Production and Manufacturing of 3D Printed Acoustic Guitars

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2510.12823
• Title: Production and Manufacturing of 3D Printed Acoustic Guitars
• Authors: Timothy Tran, William Schiesser
• Classification: cs.SD eess.AS
• Publication Date: August 16, 2025
• Affiliated Institution: Watson School of Engineering, Binghamton University
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12823

Abstract

This research investigates the feasibility of producing economical and functional acoustic guitars using 3D printing technology, with emphasis on structural design featuring appropriate tonal performance. Conducted in collaboration with William Schiesser, the study employs classical guitar models (characterized by lower string tension) to evaluate the tonal characteristics of 3D-printed prototypes fabricated from polylactic acid (PLA). Due to build plate size constraints of the Prusa Mark 4 printer, the guitar body was partitioned into multiple components connected through press-fit tolerances and minimal cyanoacrylate adhesive. CAD modeling in Fusion 360 ensured dimensional accuracy for press-fit connections and overall assembly. Following assembly, the guitar was strung with nylon strings and tested using Audacity software, comparing recorded frequencies and notes against standard reference values. Results revealed substantial frequency deviations in bass strings, potentially attributable to material selection. Despite frequency variations, all strings achieved accurate pitch through tuning, demonstrating that PLA and contemporary manufacturing methods can produce economical and playable acoustic guitars.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. Economic Barriers: High-quality guitars are expensive, limiting accessibility for general populations
2. Environmental Concerns: Traditional guitar manufacturing relies on endangered wood species (mahogany, ebony, rosewood)
3. Manufacturing Complexity: Conventional lutherie requires specialized skills and precision tools
4. Social Needs: Lack of affordable instruments for disadvantaged populations

Research Significance

• Social Impact: Expanding musical participation opportunities to broader populations
• Environmental Protection: Reducing dependence on endangered timber resources
• Technological Innovation: Exploring additive manufacturing applications in instrument fabrication
• Educational Value: Lowering barriers to music education accessibility

Limitations of Existing Approaches

• Traditional wooden guitar manufacturing is costly and time-consuming
• Requires specialized lutherie expertise
• Difficult repairs; damage often necessitates complete reconstruction
• Significant environmental impact through consumption of precious wood resources

Core Contributions

1. First systematic investigation of the feasibility and tonal characteristics of 3D-printed acoustic guitars
2. Development of modular design methodology addressing printer build plate limitations through press-fit tolerances
3. Establishment of complete manufacturing workflow from CAD design through assembly and testing
4. Provision of quantitative audio analysis comparing standard frequency values using Audacity software
5. Demonstration of PLA material viability providing new pathways for sustainable instrument manufacturing
6. Creation of open-source design philosophy promoting collaboration and knowledge sharing

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Physical dimensions and design specifications of traditional classical guitars Output: Fully functional 3D-printed acoustic guitar Constraints:

• Printer build plate size limitations (10×9.5 inches)
• PLA material characteristics
• Cost control requirements
• Tonal performance standards

Design Architecture

1. CAD Modeling Design

• Software Platform: Fusion 360
• Measurement Method: Linear measurements using rulers and calipers; angular measurements using protractors
• Modeling Strategy: Reverse engineering based on existing classical guitar designs

2. Modular Decomposition Strategy

Back Panel Decomposition: Divided into 6 components along the body and each support brace Neck System: Partitioned into headstock, mid-neck segment, and neck base Front Panel Design: Divided into 5 components using cantilever structures as adhesive connection points Fingerboard Treatment: Split in half with male-female connector heads

3. Connection Techniques

Press-Fit Tolerance System:

• Standard fit: 0.006-inch tolerance
• Tight fit: 0.005-inch clearance
• Normal fit: 0.010-inch clearance
• Loose fit: 0.020-inch clearance

Fillet Design: 0.03-inch standard radius; fingerboard uses 0.05-inch larger radius

Adhesive Assistance: Cyanoacrylate adhesive applied to thin components unsuitable for press-fitting

Technical Innovations

1. Adaptive Tolerance System: Tolerance values adjusted according to component characteristics
2. Hybrid Connection Method: Integration of press-fit and adhesive connection strategies
3. Structural Reinforcement Design: Enhanced bracing between neck and back panel
4. Print Orientation Optimization: Ensuring print quality for critical components (e.g., bridge)

Experimental Setup

Materials and Equipment

• Printing Material: Polylactic Acid (PLA)
• Printing Device: Prusa Mark 4 (build plate size: 10×9.5 inches)
• Strings: Nylon strings
• Tuner: Universal classical guitar tuner

Testing Methodology

• Frequency Analysis Software: Audacity
• Reference Standard: Standard frequency values provided by Classical Guitar 101
• Test Content: Open string pitch and frequency for all six strings

Standard Frequency Reference Values

Experimental Results

Primary Results

High-Frequency String Performance (Strings 1-3)

