Dark Matter Boosted by Terrestrial Collisions

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12791
• Title: Dark Matter Boosted by Terrestrial Collisions
• Authors: Zamiul Alam, Christopher V. Cappiello, Francesc Ferrer (Washington University, St. Louis)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12791

Abstract

Inelastic dark matter (IDM) models possess energy threshold characteristics when scattering with Standard Model particles, enabling them to remain consistent with increasingly stringent constraints from direct detection experiments. In typical constructions, tree-level elastic scattering is absent, and the lighter dark matter state must first up-scatter to a heavier state to interact with atomic nuclei in detectors. This paper models the excitation process of IDM in the Earth, followed by down-scattering within detectors, demonstrating that consideration of this process significantly enhances the sensitivity of existing detectors. In particular, current constraints based on XENON100 and XENON1T data can be extended to substantially larger mass splittings.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

1. Dark Matter Detection Dilemma: Despite astrophysical and cosmological observations indicating that dark matter comprises approximately one-quarter of the universe's critical density, decades of direct detection experiments have yet to yield conclusive detection results.
2. Inelastic Dark Matter Models: To explain detection difficulties, researchers have proposed inelastic dark matter (iDM) models, wherein dark matter interactions with Standard Model particles possess energy thresholds that can suppress or completely prohibit scattering with laboratory targets at typical galactic velocities.
3. Limitations of Traditional Detection: In typical iDM scenarios, the majority of cosmic dark matter exists as relatively light particles χ₁, tree-level elastic scattering is forbidden, and excitation to the heavier χ₂ state is necessary for scattering to occur.

Research Motivation

Traditional assumptions posit that iDM must up-scatter within the detector to be observed; however, this paper proposes an alternative possibility: iDM can up-scatter outside the Earth and subsequently down-scatter within the detector, a process capable of probing previously unconstrained parameter space.

Core Contributions

1. Proposal of Novel Detection Mechanism: Models the complete process of dark matter excitation in the Earth and de-excitation in the detector
2. Extended Detection Sensitivity: Exploits the differing kinematics of up-scattering and down-scattering to probe larger mass splittings than traditional methods
3. Reanalysis of Existing Data: Establishes new constraints based on XENON1T and XENON100 data, extending mass splitting limits by nearly 100 keV
4. Consideration of Earth Shielding Effects: Provides detailed modeling of excited-state dark matter propagation through the Earth and potential re-scattering processes

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of the process wherein inelastic dark matter χ₁ collides with heavy nuclei (primarily lead) in the Earth, exciting to χ₂, which subsequently down-scatters with xenon nuclei in underground detectors back to χ₁, with constraints on iDM parameter space established accordingly.

Model Architecture

1. Inelastic Dark Matter Kinematics

For χ₁ particles of mass m₁ scattering with stationary atomic nuclei, energy conservation requires:

½m₁v²ᵢ = ½m₂v²f + ½mₐv²ₐ + δ

where δ = m₂ - m₁ is the mass splitting, with threshold velocity:

vₜₕ = √(2δ/μχₐ)

The minimum velocity required to produce specific recoil energy Eᵣ is:

vₘᵢₙ(Eᵣ) = |mₐEᵣ/μχₐ ± δ| × 1/√(2mₐEᵣ)

where the positive sign corresponds to up-scattering and the negative sign to down-scattering.

2. Up-Scattering Process in the Earth

• Target Nucleus Selection: Due to requirements for large mass splittings, primarily considers scattering with lead nuclei in the Earth's crust and mantle
• Velocity Distribution: Employs dark matter velocity distribution including Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) contributions, with high-velocity tails crucial for large mass splitting detection
• Scattering Probability: Scattering probability for χ₁ traversing distance L through Earth is P = nₚbσχₐL

3. Down-Scattering in the Detector

Down-scattering processes lack energy thresholds but require consideration of:

• Velocity changes following up-scattering
• Kinematic constraints of down-scattering
• Shielding effects of the Earth medium

Technical Innovations

1. Kinematic Advantage: Exploits the opposite signs of up-scattering and down-scattering to enable down-scattering to produce equivalent recoil energies at lower velocities
2. Earth as Preprocessor: Conceptualizes the Earth as a dark matter "preprocessor," wherein high-energy-requirement up-scattering processes are completed
3. Multiple Scattering Modeling: Accounts for potential multiple scattering and de-excitation processes dark matter may undergo within the Earth

