The Diameter of (Threshold) Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12543
• Title: The Diameter of (Threshold) Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs
• Authors: Zylan Benjert (TU Delft), Kostas Lakis (ETH Zurich), Johannes Lengler (ETH Zurich), Raghu Raman Ravi (ETH Zurich)
• Classification: math.PR (Probability Theory), cs.SI (Social and Information Networks)
• Conference: 42nd Conference on Very Important Topics (CVIT 2016)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12543

Abstract

This paper proves that the diameter of threshold (zero-temperature) geometric inhomogeneous random graphs (T-GIRG) is Θ(log n). This result has important implications for the runtime of many distributed protocols on such graphs, as their runtimes are typically bounded as functions of the diameter. The GIRG model exhibits numerous empirical properties observed in real-world networks, and various practical algorithms demonstrate identical scaling laws on both GIRG and real networks, particularly regarding distance computation, diameter, clustering, cliques, and chromatic number. Therefore, the GIRG model is a promising candidate for gaining insights into algorithmic performance from real instances.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

This paper investigates the diameter problem of threshold geometric inhomogeneous random graphs (T-GIRG). The diameter of a graph is the maximum graph distance between all pairs of vertices; for disconnected graphs, only vertex pairs within the same connected component are considered.

Research Significance

1. Distributed Algorithm Performance: Graph diameter directly impacts the performance of many distributed algorithms, such as leader election and minimum spanning tree algorithms, whose runtimes are often bounded by the diameter.
2. Real Network Modeling: The GIRG model captures numerous important properties of real networks, including power-law degree distributions, small-world distances, high clustering coefficients, low-dimensionality, hierarchical structure, and navigability.
3. Algorithm Performance Prediction: Empirical studies demonstrate that algorithm performance on GIRG is highly correlated with performance on real networks.

Limitations of Existing Work

1. Dimensional Constraints: Previous work proved logarithmic diameter only in the one-dimensional case, with proofs heavily dependent on one-dimensional properties.
2. Tightness of Bounds: Existing work only established polylogarithmic bounds without determining the exact exponent.
3. High-Dimensional Complexity: In higher dimensions, topological arguments become complex, requiring novel technical approaches.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theoretical Result: Proves that T-GIRG diameter is Θ(log n), the first tight bound for the high-dimensional case.
2. Novel Proof Techniques:
   • Employs Peierls-type arguments combined with a new renormalization scheme
   • Uses graph-theoretic mechanisms to replace complex topological arguments
   • Develops boundary connectivity analysis applicable to high-dimensional cases
3. Complete Bound Analysis: Provides complete proofs for both upper and lower bounds.
4. Parameter Coverage: Delivers corresponding results for different τ values (power-law exponents).

Methodology Details

Model Definition

T-GIRG Model is constructed as follows:

1. Vertex Set: Vertices are generated by a Poisson point process with intensity λ on the d-dimensional torus 0, n^(1/d)^d.
2. Weight Assignment: Each vertex u independently draws a weight w_u from a power-law distribution D.
3. Edge Connection Rule: Two distinct vertices u and v are connected by an edge if and only if w_u · w_v ≥ |u-v|^d.

Power-Law Distribution: A random variable X ≥ 1 follows a power-law distribution with exponent τ > 1, satisfying PX ≥ x = Θ(x^(1-τ)).

Upper Bound Proof Strategy

1. Hierarchical Tiling Structure

Constructs a tree-structured box tiling:

• Lowest Level T_0: Partitions geometric space into boxes of side length D_0, with weight range [1, 2^(d/2)).
• Higher Levels T_i: Each level doubles box side lengths, with weight ranges expanding correspondingly.
• Highest Level T_: Covers the entire space and remaining weight ranges.

2. Canonical Path Construction

• Canonical Box Path L(B_1, B_2): The unique path in the tree connecting two boxes.
• Inactive Region W(u,v): Connected components of the canonical path and its adjacent inactive boxes.
• Boundary Set S(u,v): Active neighboring boxes of W(u,v).

3. Boundary Connectivity Analysis

Uses graph-theoretic mechanisms to prove visible boundary connectivity:

• Visible Boundary Definition: ∂_{vis(B)}(C) = {B' | B' is adjacent to some box B+ in C and B' is connected to B in B\C}.
• Generating Set Construction: Constructs a chord generating set Γ_B of the cycle space of B.
• Connectivity Theorem: Applies Timár's theorem to prove visible boundary connectivity in B.

4. Path Length Bounding

Lemma 2.16: If u and v are connected in GIRG, there exists a sequence of boxes B_0,...,B_k completely contained in W(u,v)∪S(u,v) such that vertices in adjacent boxes are at distance at most 3, yielding d_(u,v) ≤ O(|W(u,v)|).

