Structure-Aware Spectral Sparsification via Uniform Edge Sampling

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12669
• Title: Structure-Aware Spectral Sparsification via Uniform Edge Sampling
• Authors: Kaiwen He (Purdue University), Petros Drineas (Purdue University), Rajiv Khanna (Purdue University)
• Classification: cs.LG cs.DS
• Conference: 39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12669

Abstract

Spectral clustering is a fundamental method for graph partitioning, but its dependence on eigenvector computation limits scalability on large-scale graphs. Classical sparsification methods preserve spectral properties by sampling edges proportional to effective resistance, but require expensive preprocessing to estimate these resistances. This paper investigates whether simple uniform edge sampling is sufficient for spectral clustering. The main result demonstrates that for graphs with well-separated k-clusters (characterized by a large structure ratio Υ(k) = λ_{k+1}/ρ_G(k)), uniform sampling preserves the spectral subspace used for clustering. Specifically, uniformly sampling O(γ²n log n/ε²) edges (where γ is the Laplacian condition number) produces a sparsified graph whose top (n-k)-dimensional eigenspace is approximately orthogonal to the clustering indicator vectors, ensuring that spectral embeddings remain faithful and clustering quality is preserved.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

While spectral clustering is a fundamental method for discovering community structure in graphs, it faces computational bottlenecks when processing large-scale graphs. The main challenges are:

1. Computational Complexity: Computing eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian matrix is computationally expensive on large-scale graphs
2. Preprocessing Overhead: Classical spectral sparsification methods require computing effective resistances, which is itself an expensive process
3. Scalability Limitations: Existing methods struggle to handle graphs with millions of nodes and edges

Research Motivation

The authors pose a key question: Under what conditions is simple uniform edge sampling (without any heavy preprocessing) sufficient to preserve the structure needed for spectral clustering?

Intuitively, if a graph contains coherent cluster structure, then standard resistance-based samplers may be overkill. In extreme cases, if disconnected but coherent clusters exist, uniform sampling would obviously suffice to preserve cluster structure.

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Effective Resistance Sampling: While producing high-quality spectral sparsifiers, estimating effective resistance requires solving large Laplacian linear systems
2. Computational Overhead: Preprocessing costs may offset computational gains from sparsification
3. Structure Ignorance: Existing methods do not fully exploit clustering structure information in graphs

Core Contributions

1. Structure-Aware Sparsification Guarantees: Proves that under standard clusterability assumptions, uniform sampling produces spectral sparsifiers that preserve clustering structure
2. Effective Resistance Bounds for Intra-cluster Edges: Derives new bounds on effective resistance for edges in clustered graphs, quantifying how strong clustering structure constrains edge "spectral quality"
3. Matrix Chernoff Analysis for Eigenspace: Introduces matrix Chernoff concentration arguments tailored to the top (n-k) eigenvector subspace
4. Theoretical Connections: Links recent coreset-based clustering theory to spectral sparsification

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Undirected graph G = (V,E), target number of clusters k Output: Sparsified graph G̃ preserving the k-way clustering structure of the original graph Objective: Achieve spectrum-preserving graph sparsification using uniform edge sampling

Core Concepts

Structure Ratio

Define the structure ratio Υ(k) = λ_{k+1}/ρ_G(k), where:

• λ_{k+1}: The (k+1)-th eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian matrix
• ρ_G(k): The k-way expansion constant of the graph

A large Υ(k) indicates that the graph has pronounced k-cluster structure.

Rank-(n-k) Effective Resistance

Definition 4.4: Given graph G, let L = VΣV^T be the non-normalized Laplacian matrix, define:

L_{n-k} := Σ(i=k+1 to n) λ_i v_i v_i^T
R^{n-k}_{eff}(a,b) := ⟨δ_a - δ_b, L^+_{n-k}(δ_a - δ_b)⟩

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 4.3 (Main Result)

For unweighted graphs G satisfying the structure theorem, if uniform sampling of O(κ²n log(n)/ε²) edges is performed, where κ = λ_n/λ_{k+1} is the rank-(n-k) condition number, then the resulting sparsified Laplacian matrix L̃ satisfies:

‖Ṽ_{n-k} Ṽ^T_{n-k} C‖²_F ≤ k(1/Υ(k) + ε/(1-ε) κ)

where Ṽ_ is the matrix of top n-k eigenvectors of L̃.

Technical Innovations

1. Intra-cluster Edge Resistance Bounds (Lemma 4.5)

For vertex pairs {a,b} within the same cluster, their rank-(n-k) effective resistance satisfies:

2/λ_{k+1} ≥ R^{n-k}_{eff}(a,b) ≥ (1/κ)(1-k/Υ(k)) · 2/λ_{k+1}

2. Leverage Score Distribution Approximation (Lemma 4.7)

Under good clusterability assumptions, the leverage score probability distribution p_e and uniform distribution p_ satisfy:

(1-k/Υ(k))(1-ρ_G(k))/κ · p_{unif} ≤ p_e ≤ κ/((1-k/Υ(k))(1-ρ_G(k))) · p_{unif}

3. Matrix Chernoff Analysis (Theorem 4.8)

By uniformly sampling O(κ²n log(n)/ε²) edges, we can guarantee:

(1-ε)x^T Lx ≤ x^T L_H x ≤ (1+ε)x^T Lx

holds for all x ∈ span(v_{k+1},...,v_n).