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. XENON1T Data: One ton-year exposure, nuclear recoil energy range 4.9-40.9 keV
2. XENON100 Data: Extended to 240 keV high-energy analysis, primarily utilizing data above 50 keV

Model Parameters

• Dark matter mass: mχ = 1 TeV
• Lead density in Earth: Crust 1.22×10¹⁸ cm⁻³, Mantle 2.8×10¹⁶ cm⁻³
• Local dark matter density: 0.4 GeV/cm³
• Interaction type: Spin-independent nuclear scattering

Computational Methods

• Isotropic distribution across 20 different incident angles
• Helm form factor employed for nuclear scattering cross-section calculations
• Monte Carlo calculations incorporating Earth shielding effects

Experimental Results

Primary Results

XENON1T Constraints

• Mass splitting limits extended to approximately 350 keV, representing significant improvement over traditional methods' 250 keV
• At δ~300 keV, cross-section constraints reach ~10⁻³⁶ cm²

XENON100 Constraints

• High-energy data utilization extends mass splitting constraints beyond 600 keV
• Extends existing direct detection analyses by 200+ keV

Key Findings

1. Velocity Distribution Impact: High-velocity tails from LMC contributions increase detectable mass splitting by approximately 100 keV
2. Kinematic Advantage: Down-scattering enables detection of larger mass splittings at equivalent recoil energies compared to up-scattering
3. Earth Shielding Limitations: Large cross-sections necessitate consideration of multiple scattering effects, though significant detection range extension remains achievable

Related Work

Traditional Approaches

• Early iDM research primarily considered up-scattering processes within detectors
• Limited by maximum recoil energy and dark matter velocity distribution in detectors

Earth Excitation Research

• Previous work considered Earth excitation but assumed χ₂ decay through electromagnetic interactions or dark photon-electron coupling
• This paper provides more general nuclear scattering mechanisms

Alternative Constraint Methods

• Cosmic ray-dark matter scattering constraints
• Metal isotope decay spectrum constraints
• Galactic center gas cloud scattering constraints

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Consideration of dark matter excitation processes in the Earth significantly enhances existing detector sensitivity
2. Based on current XENON data, mass splitting constraints can be extended to larger ranges
3. The method is relatively model-independent, depending only on nuclear scattering mechanisms

Limitations

1. Assumes all cosmic dark matter initially exists in ground state χ₁
2. Neglects loop-level elastic scattering contributions
3. Simplified treatment of Earth composition modeling
4. Uncertainties in multiple scattering effects at large cross-sections

Future Directions

1. Extension to alternative detector materials, particularly light-nucleus detectors
2. More precise Earth composition and structural modeling
3. Consideration of more complex dark matter models and interactions

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Novel Approach: The concept of Earth as a dark matter preprocessor is innovative with clear physical motivation
2. Technical Rigor: Detailed consideration of kinematic constraints, Earth shielding, and multiple scattering effects
3. Practical Value: Extends detection range utilizing existing data without requiring new experimental equipment
4. Model Independence: Methodology is relatively universal, independent of specific beyond-Standard-Model theories

Weaknesses

1. Simplified Earth Modeling: Reduction of complex Earth structure to uniform medium may impact result accuracy
2. Insufficient Statistical Analysis: Lacks detailed analysis of systematic uncertainties
3. Limited Applicability: Primarily applicable to heavy dark matter (TeV-scale) and specific mass splitting ranges

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides novel analytical framework for dark matter direct detection
2. Experimental Guidance: Offers new perspectives for data analysis in current and future experiments
3. Method Generalization: Approach extensible to other dark matter model types

Applicable Scenarios

This method is particularly suitable for:

• Heavy dark matter detection (mχ > GeV)
• iDM models with large mass splittings (δ > 100 keV)
• Research requiring extended existing detector sensitivity
• Deep underground detector data analysis

References

The paper cites 57 relevant references, encompassing dark matter theory, direct detection experiments, and astrophysical observations, providing solid theoretical foundation and experimental support for the research.