Extensions of pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebras

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12805
• Title: Extensions of pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebras
• Authors: Tahar Benyoussef (University of Sfax), Sami Mabrouk (University of Gafsa)
• Classification: math.RA (Rings and Algebras), math.RT (Representation Theory)
• Publication Date: October 3, 2025 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12805

Abstract

This paper introduces the concept of mock-Lie superalgebras, provides relevant definitions, properties, construction methods, and investigates their representation theory. Furthermore, pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebras are introduced, namely mock-Lie superalgebras equipped with even non-degenerate supersymmetric invariant bilinear forms. Finally, double extensions and generalized double extensions of mock-Lie superalgebras and their isometric mappings are studied.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Rise of mock-Lie algebras: Mock-Lie algebras, as an instance of Jordan algebras, represent a relatively new class of algebraic structures, also known as Jacobi-Jordan algebras. They are characterized as commutative algebras satisfying the Jacobi identity.
2. Need for superalgebraic generalization: Based on the relationship between Lie superalgebras and Jordan superalgebras, there is a natural need to generalize mock-Lie algebras to the superalgebraic setting and establish a theory of mock-Lie superalgebras.
3. Importance of quadratic structures: Quadratic Lie algebras hold significant importance in modern mathematical physics, particularly in the Sugawara construction in quantum field theory and applications in conformal field theory.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical completeness: Establish a complete theoretical framework for mock-Lie superalgebras, filling theoretical gaps in this field.
2. Structural classification: Provide an inductive classification scheme for pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebras through double extension methods.
3. Application expansion: Provide new algebraic tools for supersymmetric field theory and exceptional geometry.

Core Contributions

1. Introduction of mock-Lie superalgebras: Provides rigorous definitions of mock-Lie superalgebras and establishes a basic theoretical framework.
2. Establishment of connection with Jordan superalgebras: Proves that every mock-Lie superalgebra is a Jordan superalgebra satisfying x³ = 0.
3. Development of representation theory: Constructs adjoint and dual representations, establishes semidirect product characterizations.
4. Definition of pseudo-euclidean structures: Introduces the concept of mock-Lie superalgebras equipped with invariant bilinear forms.
5. Construction of extension theory: Develops double extension and generalized double extension methods, providing systematic construction techniques.
6. Study of isometric mappings: Provides necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of isometric mappings between two generalized double extensions.

Methodology in Detail

Core Tasks

The central tasks of this paper are to establish a complete theoretical system for mock-Lie superalgebras, including:

• Definition of basic concepts and properties
• Construction of representation theory
• Investigation of cases equipped with bilinear forms
• Development of extension methods for classification

Basic Definitions

Definition 2.1 (mock-Lie superalgebra): Let J = J₀̄ ⊕ J₁̄ be a Z₂-graded vector space and "•" an even bilinear map. Then (J,•) is called a mock-Lie superalgebra if it satisfies:

1. Super-commutativity: x • y = (-1)^|x||y| y • x
2. Super-Jacobi identity: (-1)^|x||z| x • (y • z) + (-1)^|x||y| y • (z • x) + (-1)^|y||z| z • (x • y) = 0

Definition 3.3 (pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebra): A mock-Lie superalgebra (J,•) is called pseudo-euclidean if it is equipped with a pseudo-Riemannian structure B, namely an even supersymmetric non-degenerate invariant bilinear form, satisfying B(x • y, z) = B(x, y • z).

Representation Theory

Definition 2.3 (Representation): A representation of a mock-Lie superalgebra (J,•) is a pair (V,π), where V is a Z₂-graded vector space and π: J → End(V) is an even linear map satisfying: π(x • y) = -π(x)π(y) - (-1)^|x||y| π(y)π(x)

Key results include:

• Adjoint representation: ad(x)(y) = x • y
• Dual representation: π*(x)(f) = (-1)^|f||x| f ∘ π(x)
• Semidirect product construction

Extension Theory

Central extensions: Given a mock-Lie superalgebra J and a representation (V,π), along with a 2-cocycle Ω, one can construct a central extension J̄ = J ⊕ V with product: (x + u) ⋆_Ω (y + v) = x • y + π(x)(v) + (-1)^|x||y| π(y)(u) + Ω(x,y)

Double extensions: For a pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebra (J₁,•₁,B) and a mock-Lie superalgebra J₂, one can construct a double extension J₂ ⊕ J₁ ⊕ J₂*.

Generalized double extensions: Extensions via a one-dimensional odd mock-Lie superalgebra U = Ku, yielding J̃ = U ⊕ J ⊕ U*.

Technical Innovations

1. Superalgebraic generalization method: Successfully extends classical mock-Lie algebra theory to the superalgebraic setting, handling sign issues arising from Z₂-grading.
2. Invariant bilinear forms: Introduces pseudo-euclidean structures, establishing a theoretical framework similar to quadratic Lie superalgebras.
3. Inductive classification scheme: Provides systematic construction and classification techniques through double extension methods.
4. Characterization of isometric mappings: Provides complete characterization of isometric mappings between generalized double extensions.

