Vizing's Theorem in Deterministic Almost-Linear Time

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12619
• Title: Vizing's Theorem in Deterministic Almost-Linear Time
• Authors: Sepehr Assadi, Soheil Behnezhad, Sayan Bhattacharya, Martín Costa, Shay Solomon, Tianyi Zhang
• Classification: cs.DS (Data Structures and Algorithms)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12619

Abstract

Vizing's theorem states that any graph with n vertices, m edges, and maximum degree Δ can be edge-colored with at most Δ+1 colors. Vizing's original proof directly translates to a deterministic O(mn) time algorithm. This deterministic time complexity was later independently improved to Õ(m√n) time. A series of recent studies using randomization techniques improved upon the Õ(m√n) bound, ultimately achieving randomized almost-linear time (Δ+1)-coloring algorithms. However, all these improvements fundamentally rely on some form of sublinear-time algorithm, which typically requires randomization. This paper presents a deterministic almost-linear time (Δ+1)-coloring algorithm with running time m·2^O(√log Δ)·log n = m^{1+o(1)}, breaking the Õ(m√n) time barrier for deterministic algorithms for the first time.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

Edge coloring is a classical problem in graph theory: given a graph G=(V,E), assign a color to each edge such that any two adjacent edges (edges sharing a vertex) have different colors. Vizing's theorem guarantees that any graph with maximum degree Δ can be edge-colored with at most Δ+1 colors.

Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: Edge coloring is a fundamental problem in graph theory, closely related to many other graph-theoretic problems
2. Practical Applications: Widely applicable in scheduling, network routing, resource allocation, and other domains
3. Algorithmic Complexity: Determining whether a graph can be colored with Δ colors is NP-hard; therefore, (Δ+1)-coloring algorithms are of significant value

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Deterministic Algorithm Bottleneck: Since the 1980s, deterministic algorithms have remained stuck at Õ(m√n) time complexity
2. Randomization Dependency: All algorithms breaking the Õ(m√n) barrier rely on randomization, particularly sublinear-time subroutines
3. Derandomization Difficulty: Sublinear algorithms are typically difficult to derandomize, which has been the main obstacle to designing fast deterministic algorithms

Research Motivation

This paper aims to answer a fundamental question: Can the time complexity of deterministic (Δ+1)-coloring algorithms be reduced below Õ(m√n)?

Core Contributions

1. Breakthrough Result: Presents the first deterministic (Δ+1)-coloring algorithm breaking the Õ(m√n) time barrier, with time complexity m·2^O(√log Δ)·log n
2. Novel Technical Framework: Completely abandons sublinear-time algorithms and proposes a new deterministic color type sparsification method
3. Theoretical Innovation: Introduces the "type sparsification" concept, enabling processing of larger edge sets in almost-linear time
4. Derandomization Technique: Successfully derandomizes key randomized components from previous work

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Simple undirected graph G=(V,E) with n vertices, m edges, and maximum degree Δ Output: A valid (Δ+1)-edge coloring χ: E → {1,2,...,Δ+1} Constraint: Any two adjacent edges must have different colors

Core Algorithm Framework

1. Type Sparsification

This is the most important technical contribution of the paper. The algorithm partitions the color set C into η subsets C₁,...,Cη, with the goal of modifying colors of some edges so that a constant fraction of uncolored edges have types belonging to ⋃ᵢ₌₁^η(Cᵢ×Cᵢ).

Theorem 2.3: Given a color palette C and a valid partial coloring χ, one can in Õ(m·poly(η)) time, by changing colors of some already-colored edges, ensure that a constant fraction of uncolored edges have sparsified types.

2. Recursive Structure

The algorithm employs a recursive strategy:

• Set η = Δ^ε (ε is a small constant)
• Apply type sparsification to decompose the problem into η subproblems
• Each subproblem's palette size reduces to Δ/η
• Recursion depth is O(1/ε)

3. Key Data Structures

• U-fans: Structures representing uncolored edges, consisting of a center vertex and two leaf vertices
• Separable Sets: U-fan sets satisfying edge-disjointness and no color conflicts at vertices
• Alternating Paths: Color-alternating paths; modify coloring by flipping these paths

Technical Innovations

1. Batch Processing Method

Unlike previous random sampling of individual edges, this paper proposes a batch processing method:

• Identify batches of "good" edges with identical types
• Process entire batches simultaneously for improved efficiency
• Batch size guaranteed to be Ω(λ/η²)

2. Deterministic Type Analysis

Lemma 5.5: In each iteration, one can construct a batch of good U-fans of size at least λ/(4η²).