• 1st String (E4): Measured 325 Hz, deviation -4.63 Hz, deviation rate 1.4%
• 2nd String (B3): Measured 243 Hz, deviation -3.94 Hz, deviation rate 1.6%
• 3rd String (G3): Measured 193 Hz, deviation -3 Hz, deviation rate 1.5%
• Average Deviation: Approximately 3 Hz, excellent performance

Low-Frequency String Performance (Strings 4-6)

• 4th String (D3): Measured 289 Hz (D4), frequency approximately doubled
• 5th String (A2): Measured 214 Hz (A3), frequency approximately doubled
• 6th String (E2): Measured 164 Hz (E3), frequency approximately doubled

Key Findings

1. Material Impact: PLA material produces significant frequency effects on bass strings
2. Pitch Accuracy: Despite frequency deviations, all strings achieve correct pitch through tuning
3. Structural Integrity: Guitar maintains structural stability under tuning tension
4. Manufacturing Defects: Minor protrusion at fingerboard connection resolved through sanding

Structural Performance Assessment

• Assembly Success Rate: 100%, all components successfully assembled
• Press-Fit Effectiveness: 0.006-inch tolerance achieves ideal connections
• Long-Term Stability: Minor cracking observed at headstock under summer heat and string tension

Related Work

Precedents in 3D-Printed Instruments

1. Mikolas Zuza's Prusacaster: 3D-printed electric guitar body combined with wooden neck
2. Olaf Diegel's Gibson Design: Fully 3D-printed electric guitar body
3. Jose Gonzalez's 3D-Printed Violin: Acoustic instrument used in commercial performances

Academic Research Foundation

• Burgos-Pintos et al. (2023): Investigated effects of PLA print orientation on guitar soundboard acoustic behavior
• Vibration Concentration Phenomena: Research on vibration concentration effects in bridge regions

Technology Development Trends

• Technology migration from electro-acoustic to purely acoustic instruments
• Modular design applications in instrument manufacturing
• Sustainable material substitution in traditional craftsmanship

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Technical Feasibility: 3D printing technology can produce fully functional acoustic guitars
2. Economic Advantages: Significantly reduces manufacturing costs without requiring professional lutherie skills
3. Environmental Friendliness: PLA material is renewable and biodegradable, reducing dependence on endangered timber
4. Sound Quality Performance: Although frequency deviations exist, pitch accuracy meets performance requirements

Limitations

1. Frequency Deviation: Significant bass string frequency deviations affecting tonal characteristics
2. Material Constraints: PLA acoustic properties differ from traditional wood materials
3. Durability Issues: Potential structural fatigue under prolonged use
4. Size Constraints: Modular design necessitated by printer build plate limitations

Future Directions

1. Material Optimization: Exploring alternative 3D printing materials to improve frequency matching
2. Structural Improvements: Optimizing connection methods and support structures
3. Scaled Production: Developing manufacturing processes suitable for mass production
4. Sound Quality Enhancement: Investigating printing parameters' effects on acoustic performance

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Innovation: First systematic investigation of 3D-printed acoustic guitar manufacturing
2. Scientific Methodology: Employing quantitative frequency analysis for objective, reliable results
3. High Practical Value: Providing new pathways for instrument accessibility and sustainable manufacturing
4. Significant Social Impact: Addressing instrument accessibility and environmental protection concerns
5. Complete Technical Solution: Comprehensive workflow from design through manufacturing to testing

Weaknesses

1. Limited Sample Size: Single prototype fabricated, lacking statistical representativeness
2. Singular Material Selection: Only PLA tested; no comparison with alternative materials
3. Unknown Long-Term Durability: Absence of extended-use performance data
4. Insufficient Professional Evaluation: Lacking subjective assessment from professional musicians
5. Simplified Cost Analysis: Lacking detailed cost-benefit comparison

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Establishing foundation for 3D printing applications in instrument manufacturing
2. Industry Implications: Potentially driving technological transformation in instrument manufacturing
3. Social Value: Providing new solutions for music education accessibility
4. Environmental Significance: Offering practical case studies for sustainable manufacturing

Applicable Scenarios

1. Music Education: Entry-level instrument needs for schools and training institutions
2. Personal Hobbies: Economical choice for amateur musicians
3. Developing Regions: Alternative solution for areas with limited instrument resources
4. Prototype Development: Rapid prototyping tool for instrument designers
5. Customization Needs: Personalized instrument fabrication for specialized dimensions or shapes

References

1. Burgos-Pintos, Á., et al. (2023). Influence of 3D printing direction in PLA acoustic guitars on Vibration Response. PubMed.
2. Column, M. (2024). Advantages and disadvantages of PLA. Bioplastics News.
3. Hussain, A. (2019). 3D printing tolerances & fits. 3DChimera.
4. Nelson, D. (2014). Classical guitar string names. Classical Guitar 101.
5. Rifkin, G. (2007). Guitar makers regret loss of rare woods. New York Times.

Assessment Summary: This is a pioneering engineering research project that successfully demonstrates the feasibility of 3D printing technology in acoustic instrument manufacturing. Despite technical limitations, its social value and environmental significance make it a research direction worthy of further development. Subsequent research should prioritize material optimization and long-term performance evaluation.