Main Theorems and Results

Basic Properties

Proposition 2.1: Every mock-Lie superalgebra is a Jordan superalgebra satisfying x³ = 0.

Proposition 2.2: For a mock-Lie superalgebra (J,•), we have x² • (y • x) = (x² • y) • x = 0.

Pseudo-euclidean Structures

Proposition 3.4: A mock-Lie superalgebra J is pseudo-euclidean if and only if its adjoint representation is equivalent to its coadjoint representation and dim(J₁̄) is even.

Corollary 3.6: If (J,•,B) is a pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebra with J₁̄ ≠ {0}, then Ann(J) ∩ J₁̄ ≠ {0}.

Extension Theory

Theorem 4.3: Under appropriate conditions, J = J₂ ⊕ J₁ ⊕ J₂* is a mock-Lie superalgebra with product given by the double extension form.

Theorem 4.8: The generalized double extension J̃ = U ⊕ J ⊕ U* is a mock-Lie superalgebra under appropriate conditions and is equipped with an invariant scalar product.

Classification Results

Theorem 4.10: If (J̃,•̃,B̃) is a pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebra with dim(J̃₁̄) > 1, then J̃ is a generalized double extension of some pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebra.

Corollary 4.11: Any pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebra of dimension greater than 1 can be obtained through finitely many generalized double extensions and/or double extensions.

Related Work

This paper builds upon the following research foundations:

1. Mock-Lie algebra theory: First introduced by Burde and Fialowski 17, with subsequent in-depth research by Agore-Militaru 3,4 and others.
2. Quadratic Lie algebras: Pioneering work by Medina-Revoy 25 establishing the double extension method.
3. Superalgebraic generalizations: Benamor-Benayadi 15 generalized the theory to the Z₂-graded setting.
4. Jordan superalgebras: Representation theory by Martínez-Zelmanov 24 and others provides theoretical foundations for this paper.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully establishes a complete theoretical framework for mock-Lie superalgebras, including basic definitions, properties, and representation theory.
2. Proves the essential connection between mock-Lie superalgebras and Jordan superalgebras.
3. Develops double extension theory for pseudo-euclidean mock-Lie superalgebras, providing systematic classification methods.
4. Provides complete characterization of isometric mappings, offering important tools for structural classification.

Limitations

1. Dimensional restrictions: The theory primarily addresses finite-dimensional cases; infinite-dimensional generalizations require further research.
2. Characteristic restrictions: Requires the base field to have characteristic zero; theory for positive characteristic remains to be developed.
3. Concrete classification: While providing an inductive framework, specific low-dimensional classifications still require substantial computational work.

Future Directions

The paper raises important open problems at its conclusion:

1. Anti-Leibniz superalgebras: As a "non-commutative version" of mock-Lie superalgebras, deserving deeper investigation.
2. Quadratic anti-Leibniz algebras: Theory of anti-Leibniz algebras equipped with symmetric non-degenerate associative bilinear forms.
3. Algorithmic construction: Development of explicit algorithms to construct quadratic anti-Leibniz superalgebras.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical completeness: Establishes a complete system from basic definitions to classification theory with rigorous logic.
2. Methodological innovation: Successfully extends the double extension method to mock-Lie superalgebras with sophisticated technical handling.
3. Profound results: The established connections with Jordan superalgebras and classification theorems possess significant theoretical value.
4. Clear presentation: Well-structured paper with precise definitions and detailed proofs.

Weaknesses

1. Lack of applications: The paper is primarily theoretical construction with insufficient concrete physical or geometric application examples.
2. Computational complexity: While providing a theoretical framework, specific classification computations remain complex.
3. Insufficient examples: Lacks sufficient concrete examples to illustrate theoretical applications.

Impact and Significance

1. Academic contribution: Provides new research directions and tools for non-associative algebra theory.
2. Theoretical value: The established framework may have potential applications in supersymmetric theory and mathematical physics.
3. Methodological contribution: The generalization of double extension techniques provides insights for studying other algebraic structures.

Applicable Contexts

1. Theoretical research: Suitable for researchers in non-associative algebras and superalgebra theory.
2. Mathematical physics: May find applications in supersymmetric field theory and conformal field theory.
3. Algebraic geometry: May be useful in studying algebraic structures of supermanifolds and supergroups.

References

The paper cites 27 important references covering major works in mock-Lie algebras, Jordan superalgebras, quadratic algebras, and related fields, providing a solid foundation for theoretical development. Key references include Burde-Fialowski's pioneering work 17, Medina-Revoy's double extension theory 25, and Benamor-Benayadi's superalgebraic generalization 15.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper making significant contributions to mock-Lie superalgebra theory. The paper establishes a complete theoretical framework with rigorous methods and profound results, laying a foundation for further development in this field. While lacking direct applications, its theoretical value and methodological significance are substantial.