k}) : m = 0,1,\ldots,k-1\}
  2. Establish a semidefinite programming problem:
    maximize r
    subject to:
    C_j ≥ 0, ∀j = 1,...,k²
    Σ C_j = I_N
    Σ (N_i)_{jj} C_j = rU_i, i = 1,2
    
  3. The dilation constant is c(U,N)=r1c(U,N) = r^{-1}

Technical Innovations

  1. Approximation Strategy: Uses regular kk-gons to approximate the unit circle with error controlled by the cos(π/k)\cos(\pi/k) factor
  2. Semidefinite Programming Method: Transforms dilation constant computation into a convex optimization problem
  3. Horizontal Convergence Theory: Establishes the relationship between matrix range convergence and dilation constants

Experimental Setup

Dataset

  • Independent Haar-distributed N×NN \times N unitary matrix pairs
  • Matrix sizes: N=10,15,20,,60N = 10, 15, 20, \ldots, 60 (main experiments)
  • Extended experiments: NN up to 300

Evaluation Metrics

  • Numerical approximations of the dilation constant c(U(N),u0)c(U^{(N)}, u_0)
  • Convergence analysis: mean and standard deviation as functions of NN

Implementation Details

  • Programming Language: Julia
  • Optimization Package: Convex.jl + SCS solver
  • Verification: Some results cross-verified with MOSEK solver
  • Parameter Settings: k=8,20,30k = 8, 20, 30 (number of sides of regular polygons)

Experimental Results

Main Results

  1. Convergence Evidence: As NN increases, computed dilation constant values cluster around 21.414\sqrt{2} \approx 1.414
  2. Statistical Properties:
    • For N=5jN = 5j (j=2,,12j = 2,\ldots,12), k=20k=20, 100 experimental runs
    • Standard deviation decreases with increasing NN, indicating convergence
  3. Numerical Bounds:
    • All computed values fall below 2+321.57\frac{\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}}{2} \approx 1.57
    • For k=8k=8, N=125N=125, all 100 trials cluster around 1.439

Detailed Data Analysis

Figure 1 Analysis: Histograms for different matrix sizes NN show that as NN increases, dilation constant values become increasingly concentrated around 2\sqrt{2} (left dashed line) and remain below 2/cos(π/k)\sqrt{2}/\cos(\pi/k) (right dashed line).

Figures 4-5 Analysis: For k=8k=8, single-sample experiments show the dilation constant stabilizes around 1.439 for N40N \geq 40, with ten random sequences all converging to approximately 1.44.

Theoretical Derivation

Based on experimental results and theoretical relationships: C2=c(uu,u0)c(uu,uf)c(uf,u0)=232=223<2C_2 = c(u^u, u_0) \leq c(u^u, u^f)c(u^f, u_0) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} \cdot \sqrt{2} = \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{3} < 2

where the known result c(uu,uf)=23c(u^u, u^f) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} is used.

  1. Historical Development:
    • Ando's theorem: Power dilations of commuting contraction pairs
    • Applications of dilation theory in finite dimensions
  2. Evolution of Bounds:
    • CddC_d \leq dCdmax{d,2d}C_d \leq \max\{d, 2\sqrt{d}\}Cd2dC_d \leq \sqrt{2d}
    • Lower bound: CddC_d \geq \sqrt{d}
  3. Free Probability Theory:
    • Strong asymptotic freeness of Haar unitary matrices
    • Horizontal convergence theory of matrix ranges

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Numerical Evidence: Strongly supports limNc(U(N),u0)=2\lim_{N \to \infty} c(U^{(N)}, u_0) = \sqrt{2}
  2. Theoretical Significance: If the conjecture holds, then C2<2C_2 < 2, improving existing bounds
  3. Methodological Contribution: Provides a practical algorithm for computing dilation constants

Limitations

  1. Numerical Nature: Results are based on numerical computation, not rigorous proof
  2. Computational Constraints: Problem complexity is O(k2N2)O(k^2N^2), limiting the range of testable parameters
  3. Approximation Error: Systematic error introduced by regular polygon approximation

Future Directions

  1. Rigorous Proof: Seek a strict proof of c(uf,u0)=2c(u^f, u_0) = \sqrt{2}
  2. Higher-Dimensional Generalization: Study dilation constants for d>2d > 2
  3. Algorithm Optimization: Develop more efficient methods for computing dilation constants

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Innovative Methodology: Cleverly combines rigorous limit theory with numerical experiments
  2. Experimental Sufficiency: Extensive experiments under multiple parameter settings with consistent results
  3. Theoretical Rigor: Horizontal convergence theorem provides strict theoretical foundation
  4. Practical Value: Algorithm applicable to other dilation constant computation problems

Weaknesses

  1. Numerical Dependence: Core conclusions rely on numerical evidence, lacking completely rigorous proof
  2. Computational Complexity: Algorithm complexity limits large-scale experiments
  3. Error Analysis: Analysis of numerical errors could be more detailed

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides significant progress on a long-standing open problem
  2. Methodological Value: Demonstrates the application of numerical methods to pure mathematics problems
  3. Application Prospects: Potential applications in quantum information and optimization theory

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Operator Theory Research: Dilation theory and matrix convex set research
  2. Quantum Information: Quantum measurement compatibility problems
  3. Optimization Theory: Semidefinite programming and matrix inequality problems

References

The paper cites 63 related references, primarily including:

  • Ando (1963): Foundational theory of commuting contraction pairs
  • Davidson et al. (2017): Matrix convex sets and dilation theory
  • Gerhold & Shalit (2021): Matrix range theory for random matrices
  • Helton et al. (2013): Semidefinite programming algorithm foundations

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality mathematical research paper that provides breakthrough progress on an important open problem through an innovative numerical-theoretical combined approach. Although the core conclusions rely on numerical evidence, its rigorous theoretical framework and sufficient experimental verification make the results highly credible.