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Stochastic Block Model (SBM): k=4 clusters, 200 nodes per cluster
2. Hierarchical Stochastic Block Model: 4 top-level clusters with sub-clusters, 16 clusters total
3. LFR Benchmark Graphs: Network benchmark graphs with 800 nodes

Evaluation Metrics

Uses the maximum principal angle between the bottom k=4 eigenvectors and true cluster indicator vectors: ‖sin Θ(Ṽ_k, C)‖_∞ Smaller angles indicate better preservation of clustering structure in spectral embeddings.

Comparison Methods

• Uniform Edge Sampling: The proposed method
• Effective Resistance Sampling: Classical importance sampling-based method

Experimental Configuration

• Well-clustered Graphs: Large intra-cluster to inter-cluster edge probability ratio
• Weakly-clustered Graphs: Small intra-cluster to inter-cluster edge probability ratio
• Each experiment run 20 times, reporting mean and standard deviation

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Well-clustered Graphs: Uniform sampling performs comparably to effective resistance sampling on strong cluster structures, sometimes even slightly better
2. Weakly-clustered Graphs: Even in weak clustering settings, uniform sampling follows similar error trajectories as effective resistance sampling
3. Hierarchical Structure: Uniform sampling performs well on hierarchical stochastic block models
4. LFR Benchmark: Method effectiveness is validated on real network benchmarks

Key Observations

• On well-clustered graphs, uniform sampling actually slightly outperforms effective resistance sampling
• The authors hypothesize this is because uniform sampling tends to undersample inter-cluster edges, producing stronger subspace alignment with cluster membership vectors

Related Work

Clusterability and Spectral Clustering

• Structure Theorem: Peng et al. proved that when Υ(k) = Ω(k²), the subspace of the bottom k Laplacian eigenvectors is close to the subspace of k cluster indicator vectors
• Weakened Assumptions: Macgregor and Sun proved that spectral clustering success can be guaranteed under weaker Υ(k) assumptions

Spectral Graph Sparsification

• Classical Results: Spielman introduced algorithms producing ε-spectral sparsifiers through effective resistance proportional sampling
• Linear-size Sparsifiers: Batson et al. proved the existence of linear-size O(n/ε) edge spectral sparsifiers

Uniform Sampling in Clustering Coresets

• Meta-theorem: Braverman et al. demonstrated that when data structure is favorable, uniform sampling can produce clustering coresets as effective as importance sampling
• Balanced Clustering: Huang and Vishnoi studied the role of uniform sampling in balanced clustering

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Guarantees: First to provide provable guarantees for the sufficiency of uniform edge sampling in structure-preserving spectral clustering
2. Practical Value: Provides a simple and scalable preprocessing step for spectral clustering
3. Theoretical Connections: Bridges coreset theory and spectral sparsification

Limitations

1. Assumption Requirements: Requires graphs to have good clustering structure (large Υ(k))
2. Condition Number Dependence: Sampling complexity depends on condition number κ, which may be large for some graphs
3. Unweighted Graph Restriction: Current analysis primarily targets unweighted graphs

Future Directions

1. Resistance Bound Optimization: Tighten resistance bounds, particularly improving dependence on κ and Υ(k)
2. Weighted Graph Extension: Extend analysis to weighted graphs or overlapping clusters
3. Other Graph Problems: Explore whether similar structure-aware uniform sampling results apply to other graph problems such as semi-supervised learning

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: First to prove sufficiency of uniform sampling under structural conditions, filling a theoretical gap
2. Practical Value: Eliminates expensive resistance computation requirements, significantly improving scalability
3. Technical Contributions: Introduces new analytical tools such as rank-(n-k) effective resistance
4. Experimental Validation: Validates theoretical results on multiple graph models

Weaknesses

1. Sampling Complexity: While avoiding preprocessing, sampling complexity remains high, especially when κ is large
2. Structural Assumptions: Relatively strict assumptions on graph structure, limiting applicability
3. Constant Factors: Constants in theoretical bounds may not be sufficiently tight

Impact

1. Academic Value: Provides new perspective on spectral sparsification theory, connecting different research areas
2. Practical Significance: Provides simpler and more effective tools for large-scale graph analysis
3. Inspirational Value: May inspire further research on structure-aware sampling

Applicable Scenarios

1. Social Network Analysis: Social networks with pronounced community structure
2. Biological Networks: Protein interaction networks and other biological networks with modular structure
3. Recommendation Systems: User-item interaction graphs in collaborative filtering

References

This paper cites important works from multiple domains including spectral graph theory, matrix perturbation theory, and clustering analysis, including:

• Spielman & Srivastava's pioneering work on spectral sparsification
• Peng et al.'s research on structure theorems for clusterability
• Classical results in matrix perturbation theory such as the Davis-Kahan theorem

Summary: This paper makes important theoretical contributions to spectral graph sparsification, proving the effectiveness of simple uniform sampling under specific structural conditions. While having certain limitations, it provides new theoretical foundations and practical tools for large-scale graph analysis, with significant academic and applied value.