5. Inactive Region Size Control

Lemma 2.17: When τ ≤ 3 and λ is sufficiently large, with high probability |W(B_1,B_2)| ≤ C log n.

The proof employs Peierls-type arguments: the number of large connected inactive sets grows exponentially, but the probability that each set is inactive decays exponentially, with decay strength depending on λ.

Low-Density Case Handling (τ < 3)

When λ is not sufficiently large, introduces tower structures:

• Tower Definition: Merges low-level boxes with all their subordinate boxes.
• Active Tower Conditions:
  1. High-weight boxes must be active.
  2. High-weight vertices must be in the same connected component.
  3. Other components must have bounded geometric diameter.

Renormalization Scheme: Replaces low-level boxes with towers, redefines L(u,v), W(u,v), S(u,v), and proves analogous path construction and size bounding results.

Lower Bound Proof

Construction Idea:

1. Local Path Construction: Constructs logarithmic-length paths within cubic regions of volume n^{1/(τ-1)+ε}.
2. Gray Curve Skeleton: Uses curves defined by M-ary Gray codes as path skeletons.
3. Isolation Guarantee: Leverages the property that maximum weight w_ ≤ n^{1/(τ-1)+ε} to ensure path isolation from external regions.
4. Success Probability: Each attempt succeeds with probability n^{-C'}, with n^{C''} total attempts; choosing C' < C'' ensures high-probability success.

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 1.4: With high probability,

• If τ = 3 and λ is sufficiently large, then T-GIRG diameter is O(log n).
• If τ < 3, then T-GIRG diameter is O(log n).
• If τ > 2, then T-GIRG diameter is Ω(log n).

Technical Innovation Verification

1. High-Dimensional Applicability: Successfully generalizes one-dimensional results to arbitrary dimensions.
2. Parameter Range: Covers the most important parameter ranges for practical applications, τ ∈ (2,3).
3. Bound Tightness: Upper and lower bounds match, providing precise asymptotic characterization.

Related Work

Graph Model Development

• Hyperbolic Random Graphs (HRG): One-dimensional special case of T-GIRG, known to have logarithmic diameter.
• Other Complex Network Models: Kronecker graphs, scale-free percolation, etc., but lacking empirical correspondence with real networks.

Diameter Analysis Techniques

• One-Dimensional Methods: Use blocking structures, heavily dependent on dimensional properties.
• High-Dimensional Challenges: Topological arguments are complex, requiring new graph-theoretic tools.

Application Background

• Distributed Algorithms: Complexity analysis of leader election, minimum spanning tree, and other algorithms.
• Network Science: Study of structural properties of real networks.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Precise Characterization: T-GIRG diameter is Θ(log n), resolving the open problem for high-dimensional cases.
2. Method Generality: Proof techniques apply to general dimensions without relying on special low-dimensional properties.
3. Practical Significance: Provides theoretical foundation for analyzing distributed algorithm performance on complex networks.

Limitations

1. Temperature Restriction: Results apply only to zero-temperature cases; positive-temperature GIRG remains open.
2. Parameter Constraints: Some results require the assumption that λ is sufficiently large.
3. Technical Complexity: Proofs involve complex geometric and combinatorial arguments.

Future Directions

1. Positive Temperature Generalization: Study diameter of general GIRG models.
2. Algorithm Applications: Apply theoretical results to concrete distributed algorithm analysis.
3. Other Properties: Investigate other structural properties of GIRG, such as connectivity and expansion.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: Resolves an important open problem, filling theoretical gaps for high-dimensional cases.
2. Technical Innovation: Develops novel proof techniques, particularly graph-theoretic analysis of boundary connectivity.
3. Complete Results: Provides matching upper and lower bounds, yielding precise asymptotic characterization.
4. Practical Relevance: The model's high correlation with real networks gives results practical value.

Weaknesses

1. Proof Complexity: Technical details are intricate, requiring substantial mathematical background for understanding and verification.
2. Applicability Range: The zero-temperature assumption limits the generality of results.
3. Computational Complexity: Does not address algorithmic complexity of diameter computation.

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important theoretical tools for random graph theory and network science.
2. Application Potential: Offers theoretical guidance for distributed system and network algorithm design.
3. Method Value: Proof techniques may apply to other related problems.

Application Scenarios

1. Distributed System Design: Protocol complexity analysis and performance prediction.
2. Network Science Research: Theoretical analysis of complex network structural properties.
3. Algorithm Design: Algorithm optimization based on network structure.

References

The paper cites 33 relevant references, covering important works in random graph theory, complex networks, distributed algorithms, and other fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.