The proof's key elements are:

• Analyze upper bounds on the number of bad edges
• Utilize average arguments to ensure existence of sufficiently large good batches
• Employ careful counting arguments to guarantee algorithm progress

3. Synchronized Flipping of Alternating Paths

Key Insight: Alternating paths corresponding to U-fans in the same batch are either edge-disjoint or identical, thus all related paths can be safely flipped simultaneously.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Framework

This is primarily a theoretical work, with algorithm correctness and time complexity verified through rigorous mathematical proofs:

1. Time Complexity Analysis:
   • Per recursion level: Õ(m·poly(η))
   • Recursion depth: O(1/ε)
   • Total time: Õ(ε⁻¹·m·Δ^Θ(ε))
2. Correctness Proof:
   • Prove validity of type sparsification
   • Verify recursion termination conditions
   • Ensure final output validity

Parameter Selection

• ε = Θ(1/√log Δ): Balances recursion depth and per-level time complexity
• η = Δ^ε: Controls subproblem scale
• Base case: Stop recursion when palette size ≤ 10η

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 1.1 (Main Result): There exists a deterministic algorithm that, for any graph G with n vertices, m edges, and maximum degree Δ, computes a (Δ+1)-coloring in m·2^O(√log Δ)·log n = m^{1+o(1)} time.

Key Performance Bounds

1. Type Sparsification Efficiency: Each invocation guarantees a constant fraction of edges become social type
2. Recursion Convergence: Each recursion level processes Ω(1/100^{log Δ/log η+1}) fraction of edges
3. Overall Complexity: First to achieve deterministic m^{1+o(1)} time bound

Comparison with Existing Methods

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Classical Results: Vizing (1964) proved existence of (Δ+1)-coloring
2. Algorithmic Progress: Deterministic algorithm improvements from O(mn) to Õ(m√n)
3. Randomization Breakthroughs: Series of works reducing randomized time complexity to near-linear

Technical Approach Comparison

1. Randomization Methods: Rely on sublinear-time subroutines, difficult to derandomize
2. This Paper's Approach: Completely avoids sublinear algorithms, uses almost-linear time sparsification

Related Techniques

• Euler Decomposition: Decompose graphs into lower-degree subgraphs
• Vizing Fans and Chains: Classical edge coloring techniques
• Alternating Path Flipping: Fundamental operation for modifying colorings

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. First to break the Õ(m√n) time barrier for deterministic edge coloring algorithms
2. Demonstrates that almost-linear time complexity is achievable without randomization
3. The proposed type sparsification technique is general and potentially applicable to other problems

Limitations

1. Constant Factors: The 2^O(√log Δ) term, while subpolynomial, may be large in practice
2. Scope of Application: Primarily for general graphs; may not be optimal for special graph classes
3. Implementation Complexity: Algorithm involves complex data structures; practical implementation may be challenging

Future Directions

1. Constant Optimization: Further reduce the exponent in the 2^O(√log Δ) term
2. Practical Improvements: Simplify algorithm structure and improve practical feasibility
3. Generalization: Apply type sparsification techniques to other graph coloring problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: Resolves an open problem spanning over 40 years with significant theoretical importance
2. Technical Innovation: Type sparsification method is novel and completely circumvents randomization bottlenecks
3. Rigorous Proofs: Mathematical analysis is rigorous and proofs are complete and trustworthy
4. Clear Exposition: Paper structure is clear; technical overview sections aid understanding of core ideas

Weaknesses

1. Limited Practical Utility: High algorithm complexity; practical application value remains to be verified
2. Constant Factors: While asymptotically optimal, constants may be large
3. Special Cases: For certain special graph classes, more efficient specialized algorithms may exist

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new insights for graph algorithm design, particularly derandomization techniques
2. Methodological Value: Type sparsification may inspire solutions to other combinatorial optimization problems
3. Academic Influence: Expected to have significant impact in the algorithmic theory community

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Provides foundation for further algorithmic improvements
2. Educational Use: Demonstrates advanced algorithm design techniques
3. Inspirational Value: Offers insights for approximation algorithm design for other NP-hard problems

References

The paper cites extensive related work, primarily including:

1. Classical Literature:
   • Vizing (1964): Foundational theory of edge coloring
   • Gabow et al. (1985): Õ(m√n) deterministic algorithm
2. Recent Breakthroughs:
   • Assadi et al. (2025): Randomized almost-linear time algorithm
   • Bhattacharya et al. (2024): First polynomial improvement
3. Related Techniques:
   • Cole & Hopcroft (1982): Bipartite graph edge coloring
   • Various distributed and online edge coloring algorithms

Summary: This paper has significant theoretical value, breaking the long-standing bottleneck in deterministic edge coloring algorithms for the first time. While its practical utility may be limited, the type sparsification technique and derandomization methods it proposes have important methodological value, contributing new tools and insights to the field of algorithm design.